http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_smith_news/20000731_xnsof_navy_picks.shtm
l
MONDAY
JULY 31
2000            
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
 IN THE MILITARY 
Navy picks U.S.
team over Russia 
Orbital Sciences wins supersonic
target missile contract 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

By Charles Smith
� 2000 WorldNetDaily.com 


The U.S. Navy has selected U.S. space and defense contractor Orbital Sciences 
to supply a new Supersonic Sea-Skimming Target missile, or SSST, passing over 
a Russian-built missile purchased by Boeing. 

Orbital's business development senior manager Michael J. Bender credits the 
Navy victory, in part, to the company's management strategy for an 
"all-American team." 

"We teamed with Atlantic Research and Raytheon, creating an all-American team 
to eliminate any geopolitical risk and avoid dependency on foreign-based 
contractors," emphasized Bender in an interview from Orbital's facility in 
Arizona. 

 
The new Orbital target missile is intended to simulate the chief threat to 
U.S. warships, the Russian-made Raduga 3M82 Moskit supersonic cruise missile. 
 

Orbital Sciences beat a combined team of U.S. defense contractor Boeing and 
Russian missile maker Zvezda, which had proposed an extended-range version of 
the MA-31 target drone, a variant of the Zvezda Kh-31 anti-radar missile. 
Boeing currently provides the MA-31 to the U.S. Navy under a multi-year 
contract with the Russian defense ministry. 

Orbital Sciences is slated to receive $34 million to develop and build six of 
the new target missiles for testing. The contract could grow to $110 million 
with production and support options. 

"We did not do a lot of marketing outside of the Navy procurement channels," 
noted Bender, stressing that Orbital, Atlantic Research and Raytheon 
engineers working on a low-risk, high-performance SSST concept played a 
significant role in the contract victory. 

"This is very good news for Orbital and for the Navy," said Bender. "We have 
been pursuing this contract for two years. We followed the same design 
approach we use in our tactical ballistic missile simulator, low-risk, 
low-cost designs to take advantage of existing inventories and available 
technologies." 

 
Boeing and Russian missile maker Zvezda proposed an extended-range version of 
the MA-31 target drone, a variant of the Zvezda Kh-31 anti-radar missile.  

Bender added, "We plan to use retired standard missile boosters to boost the 
target to ramjet take-over speed. The Atlantic Research variable-flow ducted 
ramjet utilizes advanced solid fuel technology. The SSST ramjet is a robust 
design based on a straightforward four-inlet configuration. The [Atlantic 
Research] ramjet engine and inlet design combination lowers both the risks 
and costs associated with high-speed cruise missiles." 

The new Orbital target missile is intended to simulate what is seen as the 
number one threat to U.S. warships: the Russian-made Raduga 3M82 Moskit 
supersonic cruise missile. Russia recently supplied the Moskit missile on the 
first of two warships sold to the Chinese navy. According to the U.S. Naval 
Institute, each 8,480-ton Russian navy project 956A Sovremenny destroyer 
built for China is armed with eight Moskit supersonic sea-skimming missiles. 

In July, the General Accounting Office issued a report titled "Comprehensive 
Strategy Needed to Improve Ship Cruise Missile Defense." The General 
Accounting Office concluded that U.S. Navy warships are vulnerable against 
the new supersonic class of cruise missiles. 

"Although the Navy has made some progress in improving surface ship 
self-defense capabilities, most ships continue to have only limited 
capabilities against cruise-missile threats," states the General Accounting 
Office report. "A Navy assessment of current surface ship self-defense 
capabilities conducted in 1998 concluded that only the 12 Whidbey Island and 
Harpers Ferry-class amphibious ships have or will be equipped with defensive 
systems that can provide measurable improvement against near- and mid-term 
cruise-missile threats. 

"Current anti-ship cruise missiles are faster, stealthier, and can fly at 
lower altitudes than the missiles that hit the U.S.S. Stark in 1987, killing 
37 sailors," states the report. "The next generation of anti-ship cruise 
missiles -- most of which are now expected to be fielded by 2007 -- will be 
equipped with advanced target seekers and stealthy design. These features 
will make them even more difficult to detect and defeat." 

The General Accounting Office concluded that "none of the improvements the 
Navy plans to make in the future would provide any ship class a high level of 
self-defense capability against far-term threats." 

In 1999, WorldNetDaily reported that a Clinton administration deal with 
Moscow had left the U.S. Navy without a means to simulate the supersonic 
anti-ship missile threat. In September 1999, the SSST project ended eight 
years of study without a selection, leaving the Navy without a means to test 
its multi-billion dollar AEGIS missile air-defense system. 

The move not to issue a contract in 1999 was considered a victory for the 
Russian Zvezda-Strela State Scientific Industrial Center, maker of the MA-31 
supersonic target missile. An Aug. 31, 1999, letter to Sen. Richard Lugar, 
R-Ind., issued by Navy Undersecretary H. Lee Buchanan, claimed that the Navy 
would only purchase a "limited number" of the Russian-made systems. According 
to official U.S. Navy statements, the Zvezda MA-31 target drone cannot 
duplicate the Moskit performance. 

Each Zvezda MA-31 missile reportedly cost the U.S. Navy almost a million 
dollars. Navy officials disputed that figure, however, providing cost 
information showing that, for a limited purchase of three units, each missile 
actually cost over $1.3 million dollars. The price falls to $721,000 each if 
the U.S. Navy elected to purchase 20 MA-31 missiles from Russia. 

There also are open allegations of illegal payments made to Russian generals 
through the Zvezda project. A January 1999 article published in Janes Defense 
noted that each MA-31 missile included a kickback to the Russian military of 
over a quarter million dollars. The official response prepared on Dec. 17, 
1999, by Navy freedom of information officers George W. Griffith and Cole 
Cartledge noted that the Zvezda missile project is not being monitored for 
Russian corruption. 

"The prime contractor with McDonnell Douglas, now a wholly owned subsidiary 
of The Boeing Company, does not include, and is not required to include, any 
clauses specifically addressing the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act," states 
the Navy response. 

The newly selected air-breathing ramjet design from Orbital Sciences has the 
growth potential to install a warhead and be fielded as a new supersonic 
weapon. Supersonic cruise missiles, such as the Russian 3M82 Moskit and 
Yahont, have so far not appeared in the arsenals of Western armed forces. 

 
The Russian Yahont is considered to be part of a new class of 
surface-skimming robot missiles that threaten U.S. warships.  

Instead, U.S. and European programs are concentrating on slower subsonic 
stealth missiles such as the new U.S.A.F. JASSM. JASSM missiles are 
reportedly capable of avoiding the newly deployed Russian SA-10C Grumble 
surface-to-air defense missile. The Air Force JASSM stealthy cruise missile 
is not slated to begin production until 2002 and costs nearly a million 
dollars a copy. 

"I think the U.S. and Europe know what they are doing, so I am not surprised 
at all at the different approach," stated a highly placed source in the 
Russian defense industry. "These supersonic missiles fly just above the 
surface of the water, relying on the screen phenomena created between objects 
flying so low to surface. I don't think the Yahont or Moskit lack any stealth 
technologies." 

U.S. Navy officials openly stated that a weapon version of the Orbital target 
drone is a possible follow-on. Orbital officials, however, are keenly aware 
that the previous U.S. Navy Supersonic Low-Altitude Target program failed in 
part because it was diverted into an unsuccessful effort to modify the target 
into a weapon. 

"Our complete focus is on the SSST," stressed Bender. "Our team is fully 
committed to move the supersonic target from development to deployment phase. 
The Navy will finally get their SSST." 

 


Reply via email to