-Caveat Lector-

Secrets of federal education reform
Martin L. Gross

http://www.washtimes.com/commentary/20010724-75749200.htm

In no field is there more discussion of reform -- and less real activity --
than in education.

By this time, virtually everyone is aware that the dumbing down of America
is proceeding at a strong, steady pace. Half of our Ph.D.s in computer and
engineering are granted to foreign students, and of the remainder a large
portion are recent immigrants from Eastern Europe and Asia. In the 1998
mathematical international contest, our high-school seniors placed 19th out
of 21 nations. In reading, almost 40 percent of our third graders are not
literate.

Changing all this became a cornerstone of President Bush's campaign for
election and has taken much of his time to date. What has it all
accomplished? And what can we expect it to accomplish?

First, a $45 billion Department of Education budget for 2002, a rise of
almost 12 percent.

And what else? Frankly, nothing.

President Bush's original plan was strong. It required national tests to
measure every child in major subjects, if the children failed, the schools
would eventually be punished by providing private education, or "vouchers"
for the youngsters. Now, in a "compromise" with Sen. Edward Kennedy,
Massachusetts Democrat, the voucher program is dead and the tests are no
longer necessarily national. Students needn't take the rigorous NAEP, the
National Assessment of Education Progress, one of the federal aid to
education programs that has any real value. Instead states can substitute
their own tests, generally those that are self-serving and considerably
more lax.

But all of this controversy and compromise misses the real "dirty secret"
of educational reform -- the intellectual and academic inferiority of the
teacher corps. The Democrats refuse to discuss this because the National
Education Association is one of its main supporters, and some 10 percent of
the delegates to the Democratic National Convention were NEA members. The
Republicans refuse to discuss it because millions of voters have a sister,
wife, husband, daughter, son or other relative who is a teacher.

It's OK to bash "education" as a whole, but it is not OK to bash teacher
selection and training. However, in the last SAT tests, high school
youngsters who said they intended to become teachers scored a total of 964
in the SATs, while the average student, including minorities, scored 1019.
The odds are that the typical student, especially in the suburbs, has a
higher SAT score than his or her teachers.

In Pennsylvania, the education secretary has declared that the average
high-school graduate entering any of the 91 teacher-ed programs in the
state had a C-plus average, putting them in the bottom third of their
high-school class. Most other teacher's colleges now masquerade as
"universities" but with the same low admissions requirements and inferior
curriculum. Most of these high-school grads studying to be teachers could
not get into a mediocre liberal arts college.

The current selection and training methods are designed to enable the new
teachers to be "certified" by the state, an underwhelming achievement. One
major test for teacher certification, the Praxis I, used in 36 states, can
easily be passed by the typical 15-year-old. (I took it and laughed.)

One last frightening statistic: the Graduate Record Exam tests college
grads anxious to get into one of eight professions. Educators score at the
very bottom.

But meanwhile, the teacher crunch has forced many states, including Texas,
California and New Jersey, to hire ordinary college grads with no
certification or "education" background. The result? Administrators of
these "alternate" programs believe these untrained teachers are superior in
intelligence, have better grades from better colleges, and are equal or
better in performance to regular teachers.

What about the present federal aid to education? the largest program, Title
I for underprivileged children, has been operating since the 1960s, and
presently costs us $9 billion a year. Yet the Education Department itself,
in its report "Prospects," states that is has been of little or no value
over all these years.

If Washington wants to help with a Bush-inspired education bill, it can
best do it in the two steps designed to imitate the usually superior
European system for the selection and training of teachers.

(1) Close all the undergraduate schools of education where academically
weak high-school graduates study to become teachers (A step we took with
medical students in 1910 after the Flexner-Carnegie report.)

(2) Make teacher training entirely a one-year postgraduate course for
superior graduates of liberal arts colleges where they study a true subject
rather than "education," and do some practice teaching. The federal
government can best spend its money on scholarships for college graduates
who majored in biology, or math, or literature and who now decide they want
to teach elementary and high school.

Only by uplifting the caliber of those who become teachers can we improve
the education of our children. All the rest is just more federal money down
the anti-academic drain.



Martin L. Gross is the author of "The Conspiracy of Ignorance: The Failure
of American Public Schools." published by Harper Collins.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to