-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
<FONT COLOR="#000099">eGroups eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
</FONT><A
HREF="http://click.egroups.com/1/9698/6/_/1406/_/972320941/"><B>Click
Here!</B></A>
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->

Please send as far and wide as possible.

Thanks,

Robert Sterling
Editor, The Konformist
http://www.konformist.com


 John Stossel, Junk Journalism & the Poison Peddlers
 by Barbara Keeler and Robert Sterling

 "Science is highly politicized .... Beware of science that feeds political
agendas."
 John Stossel, 20/20 reporter, "Junk Science: What You Know That May Not Be
So"

 The 20/20 hit piece on organics by John Stossel is old news to readers of
alternative publications. Long a controversial voice in journalism, Stossel
became more so after his February 4, 2000 20/20 report, "The Food You Eat."

 Stossel's main hatchet man on the segment, Dennis Avery, was not identified
on 20/20 as the author of SAVING THE PLANET WITH PESTICIDES AND PLASTIC, or
as an employee of the Hudson Institute. Agribusinesses such as Dow, Monsanto,
ConAgra, and Novartis are leading funders of the Hudson Institute.

  Represented on Hudson Institute's board is the biotech industry's PR firm,
Burson-Marsteller, involved in a massive PR campaign to counteract the
escalating global anti-GE movement in the US and abroad. Those familiar with
Avery and the Hudson Institute were not surprised that he was eager to smear
the organic food industry on 20/20.

 The unanswered question about the segment was why Stossel chose a mouthpiece
for pesticides, biotech, chemical fertilizers, and agribusiness as 20/20's
expert on organics. Moreover, why would a respected journalist create a
segment calculated to mislead his audience about organic food?

 We cannot say for sure, and maybe the question will never be answered for
certain. We have, however, connected the dots from Stossel and ABC back to
Monsanto, DuPont, Dow, ConAgra and others with vested interests in
discrediting organic foods.

 As the segment was produced, ABC was receiving a percentage of sales from
"Stossel in the Classroom," educational materials published by the Palmer R.
Chitester Fund and based on Stossel's ABC reports. The Chitester Fund is a
conservative foundation dependant on contributions from the likes of the John
M. Olin Foundation. The Olin Foundation was created and is still controlled
by the Olin Corporation, a top producer of agricultural chemicals.

 On the Board of Associates of the Chitester Fund sits Herb London, the
President of the Hudson Institute. London also holds the John M. Olin
Professorship of Humanities at New York University.  The Hudson Institute
received grants from the Olin Foundation of $125,000 in 1993 and $300,000 in
1994.

 All of the above suggests an inbreeding of interests between two
conservative foundations, a conservative think tank, and a supposedly
independent journalist. Add the funding Hudson receives from chemical and
agribusiness companies and the inbreeding appears potentially corruptive,
even before factoring the representation of a biotech PR firm on its board.

 The interlinks go further. The Olin Corporation was, along with Occidental
Chemical and Dupont, one of the major firms involved in the Love Canal
environmental scandal in Niagara Falls, NY.  Here is Stossel's comment during
a January 9, 1997 special report, titled "Junk Science: What You Know That
May Not Be So":

 "What happens when government policy is based on junk science? Billions of
dollars are misspent, and people's lives altered forever. Love Canal. Times
Beach. Defoliant Agent Orange. These names arouse fear because of the
chemical dioxin. Dioxin is very poisonous. We know that from animal tests.
Tiny amounts kill guinea pigs. That's why our government's spending hundreds
of millions of dollars to protect us from dioxin."

 "But is that good science? Just because a chemical hurts animals, does that
mean it's harmful to us?"

 Stossel proceeds to argue that dioxin isn't harmful, and that cases such as
Love Canal are based on faulty science. The Environmental Protection Agency
begs to differ. A draft of a long-overdue EPA report concludes that dioxin is
indeed a dangerous and persistent "human carcinogen." Along the way, he
manages to smear a variety of other supposed cases of "junk science,"
including breast implant lawsuits, during his report.

 Apparently, Stossel hasn't learned his lesson: on July 15, he did another
dishonest slam piece of the story behind the film ERIN BROCKOVICH. Though the
giant utility company PG&E admits to illegally releasing the carcinogen
chromium-6 in Hinkley, CA (they settled for $333 million with local
residents), Stossel claimed there is no proof that chromium in drinking water
can cause cancer. PG&E's own documents concede "the material is toxic," and
covered up the fact that they had released high concentrations of the
material in the water (up to 20 parts per million, according to PG&E's own
measurements.) When the real-life Brockovich, a legal assistant who uncovered
the corporate pollution, challenged Stossel to give himself and his family
chromium-6 laced water, he declined. His main source for the piece,
incidentally, was Michael Fumento, a Senior Fellow of the Hudson Institute.

 To be fair to Stossel, these connected dots do not prove he is for sale. It
would be too easy to demonize him as an unprincipled hack for business
interests.  In truth, Stossel has been at times a surprisingly lone voice of
courage in the mainstream media, speaking out in defense of free speech
against frightening examples of censorship in America. If he were merely a
cynical opportunist, he would have little reason to take stands where the
rest of the establishment media remains silent.

 Whatever his faults, Stossel appears to be sincere in his libertarian-like
quest to limit the power of the state.  If he was seduced by his ideology
into supporting dubious claims, he certainly wouldn't be the first. Even so,
nothing excuses his promotion of deceptive science that serves big business.

 By incompetence or outright deceit, John Stossel has participated in what
many regard as a libel of a multi-billion dollar industry with rapidly rising
political influence. Such a blunder is rarely ignored.  Some critics believe
Stossel's more questionable works are catching up with him. For better or
worse, many predict his is on his way down.


 Barbara Keeler has focussed on nutrition and food safety as a journalist
 and contributor to nutrition, child development, parenting, health, and
 science textbooks.

 Robert Sterling is publisher of Konformist.com, and the LA Meeting
 Coordinator for the international Great Boycott targetting the leading
 multinational producers of pesticides, GE food seeds, and toxic chemicals.
 He has spoken about green and food safety issues on the BBC and a variety
 of other radio and televsion stations.


 SUGGESTED LINKS TO OTHER New Hope Media STORIES

 Organics: The Myths, The Facts

 OTA Applauds EWG's Exposure of 20/20

 Activists Say Stossel's Organic Apology Falls Short 8/14/00

 OTA Says Planned Apology Falls Short, May Sue 8/8/00


 Group Calls For Stossel's Job After Organic "Lie" Exposed 7/31/00

 Prime-Time Organic Story Called Unfair






 SOURCES FOR ARTICLE:

 "'Erin Brockovich', Fact or Fiction?" Josh Grossberg
 E! Online
 http://www.eonline.com/News/Items/0,1,6824,00.html

 FAIR On John Stossel
 http://www.fair.org/media-outlets/stossel.html

 "Prime-time Propagandist" David Mastio
 Salon Magazine
 http://www.salonmag.com/media/feature/2000/02/25/stossel

 The Hudson Institute
 http://www.hudson.org

 Michael Fumento Website
 http://www.fumento.com/

 Palmer R. Chitester Fund
 http://www.prcfund.org

 BUYING A MOVEMENT: Right-Wing Foundations and American Politics
 People for the American Way
 http://www.pfaw.org/issues/right/rw/rep_rwfound.html

 "Risky Journalism"
 Reason Magazine
 http://www.reason.com/9704/fe.stosselint.html

 "Corporate Junk Science In The Media," Edward S. Herman
 Z Magazine
 http://www.zmag.org/ScienceWars/junk2.htm


If you are interested in a free subscription to The Konformist Newswire,
please visit http://www.eGroups.com/list/konformist/ and sign up. Or, e-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject: "I NEED 2 KONFORM!!!"
(Okay, you can use something else, but it's a kool catch phrase.)

Visit the Klub Konformist at Yahoo!:
http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/klubkonformist





Reply via email to