"The October 1970 plot against Chile's President-elect Salvador
Allende, using CIA 'sub-machine guns and ammo', was the direct result of a
plea for action a month earlier by Donald Kendall, chairman of PepsiCo, in
two telephone calls to the company's former lawyer, President Richard
Nixon...." 
����������
Guardian
November 8, 1998
��    �
A Marxist threat to cola sales? Pepsi demands a US coup.
Goodbye Allende. Hello Pinochet

By Gregory Palast

'It is the firm and continuing policy that Allende be overthrown by a
coup... Please review all your present and possibly new activities to
include propaganda, black operations, surfacing of intelligence or
disinformation, personal contacts, or anything else your imagination can
conjure...' 
'Eyes only, restricted handling, secret' message. To US station chief,
Santiago. From CIA headquarters. 16 October 1970.
You would be wrong to assume this plan for mayhem was another manifestation
of the Cold War between the 'free world' and communism. Much more was at
stake: Pepsi-Cola's market share and other matters closer to the heart of
corporate America. 
In exclusive interviews with The Observer last week, the former US
Ambassador to Chile, Edward Korry, told the story in - and behind - these
and other top secret CIA, State Department and White House cables recently
released by the National Security Archives. Korry filled in gaps in the
story by describing cables still classified, and disclosing information
censored in papers now available under the US Freedom of Information Act.
Korry, who served Presidents Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon, told how US
companies, from cola to copper, using the CIA as an international debt
collection agency and investment security force.
Indeed, the October 1970 plot against Chile's President-elect Salvador
Allende, using CIA 'sub-machine guns and ammo', was the direct result of a
plea for action a month earlier by Donald Kendall, chairman of PepsiCo, in
two telephone calls to the company's former lawyer, President Richard Nixon.
Kendall arranged for the owner of the company's Chilean bottling operation
to meet National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger on September 15. Hours
later, Nixon called in his CIA chief, Richard Helms, and, according to
Helms's handwritten notes, ordered the CIA to prevent Allende's
inauguration. 
But this is only half the story, according to Korry. He claims the US
conspiracy against Allende's election did not begin with Nixon, but
originated - and read no further if you cherish the myth of Camelot - with
John Kennedy. 
In 1963, Allende was heading towards victory in Chile's presidential
election. Kennedy decided his political creation, Eduardo Frei, the late
father of Chile's current President, Eduardo Frei Ruiz-Tagle, could win the
election by buying it. Kennedy left it to his brother, Bobby, the
Attorney-General, to put the plan into action.
The Kennedys cajoled US multinationals into pouring $2 billion into Chile, a
nation of only 8 million people. This was not benign investment, but what
Korry calls 'a mutually corrupting' web of business deals, many
questionable, for which the US government would arrange guarantees and
insurance. 
In return, the American-based firms kicked back millions of dollars to pay
for well over half of Frei's successful election campaign. By the end of
this process, Americans had gobbled up more than 85 per cent of Chile's
hard-currency earning industries.
The US government, the guarantor of these investments, committed
extraordinary monetary, intelligence and political resources to protect
them. Several business-friendly US government front organisations and
operatives were sent into Chile -including the American Institute for Free
Labor Development, infamous for sabotaging militant trade unions.
Then, in 1970, US investments, both financial and political, faced
unexpected jeopardy. A split between Chile's centre and right-wing parties
permitted an alliance of communists, socialists and radicals - uniting
behind the socialist Allende - to finish the presidential election 1 per
cent ahead of his nearest rival.
That October, Korry, a hardened anti-communist, hatched an off-the-wall
scheme to block Allende's inauguration and return Frei to power. To promote
his own bloodless intrigues, the ambassador claims he 'back-channeled' a
message to Washington warning against military actions that might lead to
'another Bay of Pigs' fiasco. (Korry retains a copy of this still-classified
cable.) 
But Korry's prescient message only angered Kissinger, who had already
authorised the Pepsi-instigated coup, scheduled for the following week.
Kissinger ordered Korry to fly in secret to Washington that weekend for a
dressing-down. Still not knowing about the CIA plan, Korry told Kissinger in
a White House corridor that 'only a madman' would plot with Chile's
ultra-right generals.
As if on cue, Kissinger opened the door to the Oval Office to introduce
Nixon. Nixon - who described his ambassador as 'soft in the head' - did
agree that, tactically, a coup could not yet succeed. A last-minute cable to
the CIA to delay action was too late: the conspirators kidnapped and killed
Chile's pro- democracy Armed Forces Chief, Rene Schneider. Public revulsion
at this crime assured Allende's confirmation by Chile's Congress.
Even if the US president's sense of realpolitik may have disposed him to a
modus vivendi with Allende - Korry's alternative if his Frei gambit failed -
Nixon faced intense pressure from his political donors in business who were
panicked by Allende's plans to nationalise their operations.
In particular, the president was aware that the owner of Chile's phone
company, ITT Corporation, was illegally channelling funds into Republican
Party coffers. Nixon could not ignore ITT - and ITT wanted blood. An ITT
board member, ex-CIA director John McCone, pledged Kissinger $1 million in
support of CIA action to prevent Allende from taking office.
Separately, Anaconda Copper and other multinationals, under the aegis of
David Rockefeller's Business Group for Latin America, offered $500,000 to
buy influence with Chilean congressmen to reject confirmation of Allende's
victory. But Korry wouldn't play. While he knew nothing of the ITT demands
on the CIA, he got wind of, and vetoed, the cash for payoffs from Anaconda
and the other firms.
Korry, speaking last week from his home in Charlotte, North Carolina,
disclosed that he even turned in to the Chilean authorities an army major
who planned to assassinate Allende - unaware the officer was linked to the
CIA plotters. 
Once Allende took office, Korry sought accommodation with the new
government, conceding that expropriations of the telephone and copper
concessions (actually begun under Frei) were necessary to disentangle Chile
from seven decades of 'incestuous and corrupting' dependency.
US corporations didn't see it that way. While pretending to bargain in good
faith, they pushed the White House to impose a clandestine embargo on
Chile's economy. But in case all schemes failed, ITT, claims Korry, paid
$500,000 to someone referred to in their intercepted cables as 'The Fat
Man'. Korry identified him as Jacobo Schaulsohn, Allende's ally on a
committee set up to compensate firms whose property had been expropriated.
It was not money well spent. In 1971, when Allende learned of the corporate
machinations against his government, he refused the compensation. It was
this - the Chilean leader's failure to pay, not his perceived allegiance to
the hammer and sickle - that sealed his fate.
The State Department pulled Korry out of Santiago in October 1971. On his
return to the US, he advised the government's Overseas Private Investment
Corporation to deny Anaconda Copper and ITT compensation for their seized
property. Korry argued that, like someone who burns down their own home, ITT
could not claim against insurance for an expropriation the company had
itself provoked by violating Chilean law.
Confidentially, he recommended criminal charges against ITT's top brass,
including, implicitly, chief executive Harold Geneen, for falsifying the
insurance claims and lying to Congress.
Given powerful evidence against the companies, OPIC at first refused them
compensation, and the Justice Department indicted two mid-level ITT
operatives for perjury. But ultimately, the companies received their money
and the executives went free on the grounds that they were working with the
full co-operation of the CIA - and higher.
In September 1970 in a secret cable to the US Secretary of State, ambassador
Korry quotes Jean Genet: 'Even if my hands were full of truths, I wouldn't
open it for others.' Why open his hand now? At 77, one supposes there is a
desire to correct history. He says only that it is important to take out of
the shadows what he calls - optimistically - the last case of US 'dollar
diplomacy'.  
�    �    �



Reply via email to