-Caveat Lector-
Fw Post:
That Was No Accident
By Duncan Long
Thereıs an old story about a cowpoke who was walking alongside his horse one
day when he noticed a movement out of the corner of his eye. He turned to
see a rattlesnake coiled to strike. Thinking fast, the cowboy jumped out of
the way just as the snake struck, barely missing him. Latter, after telling
his friends about the incident, one of them said, "You barely missed having
one serious accident." The cowpoke thought about it a moment and drawled,
"That wouldnıt have been an accident, that critter aimed to bite me." Thatıs
the same sort of thing weıre seeing now. The school shootings and various
criminal assaults that are causing so much national grief arenıt accidents.
Theyıre being done by people intent on killing and maiming, wanting to harm
those around them in serious ways. The political actions that have brought
this situation are no accident, either. Itıs no accident that these
murderers are able to do their work almost unchecked. The most recent
shooting in LA (on August 10, 1999) is the perfect example of how our
governmental gas bags have betrayed us. Theyıve made it impossible for
school officials to carry a gun for self defense, turning our schools into
shooting zones for the lawless cowards looking for a place to do damage with
little chance of running into any resistance. We should all take a moment to
say thank you to the National Educators Association and gun grabbing
politicians for letting these cowards kill our children. Am I being too hard
on leaders who want to disarm citizens? I donıt think so. Because most gun
grabbers arenıt stupid. Theyıve seen how concealed carry laws reduce violent
crime. They know that the 20th Centuryıs genocides were all proceeded by
stringent gun control laws. They know all the pro-gun arguments you could
probably make are most likely correct. Why, then, does the anti-gun crowd
continue to call for more restrictions on guns? The first hint at the awful
truth comes when you realize that for the most part, those intent on taking
away our guns are also pro-abortion. How do these two views fit together and
what do they mean? At first they seem illogical. Wouldnıt you think that
someone who was pro-abortion especially someone who was pro-abortion to
the point that making partial-birth abortion legal would also be pro-gun.
After all, if guns really kill people the way the anti-gun crowd claims, and
if we really wanted to reduce the excess population, surely we would then
want to dispense guns left and right instead of taking them away from
people. Or would we? Studies show that guns in the hands of honest people
reduce crime. And they do so for the most part without a shot being fired.
Guns most often save lives by preventing the violent confrontation that
takes place when the criminal is in charge, rather than a gun-welding
citizen. Guns in honest peopleıs hands arenıt often used, but do stop a
criminal in his efforts and force him to flee. Criminals with guns may kill,
but honest citizens with guns seldom do. And honest citizens with guns often
stop criminals before they can kill. Net result: Citizens with guns prevent
deaths of innocent people. Citizens without guns result in more deaths of
innocent people. If your intent is to reduce the population, then it makes
perfect sense to be both pro-abortion and anti-gun. But are there people who
really want to get you or your children killed by violent murderers in order
to reduce the population? What would be gained in doing so? The motivation
for getting the population of Earth from growing is hard for moral men and
women to fathom. But if you throw away morality the benefits of reducing the
population become chillingly logical. In the words of conservative
commentator Lee Bellinger (writing in "Revealed: Why the Left Push So Hard
for Population Control," The American Sentinel, No. 613, April 1998): ;
Growing populations create pressure for competitive economies . Leftists in
general, and environmentalists in particular, favor strong policies to
reduce population growth (hence their anti-family agenda, including
subsidized abortion, partial birth abortion and advocacy of teenagers being
able to terminate pregnancies without parental consent or knowledge) .
Consider: Growing populations cannot be fed by socialist economies. As the
leaders of the now-defunct Soviet Union learned, unrestricted population
growth creates unwelcome pressure for social and economic innovation.
Unfortunately for socialists, the only proven system capable of generating
advances in science and technology sufficient to accommodate global
populations is free-enterprise... Were global population to decline, as
leftists want, the sharing-in-scarcity credo of environmental socialists
would become far more manageable (at least in their view) . Take North Korea
its citizens starve from a "famine," when just a few miles South of the
38th Parallel the South Koreans are well nourished. Cuba and the remaining
outposts of socialism in Africa have the same dilemma as North Korea. Their
state-run businesses are incapable of meeting basic social needs.
Totalitarian dictators cannot allow people the freedom necessary to feed
themselves. These rulers correctly see limiting population as their best
defense against social change a "sharing in scarcity" regime prescribed by
so many environmentalists . Population control: The left's counterpoint to
free-enterprise. Internationalists know that population growth forces
innovation, and that innovation is best achieved through the hated
free-enterprise system. This is the hidden reason why leftists support
policies that are anti-family and pro-abortion socialism simply cannot
sustain a growing work force.
Reducing the population can keep the standards of living high for survivors
while keeping the government in control and reducing the independence of the
population. This also explains why the more liberal a politician is, the
more interested they tend to be in taking away your guns and making sure
women have the "right to have an abortion." To those wanting to cut down on
the population, it makes perfect sense to take guns away from honest people
and make sure criminals have guns and can operate freely without fear of
running into an armed citizen. Think Iım being a little extreme here? Do you
think that surely those anti-gun, pro-abortionists arenıt quite that blood
thirsty? Well, letıs take a look at the founder of Planned Parenthood,
Margaret Sanger, did and said about her goals. While the mainstream media
and supporters of abortion rights have done their best to hide it, in fact
Sanger took Darwinian logic to its extreme, just as the Nazis did in
Germany. Not surprisingly, during the 1930s Sanger openly supported the
Naziıs goal of achieving eugenics to create what was supposed to be a "super
race." In truth, Planned Parenthoodıs 1985 "Annual Report" proclaimed
members were, "Proud of our past, and planning for our future." (reported by
George Grant, "Killer Angel," Reformer Press, p. 105.) Among Sangerıs
notable goals and sayings: · She wrote that society needed to go about the
task of the "extermination of human weedsı ...the cessation of charity,ı
... the segregation of morons, misfits, and the maladjusted,ı and ... the
sterilization of genetically inferior races.ı" ("Killer Angels" page 65) ·
In "The Birth Control Review" magazine Sanger threw her support behind the
"infanticide program" promoted by the Nazis during the 1930s. (Margaret
Sanger, Pivot of Civilization, New York: Bretanoıs, pp 101, 108, 123.) ·
Sanger publicly lauded Hitlerıs theory of Aryan white supremacy. (Pivot of
Civilization) · Sanger commissioned Ernst Rudin, a member of the Nazi Party
who would later become a the director of the German Medical Experimentation
Programs; he served Sangerıs advisor until the hostilities leading to W.W.II
broke out. (Pivot of Civilization) · Sanger opened one of her early birth
control clinics in the Brownsville section of New York; the reason
apparently was because this area was populated by newly immigrated Slavs,
Latins, Italians, and Jews groups she considered inferior to other races.
(Linda Gordon, Womanıs Body, Womanıs Right, New York: Penguin Press, p204.)
· In 1939, Margaret Sanger organized a "Negro project" to eliminate what she
called an "inferior race." She claimed, "The masses of Negroes
...particularly in the South, still breed carelessly and disastrously, with
the result that the increase among Negroes, even more than among whites, is
from that portion of the population least intelligent and fit." (Womanıs
Body, Womanıs Right, p. 332.) · Sanger wrote that she intended to hire three
or four Afro-American ministers "to travel to various black enclaves to
propagandize for birth control . The most successful educational approach to
the Negro is through a religious appeal. We do not want word to go out that
we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the Minister is the man who
can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more
rebellious members." (Killer Angel, p. 74.) · Sanger also wrote that
religious groups should be singled out for destruction because they were
"dysgenic races" which included "Fundamentalists and Catholics" as well as
"blacks, Hispanics, (and) American Indians." (Womanıs Body, Womanıs Right,
pp. 229-334) · Sanger wrote, "Birth control appeals to the advanced radical
because it is calculated to undermine the authority of the Christian
churches. I look forward to seeing humanity free someday of the tyranny of
Christianity no less than Capitalism." (Killer Angel, p. 104.) This
realization that the pro-abortion gun-grabbers are motivated by a need to
see more people dead explains a lot. It explains why the US and UN often are
slow to act when thereıs any hint of genocide going on somewhere in the
world especially if it involved Africans and/or Christians. By waiting
until the deed has been completed, there are that fewer "human weeds" to
content with. Thus American leftists turn a blind eye toward infanticide and
persecution of Christians in China and mass killings in any given African
nation can be all but ignored until the killing stops. The "inferior
population" is reduced and more is left over for the elite to enjoy. No
wonder the mainstream press and anti-gun politicians pretend to overlook the
JPFO contention that most 20th Centuryıs genocides started with gun control
measures that disarmed the population. Disarming the population will achieve
the goals of these political snakes all the quicker. Rwanda is a good
example of how this works. First the UN disarmed the population, then
between April and July of 1994 the Hutu-led military systematically killed
the Tutsis tribesmen (who also just happened to be Christians the group
Planned Parenthoodıs founder so hated). When the UN convened hearings on the
genocide, the US Ambassador, Madeline Albright, argued that "genocide" was
the wrong term for what was happening; rather what was going on was a civil
war so no intervention should be undertaken. This was an important
distinction because it made it impossible for any nation including those
neighboring Rwanda, to intervene and stop the killings. (Peter Hammond,
Holocaust in Rwanda, Touch Mission Intıl (ITMI), Tempe, AZ.)
So UN troops stood by while 750,000 people were hacked to death in Rwanda.
But it went even beyond that. Occasionally UN troops even handed helpless
Tutsis over to Hutu militia members. UN soldiers watched victims being
slaughtered with machetes right before their eyes. In 1994, after the
carnage finally came to an end, the Clinton administration handed over
millions of dollars in foreign aid to the Hutu government. Meanwhile,
Madeline Albright was elevated to Secretary of State on Clintonıs cabinet.
Albright's boss is Bill Clinton. He's also a big supporter of abortion
rights. And gun control. Following the latest shooting of Jewish children in
LA, the President very piously remarked about "another senseless act of gun
violence" and told Americans that "once again our nation has been shaken and
our hearts torn." Just like with the other shootings brought about by the
gun grabbers and just like the killings made possible by the Clinton
administrationıs intervention at the UN during the Rwanda slaughters. In the
late 1990s, Dr. Stanley K. Monteith, after investigating Planned Parenthood
and those who are intent on reducing the worldıs population, came to an
alarming conclusion (Stanley K. Monteith, M.D., "The Population Control
Agenda," http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Realm/9485/NWOhorror.htm, April 11,
1999). He wrote:
One of the most difficult concepts for Americans to accept is that there are
human beings dedicated to coercive population control and genocide. Many
readers will acknowledge that our government is helping to finance the Red
Chinese program of forced abortion, forced sterilization, infanticide, and
control of the numbers of live births. Most readers will accept the fact
that our nation is helping to finance the United Nationsı world-wide "family
planning program," a form of population control. Most rational men and
women, however, find it impossible to believe that such programs are really
part of a "master plan" to kill off large segments of the worldıs
population. I shall have to admit that I studied the politics of AIDS (HIV
disease) for over a decade before I finally came to a horrifying conclusion.
The real motivation behind efforts to block utilization of standard public
health measures to control further spread of the HIV epidemic was
"population control." That was not an easy concept for me to acknowledge,
despite the fact that I had long recognized that the twentieth century has
been the bloodiest hundred-year period in all recorded human history.
Next time you hear a politician advance the idea that we need to support
Planned Parenthood, that we must defend the right for women to have
abortions, or that we need more gun control, ask yourself why he thinks we
need that. Is it for your childrenıs good, or so he and other racists can
get rid of more "human weeds" like you and your neighbors to make way for
the elite to continue their socialist agendas? And next time you see the
news about another school shooting, remind yourself that it wasnıt an
accident. Most likely it is part of the gun grabbersı agenda. Like
rattlesnakes, these people donıt cause accidents. They aim to do serious
harm.
