NY Daily News
11-22-00


W.'s Recount
Fallback Plan 

t's called building a record, and that's what the Republicans have been
doing in earnest since it became likely that the Florida Supreme Court would
favor fairness over procedure and rule against George W. Bush.
Team Bush will of course now try to prevail in other courts at the federal
level � and will probably contest the final vote before the Florida Supreme
Court as well. But the record they're building, complaint by complaint, has
two different, nonjudicial, arenas in mind: the Florida Legislature, as
former Secretary of State James Baker indicated last evening, and
eventually, the U.S. Congress.
The Bushies have been heartened by the meager increase in votes for Al Gore
recorded so far in the three Florida counties recounting almost around the
clock. But they're worried about the votes sitting in other piles � the
several thousand questionable ballots the chad counters can't agree on.
Those are the ballots that haven't been punched through thoroughly, the ones
with mere indentations or dangling pieces of paper that make them hard to
analyze.
If the slightest indentation is sufficient to signal voter intent � and that
seems to be what the Florida Supreme Court sanctioned last night � then it's
likely Gore will finally overcome Bush's lead of about 930 votes, even if
that total increases due to the inclusion of the many overseas ballots now
in dispute.
But that won't mean Gore has won, unless the Republicans pack it in, which
they seem far from doing. "The whole purpose of our complaining about the
Democrat-dominated canvassing boards, about chads on the floor and eaten
chads and all the rest is to build a record that can allow us to say that
the election in Florida has been tainted," says a Bush adviser.
"That's why guys like [House Republican Whip] Tom DeLay are talking about
the election being stolen. We want to keep our options open if we need to,
if Gore pulls ahead in the count. If that happens, we'll need some decent
amount of public opinion on our side so we can appeal beyond the courts."
But to whom would the Republicans appeal? To the Florida Legislature, then
to the Congress.
It's possible the Republicans who dominate the Florida Legislature could
certify a slate of presidential electors pledged to Bush even if the state's
Division of Elections has certified Gore electors based on the postrecount
tabulations.
The Republican legislators, following James Baker's lead, would justify
their action by claiming that the recount process tainted the final result
instead of clarifying it � an argument that would gain power if the
standards governing a particular ballot's validity continued to vary from
county to county.
What would happen then? On Jan. 6, when the new Congress meets to count the
nation's electoral votes, the members would be faced with two competing
slates of electors � one pledged to Gore, the other to Bush.
If so, a simple majority of both houses of Congress would determine which
electoral votes to count. With the GOP controlling both houses � and if the
members move as a bloc along party lines � the votes of Bush's electors
could be counted and Bush could be elected President.
Is any of this possible? Anything is possible at this point � and the
Republicans clearly view such a scenario as both possible and do-able.
If they thought otherwise, they wouldn't be so busy crying foul. They
wouldn't be so determined to build a record of supposed vote theft to put
before legislators in Florida and Washington if Gore wins the recount. They
know that asking any legislator, even a Republican, to jeopardize his or her
career by voting to overturn a Gore-certified victory in Florida is not
something asked lightly.
But the presidency's at stake here, and it's clearer than ever that both
sides are willing to win at any cost � even if that cost virtually wipes out
any chance of governing effectively over the next four years.

Original Publication Date: 11/22/2000


 Court Backs Fla Recount (11/22/2000)





Reply via email to