-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 07/05/2001 1:19:21 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<<
Now, personally I feel that if you publish an article targeted to pedophiles,
on how to commit pedophiliac acts, in a pedophiliac magazine you stand as
guilty as those
committing the act. There's a big difference from writing "I think the age
of consent should be lowered to 10 years old" and "Here's how to lure a
young boy into your home for sexual intercourse. >>
This is absolutely correct, but unfortunately what passes for the legal
system in this country doesn't look at things that way. Remember the three
strikes system in California that was supposed to protect Californians from
murder, rape and armed robbery. I suppose that the murderers, rapists, and
thugs just moved out of state after their second conviction, and the takers
of pizza slices or chocolate chip cookies seem to be the guys Californians
are supporting for the rest of their natural lives in prison. Any case
against NAMBLA would come back to haunt us. Still, I feel that since NAMBLA
has changed its editorial policy to some degree, the names of their
subscribers should be posted on the internet so that we can take special
precautions for our children and grandchildren. I'm sure that would not be
allowed, since we have to protect their privacy. Isn't it amazing though
that we've had hackers go after the secrets of corporations and government
agencies, but never once has the subscription list of NAMBLA come to light.
I guess we know what everyone considers most important when it comes to
corporations, the government or our children. The FBI brags NOW that missing
children are entered into its main computer, but the battle to get them to do
it was prodigious. I still have copies somewhere of the letters I wrote to
congressmen to get them to make it the law, so the FBI was forced to do it.
They had all the stolen cars on the computer, but the kids weren't really
very important to them. Wasn't that Dubya who was interested in the welfare
of this country's children? Sure he was. Prudy
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
