Looking out for liberty

Labour's response to Genoa is alarming
Saturday July 28, 2001
The Guardian

One week on, and the shock of Genoa has not faded. On the contrary, the last
seven days have revealed that the ugly television pictures broadcast last
week from the G8 summit were the least of it. Police brutality on an even
more savage scale was meted out to anti-capitalist protesters - including
peaceful ones - far away from the cameras. British activists have come home
recounting desperate experiences, explaining how the headquarters of their
non-violent Genoa Social Forum were raided by uniformed thugs who clubbed,
kicked and punched indiscriminately. Later the protesters were held in
conditions they likened to Chile or Argentina under dictatorship: denied
legal or consular access, they were deprived of food and sleep for 36 hours
and subjected to a form of psychological torture. One account speaks of
demonstrators beaten if they refused to say out loud that the carabinieri
were their "government".
These revelations are, most immediately, a severe problem for Italy. Silvio
Berlusconi has promised no cover-up; he needs to go further and heed the
calls for an independent, parliamentary inquiry. Even that may not be
enough; the demand for an international investigation may grow. Italy needs
to handle this matter with care. There are already rumours of fascist
infiltration into the Genoa police force; today demonstrators will gather
outside the Italian embassy in London to vent their anger. If this concern
is not taken seriously and the carabinieri's behaviour goes unpunished,
Rome's reputation will be irreparably damaged. Italy is a lead member of the
European Union and a democracy: the world expects it to behave like one.
But Genoa has left the British government some questions of its own to
answer. For our most senior politicians let us down badly. They were among
the first to condemn the protesters. When Europe minister Peter Hain dared
suggest that "serious questions" had to be asked about the police operation,
he was rapidly slapped down by a Number 10 anxious not to offend Italy
(seen, along with Spain, as a crucial ally for London within the EU).
Instead Tony Blair spoke of a "world gone mad" that paid more attention to
demonstrations than to the declarations he and his fellow leaders had made
inside Genoa's ducal palace. Jack Straw followed his master, describing the
demonstrators as "mad". Small wonder that Britain has not made a formal
complaint to Rome; that Mr Straw has not spoken to his Italian opposite
number and that it has been the British media - not government - which has
objected to this vile treatment of British citizens.
Unfortunately, the week's events are all of a piece with two of New Labour's
least attractive traits: its authoritarian streak and tin ear for liberty.
As usual, ministers have lumped peaceful protesters alongside violent ones -
rubbishing the lot as nutters. The government's updated version of the
Prevention of Terrorism Act is guilty of the same error, failing to
distinguish between legitimate dissent and murderous terror: the former is
criminalised along with the latter. That law, passed last year, would have
made felons of the 1980s anti-apartheid movement, for using Britain as a
base of struggle against a foreign tyranny.
Our government now has a battery of tools at its disposal for the stifling
of democracy: a demo can be booked for aggravated trespass, obstruction of
the highway and even for stalking. But this does not trouble a prime
minister who condemns such matters as "libertarian nonsense". It does not
trouble him - but it should worry all of us.










Reply via email to