-Caveat Lector-

..............................................................

>From the New Paradigms Project [Not Necessarily Endorsed]
Note:  We store 100's of related "conspiracy posts" at:
http://www.msen.com/~lloyd/oldprojects/recentmail.html

From: "Alex Constantine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Repressed Memory, Eileen Franklin, the FMSF & the CIA
Date: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 4:58 PM

In article <8pk5eg$309$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:


> What of the Eileen Franklin case in San Mateo County, California?
>
> Wasn't a conviction of her father for a brutal murder secured on the
> basis of her "repressed memory" testimony?
>
     You place quotes around repressed memory as if this is not a valid
concept. In fact, repression is the basis of most psychotherapies. The FMSF
"experts," many of whom have backgrounds in illicit CIA mind control
experimentation (see my postings on the FMSF in the Usenet archives), are
desperately trying to discredit repressed memory and dissociation because of
the horrendous human rights violations of CIA mind control specialists, many
of them involving young children.
          As for your question regarding the Eileen Franklin case, her
father was sentenced in 1990 for a murder that occurred 20 years earlier.
There were, admittedly, problems with the girl's testimony, including a
claim to have been hypnotized before the trial.
     The journal Accuracy About Abuse (July 20, 1996) reports: "San Mateo
County DA James Fox said he would reluctantly ask a judge to dismiss the
charges. 'We don't believe there is sufficient evidence to justify the
prosecution.'" Insufficient evidence is not exculpatory in itself, but can
get a case thrown out of court. The DA STILL believed Eileen's story but "we
do not believe it is reasonably probable that we would prevail." Fox also
stated that recent DNA tests has cleared George Franklin of a SECOND murder
Eileen had accused him of committing.
He was NOT cleared in the first case, but there was insufficient evidence to
convict.
     But who is George Franklin?  A 1990 court document document alleges
that he : "1) engaged in sexually assaultive conduct against young girls,
including his own daughters, 2) made numerous admissions of engaging in
sexual acts with children and of his sexual desire for young girls and
fascination with incest, pedophilia and other deviant sexual practices
including sexual relations between humans and animals, and possesses written
and photographic materials documenting the above described interests. The
following twelve pages list the pornographic materials, the books and
magazines on incest, the child-sized dildos, letters written to him with
incest scenarios described, photos of Franklin himself, etc. "
     Perhaps he is not the victim of the justice system that the FMSF,
especially Richard Ofshe, has led us to believe. Accuracy About Abuse notes,
"George Franklin's wife Leah is still standing by him." But Eileen Franklin
has said of her mother: "She was a serious alcoholic throughout my
childhood. She was emotionally ill, institutionalized, treated with
electrical shock therapy (which scientists believe cause memory damage),
neglectful, and physically abusive. She chose not to act when informed
(during my childhood) of George Franklin's sexual assaults upon other
members of the family. George Franklin refused to take the witness stand -
an odd choice for an allegedly innocent man with excellent legal
representation. He never denied the murder or his abuse when confronted by
me in jail. He also admitted to having 'had sex with his daughter,' and
practiced pedophilia until the time of his arrest."
*[C-24395, a "Memorandum of Points and Authorities Re: Admissibility of
Evidence Pursuant to Evidence Code Section 2201 (B). 11 October 1990.
Superior Court of the State of California in and for the Count of San Mateo.
People of the State of California v George Thomas Franklin Sr.]
     Now, what were you saying about repressed memory?

� Alex Constantine


Forwarded for info and discussion from the New Paradigms Discussion List,
not necessarily endorsed by:
***********************************

Lloyd Miller, Research Director for A-albionic Research a ruling
class/conspiracy research resource for the entire political-ideological
spectrum. **FREE RARE BOOK SEARCH: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> **
   Explore Our Archive:  <http://a-albionic.com/a-albionic.html>

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to