-Caveat Lector-

<http://www.townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/ac20010301.shtml>


Ann Coulter
March 1, 2001

Mary Jo White-wash


While ostentatiously pursuing an "investigation" of the Marc Rich
pardon (which will lead precisely nowhere), Mary Jo White, the
U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, has
stubbornly refused to indict top Democratic and union officials
directly implicated in a money-laundering scheme uncovered by her
own office some years ago.

In what is now called the Teamsters Swap Scandal, prosecutors
working for Mary Jo White won three guilty pleas from top
Teamsters aides back in 1997. Two years later, the Teamsters'
former political director, William Hamilton, was convicted for
his role in the kickback scheme. But for four years now, the Big
Kahunas implicated in the money-swap operation have been largely
forgotten by White's office. One big fish studiously ignored by
Ms. White is the current chairman of the Democratic National
Committee and Clinton pal, Terry McAuliffe.

At the center of the money-laundering scheme was Ron Carey, who
had been anointed Teamsters president by "the most ethical
administration in history" as part of an ingenious plan to "clean
up" the Teamsters. When Teamsters legacy James Hoffa Jr. later
challenged Carey for the union presidency in 1996, Carey's aides
-- and perhaps Carey himself -- decided to give the Carey
campaign a boost using general union funds.

As was proved by the government, both in oversight and criminal
investigations, the Carey campaign repeatedly arranged for the
Teamsters to make huge contributions to various liberal and
Democratic groups, and then those groups would funnel the money
right back -- not to the Teamsters, but to the Carey campaign.
This is on the order of the IRS commissioner using tax revenues
to buy himself a Porsche.

After sitting on evidence for four years that implicated Carey,
the tough-talking Ms. White finally indicted him only days after
George W. Bush was sworn in as president. But even a Republican
in the White House hasn't prompted Clinton-appointed White to
blink in her intractable refusal to pursue McAuliffe.

This is somewhat startling inasmuch as White's own office adduced
testimony during the Hamilton trial naming McAuliffe as a party
to the money-laundering operation. Democratic Party official
Richard Sullivan testified that his former boss, Terry McAuliffe,
outlined a plan to him that would allow the Democratic National
Committee to participate in the Teamsters' evidently well-known
kickback scheme. Sullivan said that McAuliffe told him the
Democratic Party would be rewarded with up to a million dollars
in campaign contributions from the Teamsters if the Democrats
could find someone to donate $100,000 to the Carey campaign.

(Though completion of the scheme is not required for a criminal
offense, the Teamsters came through with their quid. The donor
located by the Democrats for their quo backed out at the last
minute.)

Though Sullivan later told Senate investigators he did not view
this arrangement as money laundering but rather as a way to "help
raise money from the union," Sen. Arlen Specter informed Mr.
Sullivan that he was using language that "is the equivalent of a
quid pro quo."

After Sullivan's shocking trial testimony, even The New York
Times was forced to admit that Sullivan's description of
McAuliffe's role was "troubling." While trying to mitigate the
force of Sullivan's testimony by incorrectly claiming that he had
been given a "no-prosecution" deal from the prosecutor
(correction issued 10 days later), the Times referred vaguely to
"some judgment calls" that Mary Jo White was going to have to
make with regard to McAuliffe. An indictment seemed imminent.

That was in 1999. We're still waiting. Indeed, according to
McAuliffe's lawyer, Richard Ben-Veniste, McAuliffe was given
"assurances" three years ago from Mary Jo White's office that he
"was not a target of the investigation."

Meanwhile, three other Democratic or union officials have given
sworn statements to Senate investigators also fingering McAuliffe
as a player in the Teamsters' money-swap scandal.

Not only that, but the three Carey campaign aides who pleaded
guilty to felonies back in 1997 still have not been sentenced.
Federal judges do not normally wait more than three years to
sentence felons -- unless the U.S. attorney has requested that
sentencing be delayed.

Why is Mary Jo White blocking their sentencing?

Prosecutors will sometimes request that sentencing be deferred
when a convict is cooperating so that the full extent of the
cooperation can be known by the court prior to sentencing. But
four years is enough time to have these guys describe the history
of the world since the Earth cooled -- to say nothing of a simple
money-laundering scheme. Either McAuliffe was involved or he
wasn't. Does Ms. White need four years to ask the convicted
Teamsters aides that?

It took Al Gore's defeat to get an indictment of Ron Carey. It
seems it's going to take the man who defeated him to remove New
York's own Janet Reno from her office to shut down the Democrat
protection racquet being run out of the Southern District of New
York.

=================================================================
             Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:
                     *Michael Spitzer*  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
=================================================================

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to