-Caveat Lector-

Yukon government considers oil development in "important wetlands"

Thursday, August 30, 2001
By Erica Gies, Environmental News Network


Peel River in Yukon, Canada

WHITEHORSE, Yukon, Canada - An area that has been called one of the Yukon's
most important wetlands has been nominated for oil and gas development,
raising a controversy similar to that over the United States' Arctic
National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR).
Unlike the situation in the United States, however, the Yukon government is
asking for the public's opinion. It uses a five-step process that includes
an internal departmental review, consultations with First Nations (native
Canadian groups), a call for nominations, a review process, and a call for
bids. During the fourth step, the review process, the public is given 45
days to voice its opinion to the government.

The area in question is the Peel River Watershed, and the Yukon chapter of
the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society (CPAWS) has registered its opinion
by calling on the Yukon government to cancel the area's nomination for oil
and gas development.

"The Peel Plateau wetlands support a population of endangered peregrine
falcon, contain key waterfowl habitat, and are an important staging area for
migratory waterfowl," said Mac Hislop, CPAWS oil and gas coordinator. "Over
the years, the Peel Plateau wetlands have been identified as a priority area
for protection by the Yukon Government, Environment Canada, and the
Mackenzie Delta-Beaufort Sea Regional Land Use Plan."

At the Department of Economic Development's April 2001 North Yukon
stakeholders' workshop, participants urged the government to exclude the
Peel River Watershed from its 2001 Call for Nominations, according to CPAWS.
"Why has the Yukon government ignored the advice of stakeholders and its own
data?" asked Hislop.

However, Scott Kent, minister of economic development for Yukon Territory
said, "We're following the five-step process, so we're consulting the Yukon
people before we move forward." The review process inviting public input
about the Peel River Watershed ends Sept. 21.

Kent sees no comparison between the struggles over the Peel River Watershed
and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in the United States because the
Yukon people are consulted directly and the American public's opinion is not
built directly into the United States' process.

Also, Kent said, "The Yukon government is opposed to (oil and gas
development of) ANWR because of concern for cultural values and sustenance
issues for the Vuntut Gwitchin people who live in the northern Yukon
Territory." These native people of Canada have hunted caribou in the ANWR
region for generations.

Kent couldn't say exactly what kind of public feedback would result in the
call for bids being revoked and admitted that to his knowledge, this process
had never derailed an oil and gas exploration. But he then added, "We will
not be taking this public consultation phase lightly. It is not in there
just because it looks good. It could change the parameters or conditions of
the deal, such as only allowing drilling in certain areas during certain
times of year."

The Yukon government points out that this five-step process confers oil and
gas rights for a given location but does not give the right to actually
explore or drill for oil or gas. After rights are awarded, when a company
applies for a license for oil or gas development, an environmental screening
process is required under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act or the
Yukon's Development Assessment Process.

A couple of weeks after Sept. 21, all public input will be analyzed -
including CPAWS's position - and a decision will be made by Kent.


Copyright 2001, Environmental News Network

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance�not soap-boxing�please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'�with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds�is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to