from:alt.conspiracy
As, always, Caveat Lector
Om
K
-----
Click Here: <A HREF="aol://5863:126/alt.conspiracy:632808">Re: George W.
Bush's Theme Song this November</A>
-----
Subject: Re: George W. Bush's Theme Song this November
From: <A HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ">SPAM-ME-NOTpaghat@my-dej
a.com </A> (paghat)
Date: Sun, Aug 6, 2000 12:37 PM
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In article <u69wGN9$$GA.303@cpmsnbbsa09>, "syvyn11"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am sick and tired of this supposed cocaine abuse by bush. Clinton has
> admittted to doing pot and worse acts of depravity. And he gets a free
> pass. But if there is a rumor and falsehoods about Bush doing cocaine,
> every leftist belives it and says he is unfit to be pres. CLINTON IS UNFIT
> TO BE PRESIDENT, and that's the bottom line.
> _________________________________
> SyVyN11 aka the horse you rode in on spice
>
> Munch 3:16 says don't dip your wick in the company ink!
>
> If we nominate Jesse jackson, we would alienate half of the voters.
> If we nominate Jesse Helms, we would alienate the other half.
> JESSE AND JESSE IN 2000, LET'S ALIENATE EVERYONE!
> Free America wrote in message
> <398d57e9$0$48158$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >Everyone should call up their favorite radio station on Election Night
> >if George W. Bush wins and dedicated the following song to him;
> >
> >"Cocaine" by Eric Clapton
> >
> >Free America
Whether or not Clinton is a fit president hardly matters for poop for the
next election. So the fact that you'd prefer a drunken cokehead to a
whoremonger is beside the point. Personally I can't imagine preferring a
cokehead. Here are the facts (again) for you disbelievers who're planning
to vote for a cokehead instead of Mr. Roboto:
Georgie initially refused to confirm or deny his cocaine abuse. Later,
questioned again about cocaine use, he replied "when I was young and
irresponsible, I was young and irresponsible." Getting fallout from that
"near Yes" reply, he next said that the issue wasn't relevant. Since
everyone else thought it WAS relevant, & he was the ONLY republican
candidate that refused to
answer a Daily News query on this matter, within days he was saying that
he wouldn't address "rumors" & tried a little belatedly to get the cat
back in the sack. Eventually he claimed that he could pass a standard
security check dating back seven years. When this was interpreted to mean
he'd used cocaine &/or marijuana eight years ago, & only after that time
could he have passed a urine test, he ammended his claim & said he
could've passed his father's White House security check too -- meaning
he hadn't used cocaine & marijuana for fifteen years. Later still he
pushed the date back to about 1973. It began to look like he was really
into it only when he was an out-of-control teenager, but if that was all,
why did he start with the milder boast that he'd not done coke for seven
years?? Could it be he was so bonkers DRUNK through that period he's
actually not certain? And he kept moving the date back only as his
handlers were able to clear him for another year or so, after some paid
detective work came in?
He has said a hell of a lot about the issue he claims he won't address
but the one thing he's never said is that he's never been a drug user.
You'd think he'd just lie & say "No way, no how, never did it, cocaine's
not for me," but is it possible the gov doesn't like to lie? Hell no, all
politicians like to lie -- he just knows this time bomb will eventually
explode & the one thing people won't be able to say in retrospect is that
he lied about it. He's be able to claim he hedged & winged but didn't lie.
Georgie openly admits to having had a severe problem with alcohol until
age 40 (his formative years!) but when asked about his youthful
indulgences of pot & cocaine, he gets all nervous and slick-willy-like.
Another "rumor" explains his reluctance to just lie & claim innocence:
there exist photographs of him indulging & it's a matter of time before
some sleezy outfit decides to publish them or put them on the net (though
the Bush campaign IS busy trying to netcop the world wide web on this
matter).
This from the "Bush Watch" newsletter:
---begin quote
We wonder how long it will take the nation to get sick of Bush's game of
"Obfuscation." Here's how it has worked with his cocaine crisis.
According to Washington Post reporter Dan Balz, "Bush has privately
reassured some top supporters that his 'youthful mistakes' did not
involve hard drugs and would not disqualify him to be president,
according to several sources." If that's really the case, why can't Bush
assure the American people? Is it because the only people that really
count in Dubya's world are people with big money? Why can't Bush tell the
average citizen that "his 'youthful mistakes' did not involve hard
drugs"? Why is he playing "Obfuscation"? With respect to his drip-feeding
of cocaine facts to the American people, few TV talk show reporters have
addressed Bush's reason for providing information as he did. Those who
have addressed that topic suggest that the Bush temper took over his
common sense, and once the original "Not in 7 Years" story was out of the
bag, Bush and the spinners spent the next 48 hours revising the story,
evantually turning it into "Not in 25 Years." One scribe suggested that's
what can happen at any time when Bush makes a campaign stop without one
of his press spokespersons nearby. Another factor was that Bush was being
pressed for an answer by the reporters and he grew angry.
According to Balz, Bush's original "7 years" response was in answer to a
a question about what he would do as President, not what he had done in
the past, and Bush decided that it was relevant. By the following day,
his spinners evolved the answer to cover the last 25 years, but Bush
never said that, which is why the New York Times headline read that Bush
"implied" 25 years. Wednesday and Thursdaay were filled with many
statements, clarifications, and contradictions by Bush and his spinners,
indicating how the game of "Obfuscation" is played in Texas. However, the
final obfuscation is that Bush finally never really addressed his own
question: could he pass the current White House test? Based on what Bush
has said thus far, the answer is, no: "Bush's answer yesterday fell short
of the standard required of senior government officials both in the Bush
administration and in the Clinton administration, who must reveal drug
use back to age 18," wrote Balz. Further, Bush has never addressed the
specific question reporters have been asking for months: Did he ever use
cocaine? "Yes" or "no" would suffice. We don't want to play the Austin,
Texas game of "Obfuscation."
-----end quote
Fortunately for Bush, polls show that most republican voters don't give a
shit if he was a cokehead in 1972 -- just like democrats really didn't
care all that much if Clinton HAD inhaled. The present more important
issue is that Mr. Roboto is the actual opponent & he's way smarter, way
better qualified, & politically vastly more rational than little cokehead
Bush & if Bush becomes president that means only that 51% of Americans
would prefer a dynasty to any qualification to govern.
I'm just waiting for the dancing-hamster variant "Snorting Georgie"
preferably to some Grateful Dead tune.
-paghat the ratgirl
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
All My Relations.
Omnia Bona Bonis,
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
