-Caveat Lector-
Disputes Imperil Racism Forum U.N. Rights Chief Urges Compromise to Avert
U.S. Boycott
By Darryl Fears
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, August 10, 2001; Page A07
As the curtain began to fall on meetings to prepare for the World
Conference Against Racism, the United Nations human rights commissioner
yesterday pleaded with delegates to reach a compromise on two contentious
issues to stop the United States from boycotting the event.
In a statement to the preparatory committee in Geneva, U.N. High
Commissioner Mary Robinson urged Arab and Jewish organizations to find
common ground on the Palestinian issue, and African and European groups to
come to a consensus on the issue of slavery and reparations.
"We cannot set deadlines on any particular issue," she said, "and everyone
must participate in the search for solutions - at the highest levels. I
make a strong appeal for this."
Days before the preparatory meetings began two weeks ago, President Bush
said his administration would not attend the conference, which is scheduled
to begin Aug. 31 in Durban, South Africa, if its agenda included language
equating Zionism with racism and calling for reparations to African nations
for colonialism and slavery.
In spite of Robinson's appeal, delegates wondered openly if the meetings
could accomplish in one day what they had failed to do in nearly two weeks.
The United States still has objections to some of the language being
contemplated. African groups quieted their calls for reparations for
colonialism and slavery but continued to look upon slavery as a "crime
against humanity," a characterization that could open the United States and
European nations to future legal action.
And although language explicitly identifying Zionism as racism was removed
from the agenda, Arab groups continued to refer to the Israeli government's
treatment of Palestinians as racist.
"If the conference ignores Israeli practices against the Palestinian
people, it means it will be convened to protect racism and not condemn it,"
Palestinian representative Nabil Ramlawi told the Reuters news service.
Yaakov Levy, Israel's ambassador to the United Nations in Geneva, said the
Arab delegation lacked the will to compromise, Reuters reported. "There is
a clear way to resolve it, by taking out the language and focusing on
racism, not the Middle East," he said.
The day before Robinson's appeal, her spokesman, Jose Luis Diaz,
acknowledged that "there is a lot of work left yet."
On the same day, an aide to the U.S. State Department delegation in Geneva
said, "It's still too early to say, but if the United States had to make a
decision today, it would not be going to Durban."
After the preparatory meetings close today, a compromise would be next to
impossible, with delegates and participants dispersing to their home
countries. If the United States is a no-show in Durban, it would mark the
third such U.N. conference that the government has skipped. The others were
the first and second world conferences to combat racism and discrimination,
held in 1978 and 1983 in Geneva.
Human rights and civil rights organizations were wondering how such an
ambitious attempt to stage a worldwide discussion of racism came to this.
The World Conference Against Racism was supposed to turn global promises of
racial healing into "actions, not just words," Robinson said when the
United Nations agreed to hold it, in 1997. The host nation would be South
Africa, which had triumphed over apartheid.
But the same emotions that drive people apart divided the conference
planners. Brazilian officials worried over how their country would be
characterized by people descended from both Indians and black slaves. India
wanted no part of a discussion of its caste system.
In the United States, where slaves helped build the Capitol and the White
House, the Clinton administration backed away from any discussion of
reparations. Last year, President Clinton offered $250,000 for the
development of the conference. He had offered $5 million for development of
the World Conference on Women in 1995.
President Bush is also opposed to a discussion of reparations.
"I think they should go to Durban in spite of those issues," said Arun
Gandhi, founder and director of the M.K. Gandhi Institute for Non-Violence
in Memphis. "Although I don't agree with reparations because that opens a
Pandora's box, I don't think the president is right in boycotting the
conference simply because of those issues."
Across the board, the directors of American civil rights organizations
repudiate the notion of Zionism as racism, which goes back to a U.N.
resolution passed in 1975 but repealed 10 years ago. Wade Henderson,
executive director of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, said it
had no place on the conference agenda. Hugh Price, president of the Urban
League, said the language didn't appear to make sense.
James Zogby, president of the Arab-American Institute, called for a
discussion of Israel's treatment of Palestinians and its Arab citizens, but
said equating Zionism with racism was no way to go about it.
"I personally do not think it is necessary to have a discussion on the
formula of Zionism as racism," he said. "What is necessary is a discussion
on the Israeli discriminatory policy against Palestinians and Israeli Arab
citizens."
U.S. delegations attended previous preparatory meetings in Peru and Iran.
Iran's refusal to admit Jews into the country for the meeting there
foreshadowed problems that haunt the conference now.
In Geneva yesterday, Rep. Tom Lantos (D-Calif.) called the singling out of
Israel a "hypocritical farce," Reuters reported. Lantos noted that
delegations from Egypt, Syria and Afghanistan - where human rights abuses
are widespread - had targeted one nation, and called for Secretary of State
Colin L. Powell to stay away from Durban if it continued.
"It is clearly inappropriate for Secretary Powell to dignify the conference
with his presence. That would dignify the lynching of Israel," he said.
"The Durban conference needs the United States more than the United States
needs Durban."
South Africa is leading the chorus of developing nations that are
criticizing American politicians and their ultimatums.
"We cannot brush this [conference] under the carpet," that nation's
education minister, Kader Asmal, said recently. "It cannot be deemed
inconvenient or merely impolitic and therefore forbidden in discussions.
Nobody should be able to badger us into silence through threats of boycott
and related silliness."
� 2001 The Washington Post Company
================================================================
Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT
FROM THE DESK OF:
*Michael Spitzer* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
================================================================
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
