_______   ____   ______
  /  |/  /  /___/  / /_ //    M I D - E A S T   R E A L I T I E S
 / /|_/ /  /_/_   / /\\         Making Sense of the Middle East
/_/  /_/  /___/  /_/  \\           http://www.MiddleEast.Org

  News, Information, & Analysis That Governments, Interest Groups,
         and the Corporate Media Don't Want You To Know!
    To receive MER regularly email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




            BARAK ARRANGING DECK CHAIRS ON TITANIC
                       By Martin Sieff
                   UPI senior news analyst

             "New general elections in Israel will
             torpedo and sink Barak's already-
             waterlogged career faster than it
             took to fill took those first five
             compartments of the Titanic."

             "Whoever he loses to, Barak probably
             will be surprised again when it
             happens. Commentators on both right
             and left in Israel have noted that
             nothing seems to be able to dent
             Barak's serene confidence in his
             own brilliance and unfailing judgment."


  WASHINGTON, Nov. 28 (UPI) -- Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak told the
 Knesset Tuesday that he welcomed the prospect of early elections. You might
 as well believe the captain of the Titanic if he said he welcomed hitting
 the iceberg.

  In fact, Barak tried as hard as he could to stave off facing the Israeli
 public less than two years after he had supposedly won a full mandate from
 them. He even tried to broker a deal with the opposition Likud Party, which
 has been the fiercest critic of his peace and security policies.

  New general elections in Israel will torpedo and sink Barak's
 already-waterlogged career faster than it took to fill took those first five
 compartments of the Titanic. Everybody in Israel realizes this. Everyone,
 that is, except possibly Barak himself.

  Only 17 months after winning one of the most spectacular landslide
 victories in his nation's political history, Barak is regarded as an
 embarrassing encumbrance by his own party. His three main coalition partners
 bailed out on him back in July before the Camp David summit, fearing he
 would offer too many concessions to the Palestinians.

  As it turned out, Barak fulfilled their fears -- and then some. He offered
 to give away far more than they had dreamed, only to see Palestinian
 Authority President Yasser Arafat contemptuously brush his offer aside.

  From his own perspective, Arafat had plenty of his own reasons.

  Barak has managed to perform the extraordinary feat of infuriating left
 and right, hawks and doves, at the same time. He won the May 1999 election
 on a platform of caution on the peace process, coupled with long-overdue
 social reforms at home.

  But then he concentrated fulltime on pushing through early peace deals --
 first with Syria, and then with the Palestinians. And he ignored his
 domestic constituency that had been crying out for reform.

  Far from pulling the political teeth from Israel's immensely
 well-entrenched religious parties, Barak gave them -- especially the
 Oriental Jewish Shas -- everything they could extort from him in return for
 their support on the peace process.

  Wits in Israel said that Barak had not even been able to buy Shas off. He
 was only able to rent it by the month.

  From the very beginning, Barak showed what was widely seen -- and
 criticized -- as an arrogant disdain for the very nature of Israel's
 political process. He ignored his own Cabinet and treated prominent party
 figures with a disdain that equaled that of his no-less-arrogant -- and
 almost as politically inept -- predecessor Benjamin Netanyahu.

  Prominent figures in his own Labor Party such as Knesset (Parliament)
 Speaker Avraham Burg and former Histadrut trade union leader Chaim Ramon
 seethed with frustration.

  Barak's treatment of key coalition allies like Natan Sharansky, the
 influential and widely respected leader of the powerful Yisrael B'Aliya
 Party or Rabbi Yitzhak Levy of the National Religious Party, was equally
 offhand. He never bothered to consult them about key decisions of foreign
 policy or security. He never bothered trying to even pretend to build any
 personal relations with any of them.

  Yet he appears to have been surprised when Sharansky led Yisrael B'Aliya
 out of the government on the eve of the Camp David summit. And then Levy and
 his NRP and the powerful Shas Party of Sephardi Jews, the third largest in
 the Knesset, pulled out too.

  Barak was then left to seek a consensus for the sweeping peace concessions
 he was offering with only a quarter of the Knesset's 120 members, still
 behind him - and many of them supported him only grudgingly.

  Barak seemed to go out of his way to alienate Arafat too. Arafat in the
 past had built a strong working relationship with Barak's mentor and
 predecessor Yitzhak Rabin. He had also worked well with Shimon Peres. And
 although Arafat and Netanyahu had openly loathed each other, even they had
 proved capable of making agreements and ensuring they were fulfilled when it
 suited them.

  But Barak seemed to go out of his away to alienate the cunning, shrewd,
 street-smart and immensely experienced Palestinian leader. First, he
 virtually ignored him for months while openly courting Jordan and Arafat's
 greatest enemy, President Hafez Assad of Syria.

  It was only when the cautious Assad would not strike a deal with Barak, as
 he was sure he would, that the Israeli leader belatedly turned to trying to
 work one out with Arafat, but by then the damage was done.

  Just as he underestimated and alienated Arafat, so he also completely
 failed to understand him. Arafat's rejection of Barak's terms at Camp David
 could have come as no surprise to anyone who had bothered to listen to what
 the Palestinian leader and his top lieutenants had actually said about their
 positions. But Barak was surprised anyway.

  He was even more surprised on Sept. 28 when the second Palestinian
 Intifada, or protest uprising, exploded on the eve of Rosh Hashanah, the
 Jewish New Year. For the past two months, the intifada has raged, costing
 around 30 Israeli lives and at least 240 Palestinian and Israeli Arab ones.

  Barak has used more force against the Palestinians than any Israeli leader
 in the 33 years since Israel captured Gaza and the West Bank in the 1967 Six
 Day War. Yet he has failed to deter either the Palestinians, or their
 leader, Arafat.

  Polls say Netanyahu would hammer Barak into defeat if he can recapture the
 leadership of Likud and its nomination to run for prime minister. Even
 Sharon, who has usually trailed Barak in popularity in the past, looks as if
 he would be able to beat him now.

  Whoever he loses to, Barak probably will be surprised again when it
 happens. Commentators on both right and left in Israel have noted that
 nothing seems to be able to dent Barak's serene confidence in his own
 brilliance and unfailing judgment.

  Barak still appears to believe he is politically unsinkable. Captain Smith
 of the Titanic thought that about himself and his ship too.

  He was wrong.




            ISRAEL'S BARAK SAYS HE IS READY FOR NEW ELECTIONS

 JERUSALEM (AFP - 28 Nov) - - Israeli  Prime Minister Ehud Barak  announced on
Tuesday that he was ready for new elections, throwing down the gauntlet to
 political opponents critical of  the way he has handled two months of 
Israeli-Palestinian
bloodshed.

 "I am ready for general elections for the prime minister and the Knesset," he
said during a stormy debate in parliament as it prepared to vote on a series
of
 opposition-sponsored bills calling for new elections.

 "The date will be fixed over the course of the coming days in coordination with
the various parties," he said.

 Barak has been without a majority in the 120-member parliament since July and
has tried in vain to form a national emergency government with the right-wing
opposition
 Likud party in the face of the violence.

 "I'm not blind. I can see that the Knesset wants new elections. I am not afraid
of  elections. I have always won," Barak said in a speech that was frequently
punctuated
 by heckling.

 Israeli radio reported that the Likud, lead by the hawkish Ariel Sharon, was
expected  to easily muster the necessary 61-vote majority for the bills that
are still due to be
 voted on at 10:30 pm (2030 GMT).

 "The responsibility for the situation in Israel and the fact we are obliged
to go to early elections at such a bad time is down to one man: Prime Minister
Ehud Barak," Sharon told parliament.

 Barak and his Labour-led coalition took office in July 1999 on a promise to
make a peace of the brave with Israel's Arab neighbours but he has seen his dreams
collapse
 in a wave of violence that has claimed the lives of more than 290 people.

 He was elected to a four-year term in May 1999 but has faced a rocky road since,
and his government was left with just 30 seats on the eve of the Camp David peace
 summit in July after a mass defection by right-wing and religious parties.

 Earlier in the day, Barak had called on Sharon to join a national emergency
government to deal with the unrest, saying "the nation and MPs themselves deep
down are not interested in elections at this time."

 Sharon had repeatedly rebuffed Barak's appeals and called on the prime minister
to abandon the central tenets of his peace policies, which he says have betrayed
the
 Jewish state.

 The Palestinians have warned that they will not resume peace negotiations if
a future Israeli government included Sharon.

 They blame Sharon for triggering the current wave of unrest by his visit on
September 28 to the al-Aqsa mosque compound in occupied east Jerusalem, a site
holy to both
 Muslims and Jews.

 Barak dismissed a public opinion poll released Friday which gave former right-wing
prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu a 21 percentage point lead.

 Netanyahu, who took a time out from politics after losing to Barak in a landslide,
has consistently led both Barak and Sharon in opinion polls.





        MiD-EasT RealitieS  -  www.MiddleEast.Org
        Phone:  202 362-5266    Fax:  815 366-0800
                           Email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscriibe email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subject SUBSCRIBE
To unsubscribe email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subject UNSUBSCRIBE



Reply via email to