-Caveat Lector-

Bedtime for Democracy

<http://www.ocweekly.com:80/ink/01/15/lost-washburn.shtml>

The voting booth has become the abattoir of the national will

by Jim Washburn

Was that a little wake-up slap or what? Are you sufficiently outraged? If
this putsch of an election had happened in a Central American nation,
wouldn't we be sending in the Marines right now to restore democracy, at
least if leftists had won?

The election outcome reminds me of the tale about the steel-driving
competition between John Henry and the steam engine. At the end the
contest, John Henry had driven one more spike than the machine, at which
point the man fell dead from his exertions. It's an inspiring story about
human willpower, if you ignore the outcome of the guy being dead and the
machine going on to rule the age.

And we come now to the situation where humans elected Al Gore, but machines
made George W. Bush president.
Still trying to sort out what happened in the past two months? Gore won the
popular vote in the country, which in a democracy would make him
president.  Add the few percent who voted for Ralph Nader, and there is a
distinct majority of Americans who did not want the man who is now their
president.  Fair enough: we only got Clinton rather than Bush's dad because
of Ross Perot.
But the new president-elect is only that because the electoral college (an
outmoded institution with no place in a modern republic) majority was
handed to him by voting machines.
The margin of error of the Florida vote-counting machines (3 percent to 5
percent) was greater than the difference between the candidates' vote
tallies (.016 percent), begging a manual recount. Gore's people moved to
have recounts in Democratic-leaning counties where the voting
irregularities were particularly egregious, and Gore graciously offered not
to contest any similar recounts Bush might request, an offer rejected
because Bush's handlers preferred his being the choice of machine-count
error to the uncertainty of an actual tally of citizens' votes.
Among the anomalies Republicans weren't troubled by: thousands of votes
miscast in one county due to a confusing ballot, with the detestable
outcome that persons who lived through the Holocaust may have mistakenly
voted for a man who has downplayed the Holocaust and thousands of black and
poor voters disenfranchised by old, faulty voting and tabulating machines.
They may not get separate drinking fountains anymore, but they do get
separate, inferior voting equipment.
Attempts to redress these wrongs were derided as trying to change the rules
after "the game" was over by persons who can't see that this isn't a game,
but rather a solemn undertaking thwarted. While they recited the big-lie
mantra that the votes had been counted three times, and each time Bush won,
they knew tens of thousands of votes were never counted and now only will
be counted by historians to help confirm for future generations that the
voting booth has become the abattoir of the national will.
Other election-tossing events: even when votes were recounted, Florida's
secretary of state, co-chairperson of Bush's Florida campaign, cynically
found ways to exclude them. Meanwhile, thousands of absentee ballot
applications had been illegally, the law reads "felony" doctored by
Republican operatives. When this went to court, Bush lawyers tried to have
one "liberal" judge disqualified on the grounds that she might be biased
because Bush's brother Jeb had overlooked her for a promotion. (She wasn't
disqualified and ruled in Bush's favor.)
This gets interesting when the decision between Bush and Gore was made for
us by the Supreme Court, two of whose members Gore had directly voted
against confirming in the Senate. Antonin Scalia, meanwhile, only has two
sons working for law firms that work for Bush; one of his son's partners
was even the lawyer arguing Bush's case before him. Judge Clarence Thomas,
appointed by Bush's dad, has a wife working on the Bush transition team.
Recusal anyone?
It's curious, too, to see a states-rights candidate turn to a states-rights
court to get them to intercede in a state's laws and to see the court
render a sharply divided ruling based on "equal treatment under the law"
that seems very concerned with the niggling technicalities of disparities
in recount procedures from county to county, while ignoring the rather
graver unequal treatment of thousands of votes never being counted at all
and the White House going to an unelected president.
Justice John Paul Stevens dissenting comment will ring for years: "Although
we may never know with complete certainty the identity of the winner of
this year's presidential election, the identity of the loser is perfectly
clear. It is the nation's confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian
of the rule of law."
So what do we do now? Unless there's a domed city in the Marianas Trench
where we can go sit out the Bush presidency, we deal with it.
After the Supreme Court decision, I was talking the other night with my old
friend Kim, who wasn't facing the prospect of a Bush presidency and a
possible quarter-century of Supreme Court obstructionists with a
particularly upbeat outlook. She sees the darkness gathering, a return of
the Reagan era, of the public slumbering through eight years of cynical
greed doped up with Happy Meal public relations.
Well, yeah, having Texas oilmen with CIA ties at the helm when decisive
action on global warming and alternative energy is needed isn't a best-case
scenario. At a time when world peace hinges on careful diplomacy, we also
now have a president with, apparently, a pontoon bridge where his synapses
should be. Having one who at least notices he's standing in front of a
thicket of microphones before he starts calling people "assholes" would be
preferable.  Yeah, yeah, yeah. It doesn't look good.
But maybe the Bush Mach II years form the dark, dense planet our democracy
needs to curve around, like a space probe, in order to reach maximum
velocity. As Nader put it, when the times cry out for activism, whom would
you rather have in office: A sedative or an irritant? Eternal vigilance is
the price of freedom, and I think more people are waking up to that.
Will environmental laws be gutted, and corporations rampage like foxes too
long denied the henhouse? Not so easily, I think. Citizens are more wary
now, more active. The WTO protests wouldn't have happened in the '80s.
Things are getting interesting, and the very fact that an unelected
president will be residing in the White House will be a daily reminder of
that.
We in Orange County can hope that Newport Beach congressman Chris Cox
doesn't wind up with a cabinet post, like Secretary in Charge of Looking Smug.
Bush is coming in under a dark cloud, not with Reagan's "morning in
America" mandate. I betcha the economy is going to tank during his watch,
not his fault, but because it's riding on speculation, and that's not going
to help him.  People are going to have many occasions to remember that this
president wasn't the one we wanted.
Even people who are crowing now about the Supreme Court decision deep down
have to feel how unwholesome it is and will be wary of future
extremes.  And the Supremes may very well soon have to eat their words on
elections and equal treatment under the law, when their precedent is
brought up in cases dealing with the racial and economic inequities in our
voting procedures, and guess who wins next time as a result of that?
My friend Kim also sees things in terms of dark forces at work, of the same
sort of rich, cynical, power-hungry assholes calling the shots that have
been doing so since feudal times. With ever-increasing riches and influence
continuing to flow to the richest 1 percent, there's a case for that.
But there is also this: they are human, as subject to fear and love as the
rest of us, as possibly open to change. They don't want to poison their
kids or pack them off to a new Ice Age unless there's enough profit in it.
Maybe it isn't that they are doing such a good job of ransacking the planet
and spoiling elections as it is that the rest of us aren't doing such a
good job yet of convincing them otherwise. It is morning in America, folks;
it's just kind of a shitty morning, with no one around but us to make it
better.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to