-Caveat Lector-

Thursday June 14 5:38 PM ET

Memos Highlight Oil Cost Strategy

By H. JOSEF HEBERT, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - Even as the Bush administration cites a lack of
refineries as a cause of energy shortages, oil industry documents show that
five years ago companies were looking for ways to cut refinery output to
raise profits.

The internal memos involving several major oil companies were released
Thursday by Sen. Ron Wyden (news - bio - voting record), D-Ore., whose
office obtained them from a whistleblower. He said the materials did not
necessarily reflect any illegal activities but said some of them ``sure look
very anticompetitive.''

In response, Red Cavaney, the president of an industry trade group, said:
``This finger pointing six years into the past serves no useful purpose.''

Wyden was turning the material over to the Governmental Affairs
Committee, which plans hearings on oil industry practices and energy
prices.

Tight gasoline supplies have been cited repeatedly by the industry and the
White House as a primary reason for soaring gasoline prices this year.

While pump prices have eased recently, the cost of gasoline jumped an
average of 31 cents a gallon nationwide during the seven weeks ending in
mid-May, according to government figures presented at a House hearing
Thursday.

Because it takes about four years to build a large refinery, planning for a
new plant would have had to begin by the mid-1990s, energy experts say.
There has not been a new refinery build in the United States in 25 years; in
the meantime, dozens of small ones have closed.

The documents obtained by Wyden's office suggest that in the mid-1990s
oil companies had no interest in building refineries because of low profit
margins. In fact, companies were discussing the need to curtail refinery
output in order to make more money, the documents suggest.

``If the U.S. petroleum industry doesn't reduce its refining capacity, it will
never see any substantial increase in refinery margins (profits),'' said an
internal Chevron document in November 1995, citing views presented by
participants at an American Petroleum Institute conference.

A year later, an official at Texaco, in a memo marked ``highly confidential,''
called concerns about too much refinery capacity ``the most critical factor''
facing the refinery industry. Excess capacity is producing ``very poor
refining financial results,'' the memo said.

Wyden said the documents ``raise significant questions about whether
America's oil companies tried to pull off a financial triple play - boosting
profits by reducing refinery capacity, tagging consumers with higher pump
prices and then arguing for environmental rollbacks.''

The institute produced statistics showing refinery capacity has increased
since 1996 as refineries became more efficient and some expanded. The
figures also showed capacity increasing slower than demand.

Cavaney, the institute's president, said the industry's reluctance to invest in
new refinery capacity when profit margins are low and supplies are
adequate - as was the case in the mid-1990s - was ``a normal response in
a commodity market.''

Wyden singled out a 1996 memo from Mobil Corp., which has since
merged with Exxon, that suggests that Mobil was ready for a ``full court
press'' to make sure an independent California refinery, which had closed
in 1995, would not reopen.

At the time Mobil was concerned that if the refinery, owned by the Powerine
Oil Co., resumed production it might force down the price of a special,
cleaner burning gasoline by as much as 3 cents.

``Needless to say, we would all like to see Powerine stay down,'' the memo
said. ``Full court press is warranted in this case.'' The refinery remained
closed.

Attempts to reach ExxonMobil, Texaco or Chevron were unsuccessful.

The need for more refinery capacity has been the focus of President Bush
(news - web sites)'s energy plan. Vice President Dick Cheney (news - web
sites) has blamed gasoline prices increases on tight supplies caused to a
large part, he contends, by the fact that the last new U.S. refinery was built
in 1976.

In fact, 24 refineries - many of them small independents - have shut down
since 1995, according to the Energy Department. That has accounted for
the loss of 831,000 barrels a day of refining capacity. Individual refinery
expansions at the same time have added 1 to 2 percent of capacity
annually.

At a House hearing on gasoline supplies Thursday, the National Petroleum
and Refiners Association said financial and regulatory constraints make it
difficult to build new U.S. refineries. While refinery profits have improved
recently, the group said the rate of return on investments in refining has
averaged 5 percent over the past decade.


ANOMALOUS IMAGES
http://www.anomalous-images.com

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to