-Caveat Lector-

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_btl/20001030_xcbtl_living_an_.shtml

Living in an age of unreality

� 2000 WorldNetDaily.com


ST.  LOUIS, Mo.  -- Aldous Huxley said it best 56 years ago: "A
really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the
all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of
managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be
coerced, because they love their servitude.  To make them love it
is the task assigned, in present totalitarian states, to
ministries of propaganda, newspaper editors and schoolteachers.
But their methods are still crude and unscientific."

That was certainly true 56 years ago.  Today, I would suggest,
the biggest change is that the methods are less crude, more
scientific.

In fact, America is moving closer to totalitarianism and
servitude -- and most people don't even recognize it, let alone
need to be coerced.

"What are you talking about, Farah?" I hear some of you saying.
"We're in the midst of a spirited presidential election cycle in
America.  How can you say we're not free and moving toward
dictatorship?"

The sorry state of the presidential debate is a case in point.
Both of the two major candidates are running campaigns calling
for increased federal government spending and, thus, more
intrusion in and regulation of the lives of individual Americans.

Vice President Al Gore makes no bones about what he wants -- he
would like to micro-manage every facet of American life.  Gov.
George W.  Bush, on the other hand, pays lip service to limited
government, but his programs betray the rhetoric.


Social Security is a hopeless Ponzi scheme that takes far more
money from people than it returns.  But neither of the viable
candidates dares tell the public that the emperor has no clothes.
That would be "political suicide," the consultants and polls
show.  Therefore, no debate on the merits of Social Security
takes place.

Medicare is another bureaucratic mess.  But does anyone call a
spade a spade? Not a chance.  Don't want to risk losing the
senior citizen vote.

The federal government has no business at all in education.
Washington has already made a bloody mess of school policy.  But
both major candidates would spend more on it and get Washington
even deeper into a command-and-control, one-size-fits-all,
top-down form of management.  To hell with the Constitution!

Even a program as fraudulent, unnecessary and un-American as the
National Endowment for the Arts is a non-starter in this
campaign, just as it has been with the Republican Congress that
has voted it budget increases every year since 1994.

I met over the weekend here with a group of doctors, the
Association of American Physicians and Surgeons.  These people
understand what government intrusion has meant to health care in
this country.  And with either of the leading candidates, it's
bound to get worse. Many of these doctors are opting out of the
Medicare system -- not because they don't want to treat the poor,
but because of the inefficiency, red tape, government snooping
and blatant illegality of it all.

Some of these doctors treat their poor patients for free, rather
than get involved with Medicare.  But nobody in politics or the
media establishment seems to hear their concerns, their anguish,
their common-sense analysis of what is truly wrong with our
health-care system.

What's wrong with it is there's too much government involvement
now.  And Washington's prescription is more involvement, more
regulation, more control.

This is not an accident.  I don't believe most politicians in
Washington are stupid.  They have an agenda.  And that agenda is,
in a word, "power."

The debate is rigged.  It's not really a debate at all.  The
ground rules don't permit the introduction of real controversy,
root problems and meaningful questions.

Huxley saw through it 56 years ago when he looked at the
totalitarian regimes of his day.  The methods were crude and
unscientific.  They've become more perfected.

The schools and the newspapers now serve the state blindly just
as the old propaganda ministries once did.

Are we there yet?  Have we reached our destination on the road to
totalitarianism and servitude?  If not, we're well on our way.

And, given the Orwellian state of the presidential debate in this
age of unreality, we're sure to be a step or two closer come Jan.
20, 2001.

----

A daily radio broadcast adaptation of Joseph Farah's commentaries
can be heard on TalkNetDaily.


=================================================================
             Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:
                     *Michael Spitzer*  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
=================================================================

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to