-Caveat Lector-
>From Paranoia Magazine,
http://www.paranoiamagazine.com/Michael%20Hoffman%20Interview.htm
The Scapegoating of Ted Kaczynski:
Cereal Murder and the Group Mind
Joan d'Arc Interviews Michael Hoffman, II
Joan d'Arc: Michael, in your excellent on-line article entitled "The
Scapegoat: Ted Kaczynski, Ritual Murder and the Invocation of
Catastrophe," www.hoffman-info.com you write that the Unabom case has
been "rubber-stamped in newsrooms with the logo of the FBI." As you
explain, a very un-American collusion between the media and the FBI from
the beginning primed the public for Ted Kaczynski's guilt without due
process and trial. Have we been witness again to a 'lone nut' in the
making?
Michael Hoffman: Yes, this is the point I make in my essay, "Profiling
the FBI's Unabom Charade." It fits the classic profile from Oswald to
Arthur Bremer to Tim McVeigh. The tip-off is when you see, at the height
of the investigation, that the chief suspect is apprehended and yet
there is no search for accomplices. This was true with "Son of Sam" and
now with Kaczynski. How was the FBI so certain Kaczynski had zero
accomplices? Because they had Kaczynski under surveillance for years.
They were shepherding him. Unabom is a Federal government operation.
d'Arc: As you state, the nomenclature of the "Unabom-er" was concocted
by the FBI. You state that no credible evidence has actually linked Mr.
Kaczynski to all or even most of the bombings. In addition, the most
well-known sketch of the alleged "Unabom" suspect depicts a hooded man
with sunglasses, a mustache and curly red hair. Strangely, the "Unabom
Manifesto" alludes to the existence of potential accomplices in the mail
bomb attacks for which Kaczynski is now famous. Yet there has been no
investigation or follow-up of various leads - nor has there been media
curiosity - about this possibility. How does this fit into the 'Trial by
Media" scenario?
Hoffman: I am a former reporter for the N.Y. bureau of the Associated
Press so I know the media. People have this idea that reporters for big
outlets are these super-hip, highly educated people. They're not! They
are mostly low-grade careerists who eat junk food and have filled their
heads with conformist crap since they started college. They are
rubber-stamped from a mold. They have no curiosity because real
curiosity is dangerous --just ask the late reporter Don Bolles who got
car-bombed by Barry Goldwater's pal Kemper Marley. Bolles was a very
curious reporter!
I think the local reporters on the Kaczynski scene in Montana, from the
Great Falls, Helena and Missoula papers and TV stations, knew that
something intense was happening involving the "Power Brokers" and they
backed off. The first question a good reporter would ask of the Feds is,
"Why are you so certain Kaczynski acted alone? You haven't even searched
for any accomplices even though the 'Unabom Manifesto' mentions other
members of the FC club?"
There are hundreds of questions. I'd start there.
d'Arc: You point to the fact that nobody other than the Feds were
allowed anywhere near Kaczynski's cabin during the search and seizure of
property, where the media reported that "truckloads of evidence" were
taken from a tiny structure less than 200 square feet. What in your
estimation is wrong with this picture?
Hoffman: It's the same picture as in Oklahoma City where the Murrah
building was demolished before any real investigation could begin. This
destruction of evidence-- a felony -- is committed by the felon in "our"
own government.
d'Arc: Michael, you write that a few days after Ted Kaczynski's
apprehension, on April 11, 1996, you got his attention by holding up a
cardboard poster at the window of the Helena jail. You indicate that via
sign language Kaczynski expressed an interest in a visit from you in
jail, and that you entered the jail on that day. Can you describe what
you saw in the jail that day. Were you his only visitor and were you
able to see Mr. Kaczynski?
Hoffman: It was eerie. The jail was deserted except for a couple of
local people visiting some other prisoner. This was the day Kaczynski
was the most famous man in America. This was the day Time and Newsweek
came out with Kaczynski on the cover. Yet there were no
environmentalists at the jail drumming support, singing, chanting so
Kaczynski could hear them. No environmentalists trying to visit him.
Just me, one lone investigator and that was it. The environmentalists
were massaging their computer keyboards at the time. There was wild
speculation and gossip flying all over the Internet. But for some reason
no one bothered to go to the scene - beyond virtual reality to reality.
Except for me, Kaczynski was totally alone. It was spooky, given the
fact that he was the most famous man on the planet at the time.
d'Arc: You also state that one of the media/FBI myths about Ted
Kaczynski was that he was "a reviled kook who reeked of body odor,
dressed abominably and was paranoid." Can you tell us how you have
arrived at the belief that this is a contrived story and what you think
is behind it?
Hoffman: I went to Lincoln where Kaczynski has lived for years and
talked to everyone I could. Some of the locals I spoke with said that
when the media came across a person in Lincoln who spoke positively
about Ted K., the interview was never broadcast. The townfolk told me
that the people who spoke the most negatively were people who hardly
knew him. But they're the ones who got the most sound bites on the
nightly news.
I got to befriend one lady, a town official, who knew Ted fairly well.
He had helped her son with homework and visited her irregularly. She
said that when Ted was around his cabin digging in his garden, etc. he
was dirty. That's when the Feds grabbed him -- in his work clothes. But
when Ted went to town he cleaned up, put on decent clothes, was friendly
etc. Originally this lady and several others wanted to testify on Ted's
behalf at his trial. But then his lawyers practically said he was guilty
and Ted did little from his jail cell to counter that impression and
this demoralized his friends in Lincoln severely.
d'Arc: You note that Kaczynski, an alleged "publicity-obsessed serial
killer," was peculiarly reticent at his sentencing. At this opportune
time, with the media spotlight on him, Kaczynski only stated that his
opinions had been distorted and he would make a statement later. What
did you find strange about this? Do you think Mr. Kaczynski was
immediately put on a pharmaceutical such as Prozac, or has had a mind
control implant of some sort, and remains under the influence of such?
Hoffman: I really have no idea what he was on. My essay on Unabom was
published in "Apocalypse Culture II" (Feral House) in edited form. They
even printed words I never wrote, including that I assert that Kaczynski
definitely ingested a "drug soup." I never wrote that. What I actually
wrote is that when the judge only asked Kaczynski at his sentencing if
he had taken any medication in the "previous 24 hours," that the time
frame cited was too narrow and that the effects of long-term use of such
drugs as Prozac and Luvox (the drugs of the Columbine killers and Kip
Kinkel) take longer than 24 hours to subside. If indeed Kaczynski had
been ingesting them.
I point out that Kaczynski's behavior during his pre-sentencing
incarceration may have been the result of government-imposed medication
or even as you suggest, an implant. But I have no evidence to prove
that.
d'Arc: You write, "the need to convict Kaczynski and to cover up any
connections to other individuals and organizations who may have been
associated with him, is a pattern found in several cases involving
spectacular crimes, tremendous publicity and the imprinting of the Group
Mind." Can you discuss this "pattern" as it also applies to the creation
of "lone nuts" like Lee Harvey Oswald, Arthur Bremer, Sirhan Sirhan, Tim
McVeigh, David Berkowitz and James Earl Ray?
Hoffman: Like James Earl Ray and Son of Sam David Berkowitz, Kaczynski
had no trial. He just copped the usual plea in such cases and was
whisked into his living tomb.
d'Arc: You write that in the observance of a ritual working, we should
find a pattern of relevant synchronicities in the days following the
"Unabom" attacks which would perform as Group Mind imprinting and would
have a "message for the masses." You state such messages would affect
the Group Mind like a billboard on Broadway. Michael, can you read the
Unabom billboard for those of us who are unable to see the writing on
the wall?
Hoffman: A lot of people acknowledge that Charles Fort was correct when
he said that everything is connected. New Age seminars have been
emphasizing the truth of this as well. Yet when it comes to crime,
politics and government, it's as though a rationalistic filter is
imposed on our perception and we go back to the same old mundane habits
of mind as the sleepwalkers around us.
The missing element in studying true crime or occult crime or "cereal"
killers is the story aspect. Above all else these are stories, like a
bedtime story or a fairy story or a Shakespeare play. I'm not saying
they are fiction. I'm saying they are speaking to the eternal verities
and themes that are common to powerful literature and to the tales which
have imprinted people to such an extent that they are passed down from
generation to generation.
A story is a message told with words and other symbols, invoking
familiar images from the subconscious, which then generate an internal
dialogue between our conscious and subconscious. In a benign sense this
is how much useful knowledge is imparted, but in a malignant sense this
is how people are programmed. The Cryptocracy doesn't so much seek to
program us by tampering with our high school textbooks as by the
spinning of tales that are as electric and golden as anything from the
realm of King Arthur or the Arabian Nights.
If one wishes to see this in action one studies the Unabom outrages and
then what happens during them and immediately after them because that's
part of the story! Not just the isolated data itself but the whole
fabric of Group Mind consciousness as it is driven by the ritual in the
Media-Infotainment universe of the modern world. I point out in my
Unabom study that there were some ecological catastrophes seemingly
triggered by Unabom. There was also twilight language play by the media
itself, including USA Today. Government assets in the media were making
vague allusions to the trickster element of the "hunt for Unabom."
So a story was woven and it consisted of a great deal more than the
particulars of the Unabom case itself. People who read my study will see
what I mean. For this writer the story of Unabom is the story of a
scapegoat ritually bound to a blackening (not a greening) of the earth,
as part of the trickster process at work. One could cite here the
Hellfire Club's spirit of occult jesting. Probably a number of your
readers are fans of Dashwood's Hellfire Club. I am not one of them.
There is an occult nose-thumbing at the bottom of many of these twilight
language cereal murders, such as Jack the Ripper--poking fun at the
investigators and the public because so many don't get the black comedy
at the heart of it. It's a feeling of superiority magnified
exponentially.
d'Arc: You report that Kaczynski's surrender to his captors on April 3,
1996 occurred in the geodetic realm at the following nodal point: The
Scapegoat, at Lincoln, Montana, the Scapegoat Wilderness and the
Scapegoat Eatery. You describe Ted Kaczynski as a human scapegoat, "an
Atlas whose 'shrug' continues to reverberate in the consciousness of the
Group Mind of America mystica." Is this part of the meaning of the
billboard?
Hoffman: Yes, in the sense that this "Scapegoat" element is there for
everyone to see and they do see it. Our subconscious does anyway. But
then they dismiss it as being too weird. Most investigators in this
field are vastly out-classed by the perpetrators because the
investigators limit themselves only to the prosaic "facts of the case":
the murder weapon, the motive, the suspect, etc. Ask them to look at a
US Forest Service map of where Kaczynski lived and spot "Scapegoat"
staring out at them like a beacon and they'll respond by saying, "You're
discrediting your case by this weirdness." Actually they discredit their
own investigations by failing to factor in the weirdness, which the
FBI's Behavior-Mod squad has built into it.
d'Arc: You have also asserted that the "Unabom ritual" is a "masonic
psychodrama" for the processing of humanity. You further explain that in
such occult crime rituals, a synchronistic work of literature usually
appears before the crimes are perpetrated, which serves as a "virtual
script." Can you discuss this virtual script with regard to the Unabom
psychodrama?
Hoffman: Yes, it's my contention that these are occult rituals and that
like the Rosicrucian Manifestos of the early 17th century they are
accompanied by anonymous statements of intent like the original Unabom
manifesto, as well as scripts that precede the ritual, just as the book
"Black Abductor" preceded the Symbionese Liberation Army Phoenix rite
and in Kaczynski's case, it was a story by Joseph Konrad.
d'Arc: You also point out that the Hollywood film, "U.S. Marshals,"
starring Tommy Lee Jones, debuted in theatres across the country during
the days leading up to Ted Kaczynski's arraignment. Can you delineate
this film's connection to the Unabom charade?
Hoffman: It's all connected, we just need to hone our holistic vision to
the point where we can see the whole cobweb. Look at the movie "The
Matrix" in the wake of Columbine. Look at "The Wicker Man" movie in the
same time frame as Son of Sam. The themes of the killings are in the
movies. The consciousness and secret gnosis of the killers is there too.
The processing is almost all out in the open in this era of the
Revelation of the Method. Al Gore's pal Tommy Lee Jones did a movie
called "US Marshals" in the aftermath of the capture of Kaczynski. In
the movie there's a US Federal agent named Kaczynski (I don't know how
they spell it in the screenplay but that is the exact sound of the
agent's name in the film. Rent the video and you'll see what I mean).
Kaczynski, the government agent in the movie, is at the center of an
incredible double-cross.
When Chevie Kehoe slaughtered William Mueller and his whole family in
Arkansas, he eliminated the last material witness who could have
connected McVeigh to the US government and the US government's own
pseudo-neo-Nazi terror gang, the "Aryan Republican Army." When Kehoe
perpetrated the killings he was wearing an FBI tactical command
jumpsuit.
Revelation of the Method concerns mind control in the last stages and at
a high level. When you tell someone what you are doing to them --
murder, mayhem, kidnap, rape, you name it -- and they do nothing to stop
you or protect themselves, you have created a doubly enslaved subject.
This part of the motivation for the occult processing of America through
ritual murder etc. The Cryptocracy carries out "cereal" murder crimes
attended by archetypal signs and symbols which the dreaming mind of the
Group Mind groks at a certain level. Next they confess in the Videodrome
that it is the police and the authorities who are behind the crimes.
Then they let the whole stew percolate into the psyche of the masses
until the next covert sting operation.
This is partly why we have the least revolutionary and most passive
population in recent memory. I'm not advertising the invincibility or
genius of the Cryptocracy. They are succeeding by default and by dint of
their great gambler's instincts. It's a huge risk to reveal to people
what you've done to them. Somebody who can decode this for the masses
can short circuit it and turn it against the Cryptocracy.
They guard against this by seeding all kinds of X-files style "noise"
into the ranks of conspiracy students -- all intended to mislead and to
muddy the waters so that one clear voice of discernment, one vision for
decoding the story, can't be seen or heard amid the competing din.
That's what has happened thus far, but I believe that it is inevitable
that my work is going to gain more currency. Give me two hours with any
group of average intelligence and I'll have them reading twilight
language and decoding occult rituals for the rest of their lives.
When that happens the Cryptocrats become transparent and they're in
quite a spot of trouble if you ask me, because all they have is this Oz
game of the man behind the curtain. It's a huge con. I am synchronizing
people with reality and there's power in that because reality is truth.
"What is truth?" asked Pontius Pilate. Truth is what the universe
operates on. It's what fuels the sun and makes the galaxies spiral. It
can be known and it can be surfed, and it can help and heal us all
because it's the motive force of what brought us here in the first
place. The Cryptocracy can be diminished and shifted out of the way with
this power. But to use this power people have to love truth. Most
conspiracy researchers these days don't love truth. They love novelty.
They love to contemplate a million fantasy scenarios and theories rather
like an enchanting flower garden. The Cryptocracy has got those people
right where it wants them. For such people my ideas will be merely the
latest strange novelty. I will fascinate them for as long as it takes
for someone else to come along and hypothesize about Martian vampires
infiltrating Microsoft.
But my work is not a hypothesis and I'm not seeking to entertain or
divert. My work is for those who can bear the full glare of reality;
whose heart and mind and soul have been sufficiently cleansed that when
certain truths are articulated these truths "speak" to that person in a
profound way. Such truth is discarded for the next novelty only at the
peril of the person who received this gift sinking back -- perhaps
irretrievably -- into the chaos and confusion which is the hallmark of
one of the many viruses seeded by the Cryptocracy during the final stage
of the alchemical "Must Be" - the Making Manifest of all that is Hidden.
Michael Hoffman's work entitled "The Scapegoat: Ted Kaczynski, Ritual
Murder and the Invocation of Catastrophe," can be found on his website
"The Campaign for Radical Truth in History" at www.hoffman-info.com.
Hoffman's infamous study entitled "Secret Societies and Psychological
Warfare" is available from Independent History & Research, PO Box 849,
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 for $15.00 post-paid ($20 overseas). Allow 4
to 6 weeks delivery. Hoffman's latest work "Profiling the FBI's Unabom
Charade: The Scapegoat," is published in "Apocalypse Culture II," by
Feral House (www.feralhouse.com).
Copyright 2000 by Paranoia and Michael A. Hoffman II
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
