-Caveat Lector-

A funny thing happened on the way to the regulatory state
http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/0400regstate.htm
By Diane Alden
web posted April 10, 2000

The federal government was given few, limited and enumerated powers. The
Constitution grants the federal government powers over such issues as
national defense, international trade and diplomacy, immigration procedures,
maintenance of the monetary system, patents and copyright enforcement,
bankruptcy procedures and the regulation of interstate commerce.

But in the last 75 years government has gone beyond the limits set by the
Founders and strayed to the other end of the galaxy.

In the process the constitutional republic has been replaced by the
regulatory state. What is left of the republic and the Bill of Rights is
under assault from the trial lawyers, the environmental movement, anti-gun
lobby, the corporate-government-foundation triad, the congress (as separation
of powers becomes history), runaway taxes, federal and state regulatory
monster, a corrupt press, a court system which has lost its way, dumbed down
education, a self absorbed citiznery and a debased culture. What has happened
to the republic might be called the Madison Effect, in honor of James
Madison's famous dictum that "men love power."

What went wrong in the republic has many fathers. Some of the problems date
back to the 1800s when America's intellectuals adopted a philosophy hatched
in Prussian universities. A philosophy which has spawned everything from
Nazism to communism to environmentalism to Freudian psychology. A creed which
is at odds with the intellectual tradition of the Founders. However, it was a
system of thought and philosophy which fit very well with the growth of the
state and the demise of individual freedom.

Many American intellectuals swallowed the collectivist--statist bilge and
passed it on to generations of young people some of whom became the elitist
left. America's educated elite promoted the growth of the state by
insinuating the activist federal government on America. The Great Depression
was the major catalyst for the the success of the statist philosophy and
subsequent growth of the federal government. Americans began to like the
interference of the state in their lives because it came with money and
promises of one sort or another and a sense of security. We became more
interested in what government could do for us than what we could do for
ourselves.

Once upon a time in the republic called America people were smart enough to
know that government never does anything for free. Government has no
conscience and it will do or say anything to get power and control. A
republican form of government is supposed to take care of that problem. But
we are no longer a constitutional republic. We are a nation with a plebiscite
and the whim of the majority is our creed. We call ourselves a nation of laws
not men. Unfortunately, someone never told the government or the federal
court system that there was a point where even a good thing can become a bad
thing. We have overdone a good thing. At the moment we are drowning in
regulatory law.

Rather than being as judicious as the Founders and keeping it
simple--stupidly we wove the noose that is strangling us. The Bill of Rights
and the Constitution were simple and straight forward coda. But we took a
classic construction and stuck ribbons and bows on it, tore at the hem and
the sleeves, and ended up with something we can't wear. But by gum the
government is going to make sure we are covered in something aka the
regulatory state.

Two of the greatest tragedies of the 20th century were the Great Depression
and the various social and cultural movements of the 60s. Both were born in
idealism stemming from 19th century German philosophy and a bastardized
version of Judeo-Christian tradition. The only one of the movements worth the
trouble was the civil rights movement for blacks. The rest merely cheapened
the civil rights struggle.

Moreover, the Great Depression wasn't just an economic tragedy it was the
death knell for the Bill of Rights and the Constitution. The federal Nanny
State began when Roosevelt instituted the New Deal. That in turn became
Truman's Fair Deal, and LBJ's "war on poverty."

Double Your Trouble

Since John Kennedy the number of federal agencies has doubled. Nearly every
president since Roosevelt has added their own particular "war." Each "war"
requires its own bureaucracy. Over the years, presidential, congressional and
court rule making in regards to our war mentality has led us to the ten
headed dragon better known as the federal bureaucracy.

It is the nature of bureaucracy that the process and paper work are more
important than the results. The Federal Register a daily report on new and
proposed regulations went from 15,000 pages in 1963 to over 70,000 pages
today. The cost of government is nearly $2 trillion a year. The cost and the
results are are not in sync.

However, it was the loss of self-discipline and self-control and standards
during the 60s, which pushed American civilization towards the regulatory
state. We moved closer to the day government becomes our conscience, our
policeman, and our master. The occurence of the Depression and the cultural
debacle of the 60s in the same century were a disaster for us. These two
historic trends have driven us beyond constitutional crisis and moral crisis.
We are in societal free fall a few feet from hitting bottom.

In the early 1900s the passage of the 16th amendment creating the income tax
was the beginning of nearly unlimited funding for the regulatory state. Then
the withholding tax came into the lives of Americans for the good reason
called World War II. But this so called "temporary tax" never went away.
During the 20th century taxes expanded from one percent in 1912 to over 50
percent in some cases today.

Taxes are taken from the most productive sector of society and given to the
inefficient monolith called the federal government. Meanwhile, regulations
grow at every level exponentially. Today the "surpluses" generated by taxes
is not given back to the people but are kept to prop up inefficient,
unproductive government programs and create more. The president's proposes to
earmark 62 percent of the budget surplus to "save" Social Security which
ensures that the system will continue to rely on debt and IOUs rather than
savings and personal investment.

It is the methods and programs we have chosen to deal with our problems which
have impelled us towards the out of control regulatory state. Tax revenues
will total nearly $1.9 trillion in 2000, which is 20.7 percent of gross
domestic product (GDP). The regulatory state costs each man, woman and child
in the U.S. $7,000 a year on top of taxes.

Government inefficiencies are legendary and rather than downsizing as a
sensible business would, we allow it to grow as never before. However, the
government behemoth did not develop over night.

War Zone

During our wars emergency powers are granted for various reasons. For
instance "habeas corpus" was temporarily lifted during the Civil War and the
first income tax was instituted. In WWII Japanese Americans were rounded up
and put in concentration camps - just in case; a blatant violation of the
Bill of Rights. The War Powers Act passed in the 70s gave the executive
branch the ability by pass Congress in emergency situtions. Bill Clinton has
used this beyond all reason. The "war" in Kosovo was fought for months
without congressional approval. That should have been the impeachable offense
rather than an imbroglio over some stains on an intern's blue dress.

As the cartoon character Pogo would say, "We have met the enemy and he is us."

It cost trillions of dollars and the combined efforts of millions of people
but the West defeated Soviet commnunism and won the Cold War. Ronald Reagan
and Pope John Paul II led the final charge up and over the Berlin Wall. It
succeeded beyond our wildest dreams. After 45 years the Cold War was an
overnight success. But, suddenly we were faced with what to do with the
bureaucracies and "war" mentality we had in place. Of course the obvious
answer was to find another enemy.

Turning our eyes and efforts inward the current president, the congress, the
media, academia, government employees, lawyers, the pundits, et al focus on
the new enemy. Because Americans have become such irresponsible bad boys, and
since the boomers trashed an imperfect but pretty good culture by their
excesses, we are now told that the Bill of Rights is no longer relevant to
our era. In a thousand ways, including 22,000 gun laws on the books, the
powers that be have taken the freedoms under the Bill of Rights, muted them,
removed all meaning and replaced them with the trend of the moment i.e.
political correctness. Real freedoms have become dangerous to the survival of
the elites and the regulatory state.

In recent years the number of "emergency" situations has grown and so do the
issuance of executive orders. Nowadays, executive orders are used for
everything from privacy issues to taking millions of acres of land away from
the states and putting them ever more firmly under federal control.

In one of his more notorious executive orders Bill Clinton sought to rework
federalism by handing himself and future presidents more broad and sweeping
powers than ever before, powers Caesar would envy. A couple of incensed
Congressmen and state governors, still on speaking terms with the
Constitution, stopped it. Still Bill cranks them out faster than Congress can
say Al Gore invented the internet. The fact that the Clinton administration
tried the maneuver at all says something about the state of the republic, the
corruption in the heart of the left, and the incurable statist mindset of the
democrats and republicans who would allow it.

Increasingly, the federal alphabet agencies have trouble knowing where the
line is between the "enemy" and citizens exercising their constitutional
guarantees. There is very little oversight of agency activities. Mostly they
have the rotten job of being enforcers of the regulatory state. Under Janet
Reno's watch at the Justice Department, agency morale has tanked as the
alphabet agencies are used as tools to deal with political enemies. While
this has been true during other administrations the Clinton's have raised it
to an art form.

Meanwhile the list of enemies of the state have grown to include, tobacco,
gun manufacturers, implants, Microsoft, ranchers, loggers, miners, hot
coffee, diet drugs, air bags, not having air bags, the internal combustion
engine, cows, Rush Limbaugh, Ken Starr, perfume, the smell of peanuts on
aircraft, drugs, hate speech, mattresses, doctors, car seats, SUVs, fast
foods, the list is endless.

Making war on ourselves with the eternal law suit has replaced baseball and
bowling as a national sport. It makes lawyers rich while adding a horrendous
legal and regulatory burden to a free society. Americans appear like the
biggest bunch of fools, idiots, and cry babies who have ever walked the
earth. The American "way" is no longer the freedom to make informed choices
it is becoming "sue everyone who has any money until their eyes pop."

The "root" cause of all this government growth and over reaction has to do
with what Americans expect from government. The other "root" is the free
lunch and victimhood syndrome prevalent in American society. Phil Donahue and
Oprah did a marvelous job showing us what victims and cry babies we are.

Moreover, America has run into deep trouble because we have dumped the moral
and ethical ground rules; while refusing to take responsibility for our
choices and actions. Doing "right" has been replaced by getting "rights."
Taking personal responsibility has been replaced by blaming everyone but
ourselves and then telling government to do something about it. But that
belief has its unintended consequences and requires more government agencies
which cost a great deal while accomplishing very little.

Government now takes over 20 percent of the GNP. Government employees at the
state level make 10.3 percent higher than those in the private sector. The
average federal government employee -- excluding the military -- makes 47
percent more than the average private sector employee. Studies have shown
that government employees are less productive, take more time off, have far
better benefits, and retire earlier than those in the private sector.
According to the government's own figures, federal employees average wage and
benefit package is worth $63,000 per year, while the average in the private
sector is $40,000 per year.

The reason for this is there is no competition in government. It has
unlimited funds and a lock on the delivery of certain services. Government
department heads are promoted according to the size of their budgets not
according to how fast they downsize. Every time the alphabet agencies go on a
rampage or get in trouble it is usually at budget time or when they are
trying to expand their turf. Waco and Ruby Ridge and all the rest of the
debacles didn't happen in a vacuum. Not one flak jacketed bureaucrat paid any
kind of a price for either horror. But government jobs are so secure that it
takes egregious mistakes or blowing the whistle on the government or Bill
Clinton in order to get punished.

If government did have competition, services of the same or higher quality
can often be purchased through the competitive market for 20 to 60 percent
less. Despite the fact that competitive contractors must pay taxes and earn
profits.

Government's fundamental fiscal problem is costs not funding. It costs $710
billion to finance regulatory agencies. The cost of doing federal business is
three times that of 1970. Spending increased 50 percent between the end of
the Reagan administration and the Clinton adminstration. Environmental regs
alone take 1/10 of the national income. Higher tax revenues are not the
answer. Without controlling the cost of government while providing it with
unlimited funds, we are giving the keys of the family car to a drunken
16-year-old and telling him to be careful and actually believing he will.

The left and some on the right refuse to allow competition from the private
sector, however, because at heart they are statists. They really believe that
government can mold human nature to specifications if only it is given enough
money to do the job.

They hate right wing Christians for being judgmental and say they resent it
when they try to to jam their moral beliefs down everyone's throats. However,
the left is the worst offender in this regard. Because it is the left who are
convinced that molding human nature and behavior can be accomplished by
government regulation.

Religion doesn't have nearly the control over Americans that government does.
Ask yourself on April 15 where coercion is coming from, the little white
church down the block or the big brick building in D.C. with the IRS emblem
on the front. Is it right wing Christians who are piling law upon law or is
it the actions of the left demanding more from the federal government?

The left's greatest fear is that the United States will become a theocracy.
Yet their belief system allows for the replacement of traditional "God" given
rights with those handed out by the state. Failing to recognize that when men
design the state it will always opt to save itself at the expense of the
individual.

Drowning in Law

Currently, our regulatory state is conducting a new war. It has decided to
disarm law-abiding citizens by using "children." Instead of addressing the
moral and cultural failures of society it deals with the symptoms. The state
is not content with 22,000 gun laws on the books because it is really after
registration and/or confiscation and bringing the Madison Effect to
perfection.

Environmental regulations under the endangered species act recently cost
three people their lives. Last year during the big rains in California
massive flooding occured in an area where a levee was not rebuilt. The
reason, government regulations forbad rebuilding until 5 elderberry bushes
were moved to wetlands to be created at the cost of millions and millions of
dollars in order to accomodate an endangered beetle. The regulatory state
doesn't care about cost-benefit ratio. More to the point it doesn't care
about human beings either. The state cares about expanding and maintaining
its power. The Madison Effect writ large.

While attempting to take arms from private citizens, government arms federal
agencies and discusses the possibility of using the military during civil
disturbances. Secretary Cohen in November of 1999 gave a speech about
military-civilian agency cooperation. At about the same time there was a
meeting in Washington, D.C. where a senator from a western state and her
colleagues discussed the possibility of getting rid of "possee comitatus."
This is the rule that says the military can not be used against American
civilians. But government has already done that. Military advisors and
military vehicles were used at Waco, a dangerous and unconstitutional
precedent.

Calls for downsizing and disarming government never work. In the last ten
years the only government function that got cut was the military. They have
been downsized and defunded. Spare parts are at a premium and morale is as
low or lower than that in other federal agencies. The national defense is one
of the few powers or responsibilities given to government and it is the one
it is dismantling.

The military has been required to do more with less; while Bill Clinton used
them in his quest to build his "legacy" and spread empire far and wide. The
post Cold War peace benefit was frittered away while he camouflaged his
personal problems by being a "leader" and using his position as
commander-in-chief.

Meanwhile, congress on both sides of the aisle, consistently refuse to unload
their pet porcine projects. Thereby setting no example as they make more laws
and add to the infinite regulatory burden to the lives of the citizens they
are supposed to serve. Shades of the Roman Senate during the rise of Julius
Caesar.

Culture of Resistance

According to legal scholar Professor Joel Handler, law has created a "culture
of resistance." He maintains: "Instead of fostering cooperation it destroys
it. By emphasizing violations rather than problems, regulation creates
bitterness and adversaries. Everything must be put on the record. . a culture
of resistance sets in."

The regulatory state has accomplished just that. But businessmen and the
average citizen finds numerous ways around regulation. If they didn't life
would be even more complex and difficult than it already is. For the
businessman it may not be filling out each and every form or taking cash and
not reporting it. For the rancher who possibly has an endangered species on
his property it may boil down to "shoot, shovel and shut up." Government
inflicts regulations instead of asking for cooperation by setting agreed upon
goals and allowing Americans to find their own system to meet those goals. In
other words, government and the left are control freaks.

Government does not usually willingly restrict itself or change entrenched
policy. That is why revolution and "movements" take place.

The founders tried to avoid the possibility of civil disruption by outlining
the separation of powers and giving us the Bill of Rights. We are the ones
who have screwed it up. Government activism has replaced the principles in
the Bill of Rights with a new set of conditions and laws which have more to
do with the survival of government than the enhancement and growth of
individual freedom.

In his seminal work, "The Death of Common Sense," legal scholar Phillip K.
Howard maintains: "The rules, procedures, and rights smothering us are
different aspects of a legal technique that promises a fix for human
frailty.law is cleansed of all human input.rights are absolute so that
choices among conflicting groups never need to be addressed, much less
balanced."

Justice Anton Scalia said about the condition of the regulatory state: "the
executive enfeebling measures of modern law, do not specifically deter
regulation.what they deter is change, including change by dissolving the
encrusted regulations of past decades."

Alas, unless there is a return to a national standard of morality and ethics
based on more than political correctness the regulatory state will grow until
it consumes everything and everyone in its path.

The state will become our conscience and our moral arbiter.

Old Dead White Guys

The left calls the Founding Fathers, Madison, Jefferson, Adams, Hamilton and
the rest a bunch of irrelevant racist old dead white guys. But they don't
recognize the fact that the philosophy of the American Founders, with their
traditional western Judeo-Christian ideas and principles were replaced with
the philosophy of a bunch of 19th century racist old dead German white guys.
Hegel, Engels, Marx, Nietzsche, Feuerbach, and Schopenhauer are among the
founding fathers of the left.

Most Americans have no clue why they or the left think they way they do. The
public doesn't know that there has been 150 years of Prussian philosophy
absorbed by intellectuals coming out of American academia. The American
educational system from kindergarten to college was brought to us via
Prussia. Most of the goals of education are those instituted in Prussia after
the Napoleonic wars and adopted by American education. For years, Prussian
philosophy has competed with the Western tradition of the founders. In the
early 1800s east coast intellectuals, approximately 10,000 sons of the
aristocracy, studied in Prussian universities. They absorbed the
philosophical outlook of the statist philosophy. Massachusetts Governor
Edward Everett was America's first Ph.D which he obtained in Germany. He
along with educator Horace Mann and others passed the collectivist dogma onto
intellectuals for generations to come. To this day the Prussian mindset has
infected the professions of law, education, journalism, and the humanities.

The constant turmoil between the two philosophies has morphed into the
tyranny imposed by the regulatory state. It has also led to the polarization
of American society.

In the tyranny of the state the individual is only important as he relates to
the survival of the state. That's what a statist is. They don't believe in
individual freedom -- they do believe in the supremacy of the state. Those
who promote the end of American sovereignty and the adoption of a monolithic
global government are also responsible for the end of individual liberty.
Government is always best at the local level. The farther away it gets from
the people it is supposed to support the more tyrannical and dictatorial it
becomes. Local government with all its imperfections is usually more
efficient and more receptive to the needs of citizens. But the globalists are
the intellectual descendants of the German philosophers. As Hegel wrote, "the
highest duty of the individual is to be a member of the state."

The left sincerely believes that their views are based on "humane" ideals
that grew out of the work of FDR and New Deal democracy. Heck, even FDR
probably believed that. After all both he and Woodrow Wilson were the
products of an eastern university. Admittedly, FDR was also pragmatic, humane
and an idealistic man with dead on political instincts. However, he never
understood or perhaps he didn't care to admit that the power of the state
either has to grow or it dies. In either case something fills the vacuum.
That something else may be despotism and tyranny or freedom.

The left would scream bloody murder if they really understood that their
philosophical base had developed in the same cultural and intellectual
melting pot as did that of Adolph Hitler. Adolph just mixed Prussian
philosophy with nationalism and ethnic and racial hatred. His "right" became
the greatest wrong of the 20th century.

The core beliefs of Hitler and the left depend upon materialism, the "right"
intentions of men, slavish allegiance to the state, a worship of nature,
belief that human nature can be molded by using state mandates, fixation on
the needs of the moment, and a bastardization of both language and the
Judeo-Christian tradition.

For some reason it doesn't dawn on most Americans that it is the left rather
than the right which glorifies the state. They seem oblivious that this trend
is dangerous, self-defeating and anti-human.

Human nature being as foolish as it is a lot of well meaning Americans will
continue their fight to erode the Bill of Rights for the sake of the
"children." There will be more "million mom marches" stirred by the
collectivists. With malice aforethought, Chuck Schummer and Hillary Clinton
and their ideological soul mates will continue to tear away at the Bill of
Rights and the Constitution as the media cheers them on.

Americans will have another chance in November to make a change. If they
reelect the statists like Al Gore and most of the Democrats and moderate
Republicans they hurry the day when the politicians don't even pay lip
service to the Constitution. If Republicans don't wake up and defang the
regulatory state the Bill of Rights might as well be taken off life support.

In the end history will be the harshest of judges. It will condemn us because
we took freedom for granted. It will define our generation in the same terms
we define yesteryear's slave owners and bigots. It is too bad that it will be
future generations, the "chidren's children" who will be the losers in the
battle for the soul of America. The liberty defined in the Bill of Rights and
the Constitution will be part of nostalgia just like old Star Trek episodes
or clunky shoes or disco music. Part of our memory but not part of our life.

In the meantime -- welcome to the brave new regulatory state.

Diane Alden is a research analyst and writer. Contributing to Newsmax,
Etherzone, Enter Stage Right, American Partisan, Spin Tech, Liberty Caucus,
Georgia Radio Inc., as well as Range Magazine. Contact her at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to