-Caveat Lector-
>From www.wsws.org
WSWS : News
& Analysis : Asia
: India
AIDS becomes a serious health problem in India
By Deepal Jayasekera
4 May 2001
Back to screen version| Send this link by email
AIDS is rapidly becoming a major health crisis in India, which the government is
only beginning to address in a limited fashion. The real extent of the disease and
its impact are not known but various estimates put the number of deaths a year in
the six-digit realm. The World Health Organisation (WHO) publication Epidemiological
Fact Sheet on HIV/AIDS and sexually transmitted infections (2000 update) estimated
that a staggering 310,000 adults and children died of AIDS during 1999.
According to the latest figures released by Indian Department of Health on March 20,
the number of adults believed to be HIV-positive was 3.86 million in 2000. UNAIDS
estimated that 5 million people were HIV-positive in India at end of 1998 and WHO
put the number at 4 million. If one expresses the WHO figure as a percentage, then
0.4 percent of the population or 0.7 percent of the adult population are HIV-
positive. Although the rate is less than 1 percent, the sheer volume of HIV-infected
people makes India second only to South Africa in terms of overall numbers. India is
now home to 12 percent of the HIV-positive people in the world.
The number of identified cases of HIV-infection is relatively low as a result of
serious underreporting due to general ignorance of the disease, cultural taboos and
other factors. According to the government's National AIDS Control Organisation
(NACO), the number of reported cases from 1986 to February 2001 was just 19,115.
NACO stopped publishing the data explaining that there was �gross under-reporting of
HIV infections� and the data was therefore of limited value.
The surveillance studies done by the NACO reveal a dangerous spread of the disease.
Over five years, HIV infection has grown from 1 percent to 51 percent among
commercial sex workers in Bombay in Western India and from 1 percent to 55.8 percent
among drug users in North-East State of Manipur. Among truck drivers in Tiruchi in
the south Indian state of Tamil Nadu, the rate jumped 2.7 percent to 5 percent in
just two years.
Dr Rajan Gupta, a nuclear physicist at Los Alamos National Lab in the US, who is
concerned at the spread of AIDS in India warned of a disaster: �Given the current
conservative numbers of HIV-positive individuals (UNAIDS estimates 5 million HIV
positive people in India at end of 1998) and doubling every 2-3 years means that
there will be 50 million by 2007 and 100 million by 2010. This is one in 10 people,
i.e. on average one in every family. Also, it is important to realise that all socio-
economic levels are already affected. Thus life as we know of will cease to exist by
year 2010, if not sooner.�
A World Bank report published in September 1999 entitled �India's National AIDS
Control Program� warned: �By early in the next century, India will have the highest
number of AIDS cases in the world. Even if HIV infection reaches the �low' level of
five percent seen in many other countries, more than 37 million Indians would be HIV-
infected.�
Poverty and inadequate health services are contributing to the spread of the
disease. The same World Bank report pointed out: �HIV infection in India is
concentrated among poor, marginalised groups, including commercial sex workers,
truck drivers, migrant laborers, men having sex with men, and injecting drug users.�
Originally confined in the 1980s to prostitutes and their clients�mostly long-
distance truck drivers and migrant workers�HIV-infection spread to the general
population in the early 1990s. By the mid-1990s, the first cases of children born
HIV-positive began to appear. Narcotic drug users are at high risk through the use
of unsterilised needles.
The HIV virus is also transmitted in hospitals and health centres through blood
transfusions, the use of unsterilised needles for intravenous drips and unsterilised
surgical instruments in operations. According to the Bulletin of the WHO, Volume 77,
No.10, 1999, the level of unsafe injections in India is estimated as 50 percent.
While the World Bank claims that the Indian government has taken extensive measures
to prevent HIV-infection through blood transfusion, Dr Gupta comments: �An Indian
government study based on data from HIV sentinel survey centres concludes that about
10 percent of HIV infections are due to blood, blood products, surgical instruments
and needles... To me the more telling statement of the severity of the risk is that,
today, no educated and well-to-do person is willing to go to a hospital, especially
a government hospital, and accept a blood transfusion unless they personally know a
doctor there who will pull the ropes and do the checks.�
Although government regulations require the screening of blood and the use of
sterilised needles and surgical instruments, the rules are not strictly adhered to
as result of the lack of funding. According to a World Bank report published in
January 2000: �In health, India's public spending is very low: an estimated 1.2
percent of its GDP. This figure places India among the lowest quintile of countries,
and on a per capita basis, is far less than the amount recommended to provide basic
services by the World Development Report 1993.� The report also pointed out that of
the total spending on health the government contributes only 20 percent while the
private sector, oriented to wealthier social layers, makes up the rest.
India's AIDS program
Even though the first HIV case was identified among prostitutes in Madras in 1986,
the government's initial surveillance, screening and education programs were very
limited. It was not until 1992 that it established the NACO under the Ministry of
Health and Family Welfare. According to a WHO report, NACO only began to seriously
establish consistent HIV surveillance in each state in 1998.
The total funding for first five-year plan for NACO was just $US100.5 million, of
which only $15 million came from the government. The remainder was made up of $84
million of interest free credit from the World Bank-affiliated International
Development Association and $1.5 million from the WHO. In the second phase of the
program for the period up to 2005, financing has increased to $328 million, which is
a pittance compared the latest defence budget of around $13 billion or the tax
concessions of $1.2 billion provided for big business
Dr Gupta commented: �The money we see for HIV/AIDS prevention in India has mostly
come from international sources. The Phase II of NACO is 86 percent funded by loans,
primarily from the World Bank and USAID. The 14 percent Indian contribution is of
the same size as the foreign exchange incentives given to Indian business for hard
currency trade. So, in spite of the rhetoric, as far as the indigenous government
funding is concerned, India is treating HIV/AIDS no different than any other
disease. Also, there is no sustained awareness campaign through TV or the
newspapers, or any other media.�
As in South Africa, access to anti-retroviral drugs to retard the onset of AIDS is
developing as a major issue. In the West, a triple-drug cocktail costs $US10,000-
15,000 a year per patient. Indian drug companies such as Cipla Ltd. have charged
markedly less�until recently $1,800 per year per patient. Now Cipla is offering the
drug combination at $800 per patient per year to the Indian government, $600 for
underdeveloped countries and $350 to Doctors Without Borders.
Major drug corporations such as Britain's Glaxo Smith Kline and the US-based Bristol-
Myers Squibb are seeking to use their patents to prevent Indian firms from
manufacturing generic drugs. They claim the high prices are necessary to cover the
cost of research. But as Cipla's chairman Dr Yusuf Hamied commented: �The name of
the game is monopoly... If these companies spend �x' on research, they spent �9x' on
protecting their monopoly. I have broken no laws, and I am not a threat to anyone.
There is room for a hundred Ciplas. I am not against patents and I am willing to pay
royalties, but a country like India, with a billion people, simply cannot afford a
monopoly on these drugs.�
Under existing Indian laws, it is only drug-making processes that are protected by
patents and so local companies can copy foreign medicines. As a result, Cipla and
other Indian companies are able to produce anti-AIDS cocktails at relatively low
costs and, of course, can make substantial profits. The prices of local generic
drugs are still far beyond the reach of the vast majority of people, who have to
rely upon government and non-governmental agencies.
The limited character of the government programs was highlighted in an article in
the New York Times on March 27, which noted: �India is also failing to prevent women
from passing the disease to their newborns. The appropriate drug, nevirapine, is
simple to administer and costs about $1 per child. Yet India is only now beginning
pilot projects to cut mother-to-child transmission. Generic manufacturers in India
are negotiating to sell a cocktail of AIDS medicines to African governments for $600
a year. But, shamefully, India's government does not buy these drugs. It claims that
even $600 a year is too much and would drain health budgets.�
The situation for HIV patients is likely to dramatically worsen in 2005 when India
will be subjected to the World Trade Organisation rules related to patents. Not only
drug-making processes but also the end products�the drugs themselves�will be
protected, effectively putting an end to the cheaper generic drugs that are
currently available.
Taken together, these trends�the rapid spread of the disease, the indifference of
the Indian government, the lack of adequate health programs and the high cost of
drugs�have all the makings of a major health catastrophe on the Indian subcontinent.
Copyright 1998-2001
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved
T' A<>E<>R
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Integrity has no need of rules. -Albert Camus (1913-1960)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The libertarian therefore considers one of his prime educational
tasks is to spread the demystification and desanctification of the
State among its hapless subjects. His task is to demonstrate
repeatedly and in depth that not only the emperor but even the
"democratic" State has no clothes; that all governments subsist
by exploitive rule over the public; and that such rule is the reverse
of objective necessity. He strives to show that the existence of
taxation and the State necessarily sets up a class division between
the exploiting rulers and the exploited ruled. He seeks to show that
the task of the court intellectuals who have always supported the State
has ever been to weave mystification in order to induce the public to
accept State rule and that these intellectuals obtain, in return, a
share in the power and pelf extracted by the rulers from their deluded
subjects.
[[For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto, Murray N. Rothbard,
Fox & Wilkes, 1973, 1978, p. 25]]
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
