------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> <FONT COLOR="#000099">Small business owners... Tell us what you think! </FONT><A HREF="http://promo2.yahoo.com/sbin/Yahoo!_BusinessNewsletter/survey.cgi";><B>Click Here!</B></A><FONT COLOR="#000099"> </FONT><A HREF="http://us.click.yahoo.com/vO1FAB/txzCAA/ySSFAA/zgSolB/TM";><B>Click Here!</B></A> ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Please send as far and wide as possible. Thanks, Robert Sterling Editor, The Konformist http://www.konformist.com Response to Aquino 7/19/2001 Alex Constantine [EMAIL PROTECTED] < Michael A. Aquino, Ph.D. Lt. Colonel, Military Intelligence, USAR-Ret.> He is "retired" only in a PR sense. Aquino was processed out of the Army due to the abuse allegations, according to official documents posted on the Web by Curio. He was a psyops officer, trained in the use of propaganda to mold public opinion, and here come the shaggy dogs ... < Following the publication of the "recovered memories of Satanic ritual abuse" book _Michelle Remembers_ in 1980, the United States and other Anglo-American countries went through a decade of "SRA" scares and witch-hunts.> I don't recall one university study, a thesis, a news article or even a subway scrawl linking this book to exposures of RA in the '80s. This is an allegation, and by Aquino's own rigorous standard of evidence (as applied to the children's testimony) has no relevance. Elsewhere, Aquino has dismissed ALL allegations as "hysteria" kindled by the publication of Pazder's book, as if this is a material statement of his own innocence. Robert D. Hicks, a criminal justice analyst at the Law Enforcement Section Department of Criminal Justice Services during the first Bush regime, is the source of the "hysteria" argument. Hicks seems to deny even that animal mutilations take place. The Michelle Remembers bromide was bruited on the West Coast by Paul and Shirley Eberle. Perhaps Hicks was unaware of it, but the Eberles ran a disgusting pornographic publication for pedophiles in Los Angeles, FINGER magazine, under the noses of his criminal justice system, so perhaps we are not so "hysterical," after all. Ralph Underwager, a known pedophile sympathizer and RA revisionist, and the FMSF have also made much of this comment from Hicks, who could teach Gerald Posner a thing or two about distorting evidence to arrive at a pre-determined conclusion. < After the 1984 McMartin Preschool became internationally publicized in one such scare, day-care facilities generally became targets of "SRA" witch-hunt instigators.> "Witch-hunt." The jurors stated unanimously after the fact that they believed children were molested at McMartin (and so did the jurors at Presidio, for that matter). But identifying the perpetrators beyond reasonable doubt was, they found, not possible because they were working with young, frightened children who could not even tell time, a necessity in a criminal case this serious. McMartin was not a "witch- hunt." The chidren still insist that ritual abuse occurred. Cover stories, propaganda, revisionist tactics and flimsy excuses do not count as evidence to the contrary. < The epidemic extended to U.S. military services as well, including 15 U.S. Army day-care centers and elementary schools by 1987. In late 1986 it was the turn of the Presidio of San Francisco. On 9/28/86 the _San Francisco Examiner_ began a series of 8 front- page stories sensationalizing the witch-hunts.> The stories were as factual as one might expect from the Examiner. It is Aquino's life that is "sensational," and that came through the reporting.. < Approximately a month later one set of Presidio parents claimed that their son might have been anally raped by one of the day-care teachers, Gary Hambright, and the scare was off and running, with scores of children being "abuse-diagnosed" by a "play-therapist" despite not a single published confirmation of actual physical harm to any child. Hambright denied any "abusing" whatever, and all of the other teachers and staff supported him.> The medical evidence supported the children's allegations - unless chlamydia, a sexually-transmitted disease, contracted by five or six of the children, is not to be considered evidence or to cause physical harm. < As in other witch-hunts it made no difference:> As in other RA cases, that is. < Over the next year Hambright was suspended, indicted, charges dropped, reindicted, charges redropped amidst a massive media frenzy. Parents rushed to file over $84 million in claims, as was also routine in such witch-hunts. [The previous year a similar, highly- publicized witch-hunt at West Point had resulted in $110 million claims.]> Correct. At Presidio, the Army settled quietly with some of the parents. The Pentagon announced it would tear down the preschool and organize "strike teams" to investigate future cases of organized abuse - why go to the trouble if there was no problem? Why settle with the "greedy" parents if nothing occurred at the base? < No news article that I have ever read indicated that there was a shred of *physical* evidence showing that *any* child at the Presidio had been sexually abused in connection with that scam...> Chlamydia has been reported. The San Jose Mercury-News published details of the of the medical exams in 1988. Professional physicians threw their weight behind the children. < The *only* "evidence" against Hambright thus consisted of parental hearsay allegations and the allegations of "therapist" Debbie Hickey, the Army psychiatrist who conducted the "play therapy" indoctrination sessions for the children once the scam got underway.> And the toys that police found scattered about the Aquino apartment, some bearing names that the children recognized? One might call that evidence, unless the Aquinos whiles away evenings with stuffed animals when not worshipping the God of Confusion. Yet Aquino denies there is evidence. < Later on, after Lilith and I had been attacked by Chaplain Adams- Thompson, I met with Hambright's public defenders in their S.F. office to see what documents they might provide which might help us.> An "attack" took place? Did the chaplain didn't injure the Anti- Christ.. < During that meeting (which occurred after the second dropping of all charges against Hambright), I bluntly asked the two lawyers if there were *any* actual evidence - not just accusations - that Hambright had committed any abuse crime whatever. They both said, "None at all." [They didn't say "no comment" or "we can't discuss that".]> Please post the tape of that conference, Dr. Aquino. Otherwise, this is an allegation and does not count as evidence, just as the children's testimony is completely discounted by yourself. Academics say that children are more honest when providing testimony than adults. And they are not to be ignored because a Satanic cultist - one who has written in praise of nazism and advocated affecting brainwaves en masse with mind control satellites - contends they are tiny liars. I'm snipping the remainder of Aquino's statements because I've heard them before so often I could recite them myself. He claims he is not a Satanist, for example. But a visit to his Web site should convince anyone that he is indeed a Satanist. The ToS answering machine has reported that it is a "Satanic religion." If he cannot concede this elementary fact, there is no point in debating. He will not give ground because to do so would be to admit that he has been lying all along. Alex Constantine ***** Response to Rightmyer Post 7/23/2001 Xeper Dear Mr. Sterling, Appended below is my response to a Usenet post by Dan "Alex Constantine" Rightmyer in which he quotes from a previous statement of mine in your newsletter. This is just a courtesy copy for you accordingly. Sincerely, Michael Aquino * * * * * USENET POST FOLLOWS * * * * * Dan "Alex Constantine" Rightmyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <<He is "retired" only in a PR sense. Aquino was processed out of the Army due to the well-known Presidio abuse allegations, found to be substantial, according to documents posted on the Web by Curio.>> The Army investigation of Chaplain Adams-Thompson's falsified allegations against Mrs. Aquino and myself, in order to defraud the U.S. government of $3 million in claims based upon them, was closed in May 1989 with no charges whatever. If Chaplain A-T's allegations had really been considered substantial, then most assuredly I would have been court-martialed. As it was, the Army was under no illusion whatever that they were false, from the moment he made them on 8/14/87, which is why it didn't bother to open its own investigation until 11/23/88 - and then only as a stunt to intimidate me into resigning in order to appease Helms' demand that I be purged because of my religion. Throughout the investigation I had been on fulltime active duty at the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN), St. Louis. I continued on fulltime active duty through September 1990 (another 1- 1/4 years) - with my above-Top Secret security clearance, I might add. At the end of September 1990 my fulltime Active Reserve contract expired, and I automatically reverted to the parttime Active Reserve. I was assigned as an Intelligence Officer to Headquarters, U.S. Space Command, Colorado, for the next several years until I decided to request transfer to the Retired Reserve in 1994. My request was approved, and I remain today a Lt. Colonel, USAR-Ret, as is a matter of public record. All of my Officer Efficiency Reports from the time of the Chaplain's attack through to my 1994 retirement give me the highest possible evaluations in all categories, including morals, and upon retirement I received many commendations from from the President, the Chief of the Army Reserve, and the Commander of ARPERCEN. That's also documented record. <<The SFPD only let Aquino off because the principals "refused to cooperate." That is what you call the fix.>> The SFPD investigated Chaplain A-T's allegations, verified that Mrs. Aquino and I had been in Washington, D.C. - 3,000 miles away - on *all possible* dates alleged by A-T, and closed its investigation with no charges. That is what you call an ironclad alibi. <<Aquino maintains that a letter from Jesse Helms prompted the subsquent Army probe, but Aquino has never produced it, never placed it into evidence during the hearings, because its existence is doubtful, as are many of the vapid claims he makes.>> Wrong again. The two [not one] Helms letters were reprinted in their entirety in my attorney's brief in the 1990 lawsuit I filed against the Army CID for its illegal abuse of its investigative authority. << <<Following the publication of the "recovered memories of Satanic ritual abuse" book _Michelle Remembers_ in 1980, the United States and other Anglo-American countries went through a decade of "SRA" scares and witch-hunts.>> I don't recall one university study, a thesis, a news article or even a subway scrawl linking this book to exposures of RA in the '80s.>> _MR_ was not "linked to *exposures* of RA", but rather was the inspiration for a decade-long epidemic of similarly-*faked* "RA" allegations, as has been documented in numerous studies. Rightmyer may care to refresh his selective memory at: http://users.cybercity.dk/~ccc44406/smwane/English.htm <<McMartin>> See above-cited website. I can't believe Rightmyer is still chewing on this long-since-exploded "SRA" scam. << << On 9/28/86 the _San Francisco Examiner_ began a series of 8 front-page stories sensationalizing the witch-hunts.>> The stories were as factual as one might expect from the Examiner. It is Aquino's life that is "sensational," and that came through the reporting..>> I was not mentioned at all in any of the _Examiner_'s eight stories cited above, for the simple reason that it hadn't occurred to Chaplain A-T to try to fake an allegation against me yet. [That took him and his wife another 10 months.] << << Approximately a month later one set of Presidio parents claimed that their son might have been anally raped by one of the day-care teachers, Gary Hambright, and the scare was off and running, with scores of children being "abuse-diagnosed" by a "play-therapist" despite not a single published confirmation of actual physical harm to any child. Hambright denied any "abusing" whatever, and all of the other teachers and staff supported him.>> The medical evidence supported the children's allegations - unless chlamydia, a sexually-transmitted disease, contracted by five or six of the children, is not to be considered evidence or to cause physical harm.>> As I noted, there was not a single published confirmation of actual physical harm to any child, and the initial "chlamydia" report was promptly discredited by the Army physicians as unreliable. No mention of any subsequent *verified* chlamydia was ever made, to my knowledge, nor were the children's parents (from whom this disease can also be communicated) announced as being cleared. On the other hand, the medical records of Mrs. Aquino and myself verified that neither of us had ever had it. [Presumably the daycare teacher who was the original target of the Presidio scam - Gary Hambright - never had it either; otherwise the press would certainly have announced that.] << <<Parents rushed to file over $84 million in claims, as was also routine in such witch-hunts. [The previous year a similar, highly- publicized witch-hunt at West Point had resulted in $110 million claims.]>> Correct. At Presidio, the Army settled quietly with some of the parents. The Pentagon announced it would tear down the preschool and organize "strike teams" to investigate future cases of organized abuse. Why go to the trouble if there was no problem? Why settle with the "greedy" parents if nothing occurred at the base?>> Because the Army, like the rest of the country at the time, was totally unprepared for the "daycare abuse allegations" epidemic, and simply tried to appease parental accusers because it didn't know what else to do that would not make it look "unsupportive of Army families and children". It did not have the guts, or the resources from independent research as yet, to expose such scams for what they were. <<And the toys that police found scattered about the Aquino apartment, some bearing names that the children recognized? One might call that evidence, unless the Aquinos whiles away evenings with stuffed animals>> On a single shelf in one of our rooms were about a half-dozen stuffed- animal toys that my wife had collected over the years, as do many ladies. And for Rightmyer's information, not a single of these souvenirs had been "pre-identified" by any child. Not a single one was taken by the SFPD in their search warrant either. So no, Mr. Rightmyer, my wife's collection is evidence of nothing except your own wishful fantasies. << <<During that meeting (which occurred after the second dropping of all charges against Hambright), I bluntly asked the two lawyers if there were *any* actual evidence - not just accusations - that Hambright had committed any abuse crime whatever. They both said, "None at all." [They didn't say "no comment" or "we can't discuss that".]>> Please post the tape of that conference, Dr. Aquino. Otherwise, this is an allegation and does not count as evidence, just as the children's testimony is completely discounted by yourself.>> I did not tape my interview with Hambright's attorneys. I simply went there to (a) see what documents they might have that were relevant to Chaplain A-T's and his wife's behavior, and (b) ask them point-blank whether there was anything to the earlier allegations against Hambright. My wife and I knew *we* were victims of a deliberate scam, but we knew nothing about Hambright except what we'd read in the papers. What I recounted above was simply that, without discussing any details of their client's case, both attorneys (Federal Public Defenders) stated to me flat-out that the witch-hunt against Hambright was completely baseless. As for fruits of that interview: Among the papers those two FPDs found and gave me was the January 1987 FBI interview of the Adams- Thompsons. In this interview - only 2-1/2 months after the time- period in which Adams-Thompson would later allege so many different and dramatic sexual atrocities occurred - the Adams-Thompsons stated Kinsey's denial of any abuse. They made no mention of any emergency medical care of Kinsey, such as would have been necessary had she been abused as they would later allege. They made no mention of anyone other than Hambright at all, nor of any reason to think that Kinsey had been abducted from the day-care center at any time. They did not accuse Hambright of anything. That's called a "smoking gun" exposing the adult Adams-Thompsons, Mr. Rightmyer - or are you too blinded by your "SRA!" agenda to see that in front of your nose? <<a Satanic cultist one who has written in praise of nazism>> Kindly quote any writing of mine in which I have praised Nazism. <<and advocated affecting brainwaves en masse with mind control satellites>> Kindly quote any writing of mine in which I have advocated affecting brainwaves en masse with mind control satellites. [I once wrote that the pleasing effect of rock-and-roll music might have something to do with its causing the human brain to resonate at the alpha-wave frequency. I assume you don't think I'm going to take over the planet with rock concerts!] <<He claims he is not a Satanist, for example. But a visit to his Web site should convince anyone that he is indeed a Satanist.>> One more time, slowly, for the mentally-challenged: I am a Priest of Set. Set is an ancient Egyptian god about 5,000+ years older than any Judaeo-Christian mythology. "Satan" is a figure of J-C M. I do not believe in J-C M. I do not believe in "Satan". Got that? Was I going too fast for you? I *do* think that J-C M manufactured its "devils" from many older, competing Mediterranean religions, including that of Egypt. Its "Satan" was accordingly given features from the Greek Pan, the Mesopotamian Baal, the Phoenician Astarte, the Egyptian Set [and probably Amon, Ba-neb-Tett, et al.], etc. and *then*, not unsurprisingly, pronounced THE PERSONIFICATION OF EVIL. This happens a lot between different religions, incidentally. The Set of whom I am a Priest is not in the least Evil, does not advocate Evil, and does not appreciate Evil. He doesn't care about J- C M one way or the other. If you read the Temple of Set's General Information Letter on its website: http://www.xeper.org some evening when your brain is not clouded by CIA mind-rays, or rock- and-roll recordings beamed to you by the insidious Dr. Michael Aquino, you can see that - very clearly - for yourself. <<The ToS answering machine has reported that it is a "Satanic religion." If he cannot concede this elementary fact, there is no point in debating.>> Call it (415) 771-9155 and listen for yourself. The only mention of "Satan" is - as above - to identify and eliminate the confusion of the Setian religion with anything anti-Judaeo/Christian (Satanism). <<He will not give ground because to do so would be to admit that he has been lying all along.>> I've told the truth, provided abundant evidence of it, and sworn to it under oath many times. I do get a little tired of re-re-repeating it for the hearing- challenged, however. Now consider this, Rightmyer: Are you proud of yourself for trying to defend, promote, and revive a scam - "SRA" - that destroyed hundreds of innocent lives, wrecked families, traumatized children by indoctrinating scam-artists' disgusting sexual fantasies into them, ruined many legitimate & decent daycare professionals, and extorted millions of dollars in fraudulent claims and lawsuits? All so these twisted cranks could get tabloid media glamor and make some fast free money? For someone who prides himself on being an exposer of conspiracies, you sure got played for a sucker by this *real* one. Unless, of course, you also thought it was just really, really lots of fun. Michael A. Aquino, Ph.D. Lt. Colonel, USAR-Ret If you are interested in a free subscription to The Konformist Newswire, please visit: http://www.eGroups.com/list/konformist Or, e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the subject: "I NEED 2 KONFORM!!!" (Okay, you can use something else, but it's a kool catch phrase.) Visit the Klub Konformist at Yahoo!: http://clubs.yahoo.com/clubs/klubkonformist Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
