The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
More than once in the course of the last two centuries, anti-Masonry has
been fused with an older hatred, hatred of the Jews, that is to say
anti-Semitism. Probably, the irrational nature of both phobias facilitates
their juxtaposition. Be that as it may, from the middle of the 19th Century,
we are witnessing an increasing wave of simultaneously anti-Semitic and
anti-Masonic propaganda. Possibly, the paradigmatic work of this class of
"literature" is an opuscule entitled "The Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion"
sometimes also known as "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion."
This is one of the most well-known literary falsifications in history, based
on plagiarism and fraud from the very beginning of its gestation.
Nevertheless, this swindle has captivated the imagination of many people who
are sensible in other respects, and it has been transformed into the "source
of indispensable information" in the baggage of all the anti-Semites and
anti-Masons.
In this work, we will examine the history of this fraud, will demonstrate
its absolute falsification and we will take a look at the lamentable
consequences that it has had in modern history, as much of the point of view
of the Jewish people, as of Freemasonry.
Sources of information
In the preparation of this work, I depended mainly on the works of three
investigators: Professor Jose Antonio Ferrer Benimeli, who in his book "The
Judeo-Masonic-Communist Conspiracy"1 dedicates a long chapter to the subject
that occupies us (pp. 135-210); Norman Cohn, author of "Justification for
Genocide"2, where it makes a history of the antecedents of the Protocols,
its evolution and its consequences; and Herman Bernstein, author of "The
truth on the 'Protocols of Zion'"3, where it not only relates the history of
the mystification, but reproduces the complete text of the book of Joly (pp.
75-258), the text of the news articles that appeared in the London Times
(pp. 259-264), the complete text of the Protocols (pp. 295-359), and other
authentic documents.
Also, I consulted other works to clarify or to add certain details, as the
book "Must men hate?" of the North-American lawyer Sigmund Livingston4, who
was the first President of the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai-B'rith, and
who in his book adds an interesting personal testimony (pp. 39-49) to the
meticulous relation presented by the authors mentioned before. All these
works are included in detail in the notes at the end of this work.
Antecedents
The connection of anti-Masonry and anti-Semitism does not begin with the
Protocols. Already on the occasion of the Dreyfus affair, that began in 1894
and continued intermittently until 1906, the French press and also that of
other countries5 connected the Judaism of Dreyfus with the Freemasonry of
many of his more loyal defenders. Still earlier, Father Agustin Barruel in
his "Memory to serve the History of Jacobinism,"6 blamed Freemasonry
(confusing it with the Illuminati of Bavaria) of being instrumental of the
French Revolution (and also of being the heirs of the Templars). Although
Barruel did not find historical data to allow him to extend his attack
including the Jews (between the famous French revolutionaries there were no
Jews), other later authors were not so punctilious, and did not have
scruples in inventing what did not exist in reality.
Numerous books published before and after the Protocols maintain that
Judaism is at the origin of Freemasonry. We will mention Monsignor Leon
Meurin, Archbishop of Port-Louis, Mauritius, who published in 1893 a book
entitled "La Franc-Maçonnerie, Synagogue de Satan." The author says on page
260: "Everything in Freemasonry is fundamentally Jewish, exclusively Jewish,
enthusiastically Jewish, from the beginning to the end."7
The historical truth, that can be found in any serious work on the history
of Freemasonry, is that lodges were exclusively Christian in their origin,
and only with the creation of the Grand Lodge of London (1717) began the
process of de-Christianization, that culminated in 1813. At the time of the
union of the two rival Grand Lodges of England, when the United Grand Lodge
of England and Wales was created and rituals were again revised, eliminating
from them the last remaining Christian symbolisms, the institution
transformed into the universal vocation that we now know.
It is worthwhile, as a side commentary, to remember that until today some
Grand Lodges (especially in the Scandinavian countries that practice the
Swedish Rite) do not allow to admit people who do not profess the Christian
religion.
Furthermore, even in those countries where Jews and members of other
religions are welcome in Masonic lodges, other Masonic bodies are closed
before them, exclusively reserved to Christian Masons. As examples (there
are many others), I will mention the "high degrees" of the York rite, such
as the Red Cross of Constantine, the Knights of Malta and the Knights
Templar.
Some Supreme Councils also consider that the Ancient and Accepted Scottish
Rite is an exclusively Christian rite, and do not accept the entrance of
Jews or members of other religions (for instance the Supreme Councils of
England, Scotland, Ireland and Australia). Their selectivity reaches a
point, that the candidates must declare to believe not only in the Christian
faith, but also in the Holy Trinity (!).
The Protocols appear
The Protocols appeared for the first time in 1905, in Tsarskoe Selo, a
summer resort near Saint Petersburg, Russia (still imperial Russia, under
the government of the czar Nicholas II). The author, indicated in the first
editions, was a person who was successively lawyer, judge, and
Greek-Orthodox monk called Sergei Alexandrovich Nilus (1862-1930).
Originally, the Protocols appeared as a simple appendix in the second
edition of a Nilus' book entitled "Velikoe v Malom" (The Great thing in the
Small thing). As it was common at that time, the book also bears a long
subtitle, that in this case is quite dreadful: "The Antichrist as a near
political possibility." This subtitle refers to the appendix just mentioned.
In the diverse editions that followed (1911, 1912, 1917 and 1919, always in
Russian), Nilus offers different explanations for how the manuscript of the
Protocols had arrived at his hands, stressing that he only had made the
translation into Russian. Other editions and translations, published by
other people, related different stories on the origin of the document.
One of the most frequent "added explanations" to the Protocols is that they
are the "secret minutes" of the First Zionist Congress held in Basel in
1897, summoned by Dr. Theodor Herzl.
The argument developed in the document is that the Jews conspire to control
all the governments of the world, to destroy Christian civilization and to
become masters of the Earth. The Protocols provide details on the methods
that would be used to reach these objectives. Freemasonry would be the tool
used by the "Elders of Zion" to deceive humanity and soon to dominate it.
Let us begin by making clear that an organization like the "Wise of Zion" or
the "Elders of Zion" never existed. Nevertheless, and without a shred of
evidence to prove it, it has been stubbornly maintained that these Protocols
were the minutes of this fictitious organization.
Let us examine the form of the Protocols. The first thing that draws the
attention of the objective reader is that this text does not keep any
similarity to any protocol that was read. A protocol is minutes, that is to
say, the relation of what happened in a meeting. It mentions a place, the
date, the hour in which the meeting starts, who presides over it, generally
the names of those who are present and of those who excused their absence,
and briefly the description of the debates, who intervened and--sometimes in
very summarized form--what was said and what resolutions were approved.
Finally, there is a time of closing of the meeting, and the signatures of
those who guarantee the veracity of the minutes. None of these exists in the
Protocols which we are dealing with. The only "signature" is simply a line
that says "Signed by the representatives of Zion of Degree 33."
Furthermore, in these "protocols" one listens to only one single voice.
These are monologues or lectures, harangues we could say, without making any
attempt to make it appear as a debate or the intervention of several people.
It is a sad commentary on the credulity or the malevolence of those readers
who have been ready to accept a text of this nature like real "protocols."
Going into the content, the absurdity of a supposed criminal plan prepared
by a group that pretends to control the mass media of the entire world ...
but is incapable of preventing the repeated publication of its plans is
laughable. May I quote what Leopoldo Lugones writes, in the introduction to
the Spanish edition of the commentary of Father Pierre Charles, S.J., on the
Protocols:8
"It is enough, in effect, having an average discernment ... to understand
that this is a pamphlet (The Protocols) as malignant as imbecile."
The gestation of the Protocols
The book of Nilus was not first in proclaiming the existence of a Jewish
conspiracy for world-wide domination. It was preceded by several authors,
especially one German called Hermann Goedsche, who in 1868 wrote a novel
under the pseudonym "Sir John Retcliffe," entitled "Biarritz." One of the
chapters of this fiction book describes a macabre scene in the Jewish
cemetery of Prague, where once every one hundred years, representatives of
the 12 tribes of Israel meet with the demon in person. (Goedsche apparently
ignored that 10 of the 12 tribes "were lost" in the mists of history over
two thousand five hundred years back). The representatives of the Jewish
tribes inform Satan of the progress of their plans and ask for his infernal
aid for the continuation of their criminal projects.
This anti-Semitic fantasy was quickly reproduced as a pamphlet, not as
fiction, but as a document whose authenticity was guaranteed by the "famous
English nobleman, Lord Retcliffe." This, as we just saw, was only the
pseudonym of the German writer Goedsche. The first translation was done in
Saint Petersburg in 1872, published under the title "In the Jewish Cemetery
of the Czech Prague (the Jews sovereigns of the World)." In 1876, a new
publication appeared in Moscow. In 1880, a second edition and new printings
appeared in Odessa and Prague.9
In France, the writer Gougenot des Mousseaux also made use of this subject
in his book "Le Juif, le judaïsme et la judaïsation des peuples chrétiens"
(Paris, 1869), where he accuses the Jewish "Kabbalists" of trying to seize
the world.
His follower, Father Chabauty, curate of San Andrés in Mirebeau, in Poitou,
published in 1881 a volume of 600 pages entitled "Les Francs-Maçons et les
Juifs: Sixième Age de l'Eglise d'après l'Apocalypse," in which he maintained
that Satan, by means of the Judeo-Masonic conspiracy, was preparing the way
for the Jewish Antichrist and the domination of the world by Jews.10
Approximately at the same time, in the 1880's, in Italy, Pope Leo XIII was
engaged in a ferocious fight against Italian Freemasonry. Although he
himself did not descend to make anti-Semitic propaganda, he did allow others
to do it. The Jesuit fathers associated with the publication of the journal
"Civiltá Cattolica," particularly considered perfectly legitimate to
discredit Freemasonry presenting it as part of a Jewish world-wide
conspiracy. Two of these, Reverend Fathers, R. Ballerini and F.S. Rondina,
lead a campaign that lasted until the beginning of the 1890's.11
Finally, we must mention that the first appearance of a text very similar to
the Protocols, but somewhat abbreviated, appeared in the magazine "Znamya"
(the Flag) of Saint Petersburg between August 26 and September 7 of of 1903
(that is to say, preceding by two years the publication of Nilus).
"Znamya" was published by a well-known anti-Semite, P.A. Krushevan, one of
whose associates was G.V. Butmi, of whom we will hear more further on.
Krushevan maintained that the text he published was the translation of a
document written originally in France, and that the translator had entitled
it "Minutes of the Universal World-wide Meeting of Masons and the Elders of
Zion."12
The immediate objective of the Protocols
The Protocols were used for the first time in Russia to foment hatred
towards Jews. Its immediate objective was to undermine the political
influence and the position of Count Witte, at that time the most important
minister of the czarist government.13 Witte was a person of great culture
and amplitude of views, confidant of the czar, who yearned to introduce an
enlightened and modern imperial policy. Because the wife of Witte was of
Jewish origin, the generalized opinion was that he favored the Jews of
Russia, who had undergone persecutions and discrimination during centuries.
The political opponents of Witte, headed by Grand Duchess Isabel, did
everything possible to discredit him before the leading class and the royal
family. One of his more ferocious enemies was George V. Butmi de Katzman,
whose name appears to be connected with the publication of the Protocols.
A direct testimony
On January 8 of 1935, a Catholic priest called Father Gleb E. Werchobsky,
was interviewed in Chicago by the writer Sigmund Livingston, who had already
published an article denouncing the falsification of the Protocols.14 Father
Werchobsky wanted to hand to Livingston a certain information, unknown until
then, based on his own personal experience.
Father Werchobsky confirmed the veracity of his report to Livingston in a
sworn affidavit. Later, Livingston published the complete details of this
interview in his book "Must Men Hate?" as already mentioned.
Father Werchobsky had been born in Saint Petersburg, Russia, on October 23
of 1888. He had been ordered in Constantinopolis (today Istanbul) on July 13
of 1914. Later he emigrated to the United States, where he stayed in several
places until arriving in Chicago in 1929. There, he continued to fulfill his
pastoral duties within the frame of the Catholic Church. His father was
Eugene I. Werchobsky and his mother Maria C. von Stein. George Butmi de
Katzman, an old lieutenant in the Imperial Guard of Russia, was a friend of
the family.
Immediately after the Dreyfus affair in France, Butmi traveled to Paris.
When he returned to Saint Petersburg, he brought several manuscripts that he
requested to translate into Russian. The translation was made by the wife of
Butmi and the mother of Father Werchobsky. This was the translation that
soon appeared under the name "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion." In his
sworn declaration, Father Werchobsky declared that the "Protocols" were a
fraud and a falsification, and that he made his declaration (to Livingston)
for the sake of the truth. Also, he added that he knew personally several of
the people involved in the publication of the document, including a Sergei
F. Sharapoff, director of the weekly magazine "Russky Trud" ("The Russian
Truth"), a publication particularly antagonistic to Count Witte.
The group ferociously fought against Count Witte's attempt to introduce in
Russia the gold standard, to attract foreign investments. Witte inclined to
form an alliance with France, whereas their opponents wanted to ally
themselves with Germany. It was well known that Count Witte wanted to
improve the conditions of life of the Jews in Russia, and that he proposed
to cancel certain repressive laws. The publication of the "Protocols" was
used to undermine his influence on the czar and the royal family.
Mr. Lucien Wolf, in his article "The Trivialities of Nilus," summarized the
explanations offered by Nilus on the origin of the document published as the
"Protocols":15
"According to an explanation, he obtained the Protocols from a late friend,
who had received them from a woman, who also passed away, and who stole them
from one of the most influential and high leaders of Freemasonry ... .
According to the other, there was not an intermediary woman, and no robbery
to a French Freemason, but that all the matter was executed by the late
friend himself, who made a search in the Central offices of the Society of
Zion in France ... . In the third enlarged edition of his work, published in
1911, ... he tells us that the documents did not arrive from France, but
from Switzerland, that were not Judeo-Masonic, but Zionist, and that these
were the secret protocols of the Zionist Congress held in Basel in 1897."
>From all these testimonies, the most likely conclusion is that the Protocols
in their French version were prepared by the agents of the Okrana in Paris,
who gave the manuscript to Butmi and he then gave it to Nilus, whose status
as a monk would give more prestige to the publication.
Although the illustrated Russian leaders did not really believe in the
veracity of the Protocols, it was useful to them in order to foment hatred
of the Jews.
Something on the Zionist Congress of Basel
Since some writers insist on attributing the Protocols to the first Zionist
Congress, summoned by Dr. Theodor Herzl, it is not out of place to give some
explanations about this congress, its true object, and its resolutions, all
of which is amply documented in historical form.
The Zionist movement founded by Herzl and a few supporters, was simply a
call to the Jewish people to return to its ancestral fatherland, Judea
(erroneously called Palestine by the Romans), which by the end of the 19th
Century still was part of the Ottoman Empire. The main objective was to
solve the "Jewish problem" of the European countries, especially, by means
of the emigration of the Jews. In Palestine, the Jews would return to work
in agriculture, building and other activities that had been forbidden to
them during hundreds of years in their places of dispersion. The word
"Zionism" was coined by the journalist Nathan Birnbaum, who used it in his
magazine Autoemancipation on April 1st, 1890.
The first world-wide Zionist Congress took place in the Swiss city of Basel,
on the days 29, 30 and 31 of August of 1897. The centenary of the Congress
was celebrated not long ago. The deliberations took place at the Municipal
Casino of Basel in six sessions, beginning the first at 9 a.m. and the
second at 3 p.m. in each of the three days that the Congress lasted. The
languages used were Hebrew and German, and the minutes of the Congress (a
volume of several hundreds of pages) was also published in these two
languages.
Among the delegates to the Congress came delegates from most of the European
countries (but not from Spain or Portugal). From the Arab countries, only 10
delegates arrived from Algeria. None from countries like Egypt, Syria, Iraq
and Yemen, despite the fact that great and old Jewish communities existed
there. From America, only four delegates arrived from the United States, and
there was no representative from the rest of the American countries.
The true resolutions of the First Zionist Congress were the creation of an
organism (the World Zionist Organization) to put into practice the Zionist
program, the creation of a National Fund to buy land in Palestine, to dry
marshes, to construct roads and to plant forests, and the decision to
continue to meet in periodic form in Zionist Congresses that would
constitute the maximum authority of the Zionist movement.
The truth is revealed
In 1921, a journalist of the Times newspaper of London, Philip Graves, who
was then in Constantinopolis (Istanbul), found a worn copy of a French book
entitled "Dialogues in Hell between Machiavelli and Montesquieu, or the
Policy of Machiavelli in the 19th Century." The author was anonymous ("By a
Contemporary") and the printing was done in the press of A. Mertens and Sons
in Brussels, in 1864. The book--as the staff members of the Times quickly
discovered--had been written in 1858 by Maurice Joly, a French lawyer. In
his novel, in the form of a dialogue beyond the grave between Montesquieu
and Machiavelli, Joly attacked Napoleon III. The result was that Joly was
locked up in prison for 15 months.
Graves immediately realized the extraordinary similarity between these
Dialogues and the Protocols of Nilus. There were whole paragraphs that had
been copied literally, mutatis mutandis by the change between dialogue and
monologue.
Graves had made a discovery of a greatest importance. In three long
articles,16 published in the Times of London on the 16, 17 and 18 of August
of 1921, Graves revealed the truth about the falsification of the Protocols.
Graves demonstrated that Nilus had simply plagiarized the Dialogues of Joly,
changing the original and adding some material (partly copied from Goedsche)
to serve his intentions.
Many revelations with respect to the fraudulent document were published
later. In 1933, a paragraph-by-paragraph comparison of the texts of Joly and
Nilus was published, demonstrating their similarity or identity. Another
comparison appears in the appendix of "Questions and answers with respect to
the Jews," published by the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai-B'rith. In the
book of Professor Ferrer Benimeli, already mentioned before, there is a
comparison of select paragraphs, that occupies 8 pages (pp. 157-164),
demonstrating the parallelism between both texts.
Although the Catholic Church has not been generally characterized by its
affection either towards Masons or towards Jews, it is a remarkable fact
that one of the revelations of the absolute falsification of the Protocols
was written by the R.P. Pierre Charles, S.J., published in the "Nouvelle
Revue Théologique" of Belgium in January of 1938.17 Kindly take note of the
date, we are in Europe on the eve of World War II, the totalitarian regimes
of Hitler and Franco (and in smaller degree, Mussolini) has triggered a
violent anti-Semitic and anti-Masonic campaign. All those who followed the
development of these events realized that war was imminent, and that the
German military power would squash its neighbors, including Belgium.
Father Charles must have been a man of an exceptional courage, integrity and
love of his fellow men, to dare publishing at that time his rebuttal of the
Protocols. Also his superiors, who authorized the publication, displayed a
sense of justice and humanity very scarce in the Europe of those years.
Some parallels
Although within the frame of this article it is impossible to make a
meticulous comparison between the original French of Joly and the fraudulent
version of Nilus, I will give a few select paragraphs to give an idea of
what we are speaking about. Those interested can consult the work of
Professor Ferrer Benimeli18 or some of the works mentioned at the beginning,
where many paragraphs are mentioned showing the parallelism between both
works.
Dialogue of Joly, p. 75:
I will organize, for example, immense financial monopolies, reserves of the
public wealth, on which the fate of all private wealth will depend so
closely, that they will be absorbed with the credit of the State the day
after every political catastrophe. You are an economist, Montesquieu; weigh
the value of this combination.
Protocols of Nilus, p. 42:
Very soon we will organize enormous monopolies--colossal reserves of
wealth--in which the wealth of the Christians, even the great ones, will
depend on them in such a way, that they will be absorbed with the credit of
the States the day after a political catastrophe. Gentlemen here present who
are economists, consider the importance of this combination.
Dialogue of Joly, p. 77:
It is necessary to reach that the State has only proletarians, some
millionaires and soldiers.
Protocols of Nilus, p.45:
It is necessary that the States have only proletarians, some millionaires
... and soldiers.
Dialogue of Joly, p. 159:
Sila returned deified, nobody touched a hair of his head.
Protocols of Nilus, p. 93:
Sila was deified (nobody touched a hair of the head of Sila).
It is necessary to indicate that sometimes Nilus is mistaken, loses the
thread and does not know who is speaking, mixing the contradictory judgments
of both characters in the work of Joly.
Altogether, there are more than 160 passages in the Protocols, corresponding
to a forty percent of the total text, that are evidently based on passages
in Joly. In nine of the chapters, the copied text reaches to more than half.
A small grotesque detail is the Latin quotation--the only one in the
Protocols: Per me reges regnant (By me the kings reign). This is a direct
quotation of the book of Proverbs, 8, 15, in its Catholic translation (the
Vulgata). It is inconceivable that in the Basel Congress, where many if all
the participants spoke or understood Hebrew, they would use a Catholic
translation of the Bible, instead of the Hebrew original: Bi Melakhim
Yimlekhu.
The attack on Freemasonry contained in the work of Nilus (which, of course,
does not appear in Joly's book) is shown in many paragraphs of the
Protocols. For example, in Protocol No. 11: "This is what has served as the
basis for our organization of a SECRET FREEMASONRY UNKNOWN BY THIS "GENTILE"
CATTLE, AND WHOSE OBJECTIVES NOT EVEN THEY SUSPECT, ATTRACTED BY US TO THE
THEATRICAL ARMY OF MASONIC LODGES TO THROW SAND IN THE EYES OF ITS MEMBERS."
Protocol No. 15 is perhaps most interesting from the Masonic point of view,
containing sentences such as "we will create and multiply free Masonic
lodges [evidently Joly did not understand the name Freemason] in all the
countries of the world ... . We will put all these lodges under a central
administration known only to us ... . Between the members of these lodges
will be almost all the international and national police agents."
We have here all the elements of the conspiracy theories, and it is not
worth the trouble to try to discuss with someone who is ready to believe
these nonsenses, making him see, for example, the independence kept
jealously by Grand Lodges world-wide, or that the secret police of the
totalitarian regimes count themselves among the most rabid enemies of
Freemasonry.
Another first-hand testimony
The courts have passed judgment more than once that the Protocols are a
falsification and a plagiarism. For example, in May of 1935, a Swiss judge
in Bern, judging a person accused of distributing seditious literature,
declared: "I consider that the Protocols are a falsification, a plagiarism
and a triviality." Nevertheless, the Nazi propaganda made energetic use of
the Protocols to justify its racist policies and its reprinting and
distribution are some of the main occupations of the anti-Semitic circles
anywhere in the world, until today.
Declaring at that trial, Count A.M. du Chayla provided important information
on Sergei Nilus, whom he knew closely. During World War I, Count du Chayla
commanded a squadron of Cossacks of the Don, and was decorated for heroism.
In 1909, he spent nine months in the monastery of Optina Poustina, where he
was a neighbor of Nilus, with whom he developed a close friendship. Nilus
spoke to him frequently about the Protocols and showed him the original
document and his commentaries that he was preparing.
"Nilus presented to Chayla a certain Mme. K, who had been his lover in
Paris, and after Nilus married, she came to live with him and his wife. Mrs.
Nilus was a woman of weak character and did not raise objections to this
arrangement. Nilus told du Chayla that, while they were in Paris, Mrs. K.
had known a certain General Ratchkovsky, who had given him the manuscript of
the Protocols, which according to him had been removed from the secret
archives of the Freemasons."19
General Ratchkovsky was one of the agents of the Okrana, the infamous secret
police of czarist Russia.
After the plagiarism was revealed, some anti-Semites invented an
"explanation" for the identity between texts. According to them, Joly was in
fact a baptized Jew whose true name was Moses Joel and who, naturally, was a
communist and had been shot in 1871. That Joel must have known of the
Jewish-Masonic plan of world conquest, and therefore it was natural that his
book and the Protocols agreed!
The historical truth, according to what has been found out, is that Maurice
Joly was a monarchist and anti-Semite, descendant of an old French Catholic
family, many of whose members served as government officials.
The Protocols extend
As Ferrer Benimeli remarks, the publishing success of the Protocols was
unquestionable. In the British Museum of London, 43 different editions are
conserved. Especially in the 1930's, time of height of fascism and nazism,
we find no less than 28 editions and translations, printed in the four
corners of the world.20
The first translation into another language was done by a German, captain
Müller von Hausen, writing under the pseudonym of Gottfried zur Beck, who
added numerous notes and commentaries to the appendix of Nilus--that is to
say, the Protocols--and included them in pages 68 to 143 of his book
entitled "Die Geheimnisse der Weisen von Sion" (The secrets of the Elders of
Zion). Von Hausen dedicated his book "To the princes of Europe" as a warning
against the Jewish conspiracy that threatened thrones and altars.21
Its publication was sponsored by the German nobility and popular pocket
editions were made to reach a maximum diffusion.
In 1920, the Protocols were translated into Polish, and other editions
appeared also in the United States and England. Shortly after, it also
appeared in Sweden, Japan, Portugal and France. In 1925, an edition in
Arabic was published in Damascus, widely spread throughout the Middle East.
The first edition of the Protocols in Spain dates from 1927, entitled "The
Jewish-Masonic danger. The Protocols of the Wise Men of Zion".22 There were
numerous later editions.
In the United States, the Protocols obtained the support of an important
"believer," the automobile industrialist, Henry Ford. We do not know the
reason for Ford's anti-Semitism, but the fact is that he not only financed
out of his pocket several editions of the book, but he also created a
magazine (The Dearborn Independent) especially to denounce the Jewish
danger. Eventually, Ford gathered his anti-Semitic articles in a book
entitled "The International Jew." The book was quickly translated into
German by Theodor Fritsch and in 1922 it had already reached 22 editions.
Both, the book of Ford and the Protocols, became indispensable elements in
the anti-Semitic propaganda of the Nazis.
The sequels
The Protocols, as already noted, became the "Bible" of anti-Semites and
anti-Masons. Adolf Hitler used them as justification for his policy of
racial persecution, that culminated, as we know, in the "Final Solution,"
that is to say the Holocaust--the mass murder of millions of Jewish men,
women and children for the only "crime" of being Jewish.
After the end of World War II, and after the revelation of the inconceivable
crimes against humanity perpetrated by Nazi Germany, and the extermination
of one third of the Jewish people, a more critical attitude could have been
expected towards the Protocols, whose falsification had been demonstrated
over and over again.
The Holocaust itself gave proof, in possibly the most tragic and concrete
form, the absolute nonsense of the presumed "plans of world-wide domination"
described in the Protocols. Nevertheless, anti-Semitic and anti-Masonic
hatred does not have relation with logic but rather with psychopathology.
The anti-Semites simply have chosen to deny the existence of the Holocaust,
alleging that the fields of extermination, gas chambers, thousands of
testimonies, photos, films and confessions of some of the criminals implied
in the Holocaust are inventions and mystifications.
The anti-Semitic and anti-Masonic propaganda continues to appear without
respite. In June of 1992, a pamphlet of 40 pages was published in a Turkish
newspaper, in full color, on the occasion of the celebration of the Fifth
Centenary of the welcome granted by the Ottoman Empire to the Jews expelled
from Spain. The publication is entitled "The Last Message" and shows on its
front page a photo of Kemal Atatürk, the father of the Turkish Republic,
with the motto: "Following your steps." The following title promises to
reveal the secrets of Freemasonry, but reading the text demonstrates that it
is simply another opuscule of rabidly anti-Semitic propaganda. In the
interior there is a photo of Hitler with the title "the Jews financed me,"
and one of Mussolini saying "I am a Zionist."
Of special interest for us is the illustration in truncated pyramid form,
with the all-seeing eye within a triangle at the top of the pyramid. Below,
in decreasing levels, "the structure of the Jewish world-wide power is
revealed": at the top, 3 Jewish Kabbalists, then the Sanhedrin (made up of
70 Elders), beneath them the B'nai-B'rith and something called Bilderberg
"founded in Holland in 1954 with money from Rockefeller and Rothschild."
Nobody has ever discovered what this is. The following level is ...
FREEMASONRY, thus, in large letters. Finally, below Freemasonry are the
Rotary, the Lions and ... believe it or not, the "Diners Club."
The 40 pages of the pamphlet are filled with fascinating revelations, such
as, for example, that the "Nazi" word is the name of the European Jews
(evidently, for the author there is no difference between "Ashkenazi"23 and
"Nazi"24). Hitler was financed by Jewish bankers, and the Jewish financier
Bernard Baruch, "owner of 243 of the 246 ammunition factories in the United
States" is the one who organized World War II.25
It is easy to laugh at this sad Turkish "corrected and augmented" version of
the Protocols, but the subject is very serious. Turkey is a Moslem country,
that fights to maintain the laic tradition imposed by the founders of the
Turkish Republic at the beginning of the 1920's. The Islamic fundamentalists
are fighting ferociously to recover their power, to seize primary education
and to transform Turkey into another Islamic nation in the style of Iran. In
their fight, the use of anti-Semitism--conjugated in the eyes of these
circles with Zionism--and anti-Masonry, are some of their main weapons.
The Protocols are continued to be published, as if nothing had happened. Its
popularity continues until today. In the latest volume of the annual survey
of anti-Semitism in the world, corresponding to the year 1995, published by
the University of Tel Aviv, the Protocols are written down as an excuse for
acts of Arab terrorism in Villeurbanne, France (p. 10) and new editions of
the Protocols were made in the United States, Estonia, Slovakia, Ukraine,
Iran, Denmark, and a translation into Greek published in Australia (!).26
Conclusions
I will begin by mentioning the conclusions of the R.P. Pierre Charles:27
1. If taken as a program, the Protocols ... are only a series of digressions
without importance, that frequently expose the incoherence of the editor and
his ignorance of the most elementary knowledge. Nobody could ever execute
such a program, because it is full of visible contradictions and
irrationality.
2. It is proven that these Protocols are a falsification, clumsily
plagiarized from the satirical work of Maurice Joly and composed in order to
make the Jews hateful, exciting against them the irreflexive and blind
passions of the crowd.
3. The Zionist Congress of Basel has absolutely nothing to do with the
composition of the Protocols.
4. It is possible to wonder at the aim of the authors of this falsification.
It seems, in truth, that it must be related to the internal situation of
Russia and the czarist manifesto of October 30 of the same year. But in
order not to mix conjectures with a clear conclusion, we do not want to
examine this point.
To the previous conclusions we could add the evident falsification of the
relation between Judaism and Freemasonry, of which we have already spoken.
Also, an attempt has been made to connect Freemasonry with Communism, which
is so absurd and grotesque as the previous one, if we remember that
Freemasonry was prohibited and Masons were persecuted by all communist
regimes, beginning with the Soviet Union. In 1922, the Fourth Communist
International declared that Freemasonry and Communism are incompatible, and
a couple of years later, the Russian secret police eliminated the last
vestiges of Freemasonry arresting the few remaining Masons. Something
similar happened in all the countries of the Soviet orbit, where Freemasonry
was strictly prohibited during the communist regime. The only well-known
exception to this general rule is that of Cuba, where the Order continues to
work--under close police supervision--but it is not been suppressed.
The fight between the children of light and the sectarians of hatred and
intolerance not only has not ended, but is worsening. In countries of long
democratic tradition, like England and the United States, anti-Masonry has
flowered again and is reaching new levels of fanatical activity. The
opportunities offered by electronic technology--especially the
Internet--have been quickly taken advantage of by anti-Semites and
anti-Masons, whereas of the side of Freemasonry, the reaction is very slow
and we can say that it is in its infancy. In the world-wide scene, the
Renaissance of Freemasonry in the various countries of the former Soviet
empire is extremely slow and difficult, much more than what was assumed a
few years ago.
On the other hand, there still are numerous nations in the world--especially
those with Islamic regimes--where Freemasonry is prohibited until today.
I end with a last quotation from Father Charles:
"Hatred is like the legendary tunic of Deianira, of which Hercules could not
rid himself. Hatreds are--alas!--the treasure that man keeps more
ferociously; and he stones with rage those who try to wrest them from
him."28
Notes and bibliography
1 José Antonio Ferrer Benimeli, El Contubernio Judeo-Masónico-Comunista,
Ediciones Istmo, Madrid, 1982.
2 Norman Cohn, Warrant for Genocide (The myth of the Jewish
world-conspiracy and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion), Eyre &
Spottiswoode, London, 1967.
3 Herman Bernstein, The Truth about the "Protocols of Zion" - A complete
Exposure, Covici-Friede, New York, 1935.
4 Sigmund Livingston, Must Men Hate?, Crane Press, Cleveland, 1944.
5 Profesor Ferrer Benimeli cites the publication entitled "Jews and
Masons" in La Lectura Dominical of 27 February 1898. op. cit., p.138, note
4.
6 5 volumes, London, 1797.
7 Cited by Cohn, op. cit., p. 48.
8 R.P. Pierre Charles, Los Protocolos de los Sabios de Sion, Buenos Aires,
1954. The original work of R.P. Charles appeared in the Nouvelle Revue
Théologique of January 1938.
9 Cohn, op. cit., p. 33.
10 Cohn, op. cit., p. 45.
11 Cohn, op. cit., p. 47.
12 Cohn, op. cit., pp. 65-66.
13 Livingston, op. cit., p. 41.
14 Livingston, op. cit., p. 40.
15 Ibidem, p. 42.
16 These articles were previously published as a pamphlet entitled The
Truth about the Protocols, a literary fraud.
17 A Spanish translation was published as a pamphlet in Buenos Aires in
1954.
18 Ferrer Benimeli, op. cit., pp. 157-166.
19 Bernstein, op. cit., p. 49.
20 Ferrer Benimeli, op. cit., p. 148.
21 Ferrer Benimeli, op. cit., p. 143.
22 Ferrer Benimeli, op. cit., p. 144.
23 From "Ashkenaz," the name of Germany in medieval Hebrew.
24 Abbreviation of "Nationalsozialist."
25 Report by Alexander Zvielli and David Bar-Illan: "Calculated madness in
a Turkish fantasy," The Jerusalem Post (Jerusalem), 24 July 1992.
26 Anti-Semitism World Wide 1995/6, University of Tel Aviv, Project of
Anti-Semitism Studies, Tel Aviv, 1996.
27 Charles, op. cit., p. 34.
28 Charles, op. cit., p. 35.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ole Gerstrøm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 6:29 PM
Subject: [CTRL] Sv: Re: [CTRL] The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion
> Dear Tenorlove,
>
> So, The Protocols are written by Rosicrusian. But then again I recall
having read a claim by David Icke, that The Rosicrusians are a part of the
Brotherhood and thus closely related to the Illuminati, if not just a branch
of The Illuminati.This makes The Protocols a work of the Illuminati, and
"the jewish connection," is simply a way to confuse the public.
>
> Love, Ole Gerstrom, Copenhagen, Denmark
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Tenorlove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2000 4:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [CTRL] The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion
>
>
> > --- Ole_Gerstrøm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Some have argued, that it really is the plan of the Illuminati,
> >
> > Not Illuminati. Rosicrucian. They were based on a satirical attack on
> > Napoleon III, called Dialog in Hell between Machiavelli and
> > Montesquieu, by Maurice Joly. Joly was imprisoned for this tract. It
> > was later picked up by people intent on discrediting the esoteric
> > enclave which surrounded Tsar Nicholas II. When that didn't work, one
> > Sergei Nilus re-wrote the piece into its current form. The original
> > upon which the PLEZ was based was first published in 1884, thirteen
> > years before the Zionist Congress in Basle from which the Protocols
> > allegedly issued. And the original satire was written in French. The
> > Basle conference did not include any French delegates. Why Rosicrucian?
> > Joly was allegedly a Rosicrucian. He was also a close friend of Victor
> > Hugo. Hugo exhibited Rosicrucian tendencies in his writings, and was
> > allegedly a Grand Master of the Priory of Sion, a Rosicrucian-type
> > secret society. Even AMORC, the modern Rosicrucian organization based
> > in California, lists Hugo as a "Rosicrucian." Questions? Let me know,
> > time to leave for work.
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere!
> > http://mail.yahoo.com/
> >
> > <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
> > DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
> > ==========
> > CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing
propagandic
> > screeds are unwelcomed. Substance-not soap-boxing-please! These are
> > sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'-with its many half-truths, mis-
> > directions and outright frauds-is used politically by different groups
with
> > major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and
thought.
> > That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
> > always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
> > credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
> >
> > Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
> > ========================================================================
> > Archives Available at:
> > http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
> > <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
> >
> > http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> > <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
> > ========================================================================
> > To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> > SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> > SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Om
>
> <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
> ==========
> CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing
propagandic
> screeds are unwelcomed. Substance-not soap-boxing-please! These are
> sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'-with its many half-truths, mis-
> directions and outright frauds-is used politically by different groups
with
> major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and
thought.
> That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
> always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
> credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
>
> Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
> ========================================================================
> Archives Available at:
> http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
> <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
>
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
> ========================================================================
> To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Om
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
