-Caveat Lector-

Waco producer: Weapons photos falsified
Expert says pictures of tested guns misidentified,
misrepresented to court

http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=22885

By Jon Dougherty
© 2001 WorldNetDaily.com

The producer of three documentaries critical of the FBI's
actions during the  April 19, 1993, raid on the Branch
Davidian community in Waco, Texas, has repeated his earlier
claim that key weapons were not involved in testing by an
independent counsel but were instead misidentified in a
final report.

Mike McNulty, whose latest Waco-related documentary is
entitled, "The F.L.I.R. Project," told WND that a special
counsel's report, released last November, appears to refute
his earlier claims that M-16 carbine-type weapons were not
test-fired in an exercise to determine if FBI agents fired
at Davidians as they fled buildings during the fire that
engulfed the complex.

McNulty, a small-arms expert, said photos identifying
shooters as firing CAR-15 carbines during a test set up by
then-Special Counsel John Danforth's office were
misidentified, since the weapons actually being fired were
standard-sized M-16 A2 rifles, not the shorter-barreled
carbine model FBI agents carried on the day of the raid.

Not only were those key weapons misidentified, he said, but
that incorrect data was then forwarded to a federal court
that relied exclusively upon it to determine -- as
Danforth's office had -- that FBI agents did not fire at
fleeing Davidians.

Tom Schweich, then-chief of staff for Danforth's Office of
the Special Counsel, or OSC, told WND last week that weapons
tests conducted by the OSC's office proved "conclusively"
that "glint" which appeared on infrared video shot by the
FBI from an aircraft during the raid was not gunfire, as
McNulty contends, but reflections of sunlight off of ground
debris, primarily glass.

McNulty contends the infrared video clearly shows FBI agents
firing automatic weapons at fleeing Branch Davidians, but
Schweich said the OSC found that claim "preposterous" after
conducting a
lengthy investigation and a weapons test March 19, 2000, at
Fort Hood, Texas.

Correct weapons sought

To make a final determination about the charge of gunfire on
the infrared video, the OSC -- empowered by then-Attorney
General Janet Reno to conduct one final examination of all
available evidence from the raid on the Branch Davidian
complex -- requested a sample of all weapons used by the FBI
during the raid so officials could try to recreate the
alleged gunfire on the infrared video.

Schweich told WND last week that all weapons finally tested
were approved by both sides -- government officials as well
as representatives for the Branch Davidians. He added that
the OSC
reviewed thousands of photos and other evidence during the
investigation, including photos that would be helpful in
determining which types of weapons needed to be test-fired.

McNulty has questioned that assertion, and said he wonders
why the OSC didn't test-fire carbines as it has said it did,
because the weapons were visible in photographs and video
taken of FBI agents on the day of the raid by the Texas
Department of Public Safety.

When pressed about McNulty's specific charges that the
correct types of weapons (carbines) and type of ammunition
(non-military commercial ammunition, as used by the FBI
during the Waco raid)
were not tested, Schweich again said the test's results left
no doubt that debris, not gunfire, caused the FLIR flashes.

"Anybody that looks at the result of that test is going to
know not only that it's debris that is causing those
flashes, but even which pieces of debris were causing those
flashes," said Schweich.

"We did our best to get the right weapons â?¦ but I'm in no
position to say why, in an office of 74 people, one weapon
was in and one weapon was out, other than to say that we had
tremendous input from both sides as to what weapons should
be shot," he added.

Schweich also told WND that the OSC reviewed thousands of
photos and other evidence during the investigation,
including photos that would be helpful in determining which
types of weapons
needed to be test-fired.

"The Davidians insisted that there be a CAR-15 or
short-barreled carbine included in this test" during the
protocol meetings to determine which weapons would be fired,
McNulty said in his most
recent WND interview. "And, much to the chagrin of the FBI,
a carbine - a CAR-15 - was finally agreed on to be tested."

McNulty said that an OSC document -- the Operations Plan for
the weapons test, dated the day of the Fort Hood test --
says the FBI would supply the correct ammunition for the
test while noting
that "a CAR-15 has [also] been requested.

"'Attachment A' of that document, 'Item 6,' lists a CAR-15"
as a weapon to be tested, McNulty acknowledged.

"But then it says something curious," he pointed out. "In
parentheses, it also said 'Actual M-16 A1,' and then on the
FLIR [infrared test] Test Course of Fire Commands" -- a page
from the original operations plan -- "it lists 'Item D' as
'Shooter No. 4 -- M-16,' and 'Shooter No. 5 -- CAR-15 --
Military.'"

"So that's the operation plan that was supposed to be
implemented," he said, noting that all parties agreed in
February 2000 on which weapons would be tested, as Schweich
said, during the protocol meetings to work out the test's
overall details and plans.

And though representatives for the Davidians had requested
that a CAR-15 be tested, McNulty said, "They didn't have any
weapons experts at the protocol meeting, only FLIR experts."

Final testing report

Vector Data Systems, the firm chosen by the OSC to conduct
the test and review the findings and conclusions, issued its
final testing report April 14, 2000, which was sent to U.S.
District Judge Walter Smith, who was presiding over a
lawsuit brought against the federal government and the FBI
for wrongful death by surviving Davidians.

"The judge ultimately relied exclusively on the Vector Data
Systems report and the attorneys' rebuttal to it," McNulty
said. "He did not conduct a trial on this issue, so anything
in this report is now gospel."

The VDS report, McNulty said, also contained infrared photos
taken by a helicopter that was flying overhead at Fort Hood
during the time the weapons were test fired. Each shooting
lane was
marked, documented, and described, he said, including the
type of weapon allegedly being fired and the type of combat
dress worn by the shooter.

The VDS report listed several CAR-15s being tested, but,
McNulty said, "here's the problem: We subsequently, through
the special counsel's office, confirmed, with a photograph,
that the only weapon tested at Fort Hood of the M-16 family
was an M-16 A2, with a 20-inch barrel."

"No carbines were tested at all," he added, even though the
VDS final report listed CAR-15s -- which have 14-inch
barrels or less -- as being fired on several occasions
during the test.

"They fired the M-16 A2 but mislabeled them as CAR-15s," he
said. "There was no CAR-15s tested. And in the report to the
judge, they said there was and showed pictures -- but they
were
pictures of the longer M-16 standard rifle."

FBI did not supply correct rifle

"There's also a memo that some of my colleagues have" from
the FBI, McNulty said, "that says that the FBI could not or
would not provide a CAR-15 for testing, so they were going
to substitute an M-16."

He went on to point out that the FBI's refusal to provide
the correct weapon "was referenced in the Operations Plan,
when a 'CAR-15' was listed for testing but in parentheses
next to it was listed an 'M-16' instead."

"At the point at which they actually did the test, the FBI
had not produced the requested CAR-15," he said, "but they
labeled them as such in the documents that went to the
judge."

McNulty said he has brought this to the attention of
attorneys for the Davidians. "They're looking at it on the
basis of new evidence for a new trial."

"In the earlier protocol meetings, everybody agreed that
Vector Data Systems and the OSC would test a CAR-15,"
McNulty said. "Then VDS tried to acquire one from the FBI,
but the agency
turned them down, so they substituted a full-size M-16
rifle.

"Mr. Danforth had a duty to ensure that the weapons were
absolutely representative of the weapons carried on April
19, 1993," he said. "Mr. Schweich was correct when he said
all weapons tested
were agreed upon by both parties, but that's as far as it
went."

=================================================================
                           Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

          FROM THE DESK OF:

                          *Michael Spitzer*
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

          The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To
Friends
=================================================================

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to