Linda: He offers an alternate reality of mind control in which some basic information is accurate and verifiable, and he then veers into Birch-style fantasies. The uproar he brought about over at the Christian right concerning price codes at the supermarket, for instance. IMHO, the relative threat to privacy that this particular techno-trap may pose is meager compared to the incredible invasiveness of EM bio-technology, but a big stink was made in recent times, even to the extent of characterizing the codes as the "mark of the beast." Such doggerel distracts from much more serious issues. "Illuminati," in the early-mid 20th century, was a fascist catch-word for a supposed Jewish-Communist-Freemasonic "conspiracy." That's how Hitler used the term. As found in neo-fascist literature, it is historically false (the origins of Communism are found in the Romantic Movement of early 19th century Europe, when many cultural and social leaders observed the atrocities of industrial expansion first-hand, eg. young mothers throwing their babies in the Thames because they couldn't afford to feed them, not in a supposed "Illuminist conspiracy" to undermine capitalism that culminates in Marx and the Russian Revolution). It is, in this context, an inflammatory term, one that belongs to the far-right � and it's obvious that this is where Fritz is most comfortable. My original point was that most people mean "overclass" when they speak of "illuminati" � so why not say "overclass" and avoid the historical tarnish that clings to the word. � AC on 6/9/01 6:56 AM, Linda Minor at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > When I brought up the name of Fritz Springmeier to Alex Constantine last > week, he said (and I'm paraphrasing) it was his opinion that Fritz was a > tool of a group of fascists who wanted to plant the idea that the > "Illuminati" was Jewish. It's interesting from John Torrell's description > of how Springmeier sort of appeared from nowhere and latched on to Cisco > Wheeler aka Linda Johnson and publicized her description of the Monarch > programming, which many victims of mind-control programming say has a strong > ring of truth. It is difficult to know whether Fritz was being "handled" > while he did this or whether he have been trying to escape from his own > mind-controlled past and failed. Regardless, it's clear he was not telling > the truth about himself. > > Linda > > -----Original Message----- > Date: Friday, June 08, 2001 10:29 PM > Subject: Re: FRITZ SPRINGMEIER-- ANOTHER HUMAN TRAGEDY > > >> >> In a message dated 6/8/01 1:20:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >> http://www.eaec.org/FritzSprinmeier.htm >>> Ron Patton had written an article titled, "Exposing the Exposers," >>> >>> in the Spring 1997 issue of his newsletter, Endure To The End. > Essentially, >>> >>> Patton questioned why Springmeier aloud himself to be interviewed by the >>> CIA >>> >>> front tabloid, CONTACT (December 17, 1996). Ron makes an interesting >>> >>> observation: during the interview, Fritz acknowledges his calling in life >>> is >>> >>> to be a religious and social reformer. Coincidentally, in his book, The >>> >>> Illuminati Formula Used To Create A Total Mind_Controlled Slave, he states >>> >>> on page 14 that one of the occupations the programmers select and groom >>> for >>> >>> a young child under mind control is a religious and social reformer. This >>> >>> presents the question: why would Fritz use such precise wording to > describe >>> >>> himself and why would a Christian use such ambiguous terminology for his >>> >>> calling? >> Hmm. >> >> Om >> K >> >
