-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.almartinraw.com/column12.html
Click Here: <A HREF="http://www.almartinraw.com/column12.html">Al Martin Raw: 
Criminal Govt Conspiracy - Behin�</A>
-----
NEW PAPERBACK EDITION
NEW POPULAR PRICE

THE CONSPIRATORS
Secrets of an Iran Contra Insider
BY AL MARTIN
JUST $14.95
ORDER HERE













    by Al Martin

Aries II Down: Another Technology Transfer to China 

      In the continuing effort to make China the bogeyman of the 21st 
century, Washington has scored yet another coup - the loss of the EP-3E Aries 
II surveillance aircraft.

      It's very reminiscent of the phony FBI Hanssen Spy Case. In other 
words, what the US Government is saying just doesn't jibe with the facts.

      The implausible government story states that the Aries II aircraft was 
supposedly escorted by ancient Chinese F8 fighter planes to a Chinese 
military base at Hainan Island.

      The Aries II has an electronic counter-measure capability that could 
completely fry the electronic components of a state-of-the-art MIG 29, let 
alone a vintage Chinese F-8. Its defensive capability consists of highly 
advanced directional microwave weaponry.

      Also this US Navy aircraft uses technology that is proprietary to the 
National Security Agency. Most of the technology on the aircraft is 
electronic intercept in nature.

      According to Department of Defense statements, all protocols were 
broken. This indicates that the incident has been staged to create a 
deliberate transfer of this technology. This technology is so advanced that 
even the NSA was queasy about giving it to the Chinese. 

      Since this technology is not proprietary to the Department of Defense 
and since the NSA directly controls the contractors who produce this 
equipment, there wasn't any way for those who are in favor of transferring 
this technology to China, as a matter of illegal covert State policy, to 
effect this transfer without staging an international incident. Therefore an 
incident had to be created to give the Chinese this technology.

      Whoever was in charge of the aircraft command must have been in on it. 
Otherwise they would not have had the authority to circumvent the protocols, 
unless directly ordered to do so. The aircraft then would either be in pieces 
and the crew would be floating in life rafts. Or they would all be dead.

      By the way, the military designation of the EP-3E Aries II aircraft is 
high enough that all crew members carry cyanide capsules. They must not fall 
into enemy hands for interrogation. And that is precisely where they are at 
this moment. 

      The Department of Defense claims they know nothing -- another bogus 
claim, since throughout the inside of the aircraft, there is a discreet video 
system which continues to broadcast. 

      The Defense Department is also trying to imply that the Chinese are 
jamming the signals, but what they're not saying is that the Chinese don't 
have the technological capability to jam these signals. These are highly 
advanced microburst transmissions that can even be bounced off of China's own 
satellites. The Chinese would not even be aware of it. Russian and Chinese 
equipment cannot even detect such complex microburst transmissions.

      The protocol on this aircraft is very simple. If there was any chance 
that the aircraft could fall into hostile hands, the crew is deemed to be 
completely expendable. The protocol can only be overridden by the President 
of the United States.

      The only logical conclusion about this incident is that it is simply an 
ongoing transfer of sophisticated technology to the Chinese military.

      First, the government had admitted that there were 24 personnel on the 
aircraft the "majority of which were US Navy personnel." The aircraft's has 
19 operating stations, Who are the non-Navy personnel, which the government 
refuses to identify?

      Second, why did the crew not execute its emergency protocol and destroy 
the aircraft?

      The media is reporting that the crew is supposed to destroy the 
technology by any means necessary. What they're not saying is that the 
aircraft has a self-destruct mechanism already built in. It could have been 
completely destroyed.

      If it appears that the aircraft is about to fall into "hostile" hands, 
the normal protocol is that the self-destruct mechanism is supposed to be 
activated. If the aircraft is over international waters, they are supposed to 
actually ditch the plane and land on the water. The aircraft is built, so it 
can make an emergency water landing.

      Since the Aries II is a naval aircraft, it is built to stay afloat long 
enough for the crew to get out and the life rafts to automatically inflate. 
The aircraft also carries emergency survival equipment with an EBIRB, an 
emergency locating system.

      The protocol then would have been to either destroy the plane or land 
on the water, in which case, had the emergency self-destruct mechanism been 
rendered inoperable for any reasons, as the plane began to sink, the 
emergency self-destruct mechanism would have been activated automatically 
when sea water came into contact with the amitol derivative explosives in the 
mechanism. Amitol automatically explodes when sufficiently saturated by 
seawater.

      Even if the self-destruct mechanism had been rendered inoperable, as 
the aircraft sank into the ocean and filled with seawater, it would have 
automatically detonated. The question remains - why weren't these protocols 
followed?

      If the plane was able to travel an additional 76 miles and land on 
hostile territory, why couldn't it have flown to Vietnamese territorial 
waters? The US Government claims that the plane was "severely damaged" and 
had to make an emergency landing.

      How "severely damaged" could the plane have been and still have flown 
76 miles to make a landing at a Chinese air force base?

      The aircraft had to fly north when it could have simply turned west. 
Since it was less than 76 miles from Vietnamese territorial waters, there 
would have been no threat there given the extremely hostile relationship 
between Vietnam and China regarding territorial disputes in that region.

      One could almost say that the reason the protocol was not invoked was 
because China was not considered a "hostile" country.

      The "coincidental" nature of this international incident also plays 
into the hands of the Republican right and the defense contractors clamoring 
to sell Taiwan the large and profitable arms package which includes the Aegis 
II missile system.

      The longstanding Bush family connections with defense contractors who 
would profit handsomely by this sale should also not be underestimated 
vis-a-vis the creation of this current incident. Regarding the yet 
unidentified extra personnel on the aircraft -- could they in fact be 
electronics experts who were there to help the Chinese dismantle the 
technology?

      The key system the Chinese want from this aircraft is called SCSS, 
Story Classic Surveillance System. It is the most sophisticated electronics 
surveillance and communications reception technology ever constructed.

      It has the ability to intercept and decode transmissions.

      It can locate the source of the transmissions and automatically 
translate from any language into English. It can pick up computer 
transmissions, telephone and fax transmission, and long wave transmissions 
from submarines. In short, this device can intercept any electronics 
communications generated anywhere on the planet, underneath the ocean, and 
even in outer space. There has never been anything like it. It is estimated 
to be 20 years ahead of any other similar technology.

      The reason why Washington wasn't able to get this device to China 
through the usual illicit means is that it is proprietary to the National 
Security Agency. They're the ones who control these devices and they're the 
ones who build these devices.

      Its capabilities are truly fantastic -- simultaneous translation in all 
languages from any intercepts -- underwater traffic, cable traffic, email 
traffic, telephone traffic, and satellite traffic. And it can also pinpoint 
the location of where the transmission originates.

      The National Security Agency has been consistently opposed to the 
Washington policy of covertly arming China. NSA does not have the same vested 
interest that those in the shadows of the White House and the Department of 
Defense have in arming China.

      It must be remembered that the modus operandi is to rearm China and to 
make China the bogeyman of the 21st century, so everybody can start making 
money again. Essentially it's an effort to turn back the clock.

      NSA does not have a vested interest in this because it doesn't need to 
operate from a large covert infrastructure. It doesn't have to generate 
illicit covert monies the way others do. It's not like the CIA or Department 
of Defense. It is really a more technically oriented agency dealing in 
electronics. It doesn't deal in a lot of field intelligence and the sales of 
weapons and narcotics to produce illegal covert revenue streams pursuant to 
the sustenance of illegal illicit or surreptitious State policy. It is more 
of a technical adjunct and therefore the NSA doesn't have this vested 
interest.

      The SCSS is proprietary technology built by the NSA. It's built by a 
shadowy electronics company known as Vtek Industries, which is secretly 
controlled by the NSA. It's so tightly controlled that the DoD and others in 
Washington haven't been able to get their hands on it.

      This SCSS system is also the same system used in the NSA Westar 7 
satellite, which has the ability to monitor all telephone communications on 
earth. Unlike the Echelon system, which is an invasive system, the SCSS is a 
passive intelligence gathering system.

      The Chinese F8 fighters, which supposedly forced the Aries II to land, 
are knock-offs of early MIG-21 jets from about 1961.

      The US Government is saying that the two Chinese F8 fighters were on 
"routine patrol"(you could ask -- how do they know that?) and one of them 
collided with the EP-3E.

      They're not mentioning the fact that the Chinese actually scrambled the 
aircraft out of their airbase on Hainan Island to intercept the Aries II, 
even though the aircraft was over international waters.

      The electronic countermeasure capability of this aircraft is so 
advanced and the Chinese ECCM (electronic counter-counter measure) is so 
antiquated that it is in fact possible that the only way the Chinese aircraft 
could do anything would be to ram the US aircraft..

      The Aries II ECM capability would have completely fried out the fire 
and control mechanisms of the F8. They couldn't have fired. They couldn't 
have locked on the radar and target imaging system. The only thing they could 
have done to be a threat is to have rammed the aircraft.

      That part of the story has plausibility, but now they're saying the 
contact was accidental.

      How do you make "accidental" contact with weather conditions of a 
brilliant clear sky and unlimited ceiling?

      They would have visually seen it from a long way off, since it's a 
large aircraft.

      The other explanation is that the Chinese aircraft was letting the 
Aries II know that if they didn't fly to Hainan Island that the Chinese 
pilots were prepared to sacrifice their lives and ram the plane. In other 
words, "your ECM technology may have fried our fire and control mechanism and 
our target imaging system but we will still ram you."

      The Chinese pilots didn't have the bigger picture. They were scrambled 
out on a mission and sent after this aircraft with the instructions to force 
this aircraft to land on Chinese territory by any means necessary.

      It's also unlikely that the Navy personnel on the Aries II knew the 
reasons. It's probably only the shadowy unidentified non-Navy extra personnel 
who knew what was going on. Therefore the Navy personnel didn't really have 
any choice. It was either fly the plane to Chinese territory -- or get rammed.

      These are the issues the US Government is dancing around. And just like 
the Hanssen case, the more the government talks about this incident, the more 
they contradict what they said before.

      First they said there were 24 people on the aircraft. Then when 
everyone noticed the aircraft complement of people was less, they said there 
were additional non-Navy personnel, which they weren't prepared to identify. 
Then suddenly the F8s were on patrol. Then they admitted that they were 
scrambled out. Then they said, the plane had to make an emergency landing.

      The Department of Defense briefing stated that the plane was in "severe 
distress" and "They were going down and they had to make an emergency 
landing" when they were able to fly an additional 76 miles.

      This always happens because you've got the State Dept issuing press 
releases. You've got Defense issuing press releases. The Navy is issuing 
press releases. And as always in government, they don't coordinate the lies.

      Everyone has different agendas, and consequently there isn't any 
cooperation for the LCC. The LCC (Lie Coordination Committee) function 
doesn't work And this really exists. Usually it comprises one of the Deputy 
Assistant Secretaries of each agency in the cabinet.

      The problem is when there are so many turf battles and cases of 
inter-agency rivalry, these agencies have different agendas and the normal 
Lie Coordination function doesn't work.

      Most recently, the Navy has issued another contradicting statement -- 
that contrary to public knowledge, the aircraft was not fitted with an 
explosive self-destruct mechanism.

      The Navy spokesman actually said that the self-destruct mechanism in 
the aircraft consisted in having a hammer at every operating station. Every 
operating station comes with its own emergency hammer that's built into it.

      The instructions on the hammer state that if there's any chance that 
the plane will fall into hostile hands, the station operator is instructed to 
"take the hammer and beat the ever loving piss out of this piece of 
equipment."

      In fact the Department of Defense issued a statement that as the plane 
was being escorted to Chinese territory, the crew was supposed to be taking 
their hammers and beating the piss out of their stations. Why did the 
aircraft personnel wait until the aircraft was on the ground before 
attempting to destroy the equipment, while armed Chinese troops were entering 
the aircraft?

      The DoD has repeatedly stated the level of technology is so advanced 
that if it were to fall into hostile hands, it would seriously impact US 
offensive military capabilities for a decade. Therefore, either the 
Department of Defense is over-hyping this equipment. Or someone in Washington 
wanted this equipment to be in Chinese hands. There is no other explanation.

      And here's the ludicrous context of this ludicrous story.

      With the most secret electronics surveillance system in existence - for 
which crews are supposed to become expendable, before the equipment falls 
into enemy hands, the only self-destruct mechanism, according to the 
Department of Defense, is a spare hammer with the instructions on the label 
"to beat the ever loving piss out of it�"

      This is not your ordinary hammer, but a "special" Department of Defense 
hammer, which undoubtedly cost the American taxpayer $600.

      But the real operating protocol for the emergency procedures of the 
Aries II -- if there is any possibility that the aircraft should become 
involved in a situation wherein said technology may fall into hostile hands 
-- the crew becomes completely expendable.

      They are to undertake whatever measures are necessary to prevent this 
equipment from falling into hostile hands. In other words, the technology on 
this aircraft is so sophisticated that it is CL-1 (Compartmentalized Level 1) 
technology, the highest possible classification that exists.

      The people who fly the Aries II surveillance aircraft equipped with 
this technology are essentially operating on a wartime pr

<A HREF!ttp://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
ÝÝÝCTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÚrchives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF!ttp://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF!ttp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
ÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝÝo subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send 
email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to