writes:
WELL Bill, a little baby was murdered in her charge - she was anxious to
get to the bars, but all during her testimony she continually drank
water - she showed no feelings for the baby.
And YOU who doubt so much of what you read have decided that the press has
accounted themselves well in this case?
Methinks you're wrong!
Murdered maybe, but it's unlikely that she did it...rather that little
Matthew's parents did, only to have it bite the "foreigner" on her ample arse.
<<The parents I believe were Indians (from India)....>>
Daddy was, mom was a full-fledged WASP.
<<Parents used poor judgment but in their mind they had paid out a lot of
money to find someone good.>>
LOL!!! Yup! They found the perfect little foil.
<<Why no sympathy for he parents?� I imagine by now this "nanny" has a
special bar stool with a seat belt so she won't fall off - but the baby
is still dead.>>
Sympathy for murderers?? Nay! None here.
This was a total set-up, and the little nanny was intended to take the fall,
but a decent judge prevented that from happening...all the while the criminal
parents are free to do it all over again, and it wouldn'r suprise me in the
least if they did.
