-Caveat Lector-

From
http://www.ahram.org.eg/weekly/2001/526/re4.htm

}}>Begin

Al-Ahram Weekly On-line
22 - 28 March 2001
Issue No.526
Published in Cairo by AL-AHRAM established in 1875
Current issue | Previous issue | Site map
US softening on Sudan?
Oil may lead to an about-face in US policy towards Sudan -- especially during a
Texas oilman's presidency, writes Gamal Nkrumah

The United States, the largest donor to relief operations in Sudan, is being urged
to use its clout to secure a political settlement to the Sudanese political crisis.
Since 1983, the US has spent over $1.5 billion in humanitarian aid to Sudan --
mostly in the war-torn southern third of the vast country, Africa's largest.
Humanitarian agencies, human rights groups and influential US politicians are all
calling on Washington to influence th
e course of events in Sudan.

The vociferous nature and timing of these calls have fuelled rumours that US President 
George W Bush, egged on by his Africa advisers and oil interests, is about to 
radically change Washington's Sudan policy. "There is no
 greater tragedy on the face of the earth today than the tragedy that is unfolding in 
Sudan," said US Secretary of State Colin Powell at a congressional international 
relations committee hearing last week. Powell pledged
to end the Sudanese conflict which, he said, "will be a top priority" of the Bush 
administration's foreign policy. A rapprochement between Washington and Khartoum may 
be in the offing. Sudanese Foreign Minister Mustafa Ot
hman Ismail recently held "secret talks" with a US fact-finding delegation, which also 
met with Sudanese opposition figures.

In this context, the recommendations of recently-released reports, arguing for a more 
assertive US role in Sudanese politics, caused ripple effects in Sudanese government 
and opposition circles. First, the Washington-base
d, independent Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) urged the US 
government in a report to organise a new peace initiative in Sudan with the help of 
other Western nations, most notably Britain and Norway.
 "Now is an opportune and appropriate moment for the US to join actively in a strong 
multilateral push, in collaboration with interested European powers, to end Sudan's 
internal war," stated the report.

Conspicuously absent from the report's proposals were potential contributions by 
countries geographically and culturally close to Sudan, such as Egypt, Libya, Ethiopia 
and other Inter-Governmental Authority on Development
 (IGAD) countries in East Africa.

The CSIS task force on US-Sudan policy was funded by the US Institute of Peace and 
co-chaired by Francis Deng, of City University of New York, and Stephen Morrison, 
director of the CSIS programme. Deng, a distinguished ac
ademic and influential southern Sudanese political figure, has long been a leading 
champion of the southern Sudanese cause in Western circles.

The CSIS report's recommendations, if taken up by Washington, could lead to a radical 
departure from the hitherto bellicose US attitude towards Sudan, a country put under 
US sanctions since 1997. Sudan is among a handful
of so-called "rogue" or "pariah" states that the US accuses of sponsoring 
international terrorism, an allegation which led former US President Bill Clinton to 
freeze Sudanese assets in the US and bar most American trade a
nd investments in Sudan.

While cautiously welcomed by the Sudanese government, opposition parties were alarmed 
by the CSIS recommendations. The Sudan People's Liberation Army (SPLA), the most 
powerful armed opposition group, voiced grave reservat
ions. "It is difficult to see how a US policy that offers carrots to the villains and 
sticks to the victims can achieve these objectives," SPLA leader Dr John Garang told 
Al-Ahram Weekly. "Normalisation of diplomatic and
economic relations with Khartoum would be a reward for its deception. They will have 
manoeuvred their acceptance in the international community and gained the freedom to 
misgovern Sudan," he said. "The Bush administration
 should not be advised to adopt policies of appeasement towards the regime," Garang 
urged.

The CSIS report hinted that increased oil production is tilting the balance of power 
in favour of the Sudanese government. In any case, the new-found oil wealth has 
intensified intra-southern Sudanese rivalries in and aro
und prospective oil fields. Fighting has flared between rival Nuer and Dinka people in 
Bentui, the main oil-producing region in southern Sudan. On 12 March, US-based Human 
Rights Watch (HRW) released a report urging that
all US military aid to anti-government southern Sudanese be severed. "The US has 
tremendous clout with southerners. Now is the time to use it," an HRW official 
explained.

Sudan began exporting oil in 1999 and oil revenues are expected to top the $400 
million mark by the end of the year. Most of these proceeds are used to fund the war 
effort. The British charity Christian Aid recently relea
sed a report warning that Sudanese government forces and allied militias are 
systematically killing tens of thousands of southern Sudanese civilians in a 
deliberate attempt to depopulate oil-producing areas of southern Su
dan. Some 48 villages are said to have been wiped out and 55,000 people displaced. 
Christian Aid insists that Western oil companies like oil giants British Petroleum, 
Royal Dutch-Shell, Chevron and Exxon-Mobil have major
leverage with Khartoum. The Western oil giants are investors in the subsidiaries of 
the Chinese oil companies PetroChina and Sinopec, Malaysia's Petronas and other oil 
firms which oversee oil exploration and production in
 Sudan. Observers believe that the Texan president with his interest in oil is 
cynically manoeuvring an about-turn in the US's Sudan policy to better exploit Sudan's 
rich oil deposits.




E-mail this page to someone
© Copyright Al-Ahram Weekly. All rights reserved
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


End<{{
T' A<>E<>R
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Integrity has no need of rules. -Albert Camus (1913-1960)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The libertarian therefore considers one of his prime educational
tasks is to spread the demystification and desanctification of the
State among its hapless subjects.  His task is to demonstrate
repeatedly and in depth that not only the emperor but even the
"democratic" State has no clothes; that all governments subsist
by exploitive rule over the public; and that such rule is the reverse
of objective necessity.  He strives to show that the existence of
taxation and the State necessarily sets up a class division between
the exploiting rulers and the exploited ruled.  He seeks to show that
the task of the court intellectuals who have always supported the State
has ever been to weave mystification in order to induce the public to
accept State rule and that these intellectuals obtain, in return, a
share in the power and pelf extracted by the rulers from their deluded
subjects.
[[For a New Liberty:  The Libertarian Manifesto, Murray N. Rothbard,
Fox & Wilkes, 1973, 1978, p. 25]]

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to