Dear, Dr. Boylan, Oh, PLEASE! I tried HARD to stay out of this thread, but alas... :( When: On Fri, 4 Aug 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2000 21:20:31 -0700 > From: "Richard J. Boylan, Ph.D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Hawking, the President, and ET sleep-learning > > [source: http://members.madasafish.com/~coscon/cosmicmedia.htm ] > > Stephen Hawking Talks UFOs in the White House > <snip> > (Commentary by Dr. Richard Boylan): > > Several years ago I attended a lecture at a UFO > conference by rocket scientist and NASA consultant David > Adair, who had earlier been brought to Area 51 by NASA to > help them figure out the propulsion system of a captured ET > spacecraft. This "claim" is, as is MOST of what Adair claims, totally unprovable/unverifiable/unsubstantiable (is there such a word?), and thus SUSPECT, at best! Look, Rich, "I want to believe" as much as ANYBODY (don't tell anybody, but I indeed DO BELIEVE there has been paleo AND contemporary ET visitation on Earth), but it will take MUCH MORE than the likes of a David Adair claim to get me the PROOF my opponents and skeptics in such beliefs DO justifiably require (i.e., I understand their need in these regards, and I don't blame them for their need for such PROOF). > > In the course of his lecture Mr. Adair told an anecdote > about meeting famed British astrophysicist Stephen Hawking. > After conversing a while, Hawking asked Adair where he got > his such-advanced knowledge about physics and applied > technology. Adair said, "I am given those ideas while I > sleep," (alluding to nocturnal ET sleep-teaching.) Sorry, guys. Believe it or not, I REALLY DO hate to rain on anyone's parade, BUT, there is no way in hell that it can "safely" be concluded that Adair was referring to "nocturnal ET sleep-teaching," at least not by virtue of ANYTHING that was/is written above! > ...Hawking replied, "If you had told me any other source, I > would not have believed you. I get my best ideas that way, > too." > > Thus Hawking as well as Adair acknowledge their > indebtedness to their ET teachers for the excellent coaching > that has allowed them to make such advanced contributions to > science so remarkably. > Again, even *IF* both Adair and Hawking DO IN FACT believe that they have been taught via "nocturnal ET sleep-teaching" (which, at least as pertaining to Hawking, I DOUBT VERY SERIOUSLY that he does...and, even IF he does, he would NEVER admit it publicly simply because he would NEVER voluntarily destroy the professional credibility that he has spent a life-time building!), and even *IF* they both believe they are indebted "to their ET teachers for the excellent coaching that has allowed them to make such advanced contributions to science so remarkably," there is NO WAY IN HELL that such can be concluded (or "alluded to") by virtue of what was written in any of the above! What's more, for you, Rich, to even conclude such an absurd non-sequitur from anything I saw written in the original article, or from the alleged personal one-on-one discussion between Adair (whom, imo, is so full of crap his eyes are brown...i.e., a la Bob Lazar, et. al.) and Hawking, simply demonstrates your extreme bias in such areas. And, for the record, if Adair is actually claiming to have had such a talk with Hawking, I would highly doubt that that ever occurred, i.e., the veracity of ANYTHING Adair claims to have occurred to him (especially items that there is no way to verify and/or confirm, which is the VAST MAJORITY of his claims!) ...well, imo, anything Adair claims as true is AT BEST HIGHLY SUSPECT and/or NON-PROVABLE, and thus, without proof, his claims are of no more worth than its entertainment value (which is GOOD, I might add, i.e., I do enjoy listening to his crap IF I TOTALLY PUT OUT OF MY MIND that he is being serious!). In other words, Rich, if Adair claims something as fact, well..., I wouldn't believe ANYTHING he claims without proof, and I believe this to the degree that I WILL take bets that this alleged discussion between him and Hawking never happened. And, at least for me and those I KNOW that have written Hawking, Adair's claim to have had such a discussion with him is, for all PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS, ALSO NON-PROVABLE simply because we have never been able to get anything back from Hawking when we write to him other than a form letter (and believe me, Rich, we've TRIED!). > And thus, Stephen Hawking knows first-hand that > extraterrestrials are real and are visiting Earth, because > Hawking has benefited from their mental contacts. > Again, my friend (i.e., I consider you, Dr. Boylan, a personal friend of mine, and believe you to feel the same of me), there is just NO WAY, based on anything written in any of this thread thus far, that the above can be concluded. And, Rich, as a friend of yours, i.e., for your benefit, when you DO draw such specious conclusions from JUST what was written by you above, is simply LUDICROUS, and does not shine favorably on your ability to remain [at least SEEMINGLY] "professionally unbiased and/or objective." > And that is why Hawking had the conviction and the nerve > to bring up UFO/ET reality publicly in front of President > Clinton. Again, the above is a total non-sequitur, Rich, UNLESS there is more to the story than has been written thus far in this thread. Warmest regards, Mike P.S. Rich, I guess what I am attempting to accomplish with some of my above, somewhat acerbic, reactions/comments, is to goad you into sharing with us all "the REST OF THE STORY." In other words, my friend, I feel strongly that for you to draw such seemingly wild conclusions, well...I would bet the farm you know A LOT more than you have written here thus far. ================================================================= Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT FROM THE DESK OF: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *Mike Spitzer* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ~~~~~~~~ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day. ================================================================= <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
