-Caveat Lector-

March 22, 2001

       Bush Administration Exploits Energy Issue to
       Assault Environment
       Clean choices available to resolve energy crunch in
       California, nation

       The Union of Concerned Scientists today charged the Bush
       administration with using energy needs as a pretext for
       assaulting the environment and proposing actions that would
       actually make our energy problems worse. To wit:

       · Two days before taking office, Bush said that environmental
       laws may be preventing California power plants from operating
       at full capacity. Generators subsequently declared Bush wrong.

       · Ten days into his term, the president used California power
       shortages to justify oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife. Oil
       accounts for only one percent of California electricity and less
       than three percent of national electricity generation.

       · On day 39, Bush proposed relaxing regulations to speed
       construction of new power plants.

       · On day 40, the administration proposed cutting the Department
       of Energy's overall budget by $700 million. There are indications
       that DOE's energy efficiency and renewable energy research and
       development budget could suffer a disproportionate share of the
       cut. A day earlier the president said he supported renewables
       and efficiency.

       · On day 53, he broke his campaign pledge to reduce carbon
       dioxide emissions at power plants.

       Earlier this week administration officials were wrong again when
       they said there no short-term fixes for energy problems.
       "Conserving energy by investing in energy efficiency
       improvements is by far the fastest, least expensive way to
       balance energy demand and supply needs," said Alan Nogee,
       Director of UCS's Clean Energy Program. "President Bush's
       proposals would prolong our dependence on coal and oil, which
       will only cost us more in the long run by increasing the cost of
       responding to global warming."

       "We need to develop and deploy efficiency and renewable
       energy technologies that will conserve and reduce our
       dependence on fossil fuels," said Ron Sundergill, UCS's
       Washington Representative for Energy. "These programs need
       federal funding, not lip service."

       Energy efficiency and renewable energy could immediately
       begin to stem the energy crunch. For example:

       · If the 11.5 million households in California replaced 4 (average
       100 watt) incandescent light bulbs with 4 (equivalent 27 watt)
       compact fluorescent light bulbs, burning on average 5 hours per
       day, we would save enough energy to shut down four 350
       Megawatt power plants.

       · The California Energy Commission is providing low-interest
       loans to convert traffic lights to more energy efficient modules
       that cut electricity use by 80 to 90 percent. The change is
       expected to save Sacramento County $67,000 a year in electricity
       costs.

       · A bill currently under consideration in California would
       increase funding for energy efficiency by more than $1 billion.

       · America has abundant renewable energy resources. With
       today's technology, wind energy alone could economically
       provide 20 percent of America's electricity. A typical wind farm
       generates electricity within six months of groundbreaking for the
       project.

       · The current cost for wind projects with up-to-date technology
       is 4 to 5 cents per kilowatt-hour (kWh) at good sites. Electricity
       from large new wind farms in the western United States will cost
       less than 2.5 cents per kilowatt-hour (kWh).

       · By comparison, recent hikes in natural gas prices have driven
       fuel costs alone for older gas-fired power plants past 5 cents per
       kWh produced, and spot market shortages have led to much
       higher prices -- $10 per kWh and up.

       · Leading states have made commitments that will increase the
       total use of wind, solar, geothermal and biomass power by 8,550
       megawatts. That's enough electricity to power 5.6 million homes,
       reducing as much carbon dioxide - the main greenhouse gas
       causing global warming - as planting 1.2 billion trees or taking
       four million cars off the road.

       · Sales of residential wind turbines in California are already
       skyrocketing as consumers seek refuge from high energy bills.
       Sales for one company are seven times greater for the month of
       January 2001 than they were for all of 2000.

       Meanwhile, utility spending on energy efficiency programs
       nationally fell 45 percent between 1993 and 1998. While utility
       conservation budgets were being slashed, peak summer loads
       grew by 56,000 MW. In several regions, capacity reserve
       margins are thin. Half of the growth in peak loads could have
       been avoided by increasing energy efficiency spending.

       Renewable energy generation nationally fell from 66 billion kWh
       in 1993 to 49 billion kWh in 1998, as utilities cut near-term costs
       to prepare for deregulation. Congress should extend and expand
       renewable energy tax credits and require energy companies to
       provide an increasing percentage of their supplies from clean
       renewable energy sources.



                 UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS
                 2 Brattle Square
                 Cambridge, MA 02238
                 617-547-5552
                 Contact us at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to