_______   ____   ______
  /  |/  /  /___/  / /_ //    M I D - E A S T   R E A L I T I E S
 / /|_/ /  /_/_   / /\\         Making Sense of the Middle East
/_/  /_/  /___/  /_/  \\           http://www.MiddleEast.Org

  News, Information, & Analysis That Governments, Interest Groups,
         and the Corporate Media Don't Want You To Know!
     To receive MER regularly email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



MER HISTORY:


             "Be the change you want to see in the world"
                        Mahatma Gandhi (1869-1948)


                GANDHI ON JEWS, ARABS, AND PALESTINE

   At the recent Ralph Nader gala rally in Washington just before election day,
American liberals and progressives gathered to hear a litany of wrongs that their
candidate, and the new Green Party, was dedicated to making right.  It was an
extraordinary event hosted by the dean of American Talk Shows personalities,
Phil Donahue, and was broadcast live on cable throughout the country.
   The Palestinian predicament however was highlighted by its omission.  Speaker
after speaker chastised the Republicans, the Democrats, and "corporate America"
for their immoral and sell-out policies.  And then Nader himself gave a rousing
hour-long address during which he took on just about every injustice and wrong
imaginable, clearly playing to the concerns of his considerable following.
   And yet, even with Intifada II raging, there was no mention of the plight
of the Palestinians, no mention of the powerful Israeli/Jewish lobby, no mention
of the foreign policy blackout the major parties enforce when it comes to policies
Middle Eastern.  And very little about the near-genocidal immorality of U.S.
policies toward Iraq even though weekly more than a thousand Iraqi children still
die because of U.S. policies.  Only the very last speaker at the last moment,
Harvard Professor Cornell West coming straight from the airport and unbriefed
it
seemed, even mentioned the Palestinians.
   Interestingly, the single person quoted the most times during this 
liberal/progressive
extravaganza was not an American, but rather Mahatma Gandhi.  His concepts of
social justice, political action, and personal responsibility resonated throughout
the event.  But here too, Gandhi was quoted about many things, but not about
his extraordinarily significant views about Jews, Arabs, and "the Palestinian
issue" as it was known in
his day.
   And as one reads Gandhi's analysis of the situation in 1938, realizing the
great amounts of reparations and compensation that have now been paid to the
Jews of that era, it is vital to focus more clearly on our own day, to the 3.5
million Palestinian refugees, and to the urgent need for repatriation, compensation,
and reparations to the people of Palestine for what has been done to them.




             PROPHETIC WORDS FROM MAHATMA GANDHI IN 1938

           "Palestine belongs to the Arabs in the same sense
           that England belongs to the English or France to
           the French. It is  wrong and in-human to impose
           the Jews on the Arabs...  Surely it would be a
           crime against humanity to reduce the proud Arabs
           so that Palestine can be restored to the Jews
           partly or wholly as their national home."

Several letters have been received by me asking me to declare  my views
about  the  Arab-Jew  question  in   Palestine and the persecution of
the Jews in Germany. It is not without hesitation that I venture to
offer my views on this very difficult question.

My sympathies are all with the Jews. I have known them intimately in
South  Africa.  Some  of  them  became  life-long  companions.  Through
these friends I came to  learn  much  of their  age-long persecution.
They have been the untouchables of Christianity. The parallel between
their treatment by Christians and the  treatment of untouchables by
Hindus is very close. Religious  sanction  has been invoked in both
cases for the justification of  the  inhuman treatment  meted  out  to
them.  Apart  from  the   friendships, therefore, there is the  more
common  universal  reason  for  my sympathy for the Jews.

But my sympathy does not blind me to the requirements of justice.  The
cry for the national home for the Jews  does  not  make  much appeal to
me. The sanction for it is sought in the Bible and  the tenacity with
which  the  Jews  have  hankered  after  return  to Palestine. Why
should they not, like other peoples of the  earth, make that country
their home where they are born and  where  they earn their livelihood?

Palestine belongs to the Arabs in the  same  sense  that  England
belongs to the English or France to the French. It is  wrong  and
in-human to impose the Jews on the Arabs. What  is going  on  in
Palestine today cannot be justified by any moral code of conduct.  The
mandates have no sanction but that of the last war. Surely it would be a
crime against humanity to reduce the  proud  Arabs  so that Palestine
can be restored to the Jews partly  or  wholly  as their national home.

The nobler course would be to insist on a just treatment  of  the Jews
wherever they are born and bred. The Jews born in France are French in
precisely the same sense that Christians born in France are French. If
the Jews have no home  but  Palestine,  will  they relish the idea of
being forced to leave the other parts  of  the world in which they are
settled?  Or do they want a double home where they can remain at will?
This cry  for  the  national  home affords a colourable justification
for the  German  expulsion  of the Jews.

But the German persecution of the Jews seems to have no  parallel in
history.  The tyrants of old never went so mad as Hitler  seems to have
gone.  And he is doing it with religious zeal.  For  he  is propounding
a new religion of exclusive and militant  nationalism in the name of
which any inhumanity becomes an act of humanity to be rewarded here and
hereafter.  The crime of an obviously mad but intrepid  youth  is  being
visited  upon  his  whole  race  with unbelievable ferocity.  If there
ever could be a  justifiable  war in the name of and  for
humanity,  a  war against  Germany,  to prevent  the  wanton
persecution  of  a  whole  race,  would  be completely justified.  But
I  do  not  believe  in  any  war.  A discussion of the pros and  cons
of  such  a  war  is  therefore outside my horizon or province.

But if there can be no war against Germany, even for such a crime as is
being committed against the Jews, surely there  can  be  no alliance
with Germany.  How can there be alliance between a nation which claims
to stand for justice and democracy and one which is the declared enemy
of both?  Or is England drifting towards  armed dictatorship and all it
means?

Germany is showing to the world how efficiently violence  can  be worked
when it is not  hampered  by  any  hypocrisy  or  weakness masquerading
as humanitarianism.  It is also showing how  hideous, terrible and
terrifying it looks in its nakedness. Can  the  Jews resist this
organised and shameless persecution?  Is there  a  way to  preserve
their  self-respect,  and  not  to  feel  helpless, neglected and
forlorn?  I submit there is. No person who has faith in a living God
need feel helpless or  forlorn.  Jehovah  of  the Jews is a God more
personal than the God of the  Christians,  the Mussalmans or the Hindus,
though, as a matter of fact in essence, He is  common  to  all  and
one  without  a second  and  beyond description.  But as the Jews
attribute  personality  to  God  and believe that He rules every action
of theirs, they ought not  to feel helpless. If I were a Jew  and  were
born  in  Germany  and earned my livelihood there, I would claim Germany
as my home even as the tallest gentile German may, and challenge him to
shoot  me or cast me in the dungeon; I would refuse to be  expelled  or
to submit to discriminating treatment.  And for doing this, I  should
not wait for the fellow Jews to join me in civil  resistance  but would
have confidence that in the  end  the  rest  are  bound  to follow my
example.  If one Jew or all the Jews were to accept  the prescription
here offered, he or they cannot be  worse  off  than now. And suffering
voluntarily undergone will bring them an inner strength and joy which
no  number  of resolutions  of  sympathy passed in the world outside
Germany can. Indeed, even if Britain, France and America were to declare
hostilities against  Germany, they can bring no inner joy, no inner
strength.  The  calculated violence of Hitler may even result in a
general massacre  of the Jews by way of his  first  answer  to  the
declaration  of  such hostilities. But  if  the  Jewish  mind  could
be  prepared  for voluntary suffering, even the massacre I have
imagined  could  be turned into a day  of  thanksgiving  and  joy  that
Jehovah  had wrought deliverance of the race even at the hands of the
tyrant. For to the Godfearing, death has no terror. It is a joyful
sleep to be followed by a waking that would be all the more  refreshing
for the long sleep.

It is hardly necessary for me to point out that it is easier  for the
Jews than for the Czechs to follow my prescription. And  they have in
the Indian satyagraha campaign in South Africa  an  exact parallel.
There the Indians occupied  precisely  the  same  place that the Jews
occupy in Germany.  The  persecution  had  also  a religious tinge.
President Kruger used  to  say  that  the  white Christians were the
chosen  of  God and Indians  were  inferior beings created to serve the
whites.  A fundamental clause  in  the Transvaal constitution was  that
there  should  be  no equality between the whites and coloured races
including  Asiatics.  There too the Indians were consigned to ghettos
described as locations.

The other disabilities were almost of the same type as  those  of the
Jews in Germany. The Indians, a  mere  handful,  resorted  to satyagraha
without any backing from  the  world  outside  or  the Indian
Government. Indeed the British officials tried to dissuade the
satya-grahis from their contemplated step. World opinion  and the Indian
Government came to their  aid  after  eight  years  of fighting. And
that too was by way of diplomatic pressure not of a threat of war.

But the Jews of Germany can  offer  satyagraha  under  infinitely better
auspices than the Indians of South Africa. The Jews are  a compact,
homogeneous community in  Germany.  They  are  far  more gifted than the
Indians of South Africa. And they have  organized world opinion behind
them. I am convinced that  if  someone  with courage and vision can
arise among them  to  lead  them  in  non-violent action, the winter of
their despair can in the  twinkling of an eye be turned into the summer
of hope. And what  has  today become a degrading
 man-hunt  can  be turned  into  a  calm  and determined stand offered
by unarmed men and women possessing  the strength of suffering given to
them by Jehovah. It will be then a truly religious resistance offered
against the  godless  fury  of dehumanised man. The German Jews will
score  a lasting  victory over the German  gentiles  in  the  sense
that  they  will  have converted the latter to an appreciation of
human  dignity.  They will have rendered service to  fellow-Germans
and  proved  their title to be the real Germans  as  against  those
who  are  today dragging, however unknowingly, the German name into the
mire.

And now a word to the Jews in Palestine. I  have  no  doubt  that they
are going about it the  wrong  way.  The  Palestine  of  the Biblical
conception is not a geographical tract. It is  in  their hearts. But if
they must look to the Palestine  of  geography  as their national home,
it is wrong to enter it under the shadow  of the British gun. A
religious act cannot be performed with the aid of the bayonet or the
bomb. They can settle in Palestine only  by the goodwill of the Arabs.
They should seek to convert  the  Arab heart. The same God rules the
Arab heart  who rules  the  Jewish heart. They can offer satyagraha in
front of the Arabs and offer themselves to be shot or thrown into the
Dead Sea without raising a little finger against them.  They will find
the world opinion in their favour in their religious aspiration. There
are hundreds of ways of reasoning with the Arabs, if they  will  only
discard the help of the British bayonet. As it is,  they  are
co-sharers with the British in despoiling a people who have done no
wrong to them.

I am not defending the Arab excesses. I wish they had chosen  the way of
non-violence in resisting what they rightly regarded as an unwarrantable
encroachment upon their country.  But  according  to the accepted canons
of right  and  wrong,  nothing  can  be  said against the Arab
resistance in the face of overwhelming odds.

Let the Jews who claim to be the chosen race prove their title by
choosing the way of non-violence for vindicating  their  position on
earth. Every country is their home including Palestine not  by
aggression but by loving service. A Jewish friend has sent me  a book
called The Jewish  Contribution  to  Civilisation  by  Cecil Roth. It
gives a record of what the Jews have done to enrich  the world?
literature,  art,  music, drama,   science,   medicine, agriculture,
etc. Given the  will,  the  Jew  can  refuse  to  be treated  as  the
outcaste  of  the  West,  to  be despised or patronised. He can command
the attention and respect of the world by being man, the chosen creation
of God, instead  of  being  man who is fast sinking to the brute and
forsaken by  God.  They  can add to their many contributions the
surpassing  contribution  of non-violent action.

November 20, 1938





        MiD-EasT RealitieS  -  www.MiddleEast.Org
        Phone:  202 362-5266    Fax:  815 366-0800
                           Email:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscriibe email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subject SUBSCRIBE
To unsubscribe email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with subject UNSUBSCRIBE



Reply via email to