Please send as far and wide as possible.

Thanks,

Robert Sterling
Editor, The Konformist
http://www.konformist.com

http://www.konformist.com/botm/volume04/botm0201.htm
Beast of the Month - February 2001
William Kennard, Federal Communications Commission Chairman

"I yam an anti-Christ..."
John Lydon (aka Johnny Rotten) of The Sex Pistols, "Anarchy in the UK"

"There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history, in
America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it. There is
not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you
did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am
paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am
connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar
things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest
opinions would be out on the street looking for another job. If I
allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before
twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone. The business of the
journalists is to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to
vilify, to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and
his race for his daily bread."
John Swinton, former New York Times Chief of Staff, during a toast at
the New York Press Club in 1953.


The first official month of the third millennium was dominated by two
news stories: the coronation of a fraudulent imposter in the seat of
the Presidency, and the approval of the titanic telecommunications
merger between America Online and Time Warner.  The two stories were
more closely connected than most are aware.

The connection was made clear in the news coverage of the
inauguration for the new "president," which occurred as 20,000
demonstrators protested the sham.  As Fairness & Accuracy In
Reporting noted on its website, the inauguration parade "occurred
amidst widespread and angry protests rejecting the legitimacy of
Bush's claim to office, the likes of which have not been faced by any
modern president. Along the parade route, he was confronted by signs
with messages like 'Shame,' 'Bush Lost' and 'Hail to the Thief.'"
The London Guardian reported that it "fell well short of being
triumphant, and on many occasions during its slow advance through the
drizzle, the sound of jeering drowned out the cheers."  Where was the
American korporate media on the protests?  The New York Times, for
one, had merely one story on the demonstrations, "Protesters in the
Thousands Sound Off in the Capitol".  It was found on page 17.
Meanwhile, the front page was filled with gushing reports
titled "Bush, Taking Office, Calls for Civility, Compassion
and 'Nation of Character': Unity Is a Theme" and "Proud Father and
Son Bask in History's Glow."  More telling is the dismissive mention
of the protests in a front page analysis of the inauguration by R.W.
Apple (titled "Tradition and Legitimacy: A Nation's Old Rituals Begin
to Dissolve Lingering Clouds of a Bitter Election Battle"):

Thousands of the doubtful and disenchanted took to the streets of
Washington today in angry protest. But the debate is likely to grow
softer as the nation grows accustomed to pictures of Mr. Bush
speaking from the Oval Office, boarding Air Force One, accompanied
everywhere he goes by the strains of "Ruffles and Flourishes"
and "Hail to the Chief." In the television age, those images, more
that anything else, confer the mantle of authority and legitimacy on
a leader.


In other words, thanks to repeated affirmation of a lie by the
korporate media, the masses would eventually swallow it.

There is no greater indictment of the collaboration between the
korporate media and the political establishment than their own
pronouncements.  Indeed, Apple seems to state that it is the duty of
his profession to confer legitimacy on authority.

Contrary to how some may argue, the push for resolution behind Shrub
seems more utilitarian than ideological.  The business of
korporations is business, and having people question the legitimacy
of rule is bad for the bottom line.  Fights over surface
controversies - such as the nomination of John Ashcroft for Attorney
General - are one thing, but having people question the system is out
of the question.  (Besides, since the Democratic Party serves
korporate interests as much as the Republicans, it really matters
little to most korporate entities which party is in power.)

The writing was on the wall as early as 1983, with the release of The
Media Monopoly, by Ben Bagdikian.  At the time, Bagdikian warned
that, "50 corporations dominated most of every mass medium."  Today,
such dire warnings seem like a description of relative media freedom
that seems nearly utopian.  Since that time, Bagdikian has published
updated editions, and each time the number has become even smaller:
29 in 1987, 23 in 1990, 14 in 1992, and 10 in 1997.  In 2000, he
released the sixth edition, and the number was down to six.  As
Bagdikian puts it, "It is the overwhelming collective power of these
firms, with their corporate interlocks and unified cultural and
political values, that raises troubling questions about the
individual's role in the American democracy."  Questions that became
even more troubling after the 2000 "election".

What is interesting to note (and underscores the lack of difference
between the two parties) is that the consolidation of media has, if
anything, increased under the reign of Kommander Klinton.  Of course,
the blame doesn't rest solely on the shoulders of Slick Willie: much
of the explosion in consolidation happened after the 1996
Telecommunications Act was easily passed by Congress and signed by
Billy Boy with little opposition.  At the time, most controversy
surrounding the legislation involved the Communications Decency Act,
a doggie bone thrown to religious conservatives to "protect children"
from sexual material on the Internet, which turned out (as some,
including The Konformist's humble editor, expected) to be a red
herring.  Few even in the "Free Speech" movement pointed out that the
Act was fundamentally unsound, radically changing Federal law to
allow even more control of public airwaves by even fewer hands.  The
end result was even more public power consolidated in even fewer
companies, ironically at a time when a new medium like the Internet
could have conceivably caused the reverse.

It was in this atmosphere that William Kennard (The Konformist Beast
of the Month) was appointed FCC Chairman in 1997.  Certainly, if
someone else occupied his office during his reign, things would've
ended little different.  But the frightening consolidation of
airwaves since then has his fingerprints all over the place.

The approval of the AOL-Time Warner merger (one year and a day after
first officially proposed) is the fitting capstone to his reign.  The
combination of the two titans (the nation's largest internet provider
with the largest media conglomerate) was a $100 billion-dollar deal.
(When first proposed before the tech stock tank, the deal was worth
an even more astounding $165 billion.)  The merger was approved with
a minimal requirement to open up AOL's Instant Messenger service to
at least one competitor.  The most important "concession," the
requirement of Time Warner to open it's cable Internet lines to
competitors, was actually mandated by the Federal Trade Commission
during its review of the deal.  Perhaps it's telling that previously
under Kennard, the FCC had sided with cable companies such as Time
Warner and AT&T during previous battles with local communities over
the cable giants' supposed "right" to monopolize a public service.

While the FCC under his reign has been busy approving consolidation
of public airwaves and defending cable companies' right to
monopolistically gouge, they haven't been too busy to attack what
they deemed to be a sinister threat: the use of public airwaves by
low power micro radio.  Termed "pirate radio" due to their lack of
license, micro radio is a low-priced entry onto the public airwaves,
a way for people of a community to have their voice heard.
Naturally, this is viewed as dangerous by the National Association of
Broadcasters (the radio industry's lobbying arm), who apparently
dislike any dilution of their control of radio waves.  The FCC has
instituted a policy of raiding and impounding micro radio stations
and equipment, even though in the vast majority of cases, no licensed
radio signals are interfered with.  Incredibly, Kennard has earned
praise for criticizing his own Commission's policy, as though he has
had nothing to do with it.  He has proposed a minimal reform of
limited licensing to micro radio stations (a move that has been
opposed by the NAB) but his act of Pontius Pilate is unconvincing.

Soon after the AOL-Time Warner deal was approved, Kennard resigned
from his post of FCC Chairman.  Some believe it will soon get even
worse at the FCC, as his replacement will be Michael Powell, Colin's
toad-like son.  Already an FCC commissioner, Powell was part of the
debate and vote to approve the AOL-Time Warner deal.  Apparently, the
fact his father owns $6 million in AOL stock isn't considered
conflict of interest.  Powell believes that the current minimal FCC
restrictions of telecommunication giants are too severe.  Claiming to
be an opponent of government regulation, he opposed even the
requirement on AOL's Instant Messenger service as a supposed move of
big government.  However, the alleged Mr. Anti-regulation is opposed
to the plan to license micro radio, a move that would actually be a
blow to federal power.

The good news is that for once, fear of Shrub and his sleazy cohorts
is unfounded.  Not that the Junior Powell (who combines both Dubya's
exploitation of his daddy's undeserved prestige for personal benefit
in exchange for serving korporate interests, and his dad's Oreo-like
servitude to the military-industrial-komplex status quo) isn't a
creep, but after the reign of Kennard at the FCC, little could be
made worse.  If Powell is his father and Shrub, Kennard is like
Klinton, giving lip service to issues of social justice while
enforcing programs that contradict those supposed concerns.  And for
that, Kennard is being rewarded.

In any case, we salute William Kennard as Beast of the Month.
Congratulations, and keep up the great work, Bill!!!


Sources:

The Media Monopoly, Ben Bagdikian

IGNORING REALITY AT THE INAUGURATION
Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting ( http://www.fair.org )
January 22, 2001

Media Giants Have a Pal at the FCC
Robert W. McChesney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
New York Newsday ( http://www.newsday.com/ )
January 25, 2001 (Page A-41)

BREAK UP MICROSOFT?... THEN HOW ABOUT THE MEDIA "BIG SIX"?
Norman Solomon, Media Beat, April 27, 2000

The US Media: A Critical Component of the Conspiracy Against
Democratic Rights
The World Socialist Web Site ( http://www.wsws.org )


The Konformist
http://www.konformist.com
Robert Sterling
Post Office Box 24825
Los Angeles, California 90024-0825
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

If you are interested in a free subscription to The Konformist
Newswire, please visit http://www.eGroups.com/list/konformist/ and
sign up. Or, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
subject: "I NEED 2 KONFORM!!!" (Okay, you can use something else, but
it's a kool catch phrase.)


If you are interested in a free subscription to The
Konformist Newswire,  please visit:

http://www.eGroups.com/list/konformist

Or, e-mail  [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
subject: "I NEED 2 KONFORM!!!"

(Okay, you can use something else, but it's a kool
catch phrase.)

Visit the Klub Konformist at Yahoo!:
http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/klubkonformist




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




Reply via email to