Dear Bill,
Thank you for your post in support of the nomination of Senator John Ashcroft.  Your unconditional support and efforts on his behalf are sincerely appreciated.
Amelia
:)
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 5:40 PM
Subject: [CTRL] JOHN ASHCROFT: DRUG WAR ULTRA-HAWK, CONFEDERACY NOSTALGIST AND CORPORATE SHILL

http://shadow.autono.net/sin001/ashcroft.htm


JOHN ASHCROFT: DRUG WAR ULTRA-HAWK, CONFEDERACY NOSTALGIST AND CORPORATE
SHILL

ACTIVISTS CAMPAIGN AGAINST BUSH AG APPOINTEE

by Bill WeinbergA coalition of civil liberties and drug-policy reform groups
pledges to put up a fight against the confirmation of ex-Sen. John Ashcroft
(R-MO), President-elect George W. Bush's nomination for Attorney General. The
Drug Reform Coordination Network (DRCNet) calls Ashcroft "one of the most
hawkish drug warriors, supporting some of the most extreme drug war
legislation during his tenure in the Senate.
"Capitol Hill crusader for tougher mandatory-minimum sentencing laws,
Ashcroft also blocked efforts to end the disparity between crack and powder
cocaine penalties, and to address racial profiling. DRCNet calls for
activists to visit the new coalition's web site (
http://www.StopJohnAshcroft.org
) to find out how to plug into the effort
against Ashcroft's confirmation as head of the nation's Justice Department.

Capitol Hill's Top Drug War Hawk

Where drug policy and Constitutional rights are concerned, John Ashcroft "has
one of the worst records on Capitol Hill," according to DRCNet.
Sen. Ashcroft was a key sponsor of 1999's narrowly-defeated Methamphetamine
Anti-Proliferation Act, which would have outlawed drug-related discussions on
the Internet, and allowed police to conduct secret searches--provisions which
DRCNet says "violate the spirit of the First and Fourth Amendments."
Indeed, Ashcroft is a leading right-wing proponent of tinkering with the US
Constitution. In his six years in the Senate, Ashcroft proposed seven
Constitutional amendments-including one banning desecration of the flag
(creating an unprecedented First Amendment exception),

Reply via email to