-Caveat Lector-
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: FNN: Is the CIA Involved in Drug Smuggling?
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 16:58:58 -0600 (CST)
From: Colombian Labor Monitor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: ?
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
[NOTE: Both Fox News and Bill O'Reilly are standard-bearers of the
right-wing in the U.S. The following story seems to aim at
absolving the CIA and the U.S. government from institutional
responsibility for the role they play in the narcotics trade and
the conflict in Colombia. Nevertheless it is a sobering discussion
of the more sinister operations that the U.S. is involved in. -DG
====================================================
BUCCHI: Well, and that's the thing, and what
differentiates this story, really, from what Maxine
Waters is saying is that I believe that what
happened with Maxine Waters, or that story from
"The San Jose Mercury News," was really a fractioned
-out part of the CIA, and I don't think necessarily
was sanctioned by our government.
_____________ ====================================================
FOX NEWS NETWORK
Monday, 29 January 2001
***********************
* THE O'REILLY FACTOR *
***********************
Is the CIA Involved in Drug Smuggling?
--------------------------------------
GUESTS: Ken Bucchi
HOST: Bill O'Reilly
O'REILLY: In the "Unresolved Problem" segment tonight, a couple of years
ago radical California Congresswoman Maxine Waters accused the Central
Intelligence Agency of being involved with drug smuggling, especially
crack cocaine. Now, many Americans just shrugged that off because Ms.
Waters can be extreme in her positions. But now, a former CIA operative is
making similar charges.
With us is former CIA operative, as I just said, Kenneth Bucchi, author of
"Operation Pseudo Miranda: A Veteran of the CIA Drug Wars Tells All."
Tells all about what? What did you do? What did you see?
KEN BUCCHI, AUTHOR, "OPERATION PSEUDO MIRANDA": Well, what I saw, and this
predates long before what Maxine Waters was purporting, there was
basically a decentralized organization in Colombia. Anybody with a pint of
chutzpah and a Cessna could fly in half a ton of cocaine and there was
really no way of stopping them.
What they tried to do, and they did very successfully, was centralize it,
give a small cache of drug lords the means by which, which is is
intelligence and weapons, to basically destroy the numerically larger
number of smaller dealers.
O'REILLY: All right, so in the country of Columbia...
BUCCHI: Yes?
O'REILLY: You had all kinds of free lance cocaine smugglers.
BUCCHI: Yes. Hundreds.
O'REILLY: The CIA said this is out of control.
BUCCHI: Yes.
O'REILLY: We want to wipe the little guys out and in order to do that
we're going to cooperate with the big guys?
BUCCHI: Exactly.
O'REILLY: All right, so the big guys wiped them out themselves...
BUCCHI: Right.
O'REILLY: ... killed them or whatever it had to do.
BUCCHI: And so now you've basically increased their drug traffic to the --
let's say, 10-fold. And you set up corridors now by which they can fly
those drugs into the country.
O'REILLY: All right, now, let me stop you again. So the CIA was actually
helping...
BUCCHI: Yes.
O'REILLY: ... big cartels in...
BUCCHI: And so was the...
O'REILLY: ... Colombia fly drugs into the United States...
BUCCHI: Yes.
O'REILLY: ... in return for them knocking the little guys out.
half to us.
O'REILLY: Ah.
BUCCHI: So now we stop half the drugs.
O'REILLY: So that the cartel people harvesting the coca plant, turning it
into cocaine, primarily, we're talking about here...
BUCCHI: Right.
O'REILLY: ... gave the CIA 50 percent of it?
BUCCHI: Well, it wasn't give on that level. We -- there was a game, in a
sense, where we will develop the corridors, and if we intercept them, And
once that represented half the drugs for a certain period, we'd let the
other half go free.
O'REILLY: Really? So if you got a certain amount of drugs in any period of
time, you would let the rest fly in?
BUCCHI: We'd not only let it fly in, we'd facilitate it, in that we
would...
O'REILLY: Help it fly it?
BUCCHI: We would help it fly in...
O'REILLY: Who was behind this?
BUCCHI: Well, and that's the thing, and what differentiates this story,
really, from what Maxine Waters is saying is that I believe that what
happened with Maxine Waters, or that story from "The San Jose Mercury
News," was really a fractioned-out part of the CIA, and I don't think
necessarily was sanctioned by our government.
This -- I worked directly for the State Department. I had -- you know,
Bill Casey was three people out of my chain of command, and I was
person...
O'REILLY: William Casey, the director of the CIA at the time...
BUCCHI: Yes.
O'REILLY: ... under president...
BUCCHI: This was under President Reagan.
O'REILLY: Under President Reagan.
BUCCHI: Yes.
O'REILLY: Do you believe that President Reagan...
BUCCHI: No.
O'REILLY: ... Vice President Bush, knew anything about this?
BUCCHI: Well, I don't have any firsthand knowledge. I mean, I suspect that
they would have had some peripheral knowledge (UNINTELLIGIBLE)...
O'REILLY: How about Casey? Did he know?
BUCCHI: Casey definitely, because I met with him twice.
O'REILLY: Really?
BUCCHI: Absolutely positive, yes.
O'REILLY: So the director of the CIA said to himself, It's better for us
to control the drug flow in here and help it than have all of this other
stuff come in.
BUCCHI: Yes. Because the -- it represented probably a 50 to 60 percent
increase for us, or, heck, probably more than that...
O'REILLY: Of seizures.
BUCCHI: ... of seizures. Because right now...
O'REILLY: So they were rationalizing.
BUCCHI: They were ra -- it was definitely a rationalization. And I think
it was considered an interim operation, so that while we're doing this, we
can learn a lot about how it works down there.
O'REILLY: Now, once you put this in a book, they said you were a psycho.
BUCCHI: Actually they said that long before that, and there's probably a
level of truth to that. But -- being facetious. But -- and that would have
stuck, except for the fact that the -- Noriega gets captured by the DEA.
He -- I get put on the witness list by Frank Rabino saying the operation
happened.
O'REILLY: All right. So you can prove it by these documents...
BUCCHI: A series of documents...
O'REILLY: ... that you have. And we've looked them over. But, you know,
documents can be doctored. I...
BUCCHI: No, these are original (UNINTELLIGIBLE)...
O'REILLY: I know, I just have to tell the audience...
BUCCHI: Absolutely.
O'REILLY: ... I can't vouch...
BUCCHI: Absolutely.
O'REILLY: ... for your story.
BUCCHI: Absolutely.
O'REILLY: You're saying this, it's certainly provocative...
BUCCHI: Right.
O'REILLY: ... and I understand a number of other media outlets are going
to write about this. All right, the last question is, and I'm going to
have you back again to get more in details, is this morally wrong? I mean,
you're stopping more drugs than you would ordinarily coming in.
BUCCHI: Well...
O'REILLY: Is it morally wrong? I wouldn't do it.
BUCCHI: Well, you know, I think it's tantamount to saying, you know, if I
can make you God tomorrow, I mean, it's probably not a real stretch for
you, I don't know, but if I could do that, would -- and you could cure
half the AIDS patients, and you could absolutely cure half the AIDS
patients, but in order to cure half, you had to allow the other half not
to get treatment, let's say, would you do it? I -- it's unethical, it's
improper. Who decides?
And what we did was highly unethical, and I would never do it again. I was
20-something years old when I signed on to it. (UNINTELLIGIBLE)...
O'REILLY: And billions of dollars it's taken, too,
BUCCHI: And -- but the only thing I would say is, at least it was a step
in the right direction, that I think we need to really seriously consider
legalization, control (UNINTELLIGIBLE)...
O'REILLY: All right, I don't want to get into that now.
BUCCHI: I don't either, but, but, but what we're doing now...
O'REILLY: We got to run.
BUCCHI: ... is futile.
O'REILLY: All right. Thanks very much.
Back with Richard Lewis and alcoholism in a moment.
Copyright 2001 Fox News Network, Inc.
________________________________________________________________
****************************************************************
* CLM-NEWS is brought to you by the COLOMBIAN LABOR MONITOR at *
* http://www.prairienet.org/clm *
* and the CHICAGO COLOMBIA COMMITTEE *
* Email us at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or *
* Dennis Grammenos at [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
****************************************************************
* To unsubscribe send request to [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* unsubscribe clm-news *
****************************************************************
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
