-Caveat Lector-
MINORITY REPORT | January 1, 2001
CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS
Rogue Washington
Pyongyang, North Korea
Whichever of the two losers assumed the presidency of
these United States mattered not at all in terms of
construction of a "Star Wars," or Ballistic Missile Defense,
system, since both promised to begin work on it. Indeed,
this agreement may well form part of the much-anticipated
healing process between the two party oligarchies. (Perhaps
Bush will retain the services of William Cohen, who was a
compassionate conservative to begin with, at the Defense Department. Gore
could have generously found room for a Powell/Rice clone in the same
capacity.) Given the proven and demonstrated unworkability and cost of the
proposed system, it is very slightly more probable that Bush could cancel it
without loss of face. But the "contractor community" (as I once heard it
seriously called) has demands and donations to make and raised
expectations to be fulfilled, and the exorbitant amount already committed
may need to be justified, so it is sure that we will be hearing a great deal
more about the need to protect ourselves from North Korea.
How to convey the absurdity of this? Take
the example of the Taepodong missile test,
that "shot heard round the world," when the
North Koreans fired a rocket into the air and
watched it splash down on the other side of
Japan. Red alerts all around, huge talk about
a new "rogue state" and a threat from
sinister Asian Stalinism. Well, the most
salient fact about that missile test was that,
like the more grandiose Pacific tests of the
Star Wars interceptors, it was a failure. The
objective of the Taepodong rocket was to
get a North Korean satellite into orbit; no
signal from any such satellite has ever been
picked up.
This puts the North Korean regime in an embarrassing position, because it
proudly announced that the launch was a success. However, the hysterical
Western reaction to the test has helped transform impotence into
potency--an uncovenanted propaganda victory for Kim Jong Il and his
regime. At the "Mass Games" in the May Day stadium in Pyongyang, which I
attended a few days before Secretary of State Madeleine Albright arrived to
watch the replay, the centerpiece "special effect" was a giant montage of the
Taepodong missile thrusting its way skyward, as if to bring the might of the
Dear Leader to the attention of a waiting world.
They say that visitors to North Korea see only what the regime wants them
to see. This is not true. In a country with almost no vehicles on its roads,
one of the commonest sights is a group of soldiers from the Korean People's
Army, peering mournfully into the innards of a broken-down transport. I
hardly think that these scenes were provided just to lull me into a sense of
false security, either, any more than were the bald tires and clapped-out
accouterments of the top-of-the-line tourist bus on which I traveled. The
power cuts and blackouts in the capital, the people taking care of their
laundry and personal hygiene needs in an open drain in the city of Kaesong,
the bullocks doing much of the work on main highways, the abandoned
projects and buildings, the peasants scavenging food by the grain in the
fields--none of these are Potemkin showpieces.
It is even worse in the northern provinces, where visitors don't get taken at
all. I've seen film secretly shot from across the Chinese border, where towns
and factories are completely idle because the plants and machinery were
broken up for barter during the famine. Good reports describe the once-vital
coal mines as being often flooded and partially abandoned. (The pumps don't
work because the vandals took the handles.) It's always worth remembering
that North Korea embarked on the building of a nuclear power station in the
first place because it wanted to end dependence on coal.
Everything you have read about the party state in North Korea is true or
understated; from a purely human point of view it is the most literally
oppressive and regimented society I have ever seen. But total control
has diminishing returns; you cannot orchestrate people more than 100
percent, and you cannot manage them all the time. The same goes for
ideology. In its proclamations about US imperialism the regime outdoes the
rhetoric of the Chinese Cultural Revolution, but in its actual negotiations it
conducts a tough but entirely pragmatic diplomacy. If this were not so, there
might well have been a nuclear exchange on the Korean peninsula in the
summer of 1994. When the worst has been said about the Clinton
Administration's abysmal foreign and military policy (much of it by me), it
must be admitted that the President did overrule a crazed "pre-emptive-war
party" in Washington and--with typical secrecy, hesitation and
reluctance--replayed in miniature Truman's veto of Gen. Douglas MacArthur.
(For an account of this almost unknown moment of near-calamity, see Don
Oberdorfer's invaluable book The Two Koreas.)
In closed sessions, the North Koreans have agreed to a deal whereby they
close down their graphite reactors and put the rods into "cooling ponds,"
allowing international inspection of the latter to determine whether there is
any stray reprocessable plutonium. In return the United States will help
furnish light-water reactors (which are much less proliferation-friendly) in
order to help overcome the country's energy crisis. I have actually met some
of the on-the-ground invigilators of the International Atomic Energy Agency,
tough and cynical guys who say that the agreement is being properly
observed. But this leaves us with a mystery, or at any rate a conundrum. In
secret, the military and intelligence authorities of the United States have
concluded an agreement with Pyongyang that does them some credit and
that has averted what could have been an annihilating confrontation. In
public, the political leadership speaks as if an impoverished and exhausted
North Korea is so menacing and intractable that it requires the investment of
untold billions in a destabilizing and fraudulent boondoggle. If this is not
rogue behavior, then I should very much like to know what is.
thenation.com
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
