American Journalism fell on its ass when JFK was murdered - and Walter
Cronkite staged the best performance of his life, out of sheer guilt?

The press, as this one newsman once told me, molds public opinion;
however, more and more the public begins to mold their opinion of the
press and FOX was born.

For FOX can best be described as, The People's News Network.....who
needs MSNBC, and that drunken bum Ted Turner, "molding" public opinion
and same goes for Dan Rather who now wants to be loved by all and
somehow can't even buy our love and admiration?

Saba



The collapse of American journalism     
FRIDAY JULY 20 2001    
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=23710
© 2001 WorldNetDaily.com 
     The call came in from CNN a few hours before show time. I was not to 
appear on "The Point" with Greta Van Susteren to discuss TWA 800.       
     I can't say that I was surprised. 

What surprised me was that CNN had called me the day before to set this up. 
Like many Americans, I had all but written off CNN as a serious news 
organization. But when the call came, I presumed that the ascendancy of Fox – 
and the public acknowledgement of that ascendancy in a New York Times 
Magazine cover story – had shocked CNN into journalism. I was happy to 
participate. 

There was nothing tentative about the arrangement. The producer might or 
might not select someone to go on with me as counterpoint, she told me, but 
barring a confession from Gary Condit, the show would go on in any case. That 
night I organized my thoughts as though I were to be the only guest. 

The next morning the producer called back. Jim Hall, the NTSB chair at the 
time of the crash and one of the "bad guys" in the documentary Jim Sanders 
and I had produced, had agreed to go on with me. Our dual appearance was 
posted on the CNN website. 

The producer also directed me to the studio in Kansas City where the 
interview would be shot. It was the local PBS station. I was pleased. The 
station had aired a half dozen of my other documentaries – most recently, an 
eyewitness account of the Holocaust by some 65 survivors – and I felt at home 
there. 

After making the arrangements, I headed out in my Ford Taurus to a local 
public pool where I idled away my summer lunch hour. It was only then that it 
dawned on me. In six hours, I would have the opportunity – and the 
responsibility – to expose the most brazen cover-up in American political 
history. At this point, I actually prayed for guidance. It is not something I 
do enough of. 

Then it all came to me. I would not yell or argue or accuse. I would just 
calmly ask Jim Hall a few questions he could not answer and then ask him to 
step up and assume the role of genuine American hero – acknowledge the 
cover-up, admit his own role in it, and ask for the forgiveness of the almost 
too generous American people. 

Truth be told, I never envisioned him admitting any such thing. In fact, at 
this point, I could no longer envision him on the show at all. He was much 
too ripe, much too vulnerable. Unlike the man who appointed him chairman, 
Hall is not "an unusually good liar," nor is he fast on his feet. Someone, I 
surmised, would get to him or to CNN and call this whole thing off. 

Someone did. I do not know who. But three hours before the show was to air, a 
crestfallen young producer called to tell me that I had been cancelled. As 
she explained, with undisguised irony, since Jim Hall now refused to appear 
on the show with me, I could not appear alone, as that would not be 
"responsible journalism." Jim Hall, however, having dispensed with me, could 
appear alone as that would be "responsible journalism." It didn't matter that 
this old Gore crony had quit his job at the NTSB the moment the Florida 
results were affirmed and took a job with Daimler-Chrysler's lobbyists, a 
move that was sleazy even by the admittedly humble standards of the Clinton 
White House. Not at all. 

And so that night I watched 10 painful moments of responsible journalism. Van 
Susteren began by declaring that "at first, people suspected a bomb went off 
on the plane." 

No Greta, check your own archives. As CNN and the networks first reported, 
people suspected a missile. With good reason. There were hundreds, perhaps 
thousands of eyewitnesses, including military people in helicopters and on 
other airlines. At least 96 told the FBI that they had seen the object come 
off the horizon. Scores of them provided detailed drawings. As NTSB staffer 
Dr. David Mayer said of at least one of them, "Witness 649 described events 
that certainly do sound like a missile attacking the airplane." CNN itself 
reported that FAA radar had picked up a missile sighting, something that Hall 
himself would confirm in a memo a few months later. 

"Top intelligence and security officials were told in a video conference from 
the White House Situation Room that radar tapes showed an object headed at 
the plane before it exploded." 

But to Van Susteren, a missile strike had passed to the lowly realm of "the 
conspiracy theorists." She then posed the question to Hall. 

"Jim," she asked, "can you say with 100 percent certainty that the people who 
think that this flight was shot down, that they were wrong?" 

Hall wouldn't answer. He clumsily headed off to Spin 101. 

"Greta," he intoned piously, "the first thing I need to say this evening is 
we all need to remember the 230 individuals who lost their lives in this 
tragedy." On and on he blathered while CNN cut away to images of the victim 
families. 

To her credit, Van Susteren tried again. "Does that mean, Jim, that you are 
100 percent certain that those conspiracists who some say saw a white light 
traveling skyward, zigzagging, disappearing, then an orange ball of fire, can 
you say with 100 percent certainty that they are wrong?" 

Van Susteren seemed to be reading from my description of Mike Wire's 
testimony, the honest mechanic on the bridge with whom the CIA would create 
an entirely fictitious new interview to build its preposterous animation 
around. 

Hall danced some more. "Greta, in my mind, with 100 percent certainty, our 
investigators, based on the facts they developed, they are wrong, they are 
incorrect." 

Huh? 

And that was pretty much it. There were no questions as to why the CIA 
fabricated the most important eyewitness testimony, no questions about the 
FAA missile sighting, the 736 eyewitnesses, the explosive residue found all 
over the plane, the altered and missing physical evidence, the abysmal 
failure of the NTSB to identify an ignition source or recreate an explosion 
after four years of trying. Nothing. 

I had just witnessed the culmination of five years of responsible CNN 
journalism, and it was frightening. Still, someone at CNN, at least, had 
tried. MSNBC assigned a self-described "summer intern" to wrap up its five 
years of responsible journalism. 

We begin the video "Silenced" with a quote from Thomas Jefferson. "If a 
nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it 
expects what never was and never will be." 

Enough said. 



Reply via email to