-Caveat Lector- From http://www.guardian.co.uk/Print/0,3858,4242532,00.html >>The site referred to is @ http://www.phonyveterans.com/ another @ http://www.cyberseals.org/phonyvets.htm << }}>Begin Tin soldiers For years it was the war that nobody wanted to remember. But now thousands of Americans who have never seen combat are claiming they are battle-hardened Vietnam veterans. Duncan Campbell reports on the wannabe heroes and the men and women who hunt them down Duncan Campbell Tuesday August 21, 2001 The Guardian His mission had been a dangerous one, acting as a CIA operative working underground in Laos during the Vietnam war in the late 60s. And he had been awarded a Purple Heart after being wounded in the groin by stray shrapnel during combat. All of which, along with his distinguished legal career and outstanding academic qualifications, made Patrick Couwenberg ideal material for the position for which he had applied: judge in the Los Angeles County superior court. There was only one problem: it was all a lie. Last Wednesday, Judge Couwenberg, aged 55, was sacked after an investigation discovered that he had lied during his application to the bench and had lied again during the subsequent investigation to check his claims. The commission on judicial performance ordered his removal for "wilful and and prejudicial misconduct". The judge's economy with the truth had first come to light three years ago when a colleague on the San Diego bench, who was a genuine military veteran, read a newspaper profile of Couwenberg and smelled a rat. He had claimed that between 1968 and 1969 he had worked for the CIA in Laos. He had also claimed to have carried out other missions for the CIA in Africa in 1984. However, the commission's investigators discovered that not only was Couwenberg never in the CIA, but during the time of his claim to be working for them, he was actually a social worker in Orange County, California. His military service had been carried out in the US Naval Reserve. Couwenberg's explanation was a poignant one: his wife had typed out his application and he had been unable to tell her that the service career he had invented for himself when they had first met was bogus. His lawyers argued that the judge was suffering from a condition called "pseudologica fantastica". But what is remarkable about Couwenberg's case is that it is far from isolated. Last Friday, Professor Joseph Ellis, a Pulitzer prize-winner, was suspended for a year without pay from his post at Mount Holyoke college in Massachusetts because he had also invented a Vietnam war past for himself. He had told his students that he had been a platoon commander near My Lai when he had, in fact, spent his service time teaching history at West Point. Yesterday, Professor Ellis said in a statement: "I intend to find time for self-reflection." He has already apologised to his students and to all Vietnam vets. Another judge, Michael O'Brien from Chicago, has been exposed as having falsely claimed to be a winner of two Medals of Honour, while the Toronto Blue Jays baseball team manager, Tim Johnson, was fired from his job after his claims to wartime heroics proved bogus. Almost every week it emerges that some public figure has invented a fictional war history for himself. The Unknown Soldier has been eclipsed by the Non Existent Soldier. Derring-do becomes derring-didn't. While truth has long been accepted as the first casualty of war, what had not been apparent until this year had been just how much of a casualty it had been, especially in Vietnam. But now a combination of dogged researchers, disgruntled veterans' organisations and the internet is exposing dozens of tin soldiers who have strutted at the head of their veterans' parades or used a bogus war record to parlay their way into a job or a relationship. "They are multiplying like cockroaches," says Mary Schantag, who logs the phoney war heroes on a website from her home in Skidmore, Missouri. "It's an epidemic. I had another eight calls only yesterday." She and her husband Chuck, a computer programmer and Vietnam vet who was wounded as a marine, came across the phenomenon by chance after setting up the PoW Network, a project that chronicled all former prisoners of war. People would call them having looked at the list of PoWs to ask why, say, their neighbour who had told them stories of his time in a Vietnamese prison camp was not listed. The Schantags would investigate, a relatively simple procedure, and discover that many of the claims were untrue. So they started a special section of their website dedicated to exposing "phoneys". Soon the trickle became a flood. While some of the phoney soldiers claimed to have served valiantly in the second world war, the recent rash of exposures has concerned service in Vietnam. "The Vietnam war is not the no-no it used to be," says Mary. "I think a lot of people feel that they missed the chance to face their demons, to sleep in the jungles in Vietnam, to face that psychological test. This country is so deeply in need of heroes that no one is willing to check out their backgrounds, they want to believe it is true. When you have someone who says he rescued people in darkest Cambodia, people are so desperate for it to be true that they don't check. It's a morality problem. It tears us apart." The first phoney, as Mary calls them, came to light in 1998, and since then the Schantags have constantly been asked by employers, local newspapers and by neighbours if they can check out people's claims. All too often they turn out to be nonsense. "They often make the mistake of choosing to be in elite units like special forces (much like the SAS in Britain) or Navy Seals or the CIA which are very easy for us to check - and I am a detail freak," she says. "There are now so many books and so much information about the war that we are able to find out more about a battle than the people who were in it. The people who were in it only know what was happening in their vicinity, but the phoneys, the wannabes have all the details." The Schantags have no hesitation in exposing people, saying that they are "stealing the honour and glory" that others have fought for. The number of those who have invented a military past keeps growing: so far 740 bogus PoWs have been listed but they represent only a tiny minority of bogus veterans. When confronted, some of those exposed claim that their operation was so secret that there is no official trace of it - but even if operations were secret, a service record is not. Some threaten to sue but none has yet done so. The Schantags are by no means the only way of tracking the bogus vets. In 1998, BG "Jug" Burkett wrote Stolen Valour, a book that has become the bible for the phoney-hunters. And a former Navy Seal, Larry Bailey, runs a website, cyberseals.org, which has a wall of shame with hundreds of names on it. Bailey, now a schoolteacher, reckons that more than 100,000 Americans have invented military backgrounds for themselves, often using them to get benefits. "Epidemic is an understatement," says Bailey. "It's the craziest thing I've ever come across." He had first been alerted to the phenomenon when teaching at the Seals' training school in California. Many police departments contacted him to check out applicants' claims to have been Seals: "They were all fake." He says that "pseudologica fantastica" was "putting a big name on someone who has a vacuum inside them that they have to fill. These people are absolute scum. How do they get away with it? Well, you know how gullible and how lazy we are." Bailey's wesbite also supplies handy tips for spotting bogus Seals, who tend to be the kind of person who "wear camouflage clothing with multiple patches and ribbons . . . Talks about his medals. (Seals don't talk about their medals.)" For people who have asked why they bother, Bailey gives many reasons, one being that many women have been "emotionally swindled" by men claiming a war record: "There are literally thousands of lascivious Lotharios who prey on the unsuspecting and trusting women who believe their lies and misrepresentations. If we can save one such lady by exposing these liars, then all our time and expense will have been worth it." The irony behind this spate of inventions is that, 20 years ago, people were more likely to have told lies in order to cover up their involvement in the Vietnam war. While many may have embellished their part in the first or second world wars, the Vietnam war was not one that seemed likely to attract claims of involvement, because of its association with failure and humiliation. It is only in the last few years that Vietnam veterans have started to emerge as heroic figures in the American media and with that realignment have come the stories. In the presidential election, Al Gore frequently used his service in Vietnam - which was brief and as a reporter - to contrast himself with George Bush, who had taken the rich boy's option of staying at home in the Reserve. Not that "pseudologica fantastica" is peculiar to America. There are plenty of fantasists in Britain who claim to have served in the SAS or the commandos in the Falklands or the Gulf war or to have been in bomb disposal - a popular fantasy - in Northern Ireland. But nowhere seems to have acquired so many cardboard heroes as the US, a country in the midst of a new romance with the second world war: three of the books on the New York Times bestsellers list this week are odes to second world war heroics. What the phoney-hunters have found is that few of those exposed show much contrition and some continue to protest their involvement regardless of the evidence. One or two, such as Professor Ellis, have apologised. "Denny" appears on the cyberseals website to say sorry for the "shameless pit" into which he has dug himself. But these are very much the exceptions. The truth has turned out to be even more painful than shrapnel in the groin. Guardian Unlimited � Guardian Newspapers Limited 2001 End<{{ <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
