-Caveat Lector-

From:                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date sent:              Wed, 27 Sep 2000 13:01:50 -0700
To:                     undisclosed recipients <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:                Fascism with a smile

This article highlights a long- held belief of mine-- that we are
rapidly becoming a fascist society. Some refer to the MMM's as the
"Commie Mommies," Al Gore is routinely labelled a Socialist, etc.
but if one looks closely it becomes apparent that they and the
others who would gut the Bill of Rights are clearly *National*
Socialists... aka Nazis.

~Olga

 Third Way or Third Reich?


WHAT IS THE THIRD WAY, and why is Bill Clinton pushing it?


During the collapse of the Soviet Empire, Mikhail Gorbachev
promoted the so-called "Third Way" as an alternative to free
markets. This new way of governing would be neither capitalist nor
communist, but something in between. The Third Way flopped in
Russia. But Bill Clinton thinks it will work here.

On November 14, 1998, while most of us were distracted by sex
scandals, The New York Times quietly reported that, in response
to the growing worldwide recession, "Mr. Clinton has proposed a
`third way' between capitalism and socialism."

Actually, Clinton has been touting the Third Way since 1992. But
his evasive language prevented most people from figuring out what
he meant by it.

"We have moved past the sterile debate between those who say
government is the enemy and those who say government is the
answer," Clinton said in his 1998 State of the Union address. "My
fellow Americans, we have found a third way."

Of course, most Americans didn't even know we were looking for
one. But now that we've found it, how does it work?

Among other things, the Third Way calls for business and
government to join hands as "partners."

"We are working with business to use technology, research and
market incentives to meet national goals," Clinton told the
Economic Club of Detroit in February. "Some have called this
political philosophy the third way."

What Clinton means by this gobbledygook is that Big Business will
own the economy (as under capitalism), while Big Government
runs it (as under socialism).

Corporations will be bribed into obedience through subsidies, tax
breaks, customized legislation and other special privileges.

It all sounds very cozy. But what would life be like under such a
regime? History offers some alarming clues.

"National Socialist Germany has created a new economic doctrine,"
boasted Adolf Hitler in 1939, "which views ... the economy as the
servant of the people." Hitler exemplified the Third Way. He left
industry in private hands, but appointed government bureaucrats to
run it.

Production goals were set and price controls imposed from Berlin.
Jobs were created through public works, tax incentives and
government credits.

"Hitler ... anticipated modern economic policy," enthused liberal
economist John Kenneth Galbraith in 1973. "That a nation
oppressed by economic fear would respond to Hitler as Americans
did to FDR is not surprising."

Nor should it surprise us that some might look back with nostalgia
on Hitler's strong-arm tactics, now that global depression lurks
around the corner. Is the Third Way a coded expression for
fascism? Perhaps.

This new ideology does not come with jackboots, goose-stepping
thugs or delirious crowds shouting, "Sieg Heil!" But maybe it
doesn't have to. Back in 1980, a leftwing political scientist and
urban studies professor named Bertram Gross, in his book Friendly
Fascism, foretold a kinder, gentler brand of tyranny.

"Anyone looking for black shirts, mass parties or men on horseback
will miss the telltale clues of this creeping fascism..." he wrote.
"In America, it would be supermodern and multiethnic -- as
American as Madison Avenue, executive luncheons, credit cards
and apple pie. It would be fascism with a smile."

Most people would accept the new order without distress, Gross
predicted. They would have fewer rights, of course, but more
gadgets, perks and entertainments. Troublemakers would be
blacklisted and discredited, but rarely jailed or killed. When
violence became necessary, it would be done discreetly.

"One can look forward to improved capabilities ... for the use of ...
induced heart failure ... induced suicide ... and `accidental'
automobile fatalities," wrote Gross.

The author of Friendly Fascism was no wild-eyed Cassandra. He
was a leading architect of liberal social policy under presidents
Roosevelt, Truman and Carter. As such, Gross unwittingly helped
build the partnership of Big Government and Big Business that he
later decried. He recognized his guilt only late in life.

While writing his book, Gross dreamed that he was searching
through a huge, empty house for "friendly fascists." He found one
at last.

"I flung open one of the doors," Gross writes. "And there sitting at a
typewriter and smiling back at me, I saw myself."

Over the years, Gross had helped draft such Big Government
legislation as the full-employment bills of 1944 and 1945, and the
Employment Act of 1946.

"I sought solutions for America's ills ... through more power in the
hands of central government," Gross admits. "In this I was not
alone.  Almost all my fellow planners, reformers, social scientists,
and urbanists presumed the benevolence of more concentrated
government power."

But they were wrong. Gross realized that centralized power was, in
fact, the linchpin of tyranny. "Big Business-Big Government
partnerships ...," he wrote, "were the central facts behind the power
structures of old fascism in the days of Mussolini, Hitler and the
Japanese empire builders. ... I see Big Business and Big
Government as a joint danger."

If only the Clinton cheerleaders were capable of such introspection.
Gross died in 1997. But his spirit lives on, a fading spark of
leftwing conscience, unsung and unheeded in the mad rush to the
Third Way.


Richard Poe is editor of FrontPagemag.com. For more information
about Poe and his work, visit RichardPoe.com.

Copyright © 1999-2000 by Richard Poe






--
Kathleen

Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on
what to have for dinner. Liberty is two wolves
attempting to have a sheep for dinner and finding
a well-informed, well-armed sheep.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to