Doubt and certainty – follow up
By Israel Shamir



With Sunday Times’ disclosure of the Israeli security
services’ involvement in the slaughter of the Russian kids
in Tel Aviv, the clever by half plot began to unravel. From
the first moment, there were reasonable doubts that it was
an act of Palestinian terror. The crime had the bloody
fingerprints of the Jewish supremacist all over it. It was
perpetrated on Sabbath eve, when a ‘good Jew’ is not
supposed to hang around a discotheque. It washed the
Palestinian blood off Jewish hands with expendable Russian
blood. It forced the hand of Arafat to surrender to Israeli
conditions of a cease-fire. It created a
miraculously ‘restrained’ General Sharon withholding his
justifiable fury and sparing malfeasants. It pushed a hence
neutral Russian community into the embrace of Arab-haters.
The Qui Bono principle of criminal detection led directly
to the high rooms of Israeli politics, who profited hugely
from the explosion.

An American activist voiced the initial suspicions noting
that ‘the bombing took place the day of Husseini's funeral
when the IDF had so "generously" left East Jerusalem and
when spirits were so high at the demo. And then there was
the convenient timing of this horrendous crime; exactly
what Israel needed to win over public opinion’. 

The Sunday Times now reports that the impossible feat of
delivering the bomber to the deep hinterland of Tel Aviv
was done by a Shabak (Israeli Internal Secret Police)
agent, al Nadi. Quoting a string of officials, an Israeli
journalist Uzi Mahanaimi drew a portrait of a gullible
Shabak agent who unwittingly became an accomplice in the
murder. He supposedly understood the intentions of the
bomber; but far too late. The Israeli Army spokesman also
stressed innocence of al Nadi who did not know what he was
doing.

This scoop by The Sunday Times reminded me of a plot by the
British thriller writer, Le Carre. When endangered by a
pending disclosure, secret services usually prefer to leak
their own doctored version of events. The damning report of
the English paper appears to be an Israeli damage control
procedure. Many Israel-based foreign journalists recently
received additional detailed information from usually
knowledgeable sources. The sources claimed that the
suspected bomber Said Hotari worked for a branch of
Jordanian security services until his defection to Israel.
He apparently collaborated with Shabak, and that is why his
Israeli visa was duly extended. This fact of visa extension
was reported by Israeli newspapers before the court slapped
a full publicity ban on the case. Hotari was probably
unaware of his deadly load, as the explosion was caused by
remote control.

They also claim that there was an additional reason for
the peculiar choice of the site: the nearby David
Intercontinental Hotel had an unusual guest, the German
Foreign Minister Joshka Fischer. It is not a popular hotel
with high-ranking guests. Though it is a five star
operation, it is not located in the most fashionable area
of Tel Aviv. Purely by ‘chance’, Herr Fischer became a star
witness of the outrage. He was emotionally swept away to
the Israeli side and became an important player in the
following diplomatic game that resulted in imposing the
cease fire on Israeli terms.

Ruthless use of terrorism for political and tactical
purposes has always been a traditional tool of Israeli
secret service operatives. Provocation is not below their
dignity: in 1950s, in the infamous Lavon Affair, some local
Jews enlisted by Israel were apprehended in Cairo while
placing bombs in the American and British consulates. They
tried to present their bombing as ‘acts of Islamic terror’
and cause hostility between Arabs and Americans. Israeli
agents did not hesitate to kill Jews ‘for the cause’.

Thus, on November 25, 1940, the Jewish Agency men sunk SS
Patria and killed 250 Jewish immigrants. They did it in
order to ensure sympathy to the plight of Jews who were
refused entry to British-run Palestine. The perpetrators of
the outrage admitted their crime in Israeli media a few
years ago. The explosive charge was too powerful, they
explained.

Joachim Martillo recently wrote of possible Zionist
connection with the bloody anti-Jewish riots in the Polish
town of Kielce after the WWII. The riots sent a wave of
Jewish immigrants to the shores of Palestine. Israeli
bombings of Baghdad synagogues are by now a well known and
declassified fact. They caused mass immigration of Iraqi
Jews to Israel.

In a more recent development, just over a year ago, Moscow
was shaken by dreadful explosions that caused multiple
casualties. Unknown terrorists exploded whole residential
apartment buildings in the Russian capital. The explosions
were blamed on Chechens, and brought about the Second
Chechnya war, the destruction of Grozny, thousands of dead
and wounded, but more importantly, they served as a turning
point in Russia’s relations with Israel and the Muslim
world. Russia’s media enforced the image of Islamic
terrorism and of Israel as a guardian and ally of Russia.

‘We have a common enemy, Islamic terrorism’, was the line
reiterated by Israeli politicians visiting Moscow, be it
Sharansky, Lieberman or Peres. The comparisons of Chechnya
with Palestine became commonplace in the Jewish-owned
Russian press. The old Zionist dream of creating
confrontation between Russia and Dar al Islam almost became
true. Until now, the bombers have not been  found. Russia’s
influential Nezavisimaya Gazette openly expresses doubts of
a Chechen connection to the explosions.

Moreover, I am ready to risk anger of my readers and claim
that the Palestinians are miscast for the role of
terrorists. Surely some of them try to act the part the
Jews gave them and dabble in ‘terror’. Their ‘terror’ is so
timid, that a careful and objective observer would just
pooh-pooh an idea of the ‘Palestinian terrorists’. Consider
a suicide bomber, for instance, a quiet sophomore at Bir
Zeit University, Dia Tawil. He exploded near a bus full of
Israelis. He died while only a few Israelis were lightly
wounded. Many suicide bombers die without killing a single
Israeli, only a few manage to wound and kill.

Even in their most successive and lethal wave of 1996, all
of them together could not beat a single Jewish terrorist
act, bombing of King David Hotel in 1947 with its 92
victims. When Jews deal in terror, their enemies die in
droves. That is how they operated before the state of
Israel was established. And that is how the Israeli state
operates to this day. It is meaningless  to even compare
the Palestinian ‘terror’ with the organized terror of the
state of Israel. They are not in the same league. For
Israel, the killing of a hundred refugees in Kana, or
bombing a school, or blasting a besieged Beirut for two
months, or assassinating a leader, or strafing the USS
Liberty, or shooting down a passenger airliner is a normal
occurrence. Yet the Jewish dominated media machine manages
to hang the terrorist label on the Palestinians.

The Palestinians are inefficient killers because they have
the peaceful souls of peasants and martyrs. They do not go
out to kill, they go to die. They are similar to the
kamikaze, the Divine Wind of Japan. The Japanese suicide
flyers loaded their tiny planes with explosives, prayed to
God, wrote a poem comparing themselves with falling petals
of wild cherry, tied a white band over their forehead and
took off to ram the American aircraft carriers in the blue
waves of Pacific. More often than not they caused no
damage, but they scared the hell out of McArthur. He could
not understand this willingness to sacrifice one’s life for
a higher cause. Nor can Israelis.

The unusually ‘productive’ explosion at Dolphi just did not
feel right from the start. We still do not know the answer,
but the doubts grow. Some supporters of the Palestinian
cause rushed to support the Israeli version and condemned
the discotheque explosion. They were rewarded: the usually
reluctant Jewish-owned American press published their
letters and articles. In my view, in such dubious cases,
when no known Palestinian organization claimed the act in
real time, it is not wise to dish out blame hastily.

Reply via email to