http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20010625&s=hitchens



Minority Report | June 25, 2001
by Christopher Hitchens


The Fugitive


It was, take it for all in all, a near-faultless headline: HENRY KISSINGER
RATTRAP� AU RITZ, � PARIS, PAR LES FANT�MES DU PLAN CONDOR. I especially
liked the accidental synonymy of the verb rattraper. What a rat. And such a
trap. It was in this fashion that the front page of the Paris daily Le Monde
informed its readers that on Memorial Day the gendarmes had gone round to the
Ritz Hotel--flagship of Mohamed Al Fayed's fleet of properties--with a
summons from Judge Roger Le Loire inviting the famous rodent to attend at the
Palace of Justice the following day. In what must have been one of the most
unpleasant moments of his career, noted Le Monde, the hotel manager had to
translate the summons to his distinguished guest. Kissinger left the hotel,
surrounded by bodyguards, and later announced that he had no desire to answer
questions about Operation Condor. He then left town.

Operation Condor [see Peter Kornbluh, "Kissinger and Pinochet," March 29,
1999, and "Chile Declassified," August 9/16, 1999] was a coordinated effort
in the 1970s by the secret police forces of seven South American
dictatorships. The death squads of Chile, Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay,
Paraguay, Ecuador and Bolivia agreed to pool resources and to hunt down,
torture, murder and otherwise "disappear" one another's dissidents. They did
this not just on their own soil but as far away as Rome and Washington, where
assassins and car-bombs were deployed to maim Christian Democratic Senator
Bernardo Leighton in 1975 and to murder the Socialist Orlando Letelier in
1976. The Pinochet regime was to the fore in this internationalization of
state terror tactics, and its secret police chief, Col. Manuel Contreras, was
especially inventive and energetic.

Thanks to the efforts of Representative Maurice Hinchey, who attached an
amendment to the Intelligence Authorization Act last year, we now know that
this seven-nation alliance had a senior partner. At all material times, those
directing the work of US intelligence knew of Operation Condor and assisted
its activities. And at all material times, the chairman of the supervising
"Forty Committee," and the key member of the Interagency Committee on Chile,
was Henry Kissinger. It was on his watch that the FBI helped Pinochet to
identify and arrest Jorge Isaac Fuentes de Alarc�n, a Chilean oppositionist
who was first detained and tortured in Paraguay and then turned over to
Contreras and "disappeared." Contreras himself was paid a CIA stipend. Other
Condor leaders were promised US cooperation in the surveillance of
inconvenient exiles living in the United States.

Judge Roger Le Loire has had documents to this effect on his desk for some
time and is investigating the fate of five missing French citizens in Chile
during the relevant period. He has already issued an arrest warrant for
General Pinochet. But he understands that the inquiry can go no further until
US government figures agree to answer questions. In refusing to do this,
Kissinger received the shameful support of the US Embassy in Paris and the
State Department, which coldly advised the French to go through bureaucratic
channels in seeking information. Judge Le Loire replied that he had already
written to Washington in 1999, during the Clinton years, but had received no
response.
On the Friday immediately preceding Memorial Day, another magistrate in a
democratic country made an identical request. In order to discover what
happened to so many people during the years of Condor terror, said Argentine
Judge Rodolfo Canicoba Corral, it would be necessary to secure a deposition
from Kissinger. And on June 4 the Chilean judge Juan Guzm�n Tapia asked US
authorities to question Kissinger about the disappearance of the American
citizen Charles Horman, murdered by Pinochet's agents in 1973 and subject of
the Costa-Gavras movie Missing (as well as an occasional Nation
correspondent). So that, in effect, we have a situation in which the Bush
regime is sheltering a man who is wanted for questioning on two continents.

Partly because I have written a short book pointing this out, I have recently
been interviewed by French, British and Spanish radio and TV. Indeed, if it
wasn't for that, I might not have learned of Kissinger's local and
international difficulties for some days. The Financial Times carried a solid
story on the Paris episode, with some background, the day after Le Monde. But
in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post--not a
line. And where were Messrs. Koppel and Lehrer? They usually find the views
of "Henry" to be worthy of respectful attention. I admit my own interest, but
I still feel able to ask: By whose definition is Kissinger's moment at the
Ritz not news?


It is, meanwhile, practically impossible to open the New York Times without
reading a solemn admonition, either from the Administration or from the paper
itself. Colin Powell lectures Robert Mugabe. George Bush takes a high moral
tone with Serbia. All are agreed that wanted men should be given up to
international law. All are agreed that however painful the task, other
societies must face their own past and shoulder their own grave
responsibilities. For a long time I have found it somewhat surreal to read
this righteous material, but the experience of ingesting it now becomes more
emetic every day.

The seven Condor countries, groping their way back to democracy after decades
of trauma, are making brave and honest attempts to find the truth and to
punish the guilty. Time and again, commissions of inquiry have been
frustrated because the evidence they need is in archives in Washington. And
it is in those archives for the unspeakable reason that the United States was
the patron and armorer of dictatorship. There is a heavy debt here. Is there
not a single Congressional committee, a single principled district attorney,
a single leader in our overfed and complacent "human rights community," who
will try to help cancel it? Or are we going to watch while the relatives of
the murdered and tortured seek justice by lawful means, and are waved away by
armed bodyguards if they even try to serve a scrap of paper on the man whose
immunity befouls us all?

Reply via email to