-Caveat Lector-
Has Bush seen the light?
When blackouts hit California, Bush insisted that price controls were the
wrong way to solve the electricity crisis. Now Republicans are worried
about losing Congress--and they've found a way to help the West. But is it
too little too late?
By Karen Tumulty and Michael Weisskopf With reporting by John F.
Dickerson, Michael Duffy and Adam Zagorin/Washington
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/time/2001/06/25/light.html
June 18, 2001 Posted: 3:41 p.m. EDT (1941 GMT)
Conservatives hate to meddle in the markets. So it would be hard to find a
more unlikely advocate for federal price controls than California
Congressman Duncan Hunter, whose voting record nearly every year gets
a 100% rating from the American Conservative Union. But when the owner
of a small metal shop in El Cajon showed Hunter his December electric bill-
-$115,000 for the month, four times what the man had been paying before
the state's electricity crisis began--Hunter changed his mind. "I came to the
conclusion that this wasn't free enterprise," the San Diego County
Republican says. On the day George W. Bush was inaugurated, Hunter
introduced a bill authorizing the new Administration to impose caps on
"unjust and unreasonable prices in the electric-energy market."
The Administration wasn't interested. For the past six months, Bush and
Vice President Dick Cheney have rarely missed a chance to say what a
huge mistake government controls of California energy costs would be. But
the argument has been slapping up against an obvious political problem:
Bush's free-market principles mirror the financial interests of his backers in
the energy industry--top executives who are cashing in stock options for
tens and hundreds of millions of dollars while their corporate profits are
tripling. "The consequence of the inaction has been a massive transfer of
wealth from the ordinary citizens of California to rich energy barons in
Houston, Charlotte and Atlanta," California's Democratic Governor, Gray
Davis, told TIME. The state's wholesale energy bill grew from $7 billion in
1999 to $27 billion last year, and could reach $55 billion this year.
With 54 electoral votes, California isn't used to getting the cold shoulder
from Washington. But if the plight of the state's ratepayers hasn't forced
Bush to rethink the wisdom of price caps, the plight of its Republicans may
have. Control of the House in next year's midterm elections could depend
on half a dozen endangered G.O.P. seats in California. That's why House
majority whip Tom DeLay told Bush two weeks ago that he shouldn't count
on Republicans to beat back price caps. There may be collateral damage
at the other end of the Capitol as well. Sources say Senate minority leader
Trent Lott has warned Bush aides that California's problems could infect 10
Western states, endangering Colorado's Wayne Allard, Idaho's Larry Craig
and Oregon's Gordon Smith. And while Bush may be writing off California's
votes, plenty of Democrats covet them, including putative presidential
contender Joe Lieberman, whose first act as a new committee chairman
last week was to launch hearings into the state's energy crisis.
So Bush is in a bind--caught between his principles and moneymen on one
side and the prospect of summertime blackouts, spiraling prices and
mutinous legislators on the other. He needs a way out, and may have found
one. This week a little-known agency called the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission meets in a special session, its first with two new Bush
appointees in place. For the past year, FERC has ignored pleas for
sweeping electricity price controls in California and other Western states.
Last fall, at a congressional subcommittee hearing in San Diego, chairman
Curtis Hebert suggested that consumers should learn to live with higher
electricity prices. "If the truth kills Granny," he declared, "let her die." When
things got really bad last spring, FERC limited prices only during the worst
power emergencies. But this week FERC is expected to approve full-time
price controls.
Why is FERC relenting? The argument against price caps is that they do
infinitely more harm than good, as Jimmy Carter and Richard Nixon
discovered when they allowed government bureaucrats to clog the gears of
a free market. Price caps, says Energy Secretary Spence Abraham, are
merely a formula for "an increase in the scope, duration and frequency of
blackouts."
But Davis, along with virtually the entire California congressional
delegation, Democratic and Republican, says the market now is anything
but free. It is being manipulated, in their view, by energy companies that
have wrung billions out of California consumers by squeezing supply to
create artificial shortages. Why else, they say, would California power
suppliers like Enron Corp.--a Houston-based trading giant headed by one
of Bush's top donors and informal energy advisers--be seeing their
revenues jump 281% in the first quarter? Even a respected free-marketeer
like Alfred Kahn, the father of airline deregulation, has had enough. "The
notion that caps automatically interfere with the increase of supply in the
electric industry is absurd," he says.
Word of FERC's expected action comes as Californians are getting a
break from towering prices. Last Wednesday, Davis says, the state paid
only $29 million for its power--a sharp drop from the $100 million a day it
spent in mid-May. While FERC credits its own emergency measures for
the lower costs, Davis political adviser Garry South says it is more likely the
result of unseasonably cool weather and power companies "trying to lay
low until the posse passes by."
For Bush, the beauty of having the nominally independent FERC send an
ems team to Granny's house is that it allows him to keep his distance and
take credit at the same time--to escape the bind without seeming to try. At
a frosty meeting with California lawmakers last week, Cheney repeated his
opposition to price controls even as he suggested help from FERC could
be on the way. The White House believes in the free market, but it will crow
this week that FERC acted because Bush had called on it to be vigilant.
"He has not been looking for the short-term political fix but addressing long-
term problems," says Gerry Parsky, who chaired Bush's California
campaign. "But what he has done is tell FERC to do its job."
Having it both ways requires some semantic gymnastics. FERC draws a
distinction between "price caps," which impose a maximum allowable
price, and the more flexible "price mitigation," which sets prices based on
a formula that factors in producers' costs.
Fair enough. But the White House is taking pains to get its story straight. At
a meeting in economic adviser Larry Lindsey's office, aides were told to
use the poll-approved "price caps" in place of the harsher "price controls."
Republicans on Capitol Hill are thumbing through their thesauruses for
other ways to describe the abrupt change of course. To some, the idea of
telling their allies in the energy industry to give back their "unearned
enrichment" seems more palatable than slapping them for "price gouging."
And for those who find "caps" too strong to take, there's always "market
mitigation."
But how they spell relief won't matter if FERC's action doesn't work. "It's
better than nothing but not nearly as attractive as it sounds," says Davis,
who will tell Lieberman's committee the same thing this week. "The way
around it is quite obvious. Generators simply sell the product to a middle
person--which they do anyway--and that marketer has no obligations under
the order." Also, the order will not get back the $7 billion California
estimates it has been overcharged by electricity suppliers since last May.
Even if FERC's order proves effective, Republicans will have salvage work
to do. Polls show Californians disapprove of how Bush has handled their
biggest problem; some even think he's out to get them. Bush and Davis
talked past each other during a meeting in Los Angeles last month, when
Bush was on his first presidential trip to the state. But real negotiations
were under way elsewhere. Sources tell TIME that political adviser Karl
Rove met privately with outgoing Republican mayor Richard Riordan to
press him to enter next year's race for Governor against Davis. Rove and
top Republicans have kept the pressure on, letting Riordan know that Bush
moneymen are waiting with checks if he gets in, and sharing G.O.P. polls
with him that show Davis may have been fatally wounded by his handling of
the crisis. While the Governor claims he inherited the state's deregulation
mess, even Democrats accuse him of ignoring it until it was too late. A
strong challenge by Riordan could not only unseat the Democratic
Governor but also create coattails big enough to keep Republican House
members in office.
Californians will be getting a preview of that war this week as a group
called the American Taxpayers Alliance begins airing TV ads featuring
fuzzy closeups of a robotic-looking Davis, claiming he is to blame for the
state's energy problems. Although the A.T.A. styles itself an "issue
advocacy group," funding for the ads comes from, among hundreds of
other corporations, a major power generator called Reliant Energy, one of
the companies California officials accuse of price gouging. (James Baker,
who headed the Bush recount effort in Florida, is a director, and chairman
Steve Letbetter was a top Bush fund raiser.) Republican sources tell TIME
that Scott Reed, the longtime G.O.P. activist who heads A.T.A., hopes to
raise $25 million to keep the ads running. Bush outside adviser Ed
Gillespie, an Enron lobbyist, is raising a separate $500,000 war chest for
ads attacking price caps.
Not that Davis is without resources. He is paying former Al Gore strategists
Mark Fabiani and Chris Lehane $30,000 a month of taxpayer money to
handle the p.r. crisis inside the energy crisis. That's despite the fact that
Fabiani and Lehane--known as "masters of disaster" for their work at the
White House during the Clinton scandals--are consultants to Southern
California Edison, a utility at the eye of the storm.
California is only part of the G.O.P.'s energy problem. Bush's plan to boost
production nationally is in trouble. In mid-April, internal House polls showed
the Republicans 3 points behind the Democrats on the question of which
party could be trusted more on energy issues. Two weeks ago, they'd fallen
to 15 points behind. Republicans fear that will only get worse as Lieberman
and two other committee chairmen convene hearings on Bush's energy
policies--and his friends in the industry. Both state and federal authorities
are probing allegations of market manipulation by a variety of power
generators and pipeline operators.
Even if federal regulators take some of the sting out of California's energy
prices, tight supplies and high temperatures will ensure that sporadic
blackouts continue. It's hard to tell who will have the hotter summer--
Californians, their Governor, energy executives or George W. Bush.
ANOMALOUS IMAGES
http://www.anomalous-images.com
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
