-Caveat Lector- .............................................................. >From the New Paradigms Project [Not Necessarily Endorsed] Note: We store 100's of related "conspiracy posts" at: http://www.msen.com/~lloyd/oldprojects/recentmail.html From: "Rich Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: SlickMisc: Fwd: New U.N. treaty ratified quietly Date: Saturday, December 23, 2000 5:30 PM If you wish to receive ad-free SlickMisc in the future, send $5 to Rich Martin, 201 W Tarrant Rd, #1410, Grand Prairie, TX 75050 From the Home of Rich & Peggy Martin Grand Prairie, TX 75050 [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's nice to be important, but it's important to be nice. _______________________________________________ INTRODUCTORY COMMENTARY Note new ISP [EMAIL PROTECTED] /=-=-=-=-Click Here & Support Our Sponsor-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=\ Get the competitive edge you need with highly customized news from the #1 site for comprehensive news on the Internet Register at Individual.com today! http://click.topica.com/aaaa7xb1dh9Cb1yqv9a/Individual_com \=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=/ ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steve Moser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > When we lose control over our private property the game is up, pure and > simple. > > Steve M. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Joe Sager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: New U.N. treaty ratified quietly > > > > Dear Team, > > > > The United States Senate has just given away to the United Nations that > which > > was not its to give, and done so in a quiet way, on a voice vote, which > means > > you and I may not find out how our Senator voted. Treason, done quietly, > is nonetheless > > treason. Read the story here, on World Net Daily. > > > > Now, tell me again how the United Nations is not interested in a one-world > government. > > > > > > This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which > follows. > > To view this item online, visit > http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_lamb/20001209_xchla_new_un_tre.shtml > > > > Saturday, December 9, 2000 > > > > New U.N. treaty ratified quietly > > > > by Henry Lamb > > > > The U.N. Convention to Combat Desertification > <http://www.iisd.ca/linkages/desert/ccdintro.html> > > was ratified by the U.S. Senate on October 18, but few Senators yet know > that > > it has been ratified. Senator Craig Thomas (R-WY) introduced a package of > 34 > > treaties, all of which were ratified by a show of hands -- no recorded > vote. > > > > Initially, Senator Thomas' office told callers that the Senator had > nothing to > > do with the ratification. On December 8, his office called to explain that > Senator > > Thomas just happened to be on the Senate Floor late in the afternoon of > October > > 18 -- and was asked by the leadership to handle procedurally, the package > of > > treaties. Senator Thomas has asked the Foreign Relations Committee to > explain > > how, and why, the Desertification Treaty was included in the package. > > > > At the recent climate change talks in the Hague, Senator Larry Craig > (R-ID) said > > the treaty had not been ratified, until corrected by one of his staff. > Phone > > calls to Senator Fred Thompson (R-TN), and other Senators, caught staffers > off > > guard: Nobody knew how their boss voted on the ratification. They could > not know > > -- there was no recorded vote. > > > > This treaty was signed by the Clinton administration in 1994. It has been > locked > > up in the Foreign Relations Committee since. Normally, treaties of such > monumental > > importance are debated in committee and then forwarded to the Senate floor > for > > further debate and disposition. > > > > Not this time. The treaty appeared in a package of 34 treaties -- most of > which > > were single-issue treaties with single nations, dealing with stolen > vehicles, > > criminals, and the like. The Desertification Treaty, however, is not a > single-issue > > treaty with a single nation. > > > > This treaty is one of several environmental treaties that emerged from the > 1992 > > U.N. Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro. One of > those > > treaties, the Convention on Climate Change, was ratified in 1992. The > Convention > > on Biological Diversity failed ratification in 1994. The Convention to > Combat > > Desertification was skillfully maneuvered through the Senate to avoid the > public > > reaction which killed the Convention on Biological Diversity. > > > > The Desertification Treaty claims jurisdiction over 70% of the earth's > land area > > -- virtually all of the land that is not covered by the Convention on > Biological > > Diversity. Moreover, this new treaty creates a structure through which all > other > > environmental treaties are supposed to be integrated under a common United > Nations > > implementation regime. A companion treaty is now being developed by the > U.N. > > Commission on Water for the 21st Century. The United Nations is, in fact, > creating > > the structure in international law and, through its extensive > bureaucracies, > > to control the use of all natural resources on earth. > > > > The U.S. Senate ratified the treaty on October 18, 2000 -- whether or not > it > > knew what it was doing. On November 17, the Clinton administration > delivered > > the ratification documents to the United Nations. The United States is now > bound > > by the international law that claims the power to dictate land use in 70% > of > > the earth's land. > > > > The name of the treaty implies that it is concerned about deserts -- in > fact, > > it is concerned about all land use. To combat desertification, the treaty > seeks > > to prevent land use that its enforcers think may lead to desertification. > Converting > > forests to pasture, for example, or pasture to row crops, or crop land to > subdivisions, > > are all uses that may lead to desertification, according to literature > produced > > by the United Nations. > > > > There is no distinction between federal land and privately owned land when > it > > comes to land use under the jurisdiction of the U.N. The U.N. sees its > role to > > be the establishment of policy -- it is up to the participating nations to > see > > that the policy is implemented. The recent rash of land acquisition > measures > > promoted by the administration and Congress seeks to get more land under > federal > > ownership. The vast expansion of regulatory control over land use by all > federal > > agencies makes it easier for the United States to comply with its > international > > obligations under a variety of international treaties. This new treaty > extends > > even further the U.S. obligation to control land use. > > > > According to the treaty itself, no reservations can be included in its > ratification > > (Article 37). The Resolution of Ratification adopted by the Senate > contains several > > reservations -- all of which will be ignored by the United Nations. > > > > Withdrawal from the treaty cannot even begin until after three years of > participation > > -- and then another year must pass before withdrawal is recognized by the > U.N. > > -- assuming, of course, that there is some desire in the Senate to > withdraw. > > > > > > ============================================== > > NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, > > this material is distributed without profit or payment to > > those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving > > this information for non-profit research and educational > > purposes only. For more information go to: > > http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml > > ============================================== > > > > > > > > > > ================================================== > > You are subscribed to this list as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS LIST: you MUST reply to this message with only > the word > > REMOVE in the subject line. > > This will permanently remove you from all future mailings from us. > > ================================================== > > > > > Rich Martin Editor of Slick _______________________________________________________ Send a cool gift with your E-Card http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/ /=-=-=-=-Click Here & Support Our Sponsor-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=\ Imagine a credit card with a 0% introductory APR on purchases (for complete pricing information and important terms and conditions, please click on the link below). Apply now for an Aria Visa! http://click.topica.com/aaaa5Cb1dh9Cb1yqv9c/Aria \=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=/ Want to know about the Reform Party, state activities, what we stand for? Each month read about the issues, the candidates, government waste, UN plans for America and more generally center right news. Subscribe today: RP Monthly P.O. Box 698 Oxford, Maine 04270 Make check for $18 payable to RP Monthly ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Cut out the middlemen. Send donations to: Boys Scouts of America National HQ 1329 Walnut Hill Ln. Irving, TX 75162 http://www.SaveOurScouts.com ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Join the Slick discussion list. Send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To remove your address from this list, send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] No muss, no fuss. Have a great day. Rich Martin VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV ___________________________________________________________ T O P I C A http://www.topica.com/t/17 Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics Forwarded for info and discussion from the New Paradigms Discussion List, not necessarily endorsed by: *********************************** Lloyd Miller, Research Director for A-albionic Research a ruling class/conspiracy research resource for the entire political-ideological spectrum. **FREE RARE BOOK SEARCH: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ** Explore Our Archive: <http://a-albionic.com/a-albionic.html> <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
