-Caveat Lector-
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/20010401/aponline150030_000.ht
m
China Jets Intercept U.S. Navy Plane
By Joe McDonald
Associated Press Writer
Sunday, April 1, 2001; 3:00 p.m. EDT
BEIJING �� A U.S. Navy surveillance plane collided with a Chinese
fighter jet sent to intercept it over the South China Sea on
Sunday and made an emergency landing in China. The Chinese
government said the fighter crashed and its pilot was missing.
"The U.S. side has total responsibility for this event," the
Chinese Foreign Ministry said in a statement read late Sunday on
state television.
The collision happened Sunday morning off the southern Chinese
island of Hainan, according to China and U.S. military spokesmen.
The American EP-3 plane landed at a military airfield on Hainan.
The status of the crew and control of the plane on the ground
were unclear. None of the 24 crew members was injured, said Col.
John Bratton, a spokesman for the U.S. Pacific Command in Hawaii.
Chinese officials assured the United States the crew is safe, and
American diplomats were going to Hainan to see them, said U.S.
Ambassador Joseph Prueher. He said he had talked several times
with U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell.
"It appears also the Chinese have lost an aircraft and we're
sorry that occurred," Prueher, a retired Navy admiral and
commander of U.S. forces in the Pacific, said as he left his
Embassy at 1:15 a.m. on Monday.
President Bush was briefed on the episode Sunday morning, an
administration official said.
The U.S. plane was on a routine surveillance flight in
international airspace when two Chinese fighters intercepted it,
said Bratton. The EP-3 is an unarmed four-engine propeller-driven
plane equipped to listen in on radio signals and monitor radar
sites.
China claims most of the South China Sea as its territorial
waters � a claim rejected by countries that use the vast expanse
of ocean for shipping.
The collision appeared to be an accident and the Chinese did not
force the plane down, Bratton said. Cmdr. Rex Totty, another
spokesman for the Pacific Command, said the Navy talked with the
crew after they landed but had no contact since then.
The incident comes at an uneasy time in U.S.-Chinese relations.
The Bush administration has taken a more wary attitude toward
Beijing, and China's recent detention of two scholars with links
to the United States has further raised distrust.
The collision coincided with news reports Sunday that U.S.
military experts will recommend new weapons sales to Taiwan that
could heighten tensions with Beijing. China regards Taiwan as a
renegade province, and has protested American weapons sales to
the island democracy.
Nick Cook, an aviation expert with Jane's Defense Weekly in
London, said the U.S. military routinely sends surveillance
aircraft such as the EP-3 to monitor China's military.
The EP-3 can pick up radio, radar, telephone, e-mail and fax
traffic, Cook said. He said the plane is the size of a 150-seat
commercial airliner, with most of its space taken up by
monitoring equipment.
The U.S. plane took off from Kadena Air Base in Okinawa, Japan,
the U.S. military said. It is based at Whidbey Island Naval Air
Station in Washington state and was flying with a crew of 22 Navy
personnel and one each from the Air Force and the Marines.
Bates Gill, a China expert at the Brookings Institution in
Washington, said China was acting like any military power by
trying to ward off "activities aimed at its airspace."
The collision with the American plane is a "small victory" from
China's perspective, Gill said. "You've sent the message about
intruding in airspace. You forced it to land. You've got your
hands on it."
One Chinese academic claimed that in-flight encounters were
common with U.S. surveillance aircraft flying along China's
coastline listening to its military.
"It's very regular for the American Navy to have their planes
intruding into Chinese airspace," said Yan Xuetong, an expert in
international studies at Tsinghua University in Beijing. "The
Chinese then send up fighters and chase them out."
Totty, the U.S. military spokesman, confirmed that interceptions
are common but denied that U.S. planes routinely intrude on
Chinese airspace.
"Our aircraft routinely operate in international air space on
reconnaissance missions and it is routine for Chinese aircraft to
respond by intercepting and shadowing us," Totty said.
The Chinese Foreign Ministry said the collision occurred at 9:07
a.m. some 62 miles southeast of Hainan, a large island off the
southern Chinese coast. Totty said it happened about 50 nautical
miles, or 58 statute miles, southeast of the island.
Two Chinese fighters were sent up to track the plane as it
approached Chinese airspace, said the statement.
"The U.S. plane abruptly diverted toward the Chinese planes, and
its head and left wing collided with one of the Chinese planes,
causing the Chinese plane to crash," the statement said.
It said rescuers were searching for the missing Chinese pilot.
The EP-3 landed at a military airfield at Lingshui, a town on the
southern end of Hainan, the statement said.
Totty said he had no information about whether either airplane
had diverted course.
"We want to know why contact was made," he said. "They were
intercepting us on a routine mission, and during the intercept
contact was made. How it happened, we're not able to say at this
time."
Cook noted a similar collision in the 1980s between a Soviet
fighter jet and a Norwegian P-3 � similar to the EP-3 � over the
Barents Sea, which lies north of Norway and Russia. Both planes
landed safely, he said.
In a statement, the Pacific Command said it asked China "expedite
any necessary repairs to the aircraft, and facilitate the
immediate return of the aircraft and crew."
Bratton said the Chinese appeared responsive to U.S. requests to
treat the crew well and return them. They were believed to be
still in Hainan.
"We see no problems with retrieving the crew," Bratton said. The
Chinese statement said "proper arrangements" had been made for
them, but did not say where they were. The Chinese Foreign
Ministry statement said it had made a "serious ... protest."
n
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
