-Caveat Lector-

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/coulter.html

Jewish World Review Jan. 11, 2001 / 16 Teves, 5761

Ann Coulter:

TWO WEEKS TILL INDICTMENT!

http://www.jewishworldreview.com -- AMONG THE PEOPLE in cheery
anticipation of independent counsel Robert Ray's pending
indictment of William Jefferson Clinton are those who:
demonstrated for George Bush in Florida; chanted "Get out of Dick
Cheney's house!" outside the vice presidential residence in
Washington; made possible George Bush's historic victory against
an incumbent in peacetime and a booming economy -- and whom Bush
is going to need when the left tries to "bork" his various
nominees.

They would be awfully disappointed with a pardon.

Among the people who are not eagerly awaiting Clinton's
indictment are the work-with-the Democrats Republicans on a break
from drafting big-government program bills with their pal Teddy
Kennedy. Without provocation, Sen. Orrin Hatch recently
announced, "I would pardon him."

Maybe a hegemonic liberal media that blocks Republicans from
getting out their message isn't such a bad thing. Before the
country had even forgotten about Al Gore the moment he conceded,
Republicans on the Hill were dashing to the media with press
releases announcing their opposition to Bush's tax-cut proposal.
In lieu of courage, it would be good if these guys could just
learn to keep their mouths shut.

Leaping to surrender is not unusual for Sen. Hatch, which is why
there's an expression in Washington, "Don't count your Hatches
before they've chickened." Poor good-hearted Orrin Hatch still
thinks he can work with Democrats. That's why he lasted in the
Republican primary for about six minutes before being forced to
drop out through lack of interest.

Remember that? Orrin Hatch ran for president last year. The
Republican Party is well-familiar with the Hatches and the Fords
and the Doles ("tax collector for the welfare state"). They're
known as Republicans who lose.

It's not their fault, really. They're doing the best they can
within their genetic limitations blocking them from discerning
the perfidious qualities of Democrats.

Pardoning Clinton is appeasement, and the left can never be
appeased. While in the U.S. Senate, John Ashcroft co-sponsored
that unconstitutional feminist lunacy, the "Violence Against
Women Act." That really helped calm down the harridans now that
he's Bush's nominee for attorney general. Try to play nice, and
liberals will bite your hand off.

We thought W already knew this. As a hopeful college freshman, W
introduced himself to William Sloane Coffin Jr., the Vietnam
War-protesting chaplain at Yale, and Coffin informed the young
man, "Yeah, I know your father, and your father lost to a better
man," after George Bush Sr. lost a Senate race in Texas.

Then W's father was double-crossed in his deal with the Democrats
to raise taxes if they cut spending. Because he broke his
Read-My-Lips pledge to people who knew better than to try to work
with Democrats, Bush's father promptly lost the next presidential
election to a flim-flam artist from Arkansas.

You can't negotiate with these terrorists.

Hatch's rationale for recommending a pardon was: 1) "I just don't
see keeping it alive any longer," and 2) "I don't think there's a
jury in America that is going to convict President Clinton."

On point 1, if a pardon would mean that we would never, ever,
ever have to hear Bill Clinton's name again, I'd be all for it.
But it's rather rash to assume a pardon will just brush Clinton
under the rug.

When Ford pardoned Nixon, there was no established indictable
offense. Perhaps there would have been after a lengthy and
meticulous investigation, and perhaps not. The criminal
investigation of Clinton is over. They could even charge Evita
Clinton as an unindicted co-conspirator at the same time:
("Indict one, get one free!") A full-blown trial will take about
two weeks.

Despite the pre-election booming economy, there is a new regime
in Washington -- precisely because Bush had nothing to do with
Clinton, James Riady, the travel office, the 900 FBI files, Evita
or, thankfully, Monica Lewinsky. Bush should maintain the Chinese
wall and just stay out of it.

The media insist "the country" wants to move on. No argument
there -- that's why Bush won -- but no one is forcing the press
to cover a Clinton trial. There are thousands of criminal trials
taking place every day in this country. No need for the media to
keep obsessing with this particular criminal.

On point 2: Then why did we try O.J.? From day one of the O.J.
trial, every jury consultant in the country said that jury
wouldn't convict that man. What kind of standard is that? Clinton
ought to be made to sit at the defense table and face the
evidence against him. If the jury acquits, so be it.

With or without a conviction, a criminal prosecution of William
Jefferson Clinton is the only fitting conclusion for the "most
ethical" government in history.



JWR contributor Ann Coulter is the author of High Crimes and
Misdemeanors: The Case Against Bill Clinton. You may visit the
Ann Coulter Fan Club by clicking here.

=================================================================
             Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:
                     *Michael Spitzer*  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
=================================================================

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to