-Caveat Lector-

                  SHOW: ALL THINGS CONSIDERED (9:00 PM ET)

   April 2, 2001, Monday


        JAMES BAMFORD DISCUSSES THE INTELLIGENCE GATHERING
        DONE BY THE US SURVEILLANCE EP-3 PLANE

        ANCHOR: ROBERT SIEGEL


  ROBERT SIEGEL, host: James Bamford has been writing for years about
  signals intelligence, most recently in a book called "Body of Secrets:
  The National Security Agency."

  James Bamford, can you tell us what this plane, the EP-3 and the kind of
  flight that it was on, how that fits into a larger picture of US signals
  intelligence gathering? How vital is it to begin with?

  Mr. JAMES BAMFORD (Author): Well, signals intelligence is where the US
  gets probably 70, 80 percent of its intelligence on what foreign
  countries and foreign governments are doing. On this particular flight,
  what they were interested in is the Chinese navy; where the ships are,
  what they're communicating, who they're communicating with, what kind of
  radars they have. So the people on board the airplane would be listening
  for several types of signals. One of them would be communications signals
  where people are talking to each other. The ships are talking to other
  ships or talking to the shore bases. And there's other intercept
  operators on the plane that specialize in what's known in ELINT, or
  electronic intelligence. And those people are listening for signals
  coming from radar, for example. If you know the pulses and the frequency
  of different radar, you're able to jam those radars or evade the radars.

  SIEGEL: And this is something that a plane like this would do regularly
  and week after week, or day after day for that matter?

  Mr. BAMFORD: That's right. It's not just the Navy. The Navy has these
  flying and then the Air Force have their own planes where they fly and do
  their own monitoring.

  SIEGEL: And this is a kind of intelligence that you couldn't gather from,
  say, satellites. There's no way you could get the same information from
  up in orbit?

  Mr. BAMFORD: It'd be very difficult because these particular signals--a
  lot of them are short-range and the best way to pick them up is with a
  plane or a ship in the area.

  SIEGEL: So when the EP-3 is aloft, you say that its crew members are
  monitoring these different kinds of communications. Two dozen people
  aboard the plane. It seems like a fairly labor-intensive mission.

  Mr. BAMFORD: Well, it is because they're all listening for different
  things. You have linguists on there that are trying to translate some of
  the Chinese. They have electronic intelligence people that are trying to
  pick up information on the radars. And they have communications
  intelligence people that are trying to intercept the voices.

  SIEGEL: If the planes are flying these missions all the time, does that
  mean that the Chinese are routinely changing their signals or changing
  their codes, that you would want to send the plane back week after week,
  or are they filling in with ever more detail the same picture that's
  essentially unchanging?

  Mr. BAMFORD: Well, it's a little bit of both. Some of the things they are
  changing so they want to get these changes. And at the same time these
  planes and the people who run them have found ways to maybe break some of
  the codes or to eavesdrop on some of the more profitable signals. And so
  it would send the planes back to pick up those types of information.

  SIEGEL: Well, what's your sense, although, obviously, we don't know the
  full story by any means so far, but what is your sense of how big a
  problem or disaster or catastrophe this is for the National Security
  Agency that this particular plane fell into Chinese hands?

  Mr. BAMFORD: Well, it's a very serious problem now particularly because
  the United States seems to be edging more and more towards a new Cold War
  particularly with China. And the last thing you want a potential
  adversary to do is to get ahold of an entire plane and its crew that's on
  a very sophisticated eavesdropping mission. So it's very serious. The
  seriousness actually depends on what happens next. If the crew is sent
  back right away and if the plane's sent back. What the Chinese may end up
  doing is just saying that this was a very serious situation, a Chinese
  plane went down and a pilot was lost and we need to keep the plane here
  while an investigation goes on. But it could be ended fairly easily if
  they just let the crew go, after they, you know, Xerox some of the
  documents on the plane and taken a look at some of the equipment and let
  the plane go back. It all depends on how each side wants to play this
  game out at this point.

  SIEGEL: Well, James Bamford, thank you very much for talking with us
  about this.

  Mr. BAMFORD: My pleasure. Thank you.

  SIEGEL: James Bamford is the author most recently of "Body of Secrets:
  The National Security Agency."


                  SHOW: ALL THINGS CONSIDERED (9:00 PM ET)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Copyright 2001 National Public Radio (R)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to