-Caveat Lector-

Perhaps Nader, Buchanan, and Browne should organize their own alternative
debates--with empty chairs for Gore and Bush?  A debate among those three--a
REAL debate, not an extended photo op/sound bite session--could really be
interesting...

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nurev Ind Research" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 1:26 PM
Subject: [CTRL] [Fwd: Commission Says Gore-Bush Only; Responses Available]


> -Caveat Lector-
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Commission Says Gore-Bush Only; Responses Available
> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 23:28:10 -0500 (CDT)
> From: Institute for Public Accuracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organization: ?
> To: undisclosed-recipients:;
>
> Institute for Public Accuracy
> 915 National Press Building, Washington, D.C. 20045
> (202) 347-0020 * http://www.accuracy.org * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ___________________________________________________
>
> Wednesday, September 27, 2000
>
> Debate Commission Says Gore-Bush Only; Responses Available
>
> The Commission on Presidential Debates has formally announced that it
> intends to exclude all third party candidates from the presidential debates.
>
> Phil Donahue (who is a member of the Committee to Elect Ralph Nader
> President) wrote in the Sunday Los Angeles Times: "If Ralph Nader is
> excluded from the presidential debates, many issues important to millions of
> Americans will get little or no attention during the corporate sponsored
> face-offs between the two major party candidates" -- e.g. drug war, death
> penalty, trade, national health insurance.
>
> The following are among those available for interviews:
>
> JAMIN RASKIN, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Law professor at American University, Raskin represented Ross Perot in 1996,
> chairs the Appleseed Citizens' Task Force on Fair Debates and has advised
> the Nader campaign on the debate issue. He said today: "The 15 percent rule
> is utterly lawless. It triples the 5 percent rule in federal law for
> qualifying for
> public financing in a presidential campaign." Raskin added: "Nothing stops
> Vice President Al Gore and Gov. George W. Bush from setting up an
> exclusionary debate, but these debates are paid for by large corporations
> like Anheuser-Busch, which is contributing $550,000. The corporate funding
> makes these exclusionary debates an illegal corporate contribution."
>
> JEFF COHEN, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.fair.org/debates.html
> Cohen is head of Open Debates 2000, a project of the media watch group
> FAIR. Cohen said today: "The CPD is not 'nonpartisan' as it claims, it's a
> creation of the Democratic and Republican parties. A recent Zogby poll of
> 1,000 likely voters found that 60 percent want Nader and Buchanan
> included -- and people who are not 'likely voters' may be even more
> sympathetic to third party candidates."
>
> JEFF MILCHEN, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.ReclaimDemocracy.org
> Director of ReclaimDemocracy.org, Milchen said today: "The CPD is not a
> legitimate institution. In 1992, Perot would have been banned from the
> debates under the CPD's current 15 percent standard, as would Jesse Ventura
> in 1998."
>
> ADAM EIDINGER, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.sinker.org
> Eidinger is with the Open Debate Society. He said: "I was among the
> activists who occupied the offices of Wagner Communications and Brewer
> Consulting Group, the only known address of the CPD, for 40 minutes on Sept.
> 20. Our aim was to put a face to the name of the CPD, a stealthy private
> corporation controlled by the Republican and Democratic parties." On Sept.
> 28, activists will attempt to shut down those offices. Eidinger added that
> "after this action we are going to join thousands to protest for open
> debates in Boston," the site of the first scheduled presidential debate.
>
> [The CPD (http://www.debates.org) can be reached at (202) 872-1020.]
>
> For more information, contact at the Institute for Public Accuracy:
> Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; David Zupan, (541) 484-9167

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to