New York Post
July 17, 2000
CLINTON'S LATEST RACE SLANDER
As impossible as it seems to be for President Clinton to tell the
truth, it's apparently equally hard for him to hold back from
playing the race card whenever the chance presents itself.
One lowlight of Clinton's address to the NAACP last week was his
reiteration of one of his most vile slanders: that Republicans
are holding up judicial appointments based solely on race.
In solemnly pretentious tones, Clinton said, "The quality of
justice suffers when highly qualified women and minority
candidates ... supported by the American Bar Association are
denied the opportunity to serve for partisan political reasons."
Clinton knows full well that Republicans are not blocking liberal
appointees because of race or gender, but because of the
nominees' liberal views on law and constitutional doctrine.
Senate candidate Hillary Clinton has already said that she would
not support a nominee to the Supreme Court who did not believe in
upholding the Roe vs. Wade abortion decision. That means that, as
a legislator, she would have her own litmus test.
Are current state legislators and members of Congress not
permitted to have their own views on issues such as abortion, the
death penalty and how the Constitution should be interpreted?
It goes without saying that a liberal and conservative elected
official will differ on those significant issues. Yes, it has
everything to do with politics. It has nothing to do with race.
And Bill Clinton knows it.
However, he expanded his race-baiting to include presumptive GOP
nominee George W. Bush.
The president asked why Bush had stayed silent when Republicans
had blocked Hispanic Enrique Moreno's appointment to the United
States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Of course, Clinton wouldn't implicate Bush just because the Texas
governor addressed the NAACP conference earlier in the week,
would he?
It wouldn't have anything to do with the fact that Bush spoke to
the group in decidedly non-racial terms and discussed issues like
education and home ownership, would it?
Clinton wouldn't push the racial envelope just because Al Gore is
still in desperate shape, despite Sen. Bill Bradley's tardy
endorsement, would he?
Of course he would.
=================================================================
Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT
FROM THE DESK OF: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*Mike Spitzer* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
~~~~~~~~ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=================================================================
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
