http://www.newscientist.com/dailynews/news.jsp?id=ns9999811



Terrorists could easily make an atomic bomb from MOX fuel, says a
confidential report


Exclusive from New Scientist magazine

Terrorists could easily make a crude atomic bomb from MOX fuel produced at
British Nuclear Fuels' new plant in north-west England, according to a
confidential report submitted to the British government and seen by New
Scientist.

The report comes as the state-owned company is trying to get the government's
go-ahead to make MOX, a mixture of plutonium and uranium oxide, for reactor
operators in Europe and Japan.

Although the MOX plant, at Sellafield in Cumbria, was completed in 1996, the
government has postponed authorising its start-up because of doubts over its
economic viability. Last week, as a fourth consultation exercise on the MOX
plant ended, Friends of the Earth lodged papers at the High Court in London
calling for a judicial review of the consultation, accusing the British
government of skewing the process in favour of British Nuclear Fuels (BNFL).

The environmental group alleges that the £462 million invested in the plant
so far has been disregarded in calculating its financial prospects, and that
the results of an independent audit have been withheld from the public.


"Terrifying possibility"

But now the confidential report submitted to the government highlights
another potential problem for the plant. Written by Frank Barnaby, a
physicist who worked at the nuclear weapons laboratory at Aldermaston,
Berkshire, in the 1950s and later headed the Stockholm International Peace
Research Institute, it spells out exactly how easy it is to make MOX fuel
into a bomb.

Barnaby says that terrorists intent on mass destruction would need no more
technical know-how than that used to make the Lockerbie bomb. The expertise
required is less than the equivalent skill used in 1995 by the Japanese cult,
Aum Shinrikyo, to prepare sarin nerve gas for release into the Tokyo subway,
he says.

It would be "sheer irresponsibility" for the government to allow the new
plant to open, Barnaby warns, as the theft of MOX fuel pellets would then
become a "terrifying possibility".

His report, which was commissioned by the Oxford Research Group, an
independent body of scientists studying nuclear issues, comes in the wake of
mounting concern about the poor security arrangements for radioactive
materials worldwide (New Scientist, 26 May, p 10).


 

Barnaby reveals three ways of chemically separating the plutonium dioxide
from the uranium dioxide in MOX fuel. One, involving lanthanum nitrate as a
carrier, was used in 1941 by the atomic pioneer Glenn Seaborg at the
University of Chicago.
The other two methods - one of which is currently used at the University of
Kiev in Ukraine - depend on reactions with resins. The chemistry is less
sophisticated than that required for the illegal manufacture of designer
drugs, he says. All the details terrorists need are in the published
literature or on the Internet, says Barnaby. A primitive bomb could be made
with 35 kilograms of plutonium dioxide, or terrorists could use hydrofluoric
acid to precipitate out the pure metal, Barnaby says. Only 13 kilograms of
pure metal would be needed to create an explosion with a yield of 100 tonnes
of TNT - 50 times the size of the largest terrorist bomb to date, in Oklahoma
City six years ago.


Hard to steal

BNFL points out, however, that MOX fuel would be difficult to steal because
it travels under armed guard. The security arrangements "are mature,
comprehensive and robust", says a company spokeswoman. "We are 100 per cent
confident in the physical protection measures we have."

The company points out that turning plutonium into MOX fuel and burning it in
reactors could reduce the threat of nuclear weapons proliferation by cutting
plutonium stockpiles. Some plutonium also has to be returned to foreign
customers because they own it. The risk of MOX fuel falling into the hands of
terrorists is "minimal", BNFL insists.

An atomic explosion in a city centre is "everyone's worst nightmare", says
Frans Berkhout, a nuclear expert from SPRU (formerly the Science Policy
Research Unit) at the University of Sussex, Brighton. But although turning
fresh MOX fuel into a bomb is "theoretically possible", he thinks that in
practice terrorists might find cheaper and easier ways of causing mass
destruction.




Reply via email to