-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.aci.net/kalliste/
Click Here: <A HREF="http://www.aci.net/kalliste/">The Home Page of J. Orlin
Grabbe</A>
-----

Digital Society


The Hollow Promise of Internet Banking


Think so? Get a load of the regulators.

Internet banking has failed to live up to its promise, both for traditional
banks and for the upstarts that were supposed to wipe them out

UNTIL six months ago, no self-respecting financial consultant would travel
without it: the bar chart showing that the marginal cost of Internet banking
transactions was a tiny fraction of the cost of branch banking. It was the
chart that launched dozens of stand-alone Internet banks. Unshackled from the
cost of real property�and real people�Internet banks would, it was claimed,
blow stuck-in-the-mud incumbents out of the water. However, as Roberta Arena,
director in charge of the Internet for HSBC, a British banking giant, remarks
wryly: �Easy to say; tough to do.�

Now Internet banks around the world are faltering. Part of the reason is that
their physical rivals have become wiser, launching their own integrated
�clicks �n bricks� strategies that offer customers electronic access as well
as dark satanic branches. But they are not undisputed winners either. They
are finding that the Internet is, at best, a zero-sum game.

The decline of the stand-alone Internet bank has been a global phenomenon. In
America, Wingspan, one of the e-pioneers, announced in October that next year
it will share information-technology facilities with its parent, Bank One, in
order to save money. First-e, a Dublin-based Internet-only bank valued at
euro1.1 billion ($1.1 billion) when it was acquired by Spain�s BBVA in March,
has laid off staff and cut expensive television advertising. Marbles, an
Internet credit card offered by Britain�s HFC Bank, is also switching from TV
advertising to cheaper direct mail; and SEB, a Swedish bank which has said
that it sees the Internet as a means of expanding overseas, nonetheless
acquired BfG in Germany because of its 170 physical branches.

Egg, which was established two years ago by Prudential, Britain�s largest
life insurer, has seen its value subside since it was launched on the
stockmarket this spring; and Halifax�s stand-alone Internet bank, IF (for
�Intelligent Finance�), opened eleven weeks later than planned, and then only
as a telephone bank. AIB, Ireland�s biggest bank, dropped its own plans for a
stand-alone Internet bank at the end of October after concluding that its
customers preferred to have a choice of channels. In Japan, never known for
being at the forefront of financial innovation, Sanwa Bank is abandoning
plans to set up a �15 billion ($140m) stand-alone Internet bank, having seen
their poor performance elsewhere�which leaves Japan with just one online
option: Japan Net Bank.
Customer inconvenience

Why has the online �revolution� faded so fast? The biggest problem has been
that, for all their talk of liberating customers from the yoke of traditional
branches, Internet banks did not think clearly about what customers really
wanted. For a start, they like to know that their money is secure. And
whether it is fair or not, customers fret about the security of online
transactions. Just as worrying is the thought that somebody else can find out
your bank-account details, even if they cannot do anything with them.
Traditional banks are still thought to be more secure, even though, as
Barclays showed this summer, they too can bungle software upgrades and give
one customer�s details to another.
Convenience was supposed to be the big attraction of Internet banking. But
service has proved unreliable. Servers crash and connections can be slow,
especially over home telephone lines. Often it is easier, and quicker, to
telephone. Internet-only banks have also been slow to offer a full product
range. The convenience of online banking is greatly diminished if a customer
has to maintain a current account, for example, offline. And Internet banks
have discovered that customers have a stubbornly persistent preference for
buying long-term savings products face-to-face. Egg is now considering a link
with a high-street firm for this very reason.

Customer resistance to Internet-only banking has slowed revenue growth. This
is of crucial importance to e-banks that were relying on that consultant�s
chart. Marginal costs for Internet transactions may be negligible, but fixed
costs are anything but. Halifax put aside �100m ($145m) for IF and its 1,100
staff.

Many Internet-only banks based their business plans on the assumption of
rapid customer recruitment. But new Internet-only banks start with no
customers at all. In order to get them, they had to spend real money�in
Marbles�s case, for example, some �25m to date�to build consumer awareness.
Then, to retain them, they have had to offer appealing (and unsustainably
unprofitable) returns. Eventually, everybody in the market was doing the
same.

ABN Amro, a Dutch multinational bank, reckons that British online banks have
plans to attract 3.5m customers by the end of 2002. But Forrester, an
Internet research organisation, reckons the total market is just 2m. Most of
the targeted customers already bank elsewhere. The bricks �n mortar banks may
have been slow on the uptake, but most now allow customers to do all their
banking online. And they have been forced to respond�if grudgingly�to the
�online only� banks� pricing. The result is that online banking is actually
still growing, but mostly among traditional banks.

So far, however, none has found that the Internet has delivered what it first
promised: lower costs. Cap Ernst & Young, a firm of consultants, reckons that
the Internet cut British banks� costs by just 0.1% last year when they were,
somewhat heroically, hoping for a 25% cut. Worse still, on the revenue side
they have found, says HSBC�s Ms Arena, that the Internet is the consumer�s
friend. HSBC itself was forced to cut its British mortgage rates to 6.75%,
and promised that it would never exceed base rates by more than one
percentage point, in response to a price war in home loans.
The Internet may not have brought about the wholesale cannibalisation of
traditional banks� business, but it is still not good news for them. Jose
Fonellosa of Spain�s BBVA, which acquired first-e, says that the Internet is
at best a zero-sum game for banks. He defends his massive investment as a
defensive move, saying: �If I�m not there, someone else will be.�

Big banks are now wrestling with how best to use the Internet, and some of
their plans look distinctly off-centre. Lloyds TSB, a British bank whose
share price has been hammered because investors thought it had not �got� the
Internet, has now gone to the other extreme. It has a �portal� leading to
other people�s websites, and hopes to earn commissions when, for example, its
customers use it to lease new cars.

Bankinter, a Spanish bank, developed data-mining techniques to such an extent
that it has been able to set up a useful business as a private detective
agency for suspicious spouses. It is a long way from the original dream of
click �n borrow, but then the Internet was never going to change business in
predictable ways.
Economist, November 9, 2000
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
All My Relations.
Omnia Bona Bonis,
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to