-Caveat Lector-

http://www.anti-state.com/murphy/murphy1.html

Believing is Seeing

by Bob Murphy

You think you have an open mind.  No you don't.  Nobody
does.

We necessarily interpret our sensory input to be consistent
with our model of how everything changes with time.  The one
thing everyone does-and so instinctively and automatically
that it goes largely unremarked-is try to become a better
predictor of the future.  And I don't mean, in a hokey,
Magic Eight Ball sort of way.  ("Will Bob ever dupe a girl
into marrying him?"  My sources say no.)  What I mean is,
people don't like being surprised by things, especially the
more responsibility they shoulder over time.  (Young punks
like me roll our eyes at our parents for being
"conservative," but you're damn right you have to be
cautious as hell if other people depend on you going to work
every day.)

Physics is a collection of models of reality which enumerate
precise laws that describe and hopefully predict observable,
"natural" phenomena.  The actual physicists might be in it
purely for aesthetic reasons, but there is a definite
practical payoff:  It's how we learn to better manipulate
the rest of nature.

But physics is just the most blatant field of the more
general search for understanding.  The adolescent trying to
figure out how to make someone "like" him or her is really,
when you come down to it, just trying to figure out how to
manipulate people.

It would be easy to castigate politicians as people plotting
to manipulate you to serve their ends.  But so was your
favorite teacher ever.  So was Mother Theresa.  So was Jesus
of Nazareth.

(The difference with these latter people is that they didn't
resort to intimidation or deception.  And that's precisely
why they were so influential.  But the politician is either
too weak to attempt such nobleness, or too stupid to realize
that that sort of legacy is a far greater shrine to one's
accomplishments than any monument or bust in the side of a
hill.)

Now everybody is self-centered.  You have to take care of
yourself, in the literal sense.  People think that some
benevolent virgin tenderly attending to some old dude in a
"rest home" who shits his pants everyday and has to have his
pork chops cut up into little tiny pieces and mixed in with
his applesauce (you know what I'm talking about), people
think that this scene blows up the bitter cynicism of kooks
like me and Ayn Rand.

No it doesn't.  Which of the two people is not
self-centered?  The old guy sure is.  He can't do much, but
whatever he does do, is to take care of himself.

And the nurse is self-centered, too.  She thinks, "What can
I do to comfort this man?" And of course, she never fails to
get enough food and rest to ensure her survival.

Now if you're smart like me, you'll start devoting more and
more time to convincing people to see things your way.  You
have to stop shuddering at the flagrant egoism of that bold
proclamation.

You can be very polite about the matter, and in fact you
have to be if you want to get anywhere through mere
persuasion.  But make no mistake:  You are trying to
persuade others to think like you.  Maybe not your views
about politics or religion, but whenever you throw a party,
or approach a pretzel vendor with a dollar bill in your
hand, you are employing a model of social interactions, and
you are about to make a pitch to get people to do their part
to make the future unfold the way you want it to.

And, as in the examples of throwing a party or obtaining a
pretzel from its owner, the easiest way to convince the
others involved to go along is to demonstrate to their
satisfaction that they too would enjoy this possible course
of events.

I used to get really angry arguing with people who were
really smart about some stuff, but so damned stupid about
other stuff.  Like how can anybody like Al Gore??

But then I realized that, back in the day, I had never heard
about libertarianism.  I used to dream about being a fighter
pilot on a Navy carrier, when my uncle would give me glossy
photographs of F-14s and those sweet surveillance jets with
the big fat radar dishes on top.  And I certainly had no
desire for world conquest or foreign plunder.  I just wanted
to squeeze off a few Sidewinder missiles and blow up some
Russians.

(Now, can you imagine how eager the military personnel are
to use all their cool shit and to implement all of their
battle plans?  Show of hands:  How many of you, during every
fire drill, thought, "This is just a drill.  It would be so
exciting if there were a real fire.  Then I could see if I
could scale down the building from the fifth floor, because
I've thought about how I'd do it."?  No?)

Anyway, my point is that if half your relatives are cool
about most normal stuff but not about politics, it's not
that they're stupid, it's that they're ignorant.  They have
honestly never thought about the nature of government the
way you have.

You know how fortune tellers stay in business?  It's because
the people who go to them are "looking for answers," usually
about love interests.  These people are so vulnerable and so
damn suggestible that they truly believe it's possible for a
foreigner with a funny hat to contact Aunt Rita, who's been
in the ground for a good 14 years now.

Doesn't such ignorance disgust you?  Well that's exactly how
I feel when I watch the news or read the paper.  The
American public is so ignorant of basic economics that they
are hoodwinked by "scientific" charlatans and the tyrants
they serve.

Let's back up.  Remember Moses?  Do you remember how the
Bible says that the Pharaoh's magicians were able to turn
their staffs into snakes?  Well, you shouldn't scoff at
that.  Those people had no reason to doubt the possibility
of such a thing, since their understanding of nature was so
relatively poor.  I bet those magicians soothed everyone
with nonsensical chants, then quickly threw their staffs on
the ground really hard, creating a sharp sound that
frightened everyone.  Then they used their arms in wild
gesticulation to get everyone to focus on the part of the
staff that was away from them, while they rolled the staff
on the ground in a wriggly fashion with their foot.  You'd
think that wouldn't work, that someone would notice each
guy's foot touching his staff, but then you don't know how
magic tricks work.

(Remember, these people really believed they were seeing
snakes.  Many probably turned away in terror.

You still don't believe me:  Don't you constantly "correct"
your obvious "optical illusions" or other sensory data?  If
you stop and think that your answering machine message
sounded different, then you replay it to check, and find it
back to normal, you completely write-off your original
suspicion, and assume your ears "played a trick on you."
When you start reading a story about a UFO abduction, you
immediately and without question think, "This person's
nuts.  I want to hear this ridiculous
'explanation.'")

In the same way, the American people literally do not see
that taxes are theft, that public schooling is imprisonment,
that surgical military strikes are murder.  We must explain
to them that they are falling for a massive illusion being
perpetrated on a gigantic scale.

Now what does a magician need, above all else?  Confidence.
If he's going to get you to believe he has the power to do
what he proposes, he first of all must act like he has that
power.

(Part of the success of the illusion is that many of the
best magicians start to believe that they really do possess
such superhuman abilities.  I think it was Joe Sobran who
suggested that Clinton was a better actor than Laurence
Olivier.  I don't think so.  Olivier knew full well he was
pretending.  But I think Bill Clinton, at least by the end,
believed he was a god among mortals.)

Do you know why George W. Bush stutters when he speaks,
whereas Bill Clinton was very glib?  Because George W. Bush
is nervous that perhaps he might do something wrong, and
yikes would there be consequences!  Bill Clinton, on the
other hand, really didn't care.  None of his blunders could
ever truly hurt his reputation or influence.

The American people are such sheep, in search of someone to
blindly follow, that stupid shows reflecting on Bush's
"First 100 Days" have analysts who worry over Bush's lack of
stature and composure.  He is not a "statesman" yet.  The
American public wants a leader who is so wonderful that he
doesn't even need to tread softly in such areas as foreign
policy.  Everything can be reduced to a simple moral choice.

That's why liberals are so confident.  Because they truly
believe they have the moral high ground.

And that's really the only way to win back the ground lost
to liberals.  You must take the moral high ground.

The thing is, you and I are too modest to wax indignant
about how stolen taxpayer money ought to be spent, or
precisely who should be killed next by our "smart" bombs.
(Notice that Democrats and Republicans have no problem
talking in this way.)

But what I am sure about is that, if you look at government
from my point of view, if you describe the President of the
United States not as the winner of a majority of Electoral
votes (which he is), but rather as the person in charge of a
parasitical apparatus that is loved by few, hated by some,
and feared by many, you will be able to speak with as much
righteous indignation as the Left.

The only difference is, your worldview is a lot more
accurate than theirs, and so you'll win every argument, no
matter who's listening.

And, although it sounds a bit devious to say so frankly,
really, if you think you're right, you need to do whatever
you can to convince others to think about it your way.  And
the way to do that is to make everyone think you win
arguments.

So the next time someone echoes the latest liberal clich� at
a party-and you normally would keep your mouth shut and
think, "I can't wait to read Sapienza's take on this!"-why
don't you get off your ass and stand up for what is so damn
obvious?  The other people in the room aren't going to think
you're a dork, they're going to think you've got balls.  You
don't have to be "academic" or stuffy about it, either.

It's as if we're all in a giant conformity experiment.  If
enough people just started questioning the official
mantra-like pointing out that maybe the fucking sanctions on
Cuba aren't working so well in ousting Castro, are
they?-then there'd be a huge snowball effect.  There would
be a great advance in the "conventional wisdom," so that it
would be just as obvious that "government is bullshit" as it
is that "nobody can turn a staff into a snake."

At least, that's how it seems from my point of view.

May 18, 2001


Bob Murphy is an oppressively cocky graduate student in New
York City. He is a columnist for LewRockwell.com and The
Mises Institute.


=================================================================
                       Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

          FROM THE DESK OF:

                      *Michael Spitzer*
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

      The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To
Friends
=================================================================

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to