[CTRL] Democrats Shouldn't Worry About Bush--(Republicans Should...)

[lloyd]

-Caveat Lector-

..............................................................

>From the New Paradigms Project [Not Necessarily Endorsed]
Note:  We store 100's of related "conspiracy posts" at:
http://www.msen.com/~lloyd/oldprojects/recentmail.html

From: "Lloyd Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Democrats Shouldn't Worry About Bush--(Republicans Should...)
Date: Sunday, December 31, 2000 8:27 AM

Democrats Shouldn't Worry About Bush


(Republicans Should...)

Devvy Kidd
December 13, 2000
Tonight Mr. Gore gave his speech. Give the Devil his due: Mr. Gore gave an excellent 
and I think, genuine speech--for a change. Unfortunately, even after eight years as 
Vice President of the United States, Gore still hasn't learned our legal form of 
government and called America, incorrectly, a democracy, ad nauseam. Wb'ya's speech 
was boiler- plate and what gripped my gut is the fact that I will have to look at his 
stupid and constant smirk for the next four years.

It's been bad enough viewing Clinton and his jutted chin with that disingenuous smirk 
plastered on his face for the past eight years. Now we've got a new flavor of smirk on 
a head that contains less intellectual matter than this nation deserves as it's 
President.

Bush's speech tonight was full of the usual buzz words:

"conciliatory," the silly "compassionate conservative," and "free" prescription pills 
for seniors (keep those old people medicated so they don't catch on to the scam!). 
Like Gore, Bush believes America should be governed by mob rule (democracy).

Wb'ya mouthed a phony segment about Thomas Jefferson. What an insult to Jefferson. 
Following his reference to our great third president, Bush lauded "our democracy." 
Well, Republicans, you got what you ask for, now we'll see how this "lesser of two 
evils" works out for you. I already know how it will play out for our Republic. Like a 
cartoon character, we heard "bi-partisan" at least 15 times. Smirk, smirk, yuk, 
yuk..The one party system doing the two-party dance--strictly for public consumption 
and tragically, the party faithful will go right back to sleep.

The grassroots Republicans in this country have got to wake up and recognize that your 
party has played you all for fools and let me give you one glaring example: when I ran 
for Congress, the well-meaning and very patriotic Republicans in my district were all 
excited about the "Contract with America". They pushed all the party faithful to watch 
the propaganda films put out by former House hot-shot, Newt Getrich. This guy is as 
evil as they come, but the party faithful either refuse to recognize this or they 
simply haven't had access to just how bad this guy is....here's a clue:

On 11 . 13. 96, I spoke with the Washington, DC based Roll Call to confirm the 
following information which ran in the New American magazine, November 25th issue. The 
staff at Roll Call was very helpful in verifying the accuracy of this excerpt:

"House Speaker New Gingrich has admitted that a hidden motive behind his 'Contract 
With America' two years ago was to control the large and stridently conservative 
freshman class that was expected to come into the house with the 1994 mid-term 
elections. 'Nobody fully understands this,' Gingrich explained in confidential tapes 
obtained by Roll Call, 'but if you think of the Contract with America, it was, in 
fact, a training implementation document masquerading as a public relations 
device...It was designed as a training implementation document for the freshmen when 
they arrived...It was guaranteed that from election day through April, early April, 
that the House Republican Party would have to behave in a deviant manner from what it 
would morally be expected to do.'"

Roll Call said there was much more on these confidential tapes they managed to acquire 
and will be printing it in their newspaper. Got that, party faithful? You were taken 
for a ride. Hood-winked. Newt, a new world order lackey, got all the desperate folks 
that belong to the Republican Party worked into a dither of false hope with phony 
promises. How did Mr. Newt know enough in advance to plan this little "public 
relations device" even would be needed for the '94 "elections" and incoming freshmen? 
Because somebody whispered in his ear not to worry, there would be this "Republican 
revolution," and the millions would be neutralized.

For Democrats who are crushed by use of the word 'Devil' above, Al Gore is a dangerous 
man. He has sold us out just as egregiously as Clinton, make no mistake about it. I 
would highly recommend that Democrats who are upset by this phony "election" outcome 
and my criticism of Red Al, that you get on the Internet and read the excellent 
investigative pieces on web sites such as worldnetdaily.com, newsmax.com; hit a search 
engine or two and type in Al Gore. You will discover that this guy has never cared a 
whit for the common man, "people of color," or any other American. He has always been 
red and like a bad penny, he'll probably turn up again, much to the danger of America.

To quote Matt Drudge, October 31, 2000
"New Gertz Book is a Shocker
A new book by Washington Times reporter Bill Gertz shows that the U.S. national 
security has suffered massive penetration by the Red Chinese. The Drudge Report is 
reporting that in "China Threat," best-selling author Bill Gertz is preparing to 
unleash top classified reports that detail Communist China's vast efforts to undermine 
and destroy the United States.

Classified papers from the FBI, CIA and NSA reveal that a major Chinese mole at the 
highest levels of the U.S. government named "Ma" has never been found.

Drudge also notes that Gertz published details of "a classified Chinese government 
document, known as Document 65, [that] reveals that China is willing to attack the 
United States with nuclear weapons if U.S. forces intervene to defend Taiwan in a 
regional conflict.

The book has already caused waves in the White House, and the administration may take 
legal action for the release of classified documents in the new book."
Think Red Al hasn't known what's been going on with this treasonous behavior by Mr. 
Clinton? Come on. Hang on to your hats, Republicans: GWB, Jr., has pledged that the 
United States (although there isn't a scintilla of constitutional authority to do 
so...) will defend Taiwan if China goes after them. Like father, like son. Buy clothes 
made in Communist China. Smooze up to them about how they're "our strategic trading 
partners," and in the next breath, threaten to send our military to fight them over a 
battle that isn't ours (Taiwan). More lunacy. Stay tuned.
I have been monitoring the "mainstream media" throughout the day and observed race 
baiters like Jesse Jackson, whose very financial existence depends on pitting 
Americans against each other, scream and yell about the decision of the U.S. Supreme 
Court last night. Democrat pundits have wailed and movie stars have swooned over the 
very thought, never mind the fact, that the ever smirking Jr. new world order George 
Bush, will now occupy the White House. They needn't worry.
A side note: Judicial Watch (www.judicialwatch.org) has engaged an independent audit 
firm and has now begun a real hand count of all 67 counties in the State of Florida. I 
will be interested in seeing what number they come up with at the end. If you're a 
Democrat holding your breath over this, I wouldn't bet on this independent firm 
attempting to "discern the intent of the voter," count "pregnant chads," or 
manufacture votes for Gore. Gee, how come you haven't heard anything about this 
statewide recount from Dashing Dachele, Dan Blather, Tom Brokenjaw or Alec Baldwin?
My next comments aren't going to sit well with Republican party hacks and faithful, 
but it must be said because the conservative movement in this country needs a good 
slap across the face to wake them out of their stupor. Today, Joseph Farah, 
worldnetdaily.com, gave his usual astute commentary about the state of affairs and 
made this comment about Wb'ya:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_btl/20001213_xcbtl_putting_it.shtml
"And that brings me to President-elect George W. Bush. He was not my choice for the 
presidency. I did not vote for him. I publicly stated I could not vote for him because 
he does not understand nor respect the principle of constitutional limited government. 
I wish him the best...
Based on his personality and his past performance as Texas governor, I believe he is 
going to bend over backwards to be conciliatory, to govern by consensus, to reach out 
and make friends with people who will never be his friends and ideas that are bad for 
America.
I'm going to make one promise myself: For those of you who would like me and my news 
organization to offer a honeymoon to the new administration, you will be greatly 
disappointed. There will be no safe harbor for bad government -- no matter if it is 
perpetrated by Democrats or Republicans, conservatives or liberals. Not here. Not on 
these pages."
I know that Republicans across this country took up the chant earlier this year: Hold 
your nose and vote: Anyone but Gore. "We have to vote for George Bush whether we like 
him or not, he is the lesser of two evils." Same old rat race. Same old grassroots 
waiting around until the shadow government makes their selection to carry on the 
agenda of the power monsters behind the scenes and then shoving it down the throats of 
conservatives. I wrote about this in Media Bypass back in March, 1998:
http://www.devvy.com/ar00002.html
Will the "party faithful" never learn? Will they never get out of their state of blind 
loyalty to the Republican party "at all costs," including flushing the United States 
of America down the rat hole?
The Democrats need not worry about G.W. Bush. Junior is not going to upset the apple 
cart. He is not going to get on nationwide television January 21st and mount a major 
drive to "interfere with women's reproductive rights," or demand Roe v. Wade be 
overturned. I watched the hoax they called debates where the two "main" candidates 
exchanged spit and never once touched on the real problems undermining our sovereignty 
and raping our nation blind. Bush agreed with Gore that the U.S. should have gone to 
Somalia, Panama, Bosnia and of course, the Gulf War.
Bush agreed with Gore that we must have foreign aid. Bush chanted, like a mirror twin 
of Red Al, that all seniors in America should have "free" prescription medication. 
Bush agreed with Al that social security must be saved, medicare must be saved and our 
national defense should receive more funding.

Why the military has been gutted over the last eight years seems to have gone 
unnoticed by Mr. Bush: The Republicans have held the majority in Congress for the past 
five years. With a straight party vote in both the house and the unlawfully seated 
senate, coupled with a good number of Democrats who actually believe in the importance 
of our military, these cowardly Republicans could have adequately funded the military 
and over ridden any veto by Billy Clinton. Instead, with enough hand wringing, 
dawdling and politicking, the Republicans played ball with a man who has unequivocally 
sold out the United States of America to the Communist Chinese and Russians. These 
people are not our friends, folks. The Republicans have also successfully fooled you 
into thinking it was "the other side" that blocked Republican efforts to properly fund 
our military. What pure horse crap.

With the exception of a few musical chairs exchanged during this illusion they called 
an "election," the House of Representatives is still filled with the same 
disingenuous, weak-kneed socialists. The senate is unlawfully seated and have no 
authority to even draw a paycheck. If these 535 cretins refused to address the 
constitutional issues sitting like a Goliath in front of the American cattle, what 
makes anyone think that misfits like Mad Max Waters or traitorous dogs like Diane 
Feinstein or phonies like Tom DeLay are actually going to come clean this time around? 
If you don't get it before marriage, don't expect it afterwards and that is reality, 
Republicans.

Wb'ya chirped, along with his "opponent," that Americans should get tax breaks. Red Al 
said Americans shouldn't get a tax break at the risk of hurting this illusion touted 
as a "balanced budget." This new president-elect says he trusts the American people. 
He sure does, he trusts the people so much, he won't even tell them the truth about 
the IRS. The tree-hugging psycho, who I think belongs in a straight-jacket, bleated 
how America is better nation because of "her diversity," while embracing every 
abnormal and destructive social behavior under the sun. Our new "great conciliator," 
will perform the same circus tricks, they'll just be labeled something new this time 
around.

Wb'ya, pandered to the "Latino" vote and played political patty cake with the 
sodomites and lesbians. Why, Georgie has even had his mouthpieces and operatives throw 
out trial balloons that he's going to have Democrats in his cabinet. The great 
conciliator, bringing America together. That's all well and fine, unfortunately, like 
Gore would have done, the game plan is to bring America into a homogeneous one world 
government, no borders, no sovereignty, no freedom and while they will never admit it 
to their dyding day: both parties are complicit in this monstrous and evil goal.

Under this new administration, will we see the Republican controlled White House, 
House of Reps and unlawfully seated senate stick to the status quo, which is of 
course, keep on a straight line to this Godless new world order. Not once did we hear 
from either of these two candidates about the real problems plaguing this country or 
any solutions, i.e.:

Get rid of this central banking system. America has no prosperous economy. Our economy 
is based on massive consumer debt. Debt has never ben prosperity. The whole damn thing 
is nothing but one gigantic illusion. What we're gonna get is Wb'ya's undying loyalty 
to the international banking cartel and a continuance of the hijacking of our economy, 
our nation's lifeblood, by the "FED." Db'ya will fill his cabinet with CFR insiders 
and dangerous people like Colin Powell.

Wb'ya says he's all for a tax cut. How about coming clean about the voluntary income 
tax? Not a snowball's chance in Hell.
Think Wb'ya will lift a finger to help expose the lie about the 16th Amendment? Only 
in your dreams.
The 17th Amendment? Never!

Wb'ya is a Rockefeller Republican, make no mistake about it. Think he would even dream 
of proposing the U.S. withdraw from the insidious, communist controlled UN? In a pig's 
ear. Think Wb'ya cares one whit that all these international treaties in place that 
are killing this nation and her people? It never once disturbs his sleep.

The EPA, ATF & FDA all derive their jurisdiction from international treaties. They are 
bad for America. Think Wb'ya will propose Congress do anything about this wee little 
problem? Not hardly. Wb'ya only wants to strengthen these agencies. NAFTA & GATT 
gutting America's job base? Forget it, Wb'ya has made it very clear he's for "free 
trade."

Both Red Al & Junior are going to "save social security." It can't be done, period and 
I've written extensively about this hoax on this web site.
Is there any constitutional justification for the Federal Department of Education? 
Nope, not a single word in Art. 1, Sec. 8. Wb'ya wants to pour more money into a 
system that will never work to do anything other than dumb down the population.

The list is endless, but do not look to the Republicans in Congress or the White House 
to do one single thing about these critical issues other than feed the monster. After 
all, isn't that what the people of this country "mandated" this last "election" by 
allegedly voting a 50/50 split between the Democrat agenda and the Republican agenda? 
I've already said it in a prior piece: What's the difference between the two parties? 
About 530 votes. If there was something close to an accurate vote last month, it 
simply means that we have a nation of people who can't earn a living without some form 
of government check (state, federal, county), a lazy population that wants government 
to handle them from sperm to worm and a population that is willingly embracing 
socialism. Strong words? How else can I look at this?

Today on the Communist news network [CNN], the financial segments continually 
regurgitated that the market wanted Bush all along and "we could see a Bush surge." 
Well, of course, the market wants Wb'ya: He's one of them and will do nothing to upset 
the status quo despite all his unconstitutional promises. For those of you who pay no 
attention to the constitutional restrictions placed upon the office of the President, 
let me again remind you what Art. II, Sec. 2 of the U.S. Constitution says: The 
president can veto legislation, be commander-in-chief during a time of war, negotiate 
treaties that must be ratified by a lawfully seated senate.

The president has the power to glad-hand around the world and nominate, not seat, 
candidates for the U.S. Supreme Court (they must be confirmed by a lawfully seated 
senate which we do not have). The president can appoint ambassadors, etc., and fill up 
"all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting 
Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session." (This is what 
Clinton used to appoint the current racist as head of the Civil Rights division back 
there in DC.) The president shall from time to time give Congress information on the 
state of the Union. He may, "on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses" and 
finally Sec. 4, describes the manner in which a scallywag can be thrown out of the 
White House. Far cry from the moon, sun, earth and the stars promised by both Al and 
Junior.

People should remember this little gem from Clinton's former Secretary of Labor, Robert
Reich:

USA Today, January 7, 1999:

"The dirty little secret is that both houses of Congress are irrelevant." Reich cut to 
the chase when he said that "America's domestic policy is now being run by Alan 
Greenspan and the Federal Reserve and America's foreign policy is now being run by the 
International Monetary Fund [IMF]." And, "...when the president decides to go to war, 
he no longer needs a declaration of war from Congress."

Well, that pretty much sums it up and it's just a reaffirmation of what I have been 
saying for years: Congress has rendered themselves impotent through all these treaties 
and allowing president after president since FDR to simply circumvent the Constitution 
using executive orders. These presidents are nothing more than a thinly disguised 
Monarchy ensconced on Pennsylvania Ave. The rest of this horse and pony show conducted 
by Congress everyday is nothing more than an illusion for public consumption. Reality 
isn't easy to digest sometimes, but if the people know the truth, perhaps they will 
finally get off their duffs and work to stop the destruction of our beloved Republic - 
before it's too late.

Wb'ya will carry on the agenda of the globalists, he just won't be as blatant as the 
crew packing up, heading out and leaving behind the continuation of a mess begun back 
in 1913, 1933, 1935 and 1964. Mark my words. This commentary isn't to take away hope 
or get everyone depressed, it's to hopefully drive home the point that there isn't a 
nickel's worth of difference between these two "main" parties any longer. It's one of 
the reasons Larry Becraft and I formed The Wallace Institute and are pursing legal 
remedies in a very thoughtful, methodical manner. If people think this 50-50 split in 
the unlawfully seated senate was the result of some honest vote, well, those folks 
need to do some research on vote fraud and how this game is really played.

The Enemy From Within

Our gal, Hillary, so very popular among women for her stand on "protecting women's 
reproductive rights," "partial-birth abortion" [infanticide] and support of lesbians, 
was real busy when she wasn't an elected official. Of course, she isn't one now. I 
believe without question that she was vote frauded into office, but more importantly: 
Since the 17th Amendment was never properly ratified by the states of the Union, 
little miss progressive has no authority to sit in the United States Senate. Let's 
turn back the clock and remember what our modern gal was up to a few years back:

I have in my possession, as do millions of Americans who have done the research, the 
following document obtained and reproduced from the National Archives: Memorandum for 
Walter Zellman from Sallyanne Payton, clearly marked: Preliminary Draft for Official 
Use Only. Do Not Quote or Release For Any Purpose, page 4, Health Care Task Reform 
under Hillary Clinton:

"(b) may the federal government use other actors in the governmental system and the 
private sector as its agents and give them orders as though they were parts of a 
prefectorial system? The short answer is "no." State governments are independent, 
although subordinated, sovereignties, not subdivisions of the federal government. 
Although the federal government may regulate many of their functions directly [as 
well, for example, it subjects state water districts to the Clean Water Act], it may 
not require them to exercise their own governmental powers in a manner dictated by 
federal law. The states may be encouraged, bribed or threatened into entering into 
joint federal state programs of various sorts, from unemployment insurance to 
Medicaid; but they may not be commanded directly to use their own governmental 
apparatus in the service of federal policy. There is a modest jurisprudence of the 
Tenth Amendment that seems to have settled on this proposition. See the DOJ [Dept. of 
J!
 ustice] memorandum for a fuller elaboration."

So, what were Hillary's minions saying? That the government can bribe the states, they 
can threaten them but in fact, the states cannot be forced to get down on their knees 
to the federal machine. Mrs. Clinton and Congress blew $30 million dollars and almost 
two years on creating a "national health care" candy store. Recall the words of the 
attorney who wrote the material above about there being a "modest jurisprudence of the 
Tenth Amendment"? Let's see what the U.S. Supreme Court said that made Hillary and her 
cohorts attempt to skirt the Tenth Amendment to our Constitution:

Linder v. U.S. 268 U.S. 5, 18, 45 S. Ct 446 (1925): "Obviously, direct control of 
medical practice in the states is beyond the power of the federal government." That's 
the Tenth Amendment restrictions the court is talking about. Besides the Second 
Amendment, it's the one Congress and the White House hate and fear the most.

U.S. v Anthony, 15 F Supp. 553, 555 (S.D. Ca., 1936) and U.S. v. Evers, 453 F. Supp. 
1141, 1150 (MD., Ala., 1978), the court ruled: "...the direct control of medical 
practice has been left to the states." Do you see the deception bing practiced here by 
these Marxist's in the White House and Congress? This latest malarkey Clinton calls 
"The Taxpayer Bill of Right's" is just more fuzzy, feel good stuff for which there 
isn't a scintilla of constitutional authority or enumeration by the federal government 
for enforcement. Everyone will benefit from enforcement of the Tenth Amendment and 
leave medical practice to the states where it belongs.

If you are a Democrat, I hope you will pay attention to the following and do something 
about it, unless, of course, you are one of the millions who have now embraced 
socialism disguised as "liberalism."

Democratic Socialists of America

57 Members of the U.S. Congress Betraying our Republic

This is one of the most egregious outrages in this country today, yet the majority of 
Americans are unaware of this heinous conduct by 57 sitting members of the U.S. 
Congress to overthrow our legal form of government. No, not through an armed 
revolution but rather, like the evil of Communism, these people do it through brain 
washing and deliberately breeding America to dependence on government welfare programs 
like a pusher who keeps his victim addicted.

America is a sovereign Republic. We are not a democracy. A democracy is mob rule and 
that mentality was displayed on December 10, 1998 during the prepackaged horse and 
pony show called "Impeachment Hearings." Congressman Howard Berman [D-CA] said that 
Congress could not impeach a president without the will of the people! How 
preposterous! What happened to the rule of Law, Mr. Berman? Berman's brain cavity 
wouldn't even make a good drinking up for a hummingbird. Impeachment hearings are just 
that, or, an inquest if you will. An impeachment trial then goes on to the senate, 
presided over by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Berman's ignorance isn't 
surprising if you've done enough homework as I have about the real agenda of the 
people behind the scenes who jerk the strings of Congress and the White House. And, 
no, it's not some silly conspiracy theory. The proposed take- over of America is right 
out in the open for anyone to see and read in thousands of documents, treati!
 es and the voting patterns of Congress. This is what I do, seven days a week for 
almost nine years without any financial compensation. I know what I'm talking about.

Tens of thousands of gallons of blood has been spilled by hundreds of thousands of 
Americans to keep our nation free. To keep our Constitution and Bill of Rights as the 
supreme law of the land, instead of the Communist Manifesto. Communism should be hated 
by Americans, yet Americans purchase so much junk from Communist China, that our trade 
balance with these butchers is now over $400 billion dollars.

Sadly, most Americans don't even have a clue as to what this means to the economy and 
welfare of our country. How the Commies must be laughing themselves silly over 
America's stupidity. Too many Americans know only welfare in the form of social 
programs, handed out by Congress without a scintilla of constitutional authority. 
There are more than 7,000 slave labor camps in Communist China and the blood from 
these poor souls probably made the blouse or slacks members of Congress parade around 
in - shame! Not me, not my family. We buy Made in the USA or go without and believe 
me, with the exception of some computer parts we can only get from Japan, we go 
without. This is not isolationism as we frequently hear chanted by the media mouth 
pieces and Congress, it is called protectionism. Every country on this earth protects 
it's job base and we had better start doing the same because the next 10,000 jobs that 
go to Communist China, Communist Viet NAM, Communist South Africa, Sri Lan!
 ka or the Phillippines just might be yours.

Anyone who seeks to undermine the sovereignty of the United States or overthrow our 
legal form of government should, and usually are, charged with sedition. Not the 57 
members of Congress who are actively working to overthrow our form of government. No? 
If you are on the Internet, go to: www.dsausa.org which is the web site for the 
Democratic Socialists of America and for those who just can't get to a computer, let 
me give you the exact text off the main page of their web site:

The Organization

"The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) is the largest socialist organization in 
the United States, and the principal affiliate of the Socialist International (also in 
Francais and Espanol). DSA's members are building progressive movements for social 
change while establishing an openly socialist presence in American communities and 
politics.

At the root of our socialism is a profound commitment to democracy, as means and end. 
We are activists committed not only to extending political democracy but to demanding 
democratic empowerment in the economy, in gender relation, and in culture. Democracy 
is not simply one of our political values but our means of restructuring society.....

In this web site you can find out about DSA, its politics, structure and program. 
DSA's political perspective is called Where We Stand. It says in part:

We are socialists because we reject an international economic order sustained by 
private profit, alienated labor, race and gender discrimination, environmental 
destruction and brutality and violence in defense of the status quo. We are socialists 
because we share a vision of a humane international social order based both on 
democratic planning and market mechanisms to achieve equitable distribution of 
resources, meaningful work, a healthy environment, sustainable growth, gender and 
racial equality and non-oppressive relationships."
Sounds all warm and fuzzy doesn't it? How many Americans understand what "sustainable 
growth" means? They should, it's destroying the autonomy of the states faster than a 
NY minute. DSA also has a youth section so they can do what Hitler did: turn children 
into killers. DSA, in their own words: "...to advance the cause of Socialism." Do you 
know what Adolph Hitler had to say about democracy? While I am loathe to quote a 
monster like him, those who ignore history are doomed to repeat and relive it:

"The democracy of western countries is the predecessor of Marxism, which would be 
unthinkable without democracy. Democracy provides the nourishing soil for this world 
disease; the plague spreads from this ground."

"Anti-Semitism is a useful revolutionary expedient. My Jews are a valuable hostage 
given to me by democracy."

I encourage everyone to read a book titled, The Voices of America's Destruction by 
Jeri Lynn Ball. [order: 1-877-291-1000] I guarantee you, once you read this 
meticulously researched book, see the comparisons of speeches by Adolph Hitler and 
Bill & Hill Clinton, you will see this government through different eyes. Of course, 
most Americans won't because they are like zombies, mesmerized every night in front of 
the television set watching mindless drivel. America will rue the day very soon 
because her people put garbage like Friends, The X-Files, sports, booze and drugs 
before any concern for their freedom.

If there is one single issue that Bill Clinton and Al Gore should be driven out of 
office, it is the selling of our most secret and sensitive technology to the Communist 
Chinese, our mortal enemy. Make no mistake about it, this is as serious as a full 
blown heart attack and it has made America very vulnerable and unnecessarily put our 
military at grave risk. No? I urge you to read, The Year of The Rat by Michael 
Timperlake & William C. Triplett as well as their other books. No, they are not 
members of the vast right wing conspiracy; these two courageous men have very 
impressive credentials. Like me and you, they are very, very worried about the 
security of our country. Their book is so well documented and takes the reader, step 
by step, times, dates, places and the people involved.

Sometimes I just want to throw up my hands and say, "America, you deserve exactly what 
you're going to get." But, I can't. I love my country and I have to keep trying to 
reach as many people as I can and I hope and pray you will do the same. You can order 
their book on the net through www.Amazon.com or ask your local bookseller to order it.

There can be no question that The Democratic Socialists of America's agenda is to 
overthrow our legal form of government. It is a travesty that we have an alcoholic 
lesbian as an Attorney General, Janet Reno, who, from the mouths of her own staff if 
put under oath, was probably drunk when she ordered the gassing and burning of almost 
100 men, women and children at Waco. Strong words? Not when you have done your 
homework. Another excerpt from the web site of the Democratic Socialists of America:

Now you begin to understand why a controlled vote is a necessity to get gets these 
anti- American, and by their own admission, socialists, "elected" to the U.S. 
Congress. Where is your outrage, America? Fifty-seven members of the United States 
Congress are connected like an umbilical cord with this subversive organization. Are 
you going to sit back and allow them to do this to our country? I guess so.

Actually, with the joke we call elections, it is rather difficult to vote anyone out 
of office anymore- all members of the Progressive Caucus - socialists - "reelected." 
Sure. Please help to educate everyone you know, people in your church, your union and 
all across this country. Let our voices be heard before it's too late - and we're 
getting close. Who are these members of Congress working to overthrow our Republic? 
They are all Democrats who proudly proclaim their membership in the Progressive 
Congress, they are:

Earl Hilliard [AL], Eni Faleomavaega [AS-AL], Ed Pastor [AZ], Lynn Woolsey [CA], 
George Miller [CA], Nancy Pelosi [CA], Pete Stark [CA], Henry Waxman [CA], Xavier 
Becerra [CA], Julian Dixon [CA], Esteban Torres [CA], "Mad Max" Maxine Waters [CA], 
George Brown [CA], Bob Filner [CA], Diane DeGette [CO], Corrine Brown [FL], Carrie 
Meek [FL], Alcee Hastings [FL], Cynthia McKinney [GA] - I think she was just 
redistricted out, John Lewis [GA], Neil Abercrombie [HI], Patsy Mink [HI], Jessie 
Jackson, Jr [IL}, Luis Gutierrez [IL], Danny Davis [IL], Lane Evans [IL], Julia Carson 
[IN], John Oliver [MA], Jim McGovern [MA], Barney Frank [MA], John Tierney [MA], David 
Bonier [MI], Lynn Rivers [MI], John Conyers [MI], Bennie Thompson [MS]

Melvin Watt [NC], Donald Payne [NJ], Jerrold Nadler [NY], Major Owens [NY], Nydia 
Velazquez [NY], Charles Rangel [NY], Jose Serrano [NY], Maurice Hinchey [NY], John 
LaFalce [NY], Marcy Kaptur [OH], Dennis Kucinch [OH], Louis Stokes [OH] just retired, 
Sherrod Brown [OH], Elizabeth Furse [OR], Peter DeFazio [OR], Chaka Fattah [PA] gone, 
William Coyne [PA], Carlos Romero-Barcelo [PR-AL], Robert C. Scott [VA], Bernard 
Sanders* [VT], James McDermott [WA]

*Sanders is the only "independent" in Congress. If I remember correct, Sanders ran on 
the Socialist ticket in '92 and was allegedly defeated, then ran as an "independent" 
in '94 and has been there ever since. He is as Red as Red Square in Moscow or 
Tienneman Square in Communist China. I do not believe that a constitutional and 
freedom loving state like Vermont would elect a socialist to Congress, no way.

Each and every one of these people took a solemn oath to preserve and protect the 
Constitution of the United States. They cannot uphold that oath and be socialists at 
the same time. The two are not compatible. In my book, they are guilty of lying under 
oath, but, hell, why not? The President of the United States does it so why not them? 
Can you see the pattern here?

I have watched Congress on C-SPAN and all the talking head shows for years and years. 
I have watched every single one of those listed above and each time they open their 
mouths, I am amazed at the stupidity and un-American, anti-American, destructive 
ideology that they chant on a daily basis. Marcy Kaptur became the darling of the 
anti-free trade sector of our population - all except me - I knew she was a member of 
the Progressive Caucus and what they their real agenda was/is: the overthrow of our 
legal form of government. Where's your voice, America?

There is major, serious work that needs to be done in this country and if you think 
I'm kidding (no pun intended), let me leave you with this:
The following excerpt is from the 700 pages of transcripts re: In 1978 the legislature 
of Illinois created a committee to study regional governance - one of the key 
mechanisms to erasing our sovereignty and bringing America into a Communist "New World 
Order." There were three hearings, April 11, 1978, July 10, 1978 and September 26, 
1978; the following statement is from the September 26, 1978 hearing.
This is the testimony of Norman Dodd, chief investigator in 1953 for U.S. Congressman 
B. Carroll Reece, whose committee investigated tax-exempt foundations run by the 
biggest traitors in this nation. This investigation eventually narrowed down to about 
10 foundations, those chief among them for Un-American activities were Rockefeller, 
Ford, Carnegie and the Rhodes Scholarship Fund. No? I invite you to do your homework. 
Did you know that Cecil Rhodes was one of the original white supremacists? Oh yes he 
was. In his will he spoke of eliminating all but the superior white race and working 
towards eliminating all minorities. If I were Bill Clinton, Robert Reich, George 
Stephannoplous, just to name a few, I would be ashamed to be a "Rhodes Scholar."

Transcript of Public Hearing, Joint Committee on Regional Government, September 26, 
1978, Edwardsville, Illinois, Norman Dodd, page 51, "Mr. Chairman. After listening to 
the very able descriptions of how complex the question that is before the Committee 
is, I have been thinking in terms of drawing on my own experiences that relate to the 
development of the proposal called 'regional government'...As a result of that 
investigation [into tax exempt foundations], experiences began to accrue and one of 
them stemmed from the entity - or the head of the entity - responsible for the 
proposition which you all now face called regional government. This individual was the 
head of the Ford Foundation, and this experience took place back in 1953. It took the 
form of an invitation from the President of the Ford Foundation to me to visit the 
Foundation's offices, all of which I did and on arrival, was greeted by the President 
of the Ford Foundation with this statement:

"Mr. Dodd, we have invited you to come to NY and stop in and see us in the hope that, 
off the record, you would tell us why the Congress of the U.S. should be interested in 
an operation such as ours." Before I could think of just exactly how I would reply, 
Mr. Gaither volunteered the following information, and these are practically in his 
exact words: "Mr. Dodd, we operate here under directives which emanate from the White 
House. Would you like to know what the substance of these directives is?" I said, 
"Indeed, I would, Mr. Gaither." Whereupon he then said the following: "We here, 
operate and control our grant making policies in harmony with the directives, the 
substance of which is as follows: We shall use our grant making power so to alter life 
in the U.S. that it can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union."

Page 53: Now, the second experience that I would like to share with you, oh, and 
incidentally, it is the Ford Foundation's grants which are responsible for the 
formulation of this idea of regional government, and also the idea that given regional 
government, we must, in turn, develop and accept and agree to a totally New 
Constitution which has already been drawn up, as was mentioned just a few minutes ago.
[Editorial note: Let me leave Mr. Dodd's testimony for a moment. I have a copy of the 
New States Constitution, developed many, many years ago and refined in 1978 by the 
Center for Democratic Studies, a Rockefeller funded operation. This New States 
Constitution is to replace ours. Ask former Senatorette Nancy Kassenbaum, now married 
to Howard Baker - she helped draft this document. However, first a Constitutional 
Convention must be called and the globalists are desperate to pull a con-con.

They tried and failed in 1994, they will try again soon. Did you notice during the 
105th Congress, each session these people continued to call for a Constitutional 
Amendment for virtually every major piece of legislation, i.e. a balanced budget 
amendment to the Constitution, a balanced budget amendment [another meaningless, phony 
ploy], an amendment to the Constitution for school prayer, for victim's rights, to fix 
the IRS? This is unprecedented in this century.

The last Constitutional Convention was in 1787. We've passed 16 Amendments to the 
Constitution without a con-con, so why all of a sudden do we need one for all the 
legislation listed above? We don't, but it's the only way they can throw out our 
Constitution and replace it with this Communist doctrine called a New States 
Constitution.]

Back to Mr. Dodd's testimony beginning on pg. 53, Mr. Dodd is speaking about looking 
at the minutes and records of the Carnegie Endowment: "Mr. Dodd, we have received your 
letter. We can answer all the questions, but it will be a great deal of trouble. The 
reason it will be a great deal of trouble is because, with the ratification by the 
Senate of the U.S. of the United Nations Treaty, our job was finished, we bundled up 
our records, spanning, roughly speaking, fifty years and put them in the warehouse."

I did send a member of my staff to NY to read the minute books of this organization 
since it"s inception in 1908. Now, we are back in the period of 1908, ad these minutes 
reported the following: The Trustees of the Carnegie Endowment bring up a single 
question, namely, if it is desirable to alter the life of an entire people, is there 
any means more efficient than war to gain that end? And they discuss this very 
question at a very high academic and scholarly level for a year, and they come up with 
an answer - there are no known means more efficient than war, assuming the objective 
is altering the life of an entire people."

[Editorial note: Remember, Mr. Dodd is now quoting from the Carnegie Foundation's own 
meeting minutes, page 55: "....oh, before that, the Trustees then answered the 
question of how to involve us in a war by saying, "We must control the diplomatic 
machinery of the U.S."; and then that brings up the question of how to secure that 
control, and the answer is we must control the State Department. Now, at that point, 
research discloses a relationship between the effort to control the State Dept. and an 
entity which the Carnegie Endowment set up, namely the Council of Learned Societies 
[editorial note: Later followed by the Council on Foreign Relations [CFR]. And through 
that entity, are cleared all of the appointments - high appointments in the State 
Department and they have continued to be cleared that way since then.]
Now, finally, we are in a war. Eventually the war is over, and the Trustees turn their 
attention, then, to seeing to it that life does not revert in this country to what it 
was prior to 1914; and they hit upon the idea that in order to prevent that reversion, 
they must control education in this country. They realized that this is a perfectly 
tremendous, really stupendous and complex task - much too great for them alone. So, 
they approached the Rockefeller Foundation, with the suggestion that the task be 
divided between the two of them.

The Carnegie Endowment takes on that aspect of education which is a domestic in its 
relationship. These two run along in tandem that way, disciplined by a decision - 
namely, that the answer lies entirely in the changing of the teaching of the history 
of the U.S. They then approached five of the most prominent historians in this country 
with the proposition that they alter the manner of the teaching of the subject, and 
they get turned down flatly; so they realized then they must build their own stable of 
historians, so to speak. They approach the Guggenheim Foundation, which specializes in 
Fellowships, and suggests to them that when they locate a relatively young potential 
historian, will the Guggenheim Foundation give that person a Fellowship, merely on 
their say-so and the answer is, yes they will.....And that becomes the policy which if 
finally picked up and manifests itself in the expression of collectivism all along the 
line, of which the dividing of this country into re!
 gions, using all of the logic which supports the ultimate idea that in order that 
regional government, in turn, be effective, there must be a new Constitution of the 
United States." End of quote.

Ladies and gentlemen, we are almost there, delivered right into their hands by a lazy, 
self-centered, apathetic American populace. I, for one, am begging Americans to turn 
off the tv and turn your full attention to what's going on right in front of your face 
if you'll just take the time to read the truth.

Our children, our future, our most precious gift, what is the public cesspool system 
doing to your children? How much longer are Americans going to keep buying into "we 
need more money for education?" All the money in the world isn't going to teach your 
children to read, write and spell - not in the government school system. Outcome Based 
Education is another nefarious mechanism to literally dumb down your children - 
believe these words. No? Are you willing to bet your child's future because it's 
easier just to send them off to strangers for half the day and allow them to fill your 
child's head full of New World Order doctrine?

Let me quote from a tremendous work titled America 2000/Goals 2000 - Moving the Nation 
Educationally to a New World Order; I have this manual which is over 600 pages and 
contains all the documented proof of the following:

"The restructure of America's educational system is in reality, a restructure of the 
nation through the educational system. The proposed restructure program of the U.S. 
educational system closely resembles the International/Global educational program of 
the United Nations and is clearly socialistic in concept. Outcome based/mastery 
learnings, a whole "new" innovative approach to education as proposed by the Dept. of 
Ed, was implemented in Eastern Europe [and Communist China and Communist Russia. A 
close study of the restructure program reveals an interlock with a small, but 
dedicated body of people - like the Clinton's and Gingrich's - who have consistently 
worked to establish a single world government or New World Order." End of quoted 
segment.

Wake Up, fellow Americans. Take control of your parties and get rid of the shadow 
leadership who continue to pull the strings at the highest levels of your party. Help 
rid this nation of vote fraud. Loudly reject electronic ballot machines.
Nullification of the Bill of Rights

On December 7, 1941, almost 5,000 Americans were brutally murdered by the Japanese. 
Americans went to war. By the thousands they lined up to fight to preserve and protect 
what so many had died to give us. On the wall in my office is a poster. The American 
flag is tattered, blowing in the wind; big clouds of black smoke fills the background. 
The words at the top of this poster say: "We here highly resolve that these dead shall 
not have died in vain." At the bottom it reads: Remember December 7th!

I remember, even though I have never been to war. I remember Italy, Anzio, Baatan, 
Guadacanal, Wake Island, Vietnam, Laos, Korea, Somalia, Bosnia and a thousand other 
places I've never been. All wars orchestrated by the international bankers. The push 
by the Masters of the Game - the New World Order architects - is to crush any 
patriotism in this country. Embrace "globalism," erase sovereignty, embrace slavery 
disguised as "democracy," repudiate a Constitutional Republic.

Americans today are allowing these precious freedoms to slip right away without a 
whimper. The Bill of Rights is the only protection we have for personal freedom and 
liberty. Yet, federal judges are now subverting our rights and magically turning them 
into privileges.
A privilege is something that can be taken away. Our rights, given to us by God cannot 
be taken away. During the O.J. Simpson trial, America watched Mark Furhman sit on the 
witness stand and utter the words, "I assert my Fifth Amendment privileges." For 
years, federal judges nationwide have taken it upon themselves to constantly refer to 
our rights as privileges. Balderdash! Congress should long ago have cleaned up the 
federal judiciary raining terror down on the heads of Americans and it absolutely is 
one of the ten greatest failures of Congress over the past 100 years.

The biggest propaganda machine and brainwashing tool of the globalists, the 
television, has been in full use for years. Take one episode of Law & Order, April 30, 
1997, where the defense attorney tells his client, and the judge questions his client 
about giving up his Fifth Amendment "privileges." This phrase "Fifth Amendment 
privileges" was repeated a half dozen times in ten minutes. Brainwashing through 
repetition. Soon half of America will think that our Fifth Amendment Right is a 
privilege, just the same as half this country believes America's form of government is 
a democracy. What reprehensible lies and distortions dished up every night on the 
stupid tube.

In the Hickman case, let's see what the court said about your Second Amendment right: 
"The courts understanding follows a plain reading of the Amendment's text. The 
Amendment's second clause declares that the goal is to preserve the security of a 
'free state'; its first clause establishes the premise that well-regulated militia are 
necessary to this end. Thus it is only in furtherance of state security that 'the 
right of the people to keep and bear arms' is finally proclaimed; [Footnote 6 in 
Hickman. No. 94-55836, DC. No CV-91-05594-RMT(Bx), Ninth Circuit Court, April 5, 1996.

The esteemed court also wrote: "The question presented at the threshold of Hickman's 
appeal is whether the Second Amendment confers upon individual citizens standing to 
enforce the right to keep and bear arms. We follow our sister circuits in holding that 
the Second Amendment is a right held by the states, and does not protect the 
possession of a weapon by a private citizen. We conclude that Hickman can show no 
legal injury, and therefore lacks standing to bring this action." Mother of God!

The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution says that the right of the people, to 
keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. What part don't they understand? Where does 
it say in that sentence that it is the right of the state and not the individual? 
Hitler would have been proud of these judges. Did the Founding Fathers who wrote the 
Second Amendment intend for it to apply to states instead of the people?
Thomas Jefferson: "No free man shall ever be barred the use of arms." Did he say free 
state? No. Patrick Henry: "...the people have a right to keep and bear arms." Did he 
say the state has a right to keep and bear arms? No. Alexander Hamilton: "The best we 
can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed." Did he 
say the state be properly armed? No. So just where did the Ninth Circuit come up with 
this distorted interpretation of the Second Amendment and more importantly, why are 
the people putting up with it by their silence?

Do you really believe that removing these inanimate objects [guns] will cure the 
social ills of America? You live in a dream world. Do you really believe that 
disarming America isn't the sole object of the White House and Congress? Let me quote 
from the Star Tribune, September 10, 1993, Scripps Howard Service article titled: 
Brady Bill Just One Small Step On Path To Disarm America: "The danger in all the good 
intent of the Brady bill is that it might end for the indefinite future, any prospect 
that Congress - from which not much is ever expected - would confront the real need to 
get rid of the handguns, to disarm America." The "liberal" media - Hitler must be 
smiling from Hell.

On March 11, 1992, Congressional Record, page H1168, Congressman Major Owens, a devout 
Communist masquerading as a Democrat, introduced legislation calling for the repeal of 
the Second Amendment. In his oratory of ignorance he said, "Is the second amendment 
still necessary in 1992?" Perhaps Comrade Owens, and Sen. Comrade Charles Schumer 
should ask the survivors of Hitler's killing fields how important it is for the people 
to be armed? If you're on the Internet, I urge you to go to: www.geoffmetcalf.com and 
read the most comprehensive gun studies the media won't tell you about. Why? Because 
they clearly show that the better armed a community/population is, the lower the crime 
rate and that's a fact, Jack!

On May 1, 1997 I called the bill status room in Washington, DC to check on the status 
of HJ Resolutions 19, 38 & 51; all the same: Legislation to repeal the 22nd Amendment 
to the U.S. Constitution and allow for unlimited terms for President. Yep. Paving the 
way for a totalitarian dictatorship. Can't happen here in America? Well, by God, it is 
and it's well under way!

State Department Publication 7277, which defines Public Law 87-297, the Arms Control 
and Disarmament Act show the treason well underway, excerpt from 7277:
"A world in which adjustment to change takes place in accordance with the principles 
of the UN...the disbanding of all national armed forces and the prohibition of their 
re-establishment in any form whatsoever other than those required to preserve internal 
order and for contributions to a United Nations Peace Force."

Our troops are serving all over the world, getting killed and leaving America's shores 
unguarded and being replaced with UN forces? No? Read my other booklet, Why A Bankrupt 
America? Their words, not mine, will show you their hidden agenda. Yes, I guarantee 
you, I'd rather be fishing than reading all this treason, it's very scary. But 
wouldn't you rather know the truth?

On May 29, 1994, veteran Marines of Somalia, Panama or Haiti were given what is now 
called the "Twenty Nine Palms Survey," since Twenty Nine Palms, Ca., is the base where 
this questionnaire was given. What did it ask? Forty questions and I will give you two 
of those questions to our active duty military:


1. Do you agree or disagree that you are a UN fighting machine?

2. If Congress passed a law that said Americans could only own hunting type rifles and 
had to turn in all other guns, would you fire on an American who refused to give up 
their gun? A sickening 25% said they would shoot their fellow Americans. This was a 
test run. In 1995 & 1996, it was given to Air Force personnel.

Just how important is the Bill of Rights to you? The right to free speech, to worship 
as you please, to own and bear arms, your home can't be arbitrarily violated without a 
search warrant, just to name a few. Imagine these rights completely neutralized and 
considered privileges by the courts? Can't happen here? Consider this:

The U.S. Senate held hearings Nov. 18-Dec. 11, 1975 which exposed the on-going 
internment plan covered under The Emergency Detention Act of 1950, allegedly repealed 
in 1971. I say allegedly because it is apparent from the testimony given during the 
1975 hearings, chronicled in the government report Intelligence Activities, Senate 
Revolution 21, Hearings before the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations, 
etc., that it remains the clear intent of the federal government to arrest, control 
and contain inhabitants of the U.S. who are considered "political dissidents." Which 
means if you speak out against government tyranny, one day in the not too distant 
future, you'll be considered a "political dissident." No? I pray that Americans will 
reject, fully, completely and vocally, all these so-called "hate laws." They are 
nothing but a ruse to destroy your God-given rights. We already have enough laws on 
the books that deal with violence and crimes against individuals. "Hat!
 e laws" are the beginning of the end of free speech, plain and simple. Stand up now 
or forever be silenced by those who lust for power.

Shall I make it a little worse? Ever hear of a man by the name of John Stockwell? He 
was the Director of the CIA's Angola Task Force in the 1070s and is the highest 
ranking CIA officer ever to quit the agency and expose the truth of its operations to 
Congressional investigators. He wrote a book titled The Praetorian Guard and now has a 
follow-up titled, The Praetorian Guard: The U.S. Role in the New World Order. This guy 
is no Republican hater. You can believe or reject his words --after you read his 
books. It's pretty scary stuff. While I don't agree with him on some domestic issues, 
Mr. Stockwell is a bleeding-heart liberal, what he has to say is important. From his 
second book, section titled Ex-CIA Director, President George Bush, Sr., pg 20:

"...Reagan put his and Meese's California friend Luis Guiffrida in charge of the 
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), which laid plans to suspend the 
Constitution, declare martial law, and intern several hundred thousand people without 
due process...."
This is the bald-faced truth and that phony "Ollie" North was hip-deep in this 
chicanery against the American people.

Let's try this one on for size: Senate Report. No. 94-755, pg 19(d), April 26, 1976 
states, "More importantly, the government's surveillance activities in the 
aggregate-whether or not expressly intended to do so, tends, as the committee 
concluded at Page 290 to deter the exercise of First Amendment rights by American 
citizens who become aware of the government's domestic intelligence program." I have 
in front of me the Master Warrant of Arrest detailed in this report.

I also have in front of me a document from the Department of Army, HQ, US Army 
Training and Doctrine Command, Fort Monroe, Va., 29 August 1994 titled: Draft Army 
Regulation on Civilian Inmate Labor Program and it is authentic. These are regs for 
the policies on civilian inmate utilization, procedures for preparing to establish 
civilian prison camps on installations, etc. Oh, heck, it's just something harmless 
and innocent, right? Do you remember the two men raided and arrested April 26, 1996 in 
Atlanta for allegedly having pipe bombs on their property so they could blow up the 
Olympics? They were Georgia militia members who spoke out against the increasing 
tyranny by our government against our people.

Few people know or understand what Posse Comitatus means. According to the FBI, the 
ATF, Congress and the White House it means nothing. This law for over a hundred years 
has protected US, you and me, from having the military be used against us like they do 
in foreign countries. They used the military against the people in Ruby Ridge and 
Waco. Mr. Starr and Mr. McCranie, the two militia members mentioned in the last 
paragraph, spoke out about these types of issues.

During their "trial," Agent Stephen W. Gillis of the ATF testified that the defendant, 
Robert Edward Starr III was not present when their own paid informant planted pipe 
bomb materials on his property. The agent also admitted that he did not know for sure 
whether Mr. Star was even aware the materials were there. This Agent Gillis also 
testified that Starr's co-defendant, William James McCranie had said, "I don't want to 
know anything about it" and walked away when the government's informant was talking 
about building bombs. Guess what? The mindless idiots on their jury found them guilty 
of making pie bombs and these two will spend the next 8-14 years in a federal prison. 
For what? Because they spoke out against the government? The ATF planted the bomb 
materials for God's sake! Wake up America.
FIJA stands for Fully Informed Jury Association. FIJA is a hated targed by judges all 
across this nation conducting a smear campaign against Americans who are interested in 
learning about this facet of our jury system. If you take the time to learn and 
understand your duties, responsibilities and rights as a juror, you're now 
automatically dismissed. If you listen to the wrong radio show you're now dismissed, 
if you subscribe to an "anti-government" media publication, you're out of there. This 
happened to Hoppy Heidelberg in the OKC Grand Jury. He went by the instruction booklet 
given to him by the court and when he tried to insure they went by the book, the judge 
gave him the boot. What are they so afraid of?

Today jurors are ask the most personal questions about themselves, their finances and 
their families. The judges and prosecution now seek to put empty heads on a jury, 
sheep who will not stand up and say no but hell no, this is wrong! The trend is now 
underway to do away with our God given, constitutional right to a jury and replace the 
system with "professional jurors." That's right! How long do you think it will take 
the globalists to figure out a way to get rid of jury trials altogether? They've 
already begun. In November 1998, allegedly the citizenry of Colorado voted to 
eliminate juries for capital crime cases! I don't believe it for a moment.
Steffen Bertsch wasis an attorney in the State of Washington, I say was because I 
think he's gone to Australia. For years he tried to educate Americans about the fraud 
being perpetrated by the IRS. In March 1997, a jury found 11-1 in favor of his client 
by finding that the IRS acted illegally in the seizure of his client's property. 
Knowing what such a jury decision could mean in exposing the fraudulent activities of 
the IRS, the judge simply set aside the jury decision calling it "advisory", dismissed 
the case and the IRS will re-try Steffen's client. Is there something wrong with this 
picture, America?

Have you ever heard the story about the frog in the pot of water? The cook puts the 
frog in a pot of cold water, sets the temperature on low. The frog feels no pain. 
Gradually the cook turns the hat up and as the pot grows warmer, the frog becomes a 
little uncomfortable, then a little more uncomfortable. Then one day, he discovers too 
late that he's now cooked. Do you get my meaning?
Our Sovereign Republic

Sadly, our sovereign Republic seems to mean nothing to so many - especially if it 
interferes with their "party" "winning at all costs." Of course this isn't surprising 
considering what the Federal Department of Socialist Education has been drumming into 
the heads of America's children for the past 30 years. They've been brainwashed into 
thinking America is a democracy. They're being taught everything but our heritage, our 
history and patriotism. It's all quite deliberate and well-thought out.

We used to have very loyal Americans serve in Congress. What did some of them say to 
try and warn US about the UN?

January 9, 1953, Senator John W. Bricker on Our Liberty Must be Guarded. This was a 
major discussion about the loss of our sovereignty and the passing of the UN Covenant 
of Human Rights. Bricker felt there wasn't much chance of getting it passed [this was 
before electronic ballot fraud started insuring no more loyal Americans would serve in 
Congress, only the corrupt, the ignorant and the supporters of globalism] but he 
nonetheless said:

"But the Constitution should be amended now to forestall a loss of freedom to our 
children and to oncoming generations through the power of treaties and executive 
agreements designed to circumvent the Constitution."

How prophetic. Look at all these treaties Congress and past presidents have entered 
America into, i.e. NAFTA & GATT, Ramparts & Bio-Diversity treaties that literally are 
wiping out our Republic. How many Americans have even heard of these treaties, much 
less read them as I have done? Well, heck, can't miss an episode of Baywatch's 
bouncing breasts, ER , a sports game or Who Wants To Be A Millionaire. Better to keep 
the population drunk, addicted to porn, entertained, medicated, fed junk food and 
watered.

February 3, 1953, Congressman Burdick, asking the question, "Mr. Speaker, the subject 
I was going to speak on now and do speak on is: What can this country, the U.S. do to 
prevent the United Nations from destroying the Constitution of the United States of 
America and the constitution and laws of the various states of the Union?" The 
liberals and the government's media apparatus all chant that the UN is the answer to 
the world's problems of violence, terrorism and ethnic cleansing. What rubbish. What 
pure, undiluted propaganda.Do people get the meaning of the word "programming" as it 
relates to the TV set?

January 15,1962, Congressman Utt: "You can expect to see a one world government, 
Communist controlled, under the United Nations. You will see the United Nations run up 
astronomical debts, which we, under the terms of the treaty, are bound to pay."
Again, how prophetic because that's just where we are today. These quotes were taken 
from the Congressional Record. Twenty years ago, former Congressman John Rarick and 
later, Congressman Ron Paul [now back in Congress, R-TX] introduced bills to get US 
out of this Communist boys club. It will never happen until we fix our election system 
and get real constitutionalists elected and we educate our fellow Americans about the 
material on this web site and others beating the drum for America.

Only We the People can demand our state legislatures completely purge all existing 
voter rolls and restore the integrity of one of our most precious rights - the ballot 
box. If they refuse, please get out there and get these members of your state 
legislature recalled through a petition signature drive. It's done all the time. The 
establishment media hides it from you because they don't want you to know you have 
that power. On this web site is a document titled How to Recall Elected Public 
Servants. I have laid it out, step by step, for every level of state government. We 
have the tools, don't wait until it's too late to use them.

If you're having a difficult time with this material, which is just the tip of the 
iceberg, I urge you to read G. Edward Griffin's outstanding book, The Fearful Master: 
A Second Look at the UN. There's a well documented dose of reality.

Another brave and courageous gentleman, former FBI agent, Cleon Skoussen, has written 
many fine works. Let me give you a quote from Mr. Skoussen's work:

"Norman Thomas was the Socialist candidate for President in 1928; he lost...by 1953, 
Thomas, however, was jubilant. He wrote a pamphlet called Democratic Socialism in 
which he stated that '...here in America more measures once praised or denounced as 
socialist have been adopted than once I should have thought possible short of a 
socialist victory at the polls.'

Under President Eisenhower, Thomas still found reasons to be jubilant. In the 
Congressional Record for April 17, 1958 (p. A-3080), Thomas is quoted as saying: 'The 
United States is making great strides toward Socialism under Eisenhower than even 
under Roosevelt [FDR], particularly in the fields of federal spending and welfare 
legislation.'

By 1962, Thomas summed up the whole situation as follows: 'The difference between 
Democrats and Republicans is: Democrats have accepted some ideas of Socialism 
cheerfully, while Republicans have accepted them reluctantly.' (Cleveland Plain 
Dealer, October 19, 1962)

Alfred E. Smith, Democratic Gov. of NY [4 terms], became the Democratic candidate for 
President in 1926, but lost to Herbert Hoover. In 1932, he supported FDR, but by 1936, 
he was so shocked and alarmed by what he saw happening that he decided to warn his 
party. On January 25, 1936, he gave a speech in Washington, DC to warn the American 
people that the Democratic Party was being betrayed." End of quotes.

The rock of truth is a lonely place to be sometimes. In the colonial era when America 
was in its infancy, Patrick Henry, Nathan Hale, Jefferson, Madison - they were called 
every name in the book, "radicals," "extremists" and so on. Today, those who stand up 
for the truth, for the Constitution, for America, we're all called the same names 
except the media has added a few like, "anti-government," "anti-Semitic," and so 
forth. However, the truth is the truth and no amount of name calling and vilification 
by the media or politicians will change the facts.
America, why are you sitting back and allowing our nation to be destroyed? Why don't 
you want the truth? My husband spent 27 years in the Army to keep you free. He could 
have been killed, crippled or maimed in Vietnam, Thailand or Germany. Will you so 
cavalierly toss aside his sacrifices and the sacrifices of 25 million other veterans 
who served to keep you free, because you just have to go to a museum or movie today 
instead of finding out what's really going on behind your back and then doing 
something about it?

Has the television set or a game of golf, or going to the gym or out to dinner become 
more important than saving our children's birthright and preserving the freedoms given 
to us by the spilling of tens of thousands of gallons of blood? I can't do it alone, 
we must all work together to bring about legal, peaceful change. Yes, we're all tired 
and worn out. But if we as a nation stood tall against this tyranny being rained down 
on our heads, the globalists won't stand a chance. Will you join the double digit 
millions of us in this battle to remain a free, sovereign nation? Will you stand up as 
those before you and shout to the world our cry for Freedom?

Our Founding Fathers didn't just stand up and shout. They walked away from their 
farms, business and families for you and your children's futures. They had their homes 
ransacked and burned to the ground. Brave men like Nathan Hale were betrayed by their 
own and hung by the neck. Many were shot by firing squads -- all to bring freedom to 
Americans. Please don't turn your back on our history, heritage and our tomorrows. 
Fight back



Forwarded for info and discussion from the New Paradigms Discussion List,
not necessarily endorsed by:
***********************************

Lloyd Miller, Research Director for A-albionic Research a ruling
class/conspiracy research resource for the entire political-ideological
spectrum. **FREE RARE BOOK SEARCH: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> **
   Explore Our Archive:  <http://a-albionic.com/a-albionic.html>

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om